Force Microscopy of Non-adherent Cells: A Comparison of Leukemia Cell Deformability Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, and Daniel A. Fletcher Biophysical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanics of Materials II
Advertisements

Geometrically Optimized mPAD Device for Cell Adhesion Professor Horacio Espinosa – ME 381 Final Project Richard Besen Albert Leung Feng Yu Yan Zhao Fall.
Constitutive Equations CASA Seminar Wednesday 19 April 2006 Godwin Kakuba.
Mechanical Properties of Biological Materials Chapter 14 KINE 3301 Biomechanics of Human Movement.
A Biomechanical Comparison of Cancerous and Normal Cell Plasma Membranes Olivia Beane Syracuse University BRITE 2009.
ME-381 Dec. 5Xiaohui Tan, Rui Qiao A STUDY ON CELL ADHESION BY USING MEMS TECHNOLOGY Rui Qiao Xiaohui Tan ME-381 Dec. 5.
Get to the point!. AFM - atomic force microscopy A 'new' view of structure (1986) AlGaN/GaN quantum well waveguide CD stamper polymer growth surface atoms.
Using Contact Probes For Nanomechanical Measurements Mark R. VanLandingham U. S. Army Research Laboratory Instrumentation and Metrology for Nanotechnology.
2.002 Tutorial Presentation Problem 1-Atomic Force Microscopy Justin Lai.
Protein Adsorption Affects Osteoblast- Glass Adhesion Strength as Measured by Colloidal Probe Atomic Force Microscopy Jackson Cahn Whitman College.
Cover of Scientific American, October Source: Actuator driven by thermal expansion of water and air.
EEM. Nanotechnology and Nanoelectronics
Force Microscopy of Nonadherent Cells: A Comparison of Leukemia Cell Deformability Rosenbluth, Lam, and Fletcher (2006) Presented by: Aisha Bobb-Semple.
Topic 10: Cell Mechanics 4/26/07 BE112b. Collagenous Tissue Testing: Summary of Key Points Tissue testing considerations include –Various possible configurationsconfigurations.
Topic 12: Cell Mechanics. David Rogers, Vanderbilt University Cells are dynamic, constantly reorganizing their cytoskeleton.
Today, we will study data obtained using three techniques: Micropipette aspiration Force range: 10 pN – 1000 nN soft cells hard cells Optical tweezers.
Characterisation of mechanical properties
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Sangjin Ryu Department of Mechanical Engineering
Myosin II Activity Softens Cells in Suspension
Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages (October 2013)
The Effects of Ionising Radiation on Cell Mechanics
Tapping mode AFM: simulation and experiment
Benoit Tesson, Michael I. Latz  Biophysical Journal 
Imaging Structural Proteins
Mechanical Properties of Actin Stress Fibers in Living Cells
Cellular Stiffness as a Novel Stemness Marker in the Corneal Limbus
Surface ultrastructure and mechanical property of human chondrocyte revealed by atomic force microscopy  C.-H. Hsieh, Ph.D., Y.-H. Lin, Ph.D., S. Lin,
Guillaume T. Charras, Mike A. Horton  Biophysical Journal 
The Nano-Scale Mechanical Properties of the Extracellular Matrix Regulate Dermal Fibroblast Function  Volker F. Achterberg, Lara Buscemi, Heike Diekmann,
M.G. Mendez, D. Restle, P.A. Janmey  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Local Viscoelastic Properties of Live Cells Investigated Using Dynamic and Quasi-Static Atomic Force Microscopy Methods  Alexander Cartagena, Arvind Raman 
Susanne Karsch, Deqing Kong, Jörg Großhans, Andreas Janshoff 
Maxim E. Dokukin, Nataliia V. Guz, Igor Sokolov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)
Creep Function of a Single Living Cell
Lateral Mechanical Coupling of Stereocilia in Cochlear Hair Bundles
Stiffness Tomography by Atomic Force Microscopy
Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, Daniel A. Fletcher 
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 91, Issue 9, Pages (November 2006)
Alina Hategan, Richard Law, Samuel Kahn, Dennis E. Discher 
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Shamik Sen, Shyamsundar Subramanian, Dennis E. Discher 
Magnetic Tweezer System Development
Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance
Thomas L. Daniel, Alan C. Trimble, P. Bryant Chase  Biophysical Journal 
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
E.M. Darling, Ph.D., S. Zauscher, Ph.D., F. Guilak, Ph.D. 
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Leukocyte Rolling on P-Selectin: A Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Effect of Cytoplasmic Viscosity  Damir B. Khismatullin, George A. Truskey 
Quantitative Analysis of the Viscoelastic Properties of Thin Regions of Fibroblasts Using Atomic Force Microscopy  R.E. Mahaffy, S. Park, E. Gerde, J.
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
R. Gueta, D. Barlam, R.Z. Shneck, I. Rousso  Biophysical Journal 
The Role of Stretching in Slow Axonal Transport
Atomic force microscopy system showing the cantilever tip that was used to estimate properties of the cuticle substrate. Atomic force microscopy system.
Prisca Schär-Zammaretti, Job Ubbink  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Direct Measurements of Drag Forces in C. elegans Crawling Locomotion
Frequency-Dependent Shear Impedance of the Tectorial Membrane
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Force Microscopy of Non-adherent Cells: A Comparison of Leukemia Cell Deformability Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, and Daniel A. Fletcher Biophysical Journal, 2006 Sophie Wong , MIT November 20, 2008

Background AFM used to quantify mechanical properties of biological material Current methods for measuring elasticity and viscoelasticity – Require indentation of cells adhered to substrate – Not feasible for non-adherent cells Increased stiffness of lymphocytes may be the cause of diabetes mellitus and leukemia

Three Goals Develop method for characterizing and comparing deformability of leukemia cells Compare mechanical properties of – myeloid (HL60) and lymphoid (Jurkat) lines – normal neutrophils Compare Hertzian Mechanics Model vs. Liquid Droplet Model

Developing the Method Used microfabricated wells to trap cells 50 µm2 µm Array of 8 – 20 µm diameter wells Jurkat and HL60 cells trapped in 13.6 µm wells Neutrophils trapped in 10.8 µm wells

Deflection-position curve Cantilever deflection small compared to indentation Piezo platform extended at constant rate = 1506 nm/s Deflect cantilever until ~ 800pN applied or cell indented 3 µm HL60

HL60s stiffer than Jurkat cells and neutrophils consistent with a model of leukostasis Stiffness contributes to vessel blockage 855 Pa 48 Pa 156 Pa

Fitting the model Models used to determine cell elasticity and viscoelasticity Hertzian Mechanics Model assumptions – Homogeneous, Isotropic, Linear, Elastic (HILE) – Material undergoes infinitesimally small strains Liquid Droplet Model assumptions – Internal contents are homogeneous viscous – Cortical tension constant around cell – Cortical shell deforms around tip during indentation – Radius of cell remains constant during indentation

Hertzian Model fits better Gray line = data Dash line = Hertzian mechanics model Dotted line = Liquid droplet model

Significance & Future Studies Deformability of leukemic cells plays important role in leukostasis Where does difference in cell stiffness originate? – Filament networks? – Cytoplasm? – Nuclear or cell membranes? Investigate other factors involved in leukostasis: adhesion, transmigration

Questions?