Information Exchange Workgroup Recommendations to HIT Policy Committee October 3, 2012 Micky Tripathi, Larry Garber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation Workgroup: Current Activities and Next Steps.
Advertisements

Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
Liz Johnson Christopher Ross Implementation Workgroup August 22, 2013.
Interoperability Kevin Schmidt Director, Clinical Network.
HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Proposed Next Steps Micky Tripathi, Chair David Lansky, Co-Chair August 19, 2010.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Tiger Team Deven McGraw, Chair Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Certificate Authority- Provider Authentication Recommendations.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
Care Coordination and Information Exchange Integration of Health Information Exchange with Primary Care Provider Work Flow.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Tiger Team Deven McGraw, Chair Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Provider Authentication Recommendations November 19, 2010.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Tiger Team Deven McGraw, Chair Paul Egerman, Co-Chair August 3,
Privacy and Security Tiger Team Today’s Discussion: Query/Response Models for Health Information Exchange January 24, 2013.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Exchange: The Central Feature of Meaningful Use Stage Meaningful Use and Health Care Innovation Conference Craig Brammer Office of the National.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments February 15, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Nationwide Health Information Network: Conditions for Trusted Exchange Request For Information (RFI) Steven Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Introductory Remarks David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of Commerce,
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments March 1, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy & Security Tiger Team Update Deven McGraw, Co-Chair Center for Democracy & Technology Paul Egerman, Co-Chair June 25, 2010.
Privacy and Security Tiger Team Today’s Discussion: Query/Response Scenarios for Health Information Exchange February 21, 2013.
Certification and Adoption Workgroup – Policy Committee Update on the ONC Standards and Certification NPRM Marc Probst, workgroup co-chair Larry Wolf,
HIT Policy Committee Privacy & Security Workgroup Update Deven McGraw Center for Democracy & Technology Rachel Block Office of Health Information Technology.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Direct Project Update Arien Malec. First Production Usage Immunization data from Hennepin County Medical Center to Minnesota Department of Health via.
Information Exchange WG HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi, MA eHealth Collaborative CHAIR 04/04/2012 Office of the National.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Tiger Team Deven McGraw, Chair Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Patient Matching Recommendations February 2,
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
HITPC – Meaningful Use Workgroup Care Coordination – Subgroup 3 Stage 3 Planning July 27, 2012.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
Recommendations to the HIT Policy Committee on ONC Standards and Certification NPRM May 2, 2012 Certification and Adoption Workgroup Marc Probst, Intermountain.
HIT Standards Committee NHIN Workgroup Introductory Remarks Farzad Mostashari Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Douglas Fridsma Office of.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments May 23, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Tiger Team Deven McGraw, Chair Paul Egerman, Co-Chair October 20,
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Deven McGraw, Center for Democracy & Technology Micky Tripathi, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative.
Draft Provider Directory Recommendations Begin Deliberations re Query for Patient Record NwHIN Power Team July 10, 2014.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
Recommendation to the Meaningful Use Workgroup on Meaningful Use Stage 3 September 18, 2012 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi, Larry Garber,
Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.
HIT Standards Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair.
Privacy and Security Tiger Team Potential Questions for Request for Comment Meaningful Use Stage 3 October 3, 2012.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 22, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Status Update Deven McGraw, Chair Center for Democracy & Technology Micky Tripathi, Co-Chair Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative May 19, HIT Policy.
HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 26, 2012.
Provider Directories Tasking, Review and Mod Spec Presentation NwHIN Power Team April 17, 2014.
Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
HITPC - Information Exchange Workgroup Stage 3 Draft Recommendations September 5, 2012.
Handling the SSA Patient Authorization September, 2015.
David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Quality Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Member, HIT Policy Committee President-elect, ISQua Medinfo, 2013.
Clinical, Technical, Organizational and Financial Barriers to Interoperability Task Force August 25, 2015 Paul Tang, chair.
HIT Standards Committee NwHIN Power Team Dixie Baker, Chair July 20,
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,
California Successes Engagement & Collaboration –Regional HIEs functioning and expanding for 25 years –25 organizations using Epic’s HIE solutions, many.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

Information Exchange Workgroup Recommendations to HIT Policy Committee October 3, 2012 Micky Tripathi, Larry Garber

Workgroup Membership Micky Tripathi (Chair) Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative Hunt Blair Vermont Medicaid Tim Cromwell Department of Veterans Affairs Peter DeVault Epic Jeff Donnell No More Clipboards Judy Faulkner Epic Seth Foldy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Jonah Frohlich Manatt Larry Garber Reliant Medical Group Dave Goetz OptumInsight James Golden Minnesota Department of Health Jessica Kahn Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Charles Kennedy Aetna Ted Kremer Rochester RHIO Arien Malec RelayHealth Deven McGraw Center for Democracy & Technology Stephanie Reel John Hopkins University Cris Ross Mayo Clinic Steven Stack AMA Christopher Tashjian River Falls Medical Clinics Jon Teichrow Mirth Corporation Amy Zimmerman Rhode Island Office of Health & Human Services 2

Query for Patient Information - Rationale 3 Stage 2 of Meaningful Use requires EPs, EHs & CAHs to send care summaries when patients are transitioned to another setting, with more than 10% of those summaries required to be sent digitally using certified EHR technology. The 2014 EHR Certification criteria require EHRs to have the capability to perform this function. Those criteria will help EPs, EHs & CAHs digitally transmit care summaries in circumstances where the recipient is known (or can be located through a provider directory). But these criteria will not help providers locate patient records in circumstances where the transition was unplanned. With unplanned transitions, the record holder doesn’t know in advance about the transition and/or doesn’t have the patient present to obtain authorization for release. The most common use case where this occurs is when a patient arrives in an emergency room; but there could be other circumstances where providers have a need to query a patient’s record in order to provide optimal treatment. Certified EHRs should have the capability to enable EPs, EHs & CAHs to query for a patient’s record and request that records relevant to treatment be sent.

Query for Patient Information (EHR Certification Criteria) 4 Proposed Criteria for the next phase of EHR Certification: 1. The EHR must be able to query another entity* for outside records and respond to such queries. This query may consist of three transactions: Patient query based on demographics and other available identifiers, as well as the requestor and purpose of request. Query for a document list based for an identified patient Request a specific set of documents from the returned document list *the outside entity may be another EHR system, a health information exchange, or an entity on the NwHIN, for example. 2. When receiving in inbound patient query, the EHR must be able to: Tell the querying system whether patient authorization is required to retrieve the patient’s records and where to obtain the authorization language**. (E.g. if authorization is already on file at the record- holding institution it may not be required). At the direction of the record-holding institution, respond with a list of the patient’s releasable documents based on patient’s authorization At the direction of the record-holding institution, release specific documents with patient’s authorization 3. The EHR initiating the query must be able to query an outside entity** for the authorization language to be presented to and signed by the patient or her proxy in order to retrieve the patient’s records. Upon the patient signing the form, the EHR must be able to send, based on the preference of the record- holding institution, either: a copy of the signed form to the entity requesting it an electronic notification attesting to the collection of the patient’s signature **Note: The authorization text may come from the record-holding EHR system, or, at the direction of the patient or the record-holding EHR, could be located in a directory separate from the record-holding EHR system, and so a query for authorization language would need to be directable to the correct endpoint.

Query Provider Directory (EHR Certification Criteria) 5 Rationale: Provider directory queries which facilitate Direct messaging and queries, support the following priorities: – Improved care coordination – Reduces readmission, redundant testing – Improves patient safety – Facilitates “hassle-free” health information exchange Request for Comment for EHR Certification with these additional questions: Are there sufficiently mature standards in place to support this criteria? What implementation of these standards are in place and what has the experience been? Proposed Criteria for the next phase of EHR Certification: The EHR must be able to query a Provider Directory external to the EHR to obtain entity-level addressing information (e.g. push or pull addresses).

Data Portability Between EHR Vendors (RFC) Request for Comment for EHR Certification: What criteria should be added to the next phase of EHR Certification to further facilitate healthcare providers’ ability to switch from using one EHR to another vendor’s EHR? 6