EXAMINING INTRA-VISIT IRIS STABILITY (VISIT 1) Bo Brown, Jing Guan, Vince Sipocz, Aidan Chamberlain, Brandon Cox, Preston Flint, Eric Hollensbe, Brandon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Marc Valliant, VP & CTO
Advertisements

ECE 5367 – Presentation Prepared by: Adnan Khan Pulin Patel
Analysis. Start with describing the features you see in the data.
Biometrics.
Zen and the Art of Facial Image Quality Terry P. Riopka.
Emerging biometrics Presenter : Shao-Chieh Lien Adviser : Wei-Yang Lin.
Section – Biometrics 1. Biometrics Biometric refers to any measure used to uniquely identify a person based on biological or physiological traits.
Cascaded Filtering For Biometric Identification Using Random Projection Atif Iqbal.
Biometrics in New Zealand Passport issuing Border crossing System and information access Building access.
Chapter 12: Authentication Basics Passwords Challenge-Response Biometrics Location Multiple Methods Computer Security: Art and Science © Matt.
Aki Hecht Seminar in Databases (236826) January 2009
Face Biometric Applications Team Members: Faune Hughes, Daniel Lichter, Richard Oswald, and Michael Whitfield Clients: Fred Penna and Robert Zack.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Physical Biometrics Matthew Webb ECE 8741.
FIT3105 Biometric based authentication and identity management
Iris Recognition Slides adapted from Natalia Schmid and John Daugman.
Iris localization algorithm based on geometrical features of cow eyes Menglu Zhang Institute of Systems Engineering
Biometrics Austen Hayes and Cody Powell. Overview  What is Biometrics?  Types of Biometric Recognition  Applications of Biometric Systems  Types of.
Comparison and Combination of Ear and Face Images in Appearance-Based Biometrics IEEE Trans on PAMI, VOL. 25, NO.9, 2003 Kyong Chang, Kevin W. Bowyer,
Iris Recognition By Mohammed, Ashfaq Ahmed. Introduction Iris Recognition is a Biometric Technology which deals with identification based on the human.
Chapter 9 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
ENTROPY OF FINGERPRINT SENSORS. Do different fingerprint sensors affect the entropy of a fingerprint? RESEARCH QUESTION/HYPOTHESIS.
1J. M. Kizza - Ethical And Social Issues Module 16: Biometrics Introduction and Definitions Introduction and Definitions The Biometrics Authentication.
Module 14: Biometrics Introduction and Definitions The Biometrics Authentication Process Biometric System Components The Future of Biometrics J. M. Kizza.
A survey of image-based biometric identification methods: Face, finger print, iris, and others Presented by: David Lin ECE738 Presentation of Project Survey.
Uba Anydiewu, Shane Bilinski, Luis Garcia, Lauren Ragland, Debracca Thornton, Joe Tubesing, Kevin Chan, Steve Elliott, and Ben Petry EXAMINING INTRA-VISIT.
Biometrics: Ear Recognition
PROVIDING THOROUGH PROTECTION FOR OUR CLIENTS AND THEIR ASSOCIATES. WITH BIOMETRICS INC.
Zachary Olson and Yukari Hagio CIS 4360 Computer Security November 19, 2008.
Introduction to the Design of Experiments
MEASUREMENT CHARACTERISTICS Error & Confidence Reliability, Validity, & Usability.
N ew Security Approaches Biometric Technologies are Coming of Age ANIL KUMAR GUPTA & SUMIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY.
The next step in performance monitoring – Stochastic monitoring (and reserving!) NZ Actuarial Conference November 2010.
CORE ZOO. INTRODUCTION Will biometric characteristics within a zoo menagerie change with the addition of good and bad quality biometric enrollments?
BIOMETRICS By: Lucas Clay and Tim Myers. WHAT IS IT?  Biometrics are a method of uniquely identifying a person based on physical or behavioral traits.
March 10, Iris Recognition Instructor: Natalia Schmid BIOM 426: Biometrics Systems.
At a glance…  Introduction  How Biometric Systems Work ?  Popular Biometric Methodologies  Multibiometrics  Applications  Benefits  Demerits 
Biometrics Stephen Schmidt Brian Miller Devin Reid.
Study Of Iris Recognition Schemes By:Ritika Jain Under guidance of DR K R RAO UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON SPRING 2012.
AirGuard Know who you’re flying with. AirGuard Know who you’re flying with Click Here.
Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,
BIOMETRICS FOR RECOGNITION. Presentation Outlines  Traditional methods of security  Need for biometrics  Biometrics recognition techniques  How biometrics.
Biometrics Authentication Technology
Chi-Square Test James A. Pershing, Ph.D. Indiana University.
Iris Scanning By, rahul vijay 1. Introduction  Biometrics provides a secure method of authentication and identification.  Biometric identification utilises.
Fusion of Face and Iris Biometrics from a Stand-Off Video Sensor
1 Iris Recognition Ying Sun AICIP Group Meeting November 3, 2006.
BIOMETRICS THE MAN MACHINE INTERFACE
Introduction to Biometrics Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #5 Issues on Designing Biometric Systems September 7, 2005.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10th Edition
PRESENTATION ON BIOMETRICS
Iris Technology Presented By: D.SRIKANTH Biometrics Identifying individuals using their distinct physical or behavior characteristics. Features measured.
Biometric Technologies
Non-Ideal Iris Segmentation Using Graph Cuts
Biometrics Group 3 Tina, Joel, Mark, Jerrod. Biometrics Defined Automated methods or recognizing a person based on a physiological and behavioral characteristics.
Iris Recognition.
What does it mean to us?.  History  Biometrics Defined  Modern Day Applications  Spoofing  Future of Biometrics.
By Kyle Bickel. Road Map Biometric Authentication Biometric Factors User Authentication Factors Biometric Techniques Conclusion.
Shital ghule..  INTRODUCTION: This paper proposes an ATM security model that would combine a physical access card,a pin and electronic facial recognition.
Michael Carlino. ROADMAP -Biometrics Definition -Different types -Future -Advantages -Disadvantages -Common Biometric Report -Current Issues.
Improving the Performance of Fingerprint Classification
BIOMETRICS Presented By Sapin.M.
ABSTRACT FACE RECOGNITION RESULTS
Iris Recognition Eyetracker – IRIS is the KEY
Jenna Lutton February 26th, 2007
Biometrics Reg: AMP/HNDIT/F/F/E/2013/067.
Seminar Presentation on Biometrics
Margaret Brown 3rd period October 14, 2007
Biometric technology.
Presentation Outlines
Biometrics and Standards ITU-T Technology Watch Report December 2009.
Presentation transcript:

EXAMINING INTRA-VISIT IRIS STABILITY (VISIT 1) Bo Brown, Jing Guan, Vince Sipocz, Aidan Chamberlain, Brandon Cox, Preston Flint, Eric Hollensbe, Brandon Krieg, David Manfred, Zack Tauer, Kevin Chan, Steve Elliott, and Ben Petry

Automatic recognition of individuals based on their distinguishing biological and behavioral features. [1] Types: – Face, voice, fingerprint, and iris. – Can be physiological and behavioral. BIOMETRICS

IRIS ASSUMPTIONS Unique, stable over time [2] Recognition is a faster and less intrusive method for biometrics Performance could be attributed to other issues, not the biological stability of the iris Pupil dilation could be affected by a number of factors

The iris is the colored portion of the eye. [3] The outer bounds are defined by the white sclera. The inner bounds are defined by the black pupil. STUCTURE OF THE EYE

PROBLEM STATEMENT Is the iris stable over time? Specifically: Does the stability score index change across four groupings of three images taken in succession in one visit within a day?

Data collection began on 11 June 2010 and lasted for 1 year and 2 days ( Z/P1Y0M0W2D). The time scope of interest for this report is in the day range. The collection period of interest for this analysis began on 11 April 2013 and lasted for four weeks and 1 day ( Z/P0Y0M4W1D). COLLECTION PERIOD

Aging definition [4] To make old; cause to grow or seem old To bring to maturity or a state fit for use AGING

A template aging effect occurs when the quality of the match between an enrolled biometric sample and a sample to be verified degrade with the increased elapsed time between two samples. Algorithm to find a match finds a difference causing the match scores to decrease. Iris aging is a definite change in the iris texture pattern that occurs from human aging. TEMPLATE VS IRIS AGING

Definition: The tendency to remain accurate over time [3] Research focus: Examining stability of the iris over time Action plan: Reviewed time, and issues on the dynamics of time Examined template aging vs. biological aging Developed a methodology Completed the data analysis Results STABILITY

STABILITY SCORE INDEX

Debate in the research community about the stability of the iris – and the iris template. Although the iris is stable over time [4], the iris template can change. Changes that can affect stability include, but are not limited to: The presence of visual aids (like glasses or contacts) The occlusion of the iris caused by the eyelids STABILITY OF THE IRIS

Data were collected as part of a multimodal study, at the International Center for Biometric Research Data were collected in a controlled lab environment Data were subject to ground truth, i.e. – checked for errors and consistency DATA

RESULTS

VISIT 1 AGE GROUPS

VISIT 1 GENDER

VISIT 1 – SELF DISCLOSED ETHNICITY

VISIT 1NHDFP Group Group Group Group RESULTS There was not a statistically significant difference between the median of the groupings, as indicated in the summary table. For this data, we can conclude that the iris is stable in this visit.

The results show that the iris is stable over a collection period of less then fifteen minutes, as theorized by Daugman [1][4]. CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIELD

Testing the stability of the iris over longer periods of time (days, weeks, etc.) Continued replication with similar data FUTURE WORK

[1] History of Biometrics. (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2015, from [2] Structure of the Eye, [3] Daugman, J. (2004). How iris recognition works. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 14(1), [4] Daugman, J. (2006). Probing the uniqueness and randomness of IrisCodes: Results from 200 billion iris pair comparisons. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(11), [5] Doddington, G., Liggett, W., Martin, A., Przybocki, M., & Reynolds, D. (1998, November). Sheep, goats, lambs and wolves: an analysis of individual differences in speaker recognition performance. In the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Sydney. [6] O'Connor, K. J. (2013). Examination of stability in fingerprint recognition across force levels, MS. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. BIBLIOGRAPHY