Academic Language What is it? How do I know it if I see it? PACT Implementation Conference November 14, 2008 Ann Lippincott, Ph.D. Laura Hill-Bonnet, M.A. Teacher Education Program - UCSB

A story of epiphanies How we came to better understand academic language

Epiphany 1 We would ask professionals and policy makers “What do you mean by academic language?” Typical response: “Well, you know…it’s the language needed for math and social studies.” We argued that the language of math ≠ the language of social studies. We also knew that how language is used in expository texts ≠ how language is used in narrative texts

Therefore… We began to think about how we could help teacher candidates realize that academic language is more than just content-specific vocabulary. We also made efforts to ensure articulation across courses, quarters and instructors and in departmental professional development meetings.

In early summer we ask teacher candidates Why is language used? How is language used? When/ Where/ With whom is language used?

Later in summer we add Why is language used? How is language used? When/ Where/ With whom is language used? Purposes Grammar and Pronunciation Communicative Competence

In fall quarter we introduce Why is language used? How is language used? When/ Where/ With whom is language used? Purposes Grammar and Pronunciation Communicative Competence Functions Forms Fluency

Epiphany 2 As we were calibrating PACT work with our colleagues, we had yet another epiphany. We recognized that we, as a faculty, didn’t all agree on what academic language can/should look and sound like in classroom practice. In fact, we had very different ideas about what constituted evidence of “academic language” as we analyzed PACT data together.

Therefore… We began to think about how we could facilitate consensus as to what constitutes evidence of “academic language” and what it can/should look and sound like in classroom practice. Furthermore, we began to identify additional ways we could support teacher candidates vis-à- vis our new ideas. We decided to build upon a common language that would explicitly address our common knowledge.

Functions, Forms & Fluency Dutro & Moran (2003) introduce the notions of functions (tasks), forms (tools) and fluency (derived from opportunities to practice). Provides an architectural metaphor that can be used in multiple contexts (instructional, supervisory, mentorship).

Developing Academic Language: Functions, Forms & Fluency Functions (Dutro & Moran, pp ) –The tasks or purposes AND uses of language. –We use language to accomplish something in formal or informal settings, for social or academic purposes. –Social purposes include: exchanging greetings, expressing needs, making jokes, exchanging greetings, indicating agreement or disagreement, participating in personal conversations, etc.

Academic Language Functions Dutro & Moran Navigating written text Asking/answering informational questions Asking/answering clarifying questions Relating information Comparing and contrasting Explaining cause and effect Justifying and persuading Drawing conclusions Summarizing Evaluating Conducting research

Academic Language Functions Chamot and O’Malley Seek Information - use who, what, when, where, how Inform - recount information or retell Compare - explain graphic organizer showing contrast Order - describe timeline, continuum or cycle Classify - describe organizing principles Analyze - describe features or main idea Infer - generate hypotheses to suggest cause/outcomes Justify & Persuade - give evidence why “A” is important Solve Problems - describe problem-solving procedures Synthesize - summarize information cohesively Evaluate - identify criteria, explain priorities, etc.

Language Function: Compare/Contrast Marine mammals Ocean fish Born alive Lungs Warm blooded Produce milk Born from eggs Gills Cold blooded Do not produce milk Excellent Swimmers Vertebrates Live in groups

Language Forms: Compare/Contrast Sentence Frame: ________ have __________, whereas________ have _____________. Marine mammals have lungs, whereas ocean fish have gills. Providing the mortar words will enable students to use language to compare and contrast.

Fluency (Dutro & Moran, p. 242) The facility with which a speaker, reader and writer uses language. Developed through focused and deliberate engagement with a range of uses of language (both oral and written), and many opportunities to practice the newly learned forms in different contexts.

Epiphany 3 We realized that the PACT Teaching Event could not be the only context which held teacher candidates responsible for academic language. They needed practice and support across the various contexts in which they were developing as professional educators.

Therefore… We retooled our Lesson Design Frame to hold TCs accountable for addressing academic language in their practice. –Identify learning objectives –Identify academic language functions within learning objectives Why K12 students are using language? –Identify corresponding forms How K12 students are using language –Identify opportunities for students to express academic language When, where and with whom they are using language

Why…academic language? Analyze learning activities and assessments to determine the appropriate academic language function(s) Are K12 students –Making predictions –Justifying –Comparing/Contrasting –Explaining –Etc….

How…academic language? Analyze academic language function(s) What linguistic forms do K12 students need in order to –Make predictions –Justify –Compare/Contrast –Explain –Etc…

When, where and with whom…? Analyze learning activities for the opportunities they provide to use academic language When, where and with whom do K12 students have opportunities to –Make predictions –Justify –Compare/Contrast –Explain –Etc…

Future Epiphanies?? If the lesson plan frame includes systematic opportunities to address academic language, then will the TCs be more systematic in their thinking about the needs of ELL students in the classroom? We, as a faculty are in the process of examining opportunities for feedback for our TCs. Will we be systematic in our recognition of academic language in use in the k-12 classroom?