Charter Cases Test Review. Reasonable Limits: No right or freedom can be absolute. There must be limits (covered in Section 1 of the charter). The person.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Violating The Charter II CLN4U. Charter Violations If an individual feels their rights have been violated, the onus is on the individual to prove this.
Advertisements

TECHNO-TONOMY Privacy & Autonomy in a Networked World Learning Module 2: Legislating Privacy: Your Rights.
Structural Protection of rights Express Rights Implied rights
Legal Systems “tipping the scales of justice”. What is a system Set of identifiable elements –Police, courts, corrections, victims etc. Individual elements.
1 CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 Some Notable Features. 2 PART I CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS  Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize.
J URISDICTION, E NFORCEMENT, AND G UARANTEE Charter defines the relationship between people, organizations,and companies in Canada and the government.
EVEN THOUGH THE CHARTER IS THE HIGHEST LAW, CAN IT STILL BE CHALLENGED AND CHANGED?
Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), 2002
Understanding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Limitations Criticisms.
UNIT 5 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. LESSON 29 PAGES How does the 1 st Amendment protect free expression? Objective: Explain the importance of freedom.
Exploring the Bill of Rights For the 21st Century.
APPLYING THE CHARTER.   What would society be like if we were allowed to do and say anything we like?  Irony– there are mechanisms in place to ensure.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Limitations to the Charter
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Class 7 – September CANADA: Limitations on Rights and Proportionality.
Chapter 3: How effectively does Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect your individual rights?
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Bell Work: 5/8/13 What is seditious speech? What is prior restraint?
CHAPTER THREE Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Law Reform Commission Criminal Process Pre-Trial Procedures Pierre Rosario DOMINGUE Chief Executive Officer Wednesday, May 7,
Anthony Antonacci PPAL 6100 March 24,  The Facts:  David Edwin Oakes was found in possession of 8 vials of hashish oil and $ and was charged.
Charter Cases – Take up Textbook pages 51-58
VIOLATING THE CHARTER II CLN4U. Charter Violations If an individual feels their rights have been violated, the onus is on the individual to prove this.
Should the government be able to tell you what to wear?
Unit #2.  Would the Charter of Rights and Freedoms have any application in April’s complaint?  What is the difference between a right and a privilege?
Canadian Constitutional Law Section B: November 19, 2011 Judicial Decisions on the Charter of Rights Course Director: Ian Greene.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Chapter 4 Page 92.
90 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 90 Background The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was entrenched (safeguarded) in the Canadian.
Discrimination in Employment Chapter 23. Employment Discrimination Treating individuals differently based on differences Treating individuals differently.
Policy on Competing Human Rights Ontario Human Rights Commission (2012)
Crime CLN4U. Legal Definition In Canada, a crime can be defined as any act or omission, the doing of which is an offence under federal legislation In.
Democratic Rights Section 3 states that every citizen has the right to vote Section 3 states that every citizen has the right to vote Restrictions are:
THE CHARTER:. R v. Oakes pg. 39 Question One Oakes was charged with the unlawful possession of a narcotic for the purpose of trafficking.
 The Charter was significantly inspired by documents such as the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights  Passed by the United Nations.
Constitutional Standards of Review under the Equal Protection Clause.
Comparative Approaches to Protection of Human Rights.
I can understand that sources of law include The Constitution, The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Treaties, statutes, and common law. I can understand.
Constitutional review The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Human Rights Protection.
The Oakes Test THE MOST IMPORTANT CASE YOU WILL LEARN THIS YEAR!
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Rights, Freedoms, and Responsibilities Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
DIVISION OF POWERS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
Canadian Charter Of Rights and Freedoms Chapter 3.
THE OAKES TEST 1. “….protects rights by ensuring that the government cannot limit rights without justification. Also, the Charter’s rights are not absolute.
Various International Branches Human Rights Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Rights Freedoms Public Law (Criminal Code) United Nations United Nations.
2.5 Resolving Infringement of the Charter
REGINA V OAKES [1986] 6/4/2018.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Judicial Interpretation
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 1 of the Charter & the Oakes Test
Limitations to the Charter
CLU3M Unit 2 Rights and Freedoms
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Human Rights in Canada Filing a Human Rights Complaint
Resolving Infringements of the Charter
INS AND OUTS OF THE CCRF.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 1 Reasonable Limits
The Oakes Test Revisited:
Section 1 Reasonable Limits
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Chapter 3 How effectively does Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect your individual rights?
Section 1 of the Charter & the Oakes Test
LET’S FLY THROUGH THE CHARTER
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Employment Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

Charter Cases Test Review

Reasonable Limits: No right or freedom can be absolute. There must be limits (covered in Section 1 of the charter). The person alleging that his or her rights or freedoms have been infringed must prove that there has been an infringement. They must state what section has been violated. The Crown must then defend the law by showing that the infringement is both reasonable and justified. (Demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society; for example the breathalyser law)

Charter Tests: The Supreme Court of Canada developed “tests” for applying the Charter. The court has developed seven broad tests. Not all of them are applicable to every case.

Charter Tests: Rational Connection: An infringement must have a sufficiently important objective to warrant overriding a Charter right. Proportionality: The means (measures) chosen and used by the government must be in proportion to the objective. The measures cannot be unfair or irrational; they must restrict the Charter right as little as possible; and the impact on the person must be in proportion to the objective being sought.

Charter Tests: Bona Fide Legislative Objective: The need for a law must be self-evident or at least defensible in its intent. There must be a pressing need for legislation to deal with a serious problem that cannot be ignored. (ex. breathalyser test = saves lives) Minimal Interference: If the solution to a problem infringes upon Charter rights, the infringement must be minimal and tolerable in a free and democratic society. (ex. RIDE program: You are only stopped for a short period of time) Reduced Impaired Driving Everywhere

Charter Tests: Bona Fide Legislative Objective Standards established for employment must be necessary and not arbitrary. False qualifications cannot be created just to deny opportunity to a target group. (ex. Height requirements for being a police officer were set high to keep women out of the police force) Reasonable Accommodation Employers must make a reasonable effort to accommodate special needs of employees; in particular, the religious needs of employees.

Charter Tests: Stigma Test A law or employment standard cannot put a mark of disgrace upon people in such a way as to degrade their self-worth. People should not be maligned without fault. ( malicious intent) Human Dignity - A law or employment standard should not cause people to feel unfairly degraded. Similar to the stigma test, human dignity refers to how people feel when confronted by a law.