49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 12 – November 16, 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Species: Cs-133 Initial Energy: 10 keV Launch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulations with ‘Realistic’ Photon Spectra Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.
Advertisements

DPP 2006 Reduction of Particle and Heat Transport in HSX with Quasisymmetry J.M. Canik, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, K. Zhai.
How to explore a system? Photons Electrons Atoms Electrons Photons Atoms.
Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.
Analysis of instrumental effects in HIBP equilibrium potential profile measurements on the MST-RFP Xiaolin Zhang Plasma Dynamics Lab, Rensselaer Polytechnic.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.
Transfer reactions Resonant Elastic scattering Inelastic scattering: GR.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
Outline (HIBP) diagnostics in the MST-RFP Relationship of equilibrium potential measurements with plasma parameters Simulation with a finite-sized beam.
49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Temperature Measurements and Impurity Radiation in.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
30 th EPS conference, St. Petersburg, Russia, July, 7-11, 2003 K.M.Likin On behalf of HSX Team University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Comparison of Electron.
Correlation Analysis of Electrostatic Fluctuation between Central and End Cells in GAMMA 10 Y. Miyata, M. Yoshikawa, F. Yaguchi, M. Ichimura, T. Murakami.
CJ Barton Department of Physics INTAG Meeting – GSI – May 2007 Large Acceptance Bragg Detector at ISOLDE.
The toroidal current is consistent with numerical estimates of bootstrap current The measured magnetic diagnostic signals match predictions of V3FIT Comparisons.
Negative Ions in IEC Devices David R. Boris 2009 US-Japan IEC Workshop 12 th October, 2009 This work performed at The University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology.
REALISTIC UNDULATORS FOR INTENSE GAMMA-RAY BEAMS AT FUTURE COLLIDERS Ayash Alrashdi King Abdul-Aziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) POSIPOL Workshop.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Workflows in Fusion applications José Luis Vázquez-Poletti Universidad.
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
FEC 2006 Reduction of Neoclassical Transport and Observation of a Fast Electron Driven Instability with Quasisymmetry in HSX J.M. Canik 1, D.L. Brower.
RF source, volume and caesiated extraction simulations (e-dump)
Study of Electric Field and Turbulence using Heavy Ion Beam Probe (HIBP) Proposal of International Cooperation for Transport Study Shoichi Okamura, Akihide.
47th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 24-28, 2005, Denver, Colorado ECE spectrum of HSX plasma at 0.5 T K.M.Likin, H.J.Lu, D.T.Anderson,
52 nd APS-DPP Annual Meeting, November, 8-12, 2010, Chicago, IL Plasma Pressure / BJ Contours Poloidal dimension Radial dimension Toroidal Angle (rad)
47th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 24-28, 2005, Denver, Colorado 1 Tesla Operation of the HSX Stellarator Simon Anderson, A.Almagri,
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois Non-symmetric components were intentionally added to the.
1) For equivalent ECRH power, off-axis heating results in lower stored energy and lower core temperature 2) Plasma flow is significantly reduced with off-axis.
Measurements of Magnetic Fluctuations in HSX S. Oh, A.F. Almagri, D.T. Anderson, C. Deng, C. Lechte, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, J. Schmitt HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Helically Symmetry Configuration Evidence for Alfvénic Fluctuations in Quasi-Helically Symmetric HSX Plasmas C. Deng and D.L. Brower, University of California,
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
APS, 44th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics November 11-15, 2002; Orlando, Florida Hard X-ray Diagnostics in the HSX A. E. Abdou, A. F.
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure floating potential.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure the Reynolds.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
Initial Results from the Scintillator Fast Lost Ion Probe D. Darrow NSTX Physics Meeting February 28, 2005.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 13 – November 18, 2011, Salt Lake City, UT Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
5.4 Stored Energy Crashes  Diamagnetic loop shows the plasma energy crashes at low plasma density  ECE signals are in phase with the energy crashes 
Neutral beam ion loss measurement and modeling for NSTX D. S. Darrow Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory American Physical Society, Division of Plasma.
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 8 – November 12, 2010, Chicago, IL Development of Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Erik P. Gilson** PPPL 15 th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion June 9 th, 2004 Research supported.
51st Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 2 - 6, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia ∆I BS = 170 Amps J BS e-root J BS i-root Multiple ambipolar.
Measurement of Electron Density Profile and Fluctuations on HSX C. Deng, D.L. Brower, W.X. Ding Electrical Engineering Department University of California,
54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 3-D Plasma Equilibrium Reconstruction.
Hard X-rays from Superthermal Electrons in the HSX Stellarator Preliminary Examination for Ali E. Abdou Student at the Department of Engineering Physics.
= 2·10 18 m -3 T e (0) = 0.4 keV ECH and ECE on HSX Stellarator K.M.Likin, A.F.Almagri, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B.Anderson, C.Deng 1, C.W.Domier 2, R.W.Harvey.
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
54 th APS-DPP Annual Meeting, October 29 - November 2, 2012, Providence, RI Study of ICRH and Ion Confinement in the HSX Stellarator K. M. Likin, S. Murakami.
Profiles of density fluctuations in frequency range of (20-110)kHz Core density fluctuations Parallel flow measured by CHERS Core Density Fluctuations.
Soft X-Ray Tomography in HSX V. Sakaguchi, A.F. Almagri, D.T. Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K. Likin & the HSX Team The HSX Plasma Laboratory University of.
54th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 5-pin Langmuir probe measures floating potential.
48th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 30 – November 3, 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Energetic-Electron-Driven Alfvénic Modes.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Kurchatov Institute Genetic Stellarator Optimisation in Grid Vladimir Voznesensky
SPES Target Group Data…… INFN-CISAS-CNR collaboration The Ablation Ion Source for refractory metal ion beams A preliminary design.
48th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 30 – November 3, 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania HIBP Designs for Measurement of the Electric.
Measurements of Reynolds stress flow drive and radial electric fields in the edge of HSX Bob Wilcox HSX Plasma Laboratory University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
Moving Charges in Magnetic Fields
Modeling Neutral Hydrogen in the HSX Stellarator
Time-Reversed Particle Simulations In GPT (or “There And Back Again”)
Magnetic fluctuation measurements in HSX and its impact on transport
Impurity Transport Research at the HSX Stellarator
Characteristics of Edge Turbulence in HSX
Studies of Bias Induced Plasma Flows in HSX
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Targeted Physics Optimization in HSX
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Presentation transcript:

49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 12 – November 16, 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Species: Cs-133 Initial Energy: 10 keV Launch and Detect on Boxport Front Flange Deviation from Plane Perpendicular to Axis: 3 mm Projected Maximum Deflection in E-Field: 1 cm Simulation and Implementation of HIBP Electric Field Measurements for the HSX Stellarator Christopher Clark, Jon Hillesheim, David Anderson, Paul Schoch 1, Diane Demers 1, Kenneth Connor 1, Michael Bingham 1, Alex Dunckle 1 HSX Plasma Laboratory, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, USA; 1 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, USA Optimization of Beam Parameters Beam Divergence Overview HSX Boxport Cross Section with Puncture Plot Superimposed Sensitivity to Electric Field Profile Develop inversion techniques to recover profile from deflections Develop error analysis techniques incorporating effects that have been simulated Construct mounting hardware and detector for HSX Feasibility of Approach Plan of Action Based on a full, three dimensional particle orbit simulation Realistic electric field models incorporated results based on neoclassical calculations Deflections of up to 1 cm are predicted, which should be measurable Hardware parameters are compatible with the beam hardware provided by RPI Error sources and their relative magnitude have been identified Full three dimensional simulations were then undertaken to maximize beam deflection, while ensuring an accessible launch and detector location based on the fixed parameters: 2 ¾” Ports Boxport Front Flange Magnetic Field on Axis: 1.0 T Magnetic Configuration: QHS Electric Field Model Peak Value: 90 V/cm Electric Field Profile Shape: Peaked around r/a = The HSX boxports are the only feasible locations at which to mount the beam and detector. Simulations of single particle trajectories show that sweeping the beam insertion angle can recover information about the electric field profile. The simulations found the following to be the optimal trajectory, given the above criterion: Boxport Front Flange.5 m Corresponding Deflections Measurement of a Beam Simulations with a collimated truncated Gaussian current density, show similar behavior to the single particle simulations. Two Electric Field Profiles (At Mid-Plane) Simulate Sweep Measures energies of secondary ions Crowley, 1994 Conventional HIBP Proposed HIBP Measures deflections of primary ions Ion energies must be high enough for secondaries to have large r L A wire grid detector should be sufficient Ion energies lower, as only primaries must traverse plasma Results are a path effect, and must be inverted Requires low enough density for most primaries to traverse plasma Requires energy analyzer Requires high enough density to produce large number of secondaries Sweep Insertion Angle Simulate Small Changes to Poloidal Launch Angle Launch Beam with Square Cross-SectionCentroid Shift at Point of Impact is Symmetric A similar analysis holds for the case of changing the toroidal launch angle. In general, so long as the divergence is symmetric, the location of the centroid will not exhibit a measurable shift with respect to the centroid of a perfectly collimated beam. Magnitude of Error Sources Ion Energy Error Beam Deflection +/- 1% (100 V) +/- 0.1% (10 V) +/- 1.4 mm +/- 0.1 mm Magnetic Field Strength Beam Deflection +/- 1% (.01T) +/- 0.1% (.001T) +/- 2.2 mm +/- 0.6 mm -0.1 Degrees +0.1 Degrees Nominal Centroids Simulate Sweep Compare ‘Virtual’ Measurements at Maximum Deflection Two Electric Field Profiles (At Mid-Plane) Simulated Current Density at Boxport Cover Currents Expected on a Detector Grid A Simple Grid of Wires as a Detector Sample volume can be selected by aperture angle Allows measurement of fluctuations Deflection due to fluctuations are too small to measure Beam Hardware on.Test Beam-line at HSX Simulation Results Using these results, the measurement of the beam by a wire grid are simulated. The projected peak deflections of about 1 cm are relatively small, so it is important to know the relative contributions of potential error sources. It is difficult to predict the beam divergence, so its effect was simulated to determine the effect on the measurement. A novel form of heavy ion beam probe is under development at HSX –The deflection of a 10 keV beam of singly charged Cesium ions is used to infer the radial electric field –Enabled by the equivalence of the HSX magnetic field with and without plasma Simulations of this novel technique have been performed using a realistic radial electric field model based on neoclassical calculations of the ambipolar condition –These simulations suggest that this form of beam probe will be suitable for HSX –Simulations also show that varying the insertion angle of the beam allows different radial locations in the plasma to be diagnosed Beam hardware has been moved from RPI to HSX and set up on a test-stand Beam has been operated with Sodium ions on the test-stand 1 mm wide Conductor Micro-gap