For a better tomorrow In Action 2005 “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Nutrients through Precision Feed Management
Advertisements

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Paula Przywojski, Registered Dietitian Black River Memorial Hospital Black River Falls, Wisconsin.
Yuma Conservation District’s PATHWAYS PROJECT A brief comparison between Yuma and Washington Counties. All data taken from the 2002 Census of Agriculture,
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
Perennial Forage Working Group Green Lands Blue Waters Conference November 20-21, 2013 Minneapolis.
Illinois RC & D Introduction to R esource C onservation & D evelopment Module 2: Who are the players?
BILL GATES’ CONTRIBUTION IN SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Restoration and Enhancement Delivery on Private Lands Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Monday, January 26, 2009 Kevin Lines Board of Water and Soil Resources.
Rachel Elkins, County Director and Pomology Farm Advisor, UCCE Lake County and Kelly Cox, Administrative Officer, County of Lake UCCE and County Government:
Establishing a Linking Program Marion Bowlan PA Farm Link.
Midwest Value Added Conference Bringing Profit Back to the Farm Presenter: Heather Amundson – River Country Resource Conservation and Development Council,
Mark W. Mayer, Dairy & Livestock Agent, Green County David W. Kammel, Biological Engineering, UW-Madison Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey UW-Extension.
Mark Rose, Community Planning Specialist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Resource Conservation & Development and Rural Lands Division Promoting.
ECONOMICS OF GRAZING, ORGANIC AND CONFINEMENT DAIRY FARMS Presented by: Tom Kriegl University of Wisconsin Extension and Center for Dairy Profitability.
Grow Wisconsin Farmers Shaping the Future… ……Building on the Past.
Modernizing Wisconsin’s Dairy Farms Train the Trainer Workshop June 20 – 21, 2002 Dairy Expansion Financial Case Studies by Scott Gunderson, Manitowoc.
A gricultural E nvironmental M anagement NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee Department of Agriculture & Markets A E MA E M.
Sustainable Energy at the World Bank: Policies and Experiences Anil Cabraal Lead Energy Specialist Energy and Water Department The World Bank Norway-World.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
ERDP’s Business to Business Brown Bag Seminars Hosted by Eureka Rural Development Partners.
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell. Goal 1.Explain purpose of partial budgets 2.Illustrate their structure and use 3.Give some examples.
Purdue University is an equal access/equal opportunity institution Economics of Organic Farming What Do We Know? Corinne Alexander Department of Agricultural.
Leadership Development: Creative Policy Making and Innovative Solutions Presented By: Representative Terri McCormick, Wisconsin State Legislature.
RC&D RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT Partnerships Serving America’s Communities Title of Presentation.
Jennifer Abbey NRCS District Conservationist Plant City Field Office.
The Economic Competitiveness of Dairy Systems Across The U. S. A. Thomas S. Kriegl University of Wisconsin Center for Dairy Profitability University of.
Types of Agriculture Grade 10: Food from the Land.
Including the Productive Poor in Agricultural Development Escaping Poverty Traps: Connecting the Chronically Poor to Economic Growth Cheryl Morden Director,
Illinois RC & D Introduction to R esource C onservation & D evelopment Module 3: What makes it run?
Preserving Farms and Forests in Sussex County, Delaware: Public Value Sussex Communities: Growing Better A Workshop Sponsored by the University of Delaware.
ECONOMICS OF ORGANIC DAIRY FARMS COMPARED TO OTHER DAIRY SYSTEMS Presented by: Tom Kriegl University of Wisconsin Center for Dairy Profitability 2007 National.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
© Mcgraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Farm Management Chapter 1 Farm Management in the Twenty-First Century.
Upper Midwest Grazing Educators Webinar Series Grass Based Farm Financials June 5th.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Investing in the future of Allamakee, Chickasaw, Clayton, Fayette, Howard & Winneshiek Counties Teresa Wiemerslage Iowa State University Extension.
Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan Purpose The Sustainable City Plan was created to enhance our resources, prevent harm to the natural environment and.
Selecting a BR & E Model Ten Questions to Guide the Process 2004 RCCI INSTITUTE August 2004 Henry Cothran University of Florida (352) ext 409.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) USDA Agricultural Research Service E. John Sadler, Coordinator M. A. Weltz, National Program Leader.
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
USDA Food and Nutrition Service Farm To School. USDA Food and Nutrition Service Farm To School What is USDA's Involvement in Farm to School? USDA recognizes.
Comparing Feed Costs of Wisconsin Dairy Systems From 1995 to 2010 Thomas S. Kriegl University of Wisconsin Center for Dairy Profitability University of.
S ustainable A griculture R esearch and E ducation.
Selecting a BR & E Model 10 Questions to Guide the process 2004 SCED Conference May 20 – 21, 2004 Hank Cothran Food and Resource Economics.
COUNTRY PAPER FROM VIET NAM (21th ACEDAC Board Meeting 2014) MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATIVES AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT.
1 Wisconsin Industry Partnerships Revisioning Workforce Training and Development CWI Sector Subcommittees March 2010.
Source Water Collaborative Online Partnership Tool 1 Collaboration Toolkit: Protecting Drinking Water Sources through Agricultural Conservation Practices.
Tom Dailey, Ron Reitz, Heather Scroggins, Tom Treiman and Nigel Hoilett Quail VII, January 2012 Rowing Against the Tide: The Challenge of Getting Landowners.
Structure of the US farm economy EconS350 Fall Semester, 2010.
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
Helping You Care for the Land The Natural Resources Conservation Service—
Exit Assistance Location Home About Us About Us International Agricultural Union Sustainable Agriculture for the Future Click Here to Start.
The Profitable Dairy Martha Pickard Grazing Program Coordinator Adirondack North Country Association.
Leading the way in Agriculture and Rural Research, Education and Consulting Environmental and Financial Implications of CAP 2015 reforms on Scottish Dairy.
Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.
Copyright © 2002 Center for Farm Financial Management, University of Minnesota.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
What is StrikeForce? In 2010, created as a pilot project by USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack Provides support to economically challenged areas of the nation.
PAS Peer Day 10 th February 2015 Zoe Willcox Service Director Planning Place Directorate Positive Planning: Delivering Housing Unblocking stalled sites.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Average of 2.5 million meals per year
Average of 2.5 million meals per year
Iowa State University provides education that benefits many and is available to even more because we work together as a system – Iowa State University.
Iowa State University provides education that benefits many and is available to even more because we work together as a system – Iowa State University.
Charts from: “Grazing Dairies: What happens to milk production and income?”
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Managed Grazing for Dairy Profits
Gene Schriefer has been the Agriculture Agent with the University of Wisconsin – Extension for the past 6 years working primarily in Iowa County in the.
Presentation transcript:

For a better tomorrow In Action 2005 “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has”. Margaret Mead

Where is River Country RC&D?

Our Purpose To bring people and resources together to address issues and opportunities, to conserve our natural resources, promote sustainability and improve the quality of life for people who live in the River Country area

River Country Helps Conserve Our Natural Resources

River Country Helps Strengthen the Agricultural and Rural Community

River Country Grazing Initiative and Management Intensive Grazing

River Country Grazing Initiative Why the Initiative? The Late 1990s Were Hard On The Dairy Farming Community In The River Country RC&D Area. On Average: 4 Dairy Farms Were Lost Per Week !!! Why the Initiative? The Late 1990s Were Hard On The Dairy Farming Community In The River Country RC&D Area. On Average: 4 Dairy Farms Were Lost Per Week !!!

River Country Grazing Initiative Dairy and other Livestock Farmers Were Looking For Ways To Remain Competitive Without Having To Expand...

River Country Grazing Initiative The River Country Council was looking for ways to prevent the significant loss of the agriculture economy in the rural communities

River Country Grazing Initiative A Possible Answer: Managed Intensive Grazing (MIG) Systems Why: Because It’s A Viable Alternative That Is Size Neutral.

River Country Grazing Initiative Together: Farmers, Agency Personnel and the River Country RC&D Coordinator, and River Country Council members pulled together a grant to determine if a need for grazing education and technical services really existed.

River Country Grazing Initiative Primary Objectives of the Grant Meet With Existing Agencies To Determine What Was Being Done To Service This Growing Agricultural Sector. Meet With Farmers (In Groups And One On One) To Determine The Level Of Support Needed. Develop Managed Grazing Plans For 24 Producers WithIn The River Country Area. Assist In Building Partnerships That Will Assist In Handling The MIG Workload.

River Country Grazing Initiative The Program was Completely Successful !! All objectives were exceeded. And the results were: 1.River Country Continued MIG Service 2.WI NRCS added a Grazing Specialist to the area.

River Country Grazing Initiative What have we accomplished in our area since 1999:  Planned And Implemented Over 15,000 Acres Of Grazing Lands (160 Grazing Plans)  Contacted And Provided Services To Over 1,400 Land Owners

River Country Grazing Initiative Coordinated And Hosted :  103 Pasture Walks  34 Grass Series Walks  12 Specialized Pasture Walks  14 Specialized Winter Meetings

River Country Grazing Initiative Currently, Fund-raisers, Grants And Donations Finance The Grazing Positions At River Country. The Council Continues To Search For Additional Partners And Funding To Maintain And Expand The Program.

River Country Grazing Initiative Provided Input And Teamed Up With The Following: –Wisconsin Grazing Lands Conservation Initiative Coalition –Coulee Graziers –Chippewa Graziers –North Central Graziers –USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service –University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension –Grass Works, Inc. –Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board –Marathon County Land Conservation Department –Wisconsin School for Beginning Dairy Farmers –Great Lakes Grazing Network

River Country Grazing Initiative Other RC&D’s have replicated the River Country Grazing Initiative and have hired 6 Additional Grazing Specialists in addition to the 4 NRCS Specialists In The State. This Is A Welcome Step, BUT It Does Not Meet The Demand For MIG Assistance. The Council Continues To Support The Initiative By Maintaining 2-3 staff that work on MIG technical assistance and educational.

River Country Grazing Initiative Why is Management Intensive Grazing a viable option in the River Country RC&D Area?

River Country Grazing Initiative General Benefits of Livestock on Grass: Lower cost of production Improved herd health Reduced labor Cleaner water and air

River Country Grazing Initiative More General Benefits of Livestock on Grass: Wildlife habitat for diverse species Open space for recreation Sustainable land use to support rural communities Healthier food for humans

River Country Grazing Initiative Financial Benefits of Livestock on Grass: 1. Managed grazing is economically competitive, probably at all sizes. 2. Grazing farms are more economically flexible than confinement farms because of two factors. 3. The graziers who are most financially successful are those who focus on all three factors of profit: 4. A traditional small Wisconsin dairy farm with average or better management has a good chance of improving its financial performance by judicious adoption of a managed grazing system. And

River Country Grazing Initiative 5. Low input is not the same as low cost per unit of output. 6. Managed grazing can be employed with or without other practices and technologies such as seasonal calving, milking parlors, Total Mixed Rations, and so on. 7. There is no single measurement that tells enough about a farm business to make substantive comparisons or decisions without additional information from other measures. Several measures are needed to accurately judge the financial performance of any farm business.

Figure 1. Per cow net farm income from operations (NFIFO) and milk production on grazing and confinement farms in Wisconsin Key Finding: Wisconsin graziers consistently showed a higher Net Farm Income For Operations (NFIFO) per cow than confinement farmers despite lower milk production per cow.

Table 2. Comparing financial performance of three farm types in Wisconsin, 2002 Managed Traditional Large modern Grazing confinement confinement Avg. lbs. of milk per cow 15,644 19,490 22,403 Avg. basic cost per CWT EQ $7.48 $7.69 $8.18 Avg. non-basic cost per CWT EQ $2.39 $3.55 $3.50 Avg. allocated cost per CWT EQ $9.87 $11.24 $11.68 Avg. NFIFO per farm $49,108 $33,775 $164,599 Avg. NFIFO per cow if all labor and management were free $649 $561 $523 Avg. NFIFO per cow $524 $245 $131 Avg. NFIFO per CWT EQ $2.53 $0.91 $0.47 Avg. NFIFO per CWT EQ if all labor and management were free $3.14 $2.12 $2.34 Multiple year data* Simple avg. NFIFO per CWT EQ $3.96 $2.39 $1.50 Range in number of herds Range in avg. number of cows/herd Source: An Eight-Year Economic Look at Wisconsin Dairy Systems, Tom Kriegl and Gary Frank, June * The multi-year data is available starting in 1995 for grazing farms. Data for TC and LMC farms was not fully sorted into the two size groups until 1996 and by labor compensation type until 1997.

What is the trend in Wisconsin?

Program on Agriculture and Technology Studies, UW Madison

River Country Grazing Initiative For more information please call: Mary C. Anderson River Country Resource and Development Council 1304 N. Hillcrest Pkwy, Suite B Altoona Wisconsin Home office: Mary’s office: ext. 33 Or visit

Hey Look Everybody, The Grazing Specialist Is Here!!!