CEGRN 2015 Campaign A. Caporali (1), J. Zurutuza (1), O. Khoda (2), G. Stangl (3), M. Becker (4), M. Bertocco (1), L. Gerhatova (5), M. Mojzes (5), M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sarajevo, October 17,   The institution of the Unit was in line with the strategy adopted by the Italian Government in the Region and its work.
Advertisements

Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo National Report of Switzerland E. Brockmann, D. Ineichen, M. Kistler, U. Marti, S. Schaer, A. Schlatter,
3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences,
Accurate reference frame access at arbitrary points on Earth GPS Dancer project Henno Boomkamp Dancer algorithms, JAVA programming, JXTA, P2P & internet,
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Permanent GNSS-Network Albania EURALIUS GPS-Network Tirana July 2007 Permanent GNSS-Network Albania Proposal of a Realization Guenter Stangl Tirana, July.
The Danube Basin ICPDR Philip Weller Danube Leaders Conference, Novi Sad, July 9, 2010 The Ecological Foundations for Development.
LINDA MORGAN PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT – SPATIAL POSITIONING WESTERN AUSTRALIA SURVEYING CONFERENCE 2013 Geodetic Stuff You Need to Know: Datums, Standards.
OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,
Tide Gauge Benchmark Monitoring Need for Reprocessing in Europe Tilo Schöne & the IGS TIGA Working Group.
INTERREG III B CADSES Neighbourhood Programme Letterio DENARO Managing Authority INTERREG III B CADSES Neighbourhood Programme Trasnational.
National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.
Graz 2003 Report of the OLG LAC EPN and other activities Report 2003 E. Cristea, Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences G. Stangl, Federal.
EPN LAC Workshop 2008 Frankfurt Main, Germany, October, 2008 ASI Local Analysis Center Report C. Ferraro, Telespazio/CGS Matera R. Pacione, e-GEOS/CGS.
Project: EU-Georgia E-Governance Facility GITI 2014 November 6 – 7, 2014 Kostas Drakas Team Leader In cooperation with.
20th Directors-General Meeting for Civil Protection, Ljubljana, 19 May th Directors-General Meeting for Civil Protection Joint Session of the Member.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW COORDINATE SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Belgrade, 11 th and 12 th May 2007M.Sc. Blaž Mozetič.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Civil society and its role in the process of EU integration Regional Conference Through Cooperation towards Integration Przno, 08 –
© TU Darmstadt-IPG p 1 The CEGRN 2011 Campaign and the densification of ETRF2000 in Central Europe A. Caporali, M. Barlik, M. Becker, L. Gerhatova, G.
Inspire services from the EuroGeographics point of view Antti Jakobsson Programme manager.
Permanent GNSS-Network Albania EURALIUS GPS-Network Tirana July 2007 Permanent GNSS-Network Albania Proposal of a Realization Guenter Stangl Tirana, July.
WEGENER Nice 2006 OLG Monitoring of the Eastern Mediterranean and Arabia Velocitiy Estimations of Permanent GPS Stations 1Space Research Institute, Austrian.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
Introducing the 3 rd SEE Call: a strategic approach SEE Programme: the new Calls Ljubljana, 20 April 2011 Ivan Curzolo – SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Linking GPS to Tide Gauges and Tide Gauge Benchmarks Tilo Schöne GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam Understanding Sea-level Rise and Variability, WCRP Workshop,
IAG Gen.Assembly, Budapest, Hungary 1 The CEGRN Consortium Consortium for Central European GPS Geodynamic Reference Network I. Fejes FÖMI Satellite.
Presentation WG 2 Managing EU Funds on the Regional Level Republic of Albania Ministry of European Integration (MEI) Regional Conference EU Perspectives.
CERGOP-2 Conference, Warsaw, September , 2003 CERGOP-2/Environment A Challenge for the Next 2.5 Years P. Pesec Space Research Institute, Graz, Austria.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
EU TWINNING PROGRAM “SUPPORT TO THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA” Mrs. Eszter Kertészné Gérecz Head of IT Department
1 First Results of the CMONOC GNSS Network Junping Chen Bin Wu, Shuhua Ye, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
Recent GNSS Activities at Geoscience Australia Gary Johnston, Guorong Hu, Anna Riddell Geodesy & Seismic Monitoring Branch, Geoscience Australia.
Czech – UNDP Trust Fund March 2007 Emerging Donors Workshop in Budapest Hana Kosová (UNDP Regional Centre Bratislava, Programme Associate to the Czech.
EPN Central Bureau IGS Analysis Workshop 2008, Miami Royal Observatory of Belgium C. Bruyninx, J. Legrand, F. Roosbeek EPN Central Bureau Royal Observatory.
Tempus project: Master programme in Applied Statistics MAS Workshop in Methodology for teaching Statistics, December 13, 2011.
Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Initiative for South Eastern Europe DPPI SEE Seminar on Strengthening Cooperation with Candidate Countries and Western.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
UNITED NATION ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE First meeting of regulators from South East European countries Technical regulation in the Republic of Moldova.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
The International GNSS Service (IGS), June 2008: Perspectives and Key Issues John M. Dow Chair, IGS Governing Board.
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
EUREF2011: National Report of Austria Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) 1 EUREF 2011 Symposium National Report of Austria by Günter Stangl,
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris EUREF Permanent GNSS Network Carine
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
A Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria Cornelia Aichhorn, Sandro Krauss (1) Günter Stangl (2) (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences.
EGS Nice 2003 G17 Deficits of CEGRN Solutions and Time Series G. Stangl.
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) / Institut für Weltraumforschung (IWF), 8042 Graz, Austria, Contact:
P. Mitterschiffthaler, D. Ruess, G. Stangl, H. Titz, Ch. Ullrich, E. Zahn EUREF National Report Austria.
Time Series of GPS stations in the Near East 1Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences 2Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) EUREF.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
Reprocessing CEGRN campaigns M. Becker(1), A. Caporali(2), R. Drescher(1), L. Gerhatova(5), G. Grenerczy(3), C. Haslinger(4), J. Hefty(5), S.
NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy
EGU G6 Vienna 2006 The CERGOP2 database after the project EU project CERGOP2/Environment Work Package 1 P. Pesec, C. Haslinger, Space Research Institute.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
 The purpose of the Bologna Process (or Bologna Accords) is to create the European Higher Education Area by making academic degree standards and quality.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
ROSEE Project- ROad safety in South East European regions Jovica Vasiljević, PhD, Assistant Director, RTSA-Serbia, Belgrade George Yannis, PhD, Associate.
REC Savannah, Febr. 22, 2006 Title Outlier Detection in Geodetic Applications with respect to Observation Imprecision Ingo Neumann and Hansjörg.
GNSS-meteorology situation
Made in Danube Transnational Cooperation to transform knowledge into
The need of a Local Reference Frame in Greece:
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
National Transition Facility / Phare / Cards
Overview Bitola, November 22-24, 2016.
Session 8: Constituency Coordination lessons and good practices Strenghening the GEF Constituency coordination Experience of Moldova 1-2 April 2008,
Combination of reprocessed orbit, clock and ERP products
Presentation transcript:

CEGRN 2015 Campaign A. Caporali (1), J. Zurutuza (1), O. Khoda (2), G. Stangl (3), M. Becker (4), M. Bertocco (1), L. Gerhatova (5), M. Mojzes (5), M. Mulic (6), Yu. Stopkhay (7), C. Nagorneac (8), A. Mihailov (8), S. Lazić (9), J. Papčo (5), B. Stopar (10) (1) University of Padua, Italy; (2) Main Astronomical Observatory National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine; (3) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria; (4) Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany; (5) Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia; (6) University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; (7) System Solutions, Kiev, Ukraine; (8) Institute of Geodesy, Engineering Research and Cadastre "INGEOCAD", Chisinau, Moldova; (9) Republic Geodetic Authority, Belgrade, Serbia; (10) University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

The CEGRN Consortium serves the operation, maintenance and development of the CEGRN network, coordinates the measurements, data processing, and collaboration in different research topics. The Consortium also serves as the institutional background of the CERGOP-2/Environment Project, supported by the EU 5th Framework Programme under contract EVK2-CT A first campaign took place in Since 1997, each two years, a weekly campaign has been observed, normally in June. CEGRN Consortium

Motivation and Goals (extract from the EUREF CEGRN MoU signed in Chisinau, 2011) 3. Objectives The objective of this Memorandum of Understanding is, in general, to create the conditions to facilitate the data exchange and to promote the increase in the co- operation between the two parties, for the benefit of both, and in particular, to facilitate the densification of the European GNSS network for reference frame definition and geokinematical applications. It is expected that a closer co-operation between EUREF and CEGRN will increase the level of support to the IAG Dense Velocity Field Project, and the availability of a combined solution with respect to a denser network. Moreover, the co-operation will contribute to: provide better and more consistent data for geokinematics, by the optimization of guidelines for approval of networks with position and velocities and the improvement of offset treatment in time series; stimulate reprocessing of old EPN data, taking into account the foreseen realization of CEGRN 2011 and the completion of the reprocessing of the EPN; involve more nations into the INSPIRE initiative, in particular with the CRS (Coordinate Reference Systems) Implementing Rules.

CEGRN campaigns CAMPAIGNPERIODCOUNTRIESSITES CEGRN'942–6 May, CEGRN'9529 May – 3 June, CEGRN'9610–15 June, CEGRN'974–10 June, CEGRN'9914–19 June, (extended network)57 (29P+28E) CEGRN'0117–23 June, (extended network)51 (28P+23E) CEGRN'0316–21 June, (extended network)51 (28P+23E) CEGRN'0520–25 June, (extended network)94 CEGRN'0612–18 June, 2006only CGPS44 CEGRN'0718–23 June, (extended network)95 CEGRN'0922–27 June, (extended network)85 CEGRN'1120–25 June, (extended network)74 CEGRN'1316–22 June, CEGRN'1514–20 June, (UPA+MAO)

CEGRN 2015 stations (22 UKR stations removed from the list)

CEGRN 2015 Network

Prepare data EPN_A Class stations A priori coordinates RINEX filesOrbits, ERP: repro2 PCVs, DCBs, HOI,… Daily GNSS analysis Campaign weekly stacking (MC) Check residuals Remove oultiers Export weekly normal equations, coordinates,… Processing of a weekly campaign (EUREF guidelines)

Stacking of weekly campaigns (EUREF guidelines) Prepare data EPN_A Class stations A priori coordinates and velocities Normal equationsSTA file to introduce set ups according to EPN_A C1830 Multiyear stacking (MC on coordinates and velocities constrained) Check residuals Remove oultiers Add setups of CEGRN sites (STA) Final products: Coordinates, velocities, SNX file,…

CEGRN 2015 Solution The CEGRN 2015 Solution is a combination of two solutions at the NEQ level. 1.UPA — University of Padua, Italy: A.Former CEGRN network. B.32 new stations in the Western Ukraine. C.2 new sites in BIH. D.6 new Moldavian sites. 2.MAO — Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine (stations located in Ukraine and in the Eastern Europe).

Weekly results (mean repeatibilities) Repeatibility (mm) Computed Sites N E U CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN CEGRN 2015 (UPA) CEGRN 2015 (MAO) REPRO2 implies consistent quality for years GLONASS was included Guidelines for densification strictly implemented Class A EPN sites for datum definition; solution numbers of EPN_A and B sites implemented

UPA vs MAO: Helmert Transformation Parameters With Respect to Combined Solution

Cummulative results (combined vs individual)

Horizontal Velocities (ETRF2000) of proposed class A sites

Vertical Velocities of proposed class A sites

Conclusions (I) We have completed 12 CEGRN campaigns bringing data spanning 1996–2015. DOMES numbers and IGS log files are required for number of CEGRN sites. Increasing data in 2015 thanks to Ukraine, Moldova, and Serbia contributed new sites. The velocities of old CEGRN sites become more reliable and more accurate velocities from the Ukrainian, Moldovian, and Serbian sites are expected in the near future. Likewise for Bosnia and Herzegovina, for example, that contributed with considerable number of stations in 2013.

Conclusions (II) Grateful for successful cooperation with the Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kiev, Ukraine). We acknowledge to the System Solutions (Kiev, Ukraine), the Institute of Geodesy, Engineering Research and Cadastre "INGEOCAD" (Chisinau, Moldova), and Republic Geodetic Authority (Belgrade, Serbia) for providing data for new GNSS stations.