Center for Information and Communication Studies Shaping the Future of Scholarly Communication Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee (Visiting University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
+ Making Web2.0 Researchable Web2.0 and Scholarly Communication innovation and use James Stewart.
Advertisements

Center for Information and Communication Studies Just Because You Don’t See Them, Doesn’t Mean They Aren’t There: Tracing Scholars and Their Use of Resources.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Altmetrics and Traditional Metrics: What Do Scholars Use to Judge Quality? Carol Tenopir University of.
Measuring Value and Outcomes of Reading Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee Fiesole April 2010.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Assessment of the Use, Value and ROI of All Academic Library Services Donald W. King Honorary University.
JISC National E-Books Observatory Mark Carden, Ingram Digital With thanks to Prof. David Nicholas CIBER, UCL Centre for Publishing University College London.
C. Tenopir 1 Scholarly Publishing at the Crossroads Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Digital trends shaping e-commerce and content in South Africa
ROI in Libraries Measuring a Library’s Value: Why, Who, How Chrysanne Lowe, Elsevier Paula Kaufman, UIUC Lynn Wiley, UIUC.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring (and Increasing) the Value of Academic Libraries Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Center for Information and Communication Studies University Investments in the Library: Measuring the Return Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES The Future of Scholarly Publication Dr Paul Ayris Director of UCL Library Services and UCL Copyright Officer
HOW ELECTRONIC JOURNALS ARE CHANGING ENGINEERS’ INFORMATION SEEKING & READING PATTERNS Donald W. King University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences.
Return on Investment in Academic Research Libraries: Phase 2-The Role of Libraries in the Grants Process Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Center for Information and Communication Studies Demonstrating The Value of Scholarly Collections Through ROI and Other Methods Carol TenopirKira CooperRegina.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Beyond Usage: Measuring Library Outcomes and Value Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
1 Connecting with Faculty Perceptions and Behaviors Dr. Karla Hahn Collection Management Team Leader University of Maryland Libraries.
Measuring Readings by Surveys Using Critical Incident Technique Surveys of Scientists and Engineers: Ensuring Reliable Research Evidence for Good Practice.
Literature Review Week 3 Lecture 1. School of Information Technologies Faculty of Science, College of Sciences and Technology The University of Sydney.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring Value and ROI of Academic Libraries: The IMLS Lib-Value Project Carol Tenopir University of.
Rise of E-Reading  Pew Internet and American Life,
Electronic or Print: Are Scholarly Journals Still Important? Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, USA.
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Center for Information and Communication Studies Trust in Reading, Citing, and Publishing Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA
Center for Information and Communication Studies The Link Among Faculty Purposes of Reading, Information Seeking Patterns, Aspects of Use, Value and the.
Lib-Value: Can We Determine the Value of Academic Libraries? Paula Kaufman, UIUC Texas Library Association April 25, 2013 COSTSBENEFITS WHAT WE GIVE (INVESTMENT)
Value of Scholarly Reading to Graduate Work: An Academic Survey of 3 U.S. Universities Rachel Volentine, Liz Whitson; University of Tennessee; College.
Swapan Deoghuria Scientist-II, Computer Centre Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Kolkata , INDIA URL:
Center for Information and Communication Studies Donald W. King Adjunct Professor University of Tennessee Bryant University
What Does Usage Data Tell Us? Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Measuring the Value of Academic Libraries
Electronic Publishing and the Economics of Information Part II Implications for Libraries Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Fall 2003 Library Liaison Meeting. Agenda Introductions Role of Liaison Ordering schedule Library News –Valuable services to your department –Budget –Books.
Group 1 Case Study Presentation Proposal for Open Access (OA) Library Leadership Institute 2014.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring and Applying Data about Users in the Seton Hall Library Carol Tenopir Rachel Volentine Lisa.
Knowing Journal Users: Methods for User-Focused Research and a Case Study of Pediatricians Carol Tenopir Univ. of Michael Clarke.
Building Bridges Miles Conrad Lecture 2006 Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee
What Do Faculty Think of the Changing Environment? Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld April 17, 2007.
1 C. Tenopir Quality in the Online Environment Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
The Impact of Scholarly Communication on LIS Education Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Measuring Value and Outcomes of Reading Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Gaining and Maintaining Supported Researcher Status Knowing the Rules of the Game June 2007.
History and Hysteria Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee & Donald W. King Society of Scholarly Publishing Annual Meeting.
Measuring Value and ROI of Academic Libraries: The IMLS Lib-Value Project Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee Charleston 2011.
Journal Reading Patterns of Medical Faculty in a Digital Age Carol Tenopir
Maximizing Library Investments in Digital Collections Through Better Data Gathering and Analysis (MaxData) Carol Tenopir and Donald.
Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007.
Perceptions of Value and Value Beyond Perceptions Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Indexing of Tables and Figures: Scientists’ Reaction Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
How Scientists Use Journals: Electronic and Print Carol Tenopir Donald W. King
Are academic journals becoming obsolete? Ted Bergstrom University of California, Santa Barbara.
Tina Chrzastowski Lynn Wiley Jean-Louise Zancanella University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Incorporating Ebooks into Humanities Scholarship: Results.
Communication Patterns of Engineers Carol Tenopir
Undergraduate Science Students and Electronic Scholarly Journals Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
C.Tenopir Using E-Journals To Promote Information Worldwide Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries - What Libraries Are Doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
USE PATTERN OF ELECTRONIC JOURNALS BY FACULTY MEMEBRS IN K.L.UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A STUDY Smt. K. Usha Rani Librarian K L University, Vaddeswaram Guntur,
Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/ How Electronic Journals Are Changing Scholarly Reading Patterns.
Researching Researchers: What User Studies Tell Us.
Use Patterns of Print and Electronic Journals Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, School of Information Sciences
The Gutenberg-e Online History Project Changing Roles of players and implications for scholarly communication.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Scholarly Reading in a Digital Age: Some things change, some stay the same Carol Tenopir University of.
The Use and Value of Scientific Journals Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee.
Patterns of Journal Use: What Are Our Users Telling Us? Carol Tenopir
Introduction In these challenging economic times, the value of academic libraries to the institution’s core goals and mission comes under close scrutiny.
Does e-Resources access improve Academic and Research Productivity
Are Academic Journals Still Relevant for Researchers?
Use Patterns of Print and Electronic Journals
The Use and Value of Scientific Journals: Impact on Practitioners
Presentation transcript:

Center for Information and Communication Studies Shaping the Future of Scholarly Communication Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee (Visiting University of New South Wales through April)

Center for Information and Communication Studies Diffusion of Innovations Everett Rogers

Center for Information and Communication Studies ipads-three-times-faster-than-normal-books/

Center for Information and Communication Studies

Reading and scholarship surveys  Purpose, outcome, and value from scholarly reading  Differences by discipline, status, or age of reader  Details on how and where readings are discovered, obtained, and used and format of reading  How has this changed over time?  How does social media influence reading?  Data sharing and re-use practices and opinions of scientists

Center for Information and Communication Studies Types of questions: 1.Demographic 2.Recollection 3.Critical Incident 4.Comments Data surveys also ask opinions, agreement/disagreement Therefore, insights into both READERS and READINGS

Center for Information and Communication Studies The following questions in this section refer to the SCHOLARLY ARTICLE YOU READ MOST RECENTLY, even if you had read it previously. Note that this last reading may not be typical, but will help us establish the range of patterns in reading. Critical incident of last reading

Center for Information and Communication Studies The following questions in this section refer to the BOOK FROM WHICH YOU READ MOST RECENTLY, even if you had read it previously. Note that this last reading may not be typical, but will help us establish the range of patterns in reading. Critical incident of last reading

Center for Information and Communication Studies The following questions in this section refer to the OTHER PUBLICATION YOU READ MOST RECENTLY, even if you had read it previously. Note that this last reading may not be typical, but will help us establish the range of patterns in reading. Critical incident of last reading

Center for Information and Communication Studies 6 conclusions 1.Scholarly reading remains essential 2.E-access has made a difference 3.Book reading is different 4.Social media users also read traditional materials 5.There are barriers to data sharing 6.Successful academics read more

Center for Information and Communication Studies 1. Scholarly reading remains essential to academic work.

Center for Information and Communication Studies Academics read a lot of material n=2117, 6 UK institutions, June 2011

Center for Information and Communication Studies Article readings 1977 to present by scientists and social scientists * * (US) n=419, (UK),n=1013; (Australia), n= 133; 2005,n=932; , n=397; 1993, n=70; 1984, n=865; 1977, n=2350 Readings per year

Center for Information and Communication Studies Change in Scholarly Article Reading and Time Spent per Reading on Average for U.S. Academics

Center for Information and Communication Studies Research & writing is the most likely principal purpose of reading (US numbers lower than UK) n=2117, 6 UK universities, June 2011 Article Readings Book Readings Other Publication Readings 74% 58% 45% 59% 47% 31%

Center for Information and Communication Studies Readings for research are.. Read longer Read with greater care Less likely to be skimmed Ranked more highly valuable to purpose

Center for Information and Communication Studies 2. E-access has made a difference.

Center for Information and Communication Studies Use of electronic sources: 2005 n=1105, 5 US universities 2005

Center for Information and Communication Studies Did you obtain the article from a print or electronic source? U.S (2012) U.K (2011) n=1163 n=609 US Jan 2013, UK: June 2011

Center for Information and Communication Studies Use of library collections for articles n=775 UK: 6 UK universities June 2011 US: January 2013 n=609

Center for Information and Communication Studies Format of last article reading n=923

Center for Information and Communication Studies Format of last article reading

Center for Information and Communication Studies

Where academics are obtaining articles: UK, n=1189, June 2011; US, n=609 January 2013 Percent

Center for Information and Communication Studies n=764, 6 UK universities, June 2011 Just because they read from library collections (library collections only)… n=327, 5 US universities, January 2013 UK, 2011

Center for Information and Communication Studies Yet … [journals] remain central to what I produce and what I consume. However, I find myself looking at blogs more. I don’t think people actually read journal articles as much as conference proceedings. They are too long and too out of date…They are just citation fodder. … there are many sources that are vitally important that are neither online nor in the collection, necessitating the ILL process. Frankly, I turn to purchasing many out of print books.

Center for Information and Communication Studies 3. Book reading is different from article reading.

Center for Information and Communication Studies The library is the source of scholarly articles, not books % library-provided n=2117, 6 UK universities, June % 28% 9%

Center for Information and Communication Studies Percent of readings from e-books Percent n=458, 5 US universities, January 2013

Center for Information and Communication Studies The library book collection supports younger academics % library-provided n=2117, 6 UK universities, June 2011

Center for Information and Communication Studies 4. Social media users also read traditional materials.

Center for Information and Communication Studies How many types of social media do you use (read/view)? n=1028, June 9, 2011, 6 U.K universities

Center for Information and Communication Studies Top 3 social media used occasionally n=2117, June 9, 2011, 6 U.K universities Percent 100%

Center for Information and Communication Studies How many types of social media do you create? n=1031 June 9, U.K universities

Center for Information and Communication Studies Top 3 social media created occasionally June 9, 2011, 6 U.K universities Percent n=194n=212 n=258

Center for Information and Communication Studies 5. Many researchers are interested in sharing or re- using data, but there are barriers and conditions.

Center for Information and Communication Studies Interest in Data Sharing

Center for Information and Communication Studies Gap Between Willingness to Share and Accessibility

Center for Information and Communication Studies Reasons for Not Making Data Available

Center for Information and Communication Studies 40 Conditions for Data Sharing

Center for Information and Communication Studies 6. Successful academics read more.

Center for Information and Communication Studies Award-winning academics read more Per Month n=2117, 6 UK universities, June 2011

Center for Information and Communication Studies  Reads more of every type of material.  Spends more time per book and other publication readings.  Uses the library for articles  More often buys books and obtains other publications from the Internet.  Occasionally participates and creates social media content. Portrait of a successful academic: In last 2 years: Has won an award and published four or more items.

Center for Information and Communication Studies Moving forward… Will e-books change scholarly reading? What is the library role in open access? How do mobile devices change reading? How do we face sociocultural challenges of data sharing and re-use? What features/systems help readers the most?

Center for Information and Communication Studies Carol Tenopir