ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Advertisements

ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
ABET PRIMER What is ABET, What Does ABET Do, How Do We Do Well With ABET.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
ABET Introduction of ABET to CE 203 Tim Ellis, Ph.D., P.E.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
What You Need to Know About ABET Accreditation
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
What is ABET Accreditation and Why Should I Care?
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
ABET Accreditation: Basic Information
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Southern University, 18 October 2002, Baton Rouge, Louisiana Preparing for EC 200x Southern University Jeff Froyd, Texas A&M University.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
Chapter 8 Orientation to the Engineering Education System.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
ABET Assessing Program Outcomes Amir Rezaei. Outline Context of Assessment Process of Assessment Similarities and differences between classroom and program.
معايير ABET المعتمدة لكليات الهندسة للحصول على الاعتمادية الدولية
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Introduction to ABET EC 2000 A Road Map Proposal Workshop for Excel in Engineering Education Prof. Ali M. Albahi Prof. Reda M. Abdulaal October 11, 2005.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 28,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.2 Guidelines on: IMapping of PEOs to Mission Statement IIMapping of SOs to PEOs.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle.
Dr. Mohorjy, Prof. Reda, Dr. Ahmed EC بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Accreditation of Engineering Education in Turkey Prof. Dr. Bülent E. Platin Mechanical Engineering Department Middle East Technical University Ankara,
Venue: M038 Date: Monday Sep 26,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.7 How to write the Self-Study Report ? Presented by: JIC ABET COMMITTEE.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
B - 1 October 2004 Eric Guilbeau, PhD  Department Chair, ASU, has overseen 4 visits to ASU (2 BME, 1 ChE, 1 Mat’ls Eng)  Lead 1 PEV visit (Bioengineering)
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingOctober 6, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ABET Accreditation Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement Direct Assessment of Learning Outcomes Dr. Abdel-Rahman Al-Qawasmi Associate Professor EE Department.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
Neelam Soundarajan Chair, Undergrad Studies Comm. CSE Department
ZZULI ABET Workshop Assessment and Continuous Improvement
Presentation transcript:

ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.

2 What is ABET? ABET is an organization that provides world leadership to ensure quality and stimulate innovation in applied science, computing, engineering and technology education. ABET is the primary organization responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and certifying the quality of education in these areas in the U.S. ABET is an organization that provides world leadership to ensure quality and stimulate innovation in applied science, computing, engineering and technology education. ABET is the primary organization responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and certifying the quality of education in these areas in the U.S.

3 The Accreditation Timeline: Year 1 January: Institution requests accreditation for programs January: Institution requests accreditation for programs February-March: Institution prepares self- evaluation (Program Self-Study Report) February-March: Institution prepares self- evaluation (Program Self-Study Report) March-June: Team chair assigned, visit dates set, team members chosen March-June: Team chair assigned, visit dates set, team members chosen September-December: Visit takes place, draft statements written and finalized following 14- day response period September-December: Visit takes place, draft statements written and finalized following 14- day response period

4 The Accreditation Timeline: Year 2 January-February: Draft statements edited and preliminary statements sent to institution January-February: Draft statements edited and preliminary statements sent to institution March – April: Institution responds to draft statement and return to ABET March – April: Institution responds to draft statement and return to ABET May-June: Necessary changes to statement, if any, are made May-June: Necessary changes to statement, if any, are made July: Commission meets to take final action July: Commission meets to take final action August: Institution notified of this action August: Institution notified of this action

5 Program Evaluator Responsibilities Conduct pre-visit analysis to identify areas for further investigation during the visit Conduct pre-visit analysis to identify areas for further investigation during the visit During visit, complete review of materials, tour facilities, interview faculty, staff, and students, verify and document findings, participate in team meetings, recommend accreditation actions, and provide institution with a preliminary assessment of strengths and weaknesses During visit, complete review of materials, tour facilities, interview faculty, staff, and students, verify and document findings, participate in team meetings, recommend accreditation actions, and provide institution with a preliminary assessment of strengths and weaknesses

6 ABET Evaluates Programs ABET accredits programs that lead to degrees, and not institutions. All paths of study leading to a degree must meet the ABET requirements for a program to be accredited. ABET accredits programs that lead to degrees, and not institutions. All paths of study leading to a degree must meet the ABET requirements for a program to be accredited. A program is typically described by a unique set of objectives and outcomes achieved by an unique course of study – curriculum and related co- and extra-curricular activities A program is typically described by a unique set of objectives and outcomes achieved by an unique course of study – curriculum and related co- and extra-curricular activities A student transcript is the primary evidence of degree completion A student transcript is the primary evidence of degree completion

7 Terms Used by ABET Objectives Objectives Outcomes Outcomes Performance Criteria Performance Criteria Assessment Assessment Evaluation Evaluation

8 Objectives Statements that describe the expected accomplishments of graduates during the first few years after graduation Statements that describe the expected accomplishments of graduates during the first few years after graduation

9 Outcomes Statements that describe what students are expected to know and able to do by the time of graduation. Statements that describe what students are expected to know and able to do by the time of graduation.

10 Performance Criteria Specific, measurable statements identifying the performance(s) required to meet the outcomes; confirmable through evidence (standards, rubrics, specification, metrics, etc.) Specific, measurable statements identifying the performance(s) required to meet the outcomes; confirmable through evidence (standards, rubrics, specification, metrics, etc.)

11 Assessment Processes that identify, collect, use and prepare data that can be used to evaluate achievement (knowledge, skills, attitude and values, behavior). Processes that identify, collect, use and prepare data that can be used to evaluate achievement (knowledge, skills, attitude and values, behavior). Can be group or individual, formative or summative. Can be group or individual, formative or summative.

12 Evaluation Process of reviewing the results of data collection and analysis and making a determination of the value of findings and action to be taken. Process of reviewing the results of data collection and analysis and making a determination of the value of findings and action to be taken.

13 Self-Study Report A good program self-study should include: A good program self-study should include: A complete description of how and the extent to which the program satisfies each of the criteria requirements: A complete description of how and the extent to which the program satisfies each of the criteria requirements: Students Students Program Educational Objectives Program Educational Objectives Program Outcomes and Assessment Program Outcomes and Assessment Professional or Technical Component Professional or Technical Component Faculty Faculty Facilities Facilities Institutional Support and Financial Resources Institutional Support and Financial Resources Program Criteria Program Criteria

14 Criterion 1 - Students The program must evaluate student performance The program must evaluate student performance Advise students regarding curricular and career matters Advise students regarding curricular and career matters Monitor student progress to foster their success in achieving outcomes Monitor student progress to foster their success in achieving outcomes The institution must have and enforce policies for transfer students and validation of courses taken for credit elsewhere The institution must have and enforce policies for transfer students and validation of courses taken for credit elsewhere The institution must have and enforce procedures to assure that all students meet program requirements The institution must have and enforce procedures to assure that all students meet program requirements

15 Criterion 2 – Program Educational Objectives Each program must have: Each program must have: Detailed published education objectives consistent with the mission of the institution Detailed published education objectives consistent with the mission of the institution Process based on needs of constituents in which objectives are determined and periodically evaluated Process based on needs of constituents in which objectives are determined and periodically evaluated An educational program, including a curriculum that prepares students to attain program outcomes An educational program, including a curriculum that prepares students to attain program outcomes A process of on-going evaluation of the extent and uses results to develop and improve the program outcomes A process of on-going evaluation of the extent and uses results to develop and improve the program outcomes

16 Criterion 3 – Program Outcomes and Assessment Programs must demonstrate their graduates have outcomes “a to k” Programs must demonstrate their graduates have outcomes “a to k” Program must have an assessment process with documented results that indicate the degree to which outcomes are attained Program must have an assessment process with documented results that indicate the degree to which outcomes are attained Evidence that the results of the assessment process are applied to the further development and improvement of the program Evidence that the results of the assessment process are applied to the further development and improvement of the program

17 Assessment Tools and Measures The primary outcomes assessment should be based on direct measures of student learning The primary outcomes assessment should be based on direct measures of student learning Senior exit surveys, alumni surveys, and employer surveys as means of outcomes assessment are indirect measures. Senior exit surveys, alumni surveys, and employer surveys as means of outcomes assessment are indirect measures. A system must be in place to ensure that all graduates have, to some extent, attained the prescribed outcomes and all elements of the Professional Component A system must be in place to ensure that all graduates have, to some extent, attained the prescribed outcomes and all elements of the Professional Component

18 ABET Criteria 2000 F (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering F (b) an ability to design, conduct experiments,as well as analyze and interpret data F (c) an ability to design a system,component or process to meet desired needs F (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams F (e) an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems F (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility F (g) an ability to communicate effectively F (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and social context F (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning F (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues F (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice

19 Accepted Direct Assessment Student portfolios Student portfolios Subject content examinations Subject content examinations Performance observations Performance observations Performance evaluations of internships and/or co-ops Performance evaluations of internships and/or co-ops

20 Criterion 4 – Professional Component Faculty must ensure that the curriculum devotes adequate attention and time to each component, consistent with the outcomes and objectives of the program and institution Faculty must ensure that the curriculum devotes adequate attention and time to each component, consistent with the outcomes and objectives of the program and institution Preparation for engineering practice Preparation for engineering practice Major design experience Major design experience Subject areas appropriate to engineering Subject areas appropriate to engineering

21 Subject Areas One year of a combination of college-level mathematics and basic sciences appropriate to the discipline One year of a combination of college-level mathematics and basic sciences appropriate to the discipline One and one-half years of engineering topics, consisting of engineering sciences and engineering design appropriate to the student’s field of study One and one-half years of engineering topics, consisting of engineering sciences and engineering design appropriate to the student’s field of study A general education component that complements the technical content of the curriculum and is consistent with the program and institution objectives A general education component that complements the technical content of the curriculum and is consistent with the program and institution objectives

22 Criterion 5 - Faculty Sufficient in number and competencies to cover all curricular areas Sufficient in number and competencies to cover all curricular areas Sufficient in number to accommodate adequate levels of student-faculty interaction, advising and counseling, service, professional development, and interactions with industrial and professional practitioners and employers Sufficient in number to accommodate adequate levels of student-faculty interaction, advising and counseling, service, professional development, and interactions with industrial and professional practitioners and employers Ensure proper guidance of the program and its evaluation, development, and improvement. Ensure proper guidance of the program and its evaluation, development, and improvement.

23 Criterion 6 - Facilities Classrooms, laboratories, and associated equipment must be adequate to accomplish program objectives and provide an atmosphere conducive to learning Classrooms, laboratories, and associated equipment must be adequate to accomplish program objectives and provide an atmosphere conducive to learning Opportunities to learn the use of modern engineering tools Opportunities to learn the use of modern engineering tools Computing/information infrastructure to support scholarly activities of the students and faculty and the educational objectives of the institution Computing/information infrastructure to support scholarly activities of the students and faculty and the educational objectives of the institution

24 Criterion 7 - Institutional Support and Financial Resources Institutional support, financial resources, and constructive leadership must be adequate to assure quality and continuity of the program Institutional support, financial resources, and constructive leadership must be adequate to assure quality and continuity of the program Attract, retain, and provide for professional development of a well-qualified faculty Attract, retain, and provide for professional development of a well-qualified faculty Resources to acquire, maintain, and operate equipment and facilities Resources to acquire, maintain, and operate equipment and facilities Adequate support personnel Adequate support personnel Support of quality-improvement efforts Support of quality-improvement efforts

25 Program Criteria Each program must satisfy applicable Program Criteria Each program must satisfy applicable Program Criteria Curricular topics Curricular topics Faculty qualifications Faculty qualifications Current Program Criteria unique to Agricultural Engineering Current Program Criteria unique to Agricultural Engineering Must satisfy all Program Criteria Implied by title of program Must satisfy all Program Criteria Implied by title of program

26 Accreditation Definitions Deficiency Deficiency Weakness Weakness Concern Concern Observation Observation

27 Deficiency Indicates that a criterion, policy, or procedure is not satisfied. Therefore, the program is not in compliance with the criteria. Indicates that a criterion, policy, or procedure is not satisfied. Therefore, the program is not in compliance with the criteria.

28 Weakness Indicates that a program lacks the strength of compliance with a criterion, policy, or procedure to ensure that the quality of the program will not be compromised Therefore, remedial action is required to strengthen compliance with the criterion, policy, or procedure prior to the next evaluation. Indicates that a program lacks the strength of compliance with a criterion, policy, or procedure to ensure that the quality of the program will not be compromised Therefore, remedial action is required to strengthen compliance with the criterion, policy, or procedure prior to the next evaluation.

29 Concern Indicates that a program currently satisfies a criterion, policy, or procedure; however, the potential exists for the situation to change such that the criterion, policy, or procedure may not be satisfied. Indicates that a program currently satisfies a criterion, policy, or procedure; however, the potential exists for the situation to change such that the criterion, policy, or procedure may not be satisfied.

30 Observation Is a comment or suggestion which does not relate directly to the accreditation action but is offered to assist the institution in its continuing efforts to improve its programs. Is a comment or suggestion which does not relate directly to the accreditation action but is offered to assist the institution in its continuing efforts to improve its programs.

31 Any Questions?