Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative February 2, 2004 Oakland, CA Clinical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team/Organization Name Background and structure Location Brief system information (type, size) Pilot population.
Advertisements

Clinical Information Systems
System Changes and Interventions: Planned Care Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Team/Organization Name Background and structure Location Brief system information (type, size) Pilot population.
Panel Identification Improvement Facilitator Training Session 1 Day 2.
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
The Chronic Care Model.
THE CHALLENGE: CHRONIC DISEASE CARE AND THE PROMISE OF HIT Health Care Information Technology 2004: Improving Chronic Care in California San Francisco.
Organization of Diabetes Care Chapter 6 Maureen Clement, Betty Harvey, Doreen M Rabi, Robert S Roscoe, Diana Sherifali Canadian Diabetes Association 2013.
PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE
Integrating Chronic Care & Business Strategies in the Safety-Net AHRQ Annual Meeting September 9, 2008.
California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative Final Outcomes Congress December 2005 Richmond Health Center Diabetes project.
Local Health Department Perspective Electronic Medical Record Software and Health Information Exchanges Kathleen Cook Information & Fiscal Manager, Lincoln-Lancaster.
99.98% of the time patients are on their own “The diabetes self-management regimen is one of the most challenging of any for chronic illness.” 0.02% of.
Jackie Gianunzio CDEMS Support Specialist Intro to CDEMS.
Informatics And The New Healthcare System Information Technology Will Provide the Platform for Quality Improvement in Healthcare for the 21 st Century.
Topics: Interviewing Question Type Interviewing techniques
1.01 E LECTRONIC M EDICAL R ECORD S YSTEMS AND D ISEASE R EGISTRIES : S ELECTION A LONG THE S PECTRUM Wayne T. Pan, MD Medical Director Choosing a Chronic.
Maple Valley MultiCare Clinic Level III NCQA Certified Patient Centered Medical Home.
WHAT IS CQI? Contact the CQI Committee: (360)
Presented by Vicki M. Young, PhD October 19,
Patient Centered Medical Home What it means for Duffy Health Center Board Presentation September 10 th 2012.
Solution Overview for NIPDEC- CDAP July 15, 2005.
Sue Roberts Chair, Year of Care Partnerships
Optimizing Technology to Achieve Population Health Shannon Nielson, MHSA, PCMH-CCE Centerprise, Inc May 5 th, 2015 Indiana PCA Annual Conference
Diabetes Registry. The Care Model Informed, Empowered Patient Productive Interactions Prepared, Proactive Practice Team Improved Outcomes Delivery System.
Chapter Quality Network (CQN) Asthma Pilot Project Team Progress Presentation State Name: Oregon Practice Name: Childhood Health Associates of Salem Team.
NFP CARE TEAM PATIENT ADVOCATE New Roles, New Possibilities.
Clinical Care Improvement System Mark Murray, MD, MPA Mark Murray & Associates.
A simple performance measurement framework A good performance measurement framework will focus on the customer and measure the right things. Performance.
4C’s Clinic Redesign Operational Snapshot July 28, 2005.
Using a Registry to Manage Asthma Population
Introduction to Case Management. Why Case Management ?  The context of care is changing; we now have an ageing population and an increase in chronic.
Together.Today.Tomorrow. The BLUES Project Karen C. Fox, PhD Chief Executive Officer.
We have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this.
California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative Final Outcomes Congress December 9, 2005.
The Chronic Care Model in CQN System Framework for Great Asthma Care.
Chapter Quality Network (CQN) Asthma Pilot Project Team Progress Presentation State Name: Ohio Practice: Toledo Children Primary Care Team Members:
/ 201 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine Principles of Family Medicine Chronic Disease Management Dr.
System Changes and Interventions: Registry as a Clinical Practice Tool Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care, a national program of the Robert.
Chronic Care Learning Communities California Association of Public Hospitals Lisa Johnson, M.D. David Ofman, M.D. Oakland, California November 2, 2004.
Chronic Illness Care and the future of Primary Care Ed Wagner, MD, MPH MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation Center for Health Studies Group Health.
Mental Health Services Act Oversight and Accountability Commission June, 2006.
School of Health Sciences Week 8! AHIMA Practice Briefs Healthcare Delivery & Information Management HI 125 Instructor: Alisa Hayes, MSA, RHIA, CCRC.
Maine Prenatal Collaborative Susan Swartz, M.D. Judy Soper, RT(R), RDMS, BS Tim Cowan, MSPH Principal Investigator Project Director Data Analyst December.
Project Closure. Objectives  Determine when to terminate a project  Identify various reasons why a project is terminated  Describe a project audit.
SHOPS is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. Abt Associates leads the project in collaboration with Banyan Global Jhpiego Marie Stopes.
1 The Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Illness Care Management Julie Schmittdiel, Ph.D., Stephen M. Shortell, Ph.D., Thomas Rundall,
POWERED BY HEALTH AND WELLNESS Sharing Our Story in a Nut Shell The Power Point entails our work with Metastar and 2 clinics in Wisconsin The information.
Using VistA for Chronic Care Management Strategies for Quality Chronic Disease Management in FQHCs Matthew King MD Medical Director Clinica Adelante Community.
Administrative Applications of Information Technology for Nursing Managers CHAPTER 27.
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions Approach and Proposal “Charting Our Course”
Chronic Disease Tracking System  Problem  The current healthcare model focuses on one patient at a time in the office.  Chronic disease leads to higher.
Readmissions Driver Diagram OHA HEN 2.0. Readmissions AIMPrimary Drivers Secondary DriversChange Ideas Reduce Readmissions Identify patients at high-risk.
Transforming Care in Patient Centered Medical Home and Accountable Care Organization Hae Mi Choe, PharmD Director, Pharmacy Innovations & Partnerships.
Coordination of Care, Information Support, and Quality of Diabetes Care : A STARNet Study Michael L. Parchman, MD, MPH Raquel L. Romero, MD Jacqueline.
Leadership Launch Module 11: Introduction to School Wide Information System (SWIS) and the Student Risk Screening Scale District Cohort 1 1.
Using a Registry to Manage Asthma Population James Wiley, MD Physician Leader, Alabama AAP Chapter Stephen Pleatman, MD Pediatrician, Suburban Pediatric.
Building Capacity for EMR Adoption and Data Utilization Among Safety Net Organizations Presented by Chatrian Reynolds, MPH, Evaluator, LPHI Shelina Foderingham,
Reporter Training for High School RIO TM
Join the conversation! Our Twitter hashtag is #CPI2011. Garbage in, garbage out: Barriers to Efficient Data Capture and Review A case study in maximizing.
Group Health’s experience September 24, 2015| Kathryn Ramos Implementing CDSME in an integrated health care system.
Welcome to Learning 2: Care Management October 2011 Connie Sixta, RN, PhD, MBA.
Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing (8th ed.)
Developing an Office Approach
System Changes and Interventions: Planned Care
System Changes and Interventions: Planned Care
Implementing Health Coaching
Implementing Health Coaching
The Chronic Care Model Overview
Presentation transcript:

Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative February 2, 2004 Oakland, CA Clinical Information Systems: Integrating Registries into Everyday Practice

The Care Model Informed, Empowered Patient Productive Interactions Prepared, Proactive Practice Team Improved Outcomes Delivery System Design Decision Support Clinical Information Systems Self- Management Support Health System Resources and Policies Community Health Care Organization You are here

What a Registry Should Be be quick to implement be simple to use be organized by patient; not disease, but responsive to disease populations contain only data relevant to clinical practice when necessary, make data entry simple and efficient be easy to update from other automated data sources assist with internal and external performance reporting guide clinical care first, measurement second!

Can I use my EMR for what I need to do? Yes, if… It provides access to lab data, dx test results, and across settings in your system. Guidelines and prompts are included for needed services You can identify populations and subpopulations of patients

Can I…(cont.) If… Allows stratification of patients (complexity, disease severity for case management services) Captures outcomes by provider Captures all critical clinical information

Use the CIS to: 1.Create population-specific reports 2.Facilitate external reporting requirements 3.Create dashboard reports of the practice as a whole

CIS: Facts vs. Fears Fear: Why do we have to have a registry? Fact: Planned population-based care cannot be done without knowing your patient population and its key clinical data Fact: Primary care teams that implement registries are more likely to improve processes of care for all chronic conditions Fact: Teams with registries are less likely to lose patients to follow-up, and more likely to improve patient satisfaction as care improves

CIS: Facts vs. Fears Fear: I don’t need anyone telling me how to practice! I’m doing just fine with my patients! Fact: Surveys show that providers consistently under estimate the numbers of patients with chronic disease in their practice Fact: Surveys show that provider consistently over estimate their performance measures on process and clinical outcomes for chronically ill patients. Fact: The two are interdependent. Fact: Knowing you population of patients will help rectify this disparity.

CIS: Facts vs. Fears Fear: It’s just more work during our already hectic day! Fact: Using a patient summary form from a Registry will actually reduce charting time and make the visit run more smoothly Fact: The form gives a snapshot of past care, reminders of needed care and planning for future care all at the time of the visit Fact: Teams with registries feel better prepared for visits since they have the patient information when and where they need it.

CIS: Facts vs. Fears Fear: This will cost me a fortune and there’s no return on investment! Fact: Implementing a registry is simple, and there are economies of scale as you add more patients. Fact: Registries facilitate populations-based care which improves outcomes and patient satisfaction Fact: Planned care via the registry generates visits that are typically of higher intensity while reducing unexpected visits for acute exacerbations

Making Clinical Information Work for You in Clinical Practice

The Software Assess available software for appropriate functionality Install the software. Identify training resources. Highlight CIS importance to rest of team for buy-in

The Chronic Illness Data Manager Identify best person on team to manage the disease management information. Choose person with computer skills and interest. Define roles and responsibilities for manager. Secure training for manager as needed. Train a back-up.

Populating a Registry Use billing data and ICD9 codes to identify specific populations or build prospectively. Download names and contact information into registry. Establish process for regular population updates.

Getting Clinical Data into the Registry Define the relevant clinical data needs. Use the visit for collecting non- automated data. Develop and test data capture process. Use chart audits judiciously. Develop and test data entry process

Using Data at Point of Care Establish process for producing patient summary data for use at time of visit. (acute or planned) Make sure summary is replacing other data capture processes to avoid double entry. Ensure summary is on chart or in the exam room. Does the summary work for various patient types? Ensure new data is captured on the summary. Develop process for new summary data to be entered into registry.

Using Data for Care Reminders Establish what you want “reminding” about. Determine how you want to be reminded. (i.e, exception reports or individual patient prompts) Identify team member responsible for monitoring reminders. Create process for responding to reminders. (i.e., who calls patient, when and for what purpose) Create process for updating/modifying reminders.

Using Data to Monitor Performance Determine what types of population reports are needed and reporting intervals. Establish process for creating customized reports. Who will generate reports? Who receives reports? Do the reports facilitate continued improvement?

Keys to Success from Others That Have Implemented Registries Everyone understands the clinical utility and supports the time involved in registry upkeep. Care management using registry data is a team approach Dedicated time each week for primary team to use data Data forms are clear, roles are assigned, data review time allotted. Data are clinically relevant, and used for patient care first, and measurement second. Data can be shared with patient to improve understanding of treatment plan.

Barriers to CIS use Lack of perceived value Competing business and productivity demands Lack of office flow expertise Lack of information support Lack of leadership support

For More Information: Please visit Improving Chronic Illness Care’s web site at