Cross-National Impact of Victim Offender Mediation Mark S. Umbreit, Ph.D. Center for Restorative Justice & Peacemaking University of Minnesota College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restorative Justice Programs in Schools Summarized from T. S. Jones and R. Compton (Eds.), Kids Working It Out: Stories and Strategies for Making Peace.
Advertisements

School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Restorative Justice in Australia Hennessey Hayes School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Griffith University.
Mandated Community Service is in all Youth Justice Programs. Mandated Community Service – Requires the youthful offender to help the community. – The youth.
The Scottish Association for the Study of Offending Glasgow Branch Annual Conference 12 May 2008 Community Courts: Bringing Community Justice into the.
Which Restorative Justice Programs are Most Effective? Jason Carr Megan Chambers Morgan Jerri Jason Carr Megan Chambers Morgan Jerri.
Evidence Best Practices & Latest Research Presented by: Dr. Cary Heck University of Wyoming National Association of Drug Court Professionals Developed.
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Restorative Dialogue: A Transformative Journey of Peacemaking Mark S. Umbreit, Ph.D. Center for Restorative Justice & Peacemaking University of Minnesota,
National Commission on Restorative Justice Presentation to ACJRD on Commission Report April 2010.
JDCA 2008 and Juvenile Court Initiatives. Recommendations/ Areas of Inquiry Individual rights Meaningful court participation Comprehensible hearings Individualized.
Juvenile Offenders. Purpose What is the purpose of the JO system?
THE MEDIAION & DIALOGUE PROCESS: PHASES AND TASKS Mark Umbreit Center for Restorative Justice and Peacemaking School of Social Work, University of Minnesota.
Presentation to the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission April 13, 2015 Judy Clarke, Executive Director, Virginia Center For Restorative Justice Mark.
Agenda: Zinc recap Where are we? Outcomes and comparisons Intimate Partner Violence Judicial Oversight Evaluation Projects: Program Theory and Evaluation.
RESTORE1 RESTORE: Restorative Justice for Sexual Violence Sisco, M., Koss, M.P., Bachar, K.J., & Carlson, C. (2004, March 4)
YCJA THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Provides public education about the law, especially the.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Restorative Justice For Victims, Offenders and Community
URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center The OJJDP Evaluation of Teen Courts (ETC) Project Janeen Buck Jeffrey Butts October 23, 2002 National Youth Court.
Thinking for a Change Cognitive Skills Program Outcome Evaluation Carver County Court Services.
R ESTORATIVE J USTICE Presented November 8, 2014 By: The California Conference for Equality and Justice Sunshine Daye, Restorative Community Conferencing.
Criminal Law and Young People
Victim-Offender Mediation Impact upon Youth Crime Presented by Betty Noreen, Mediation Advisor North Star Youth Mediation Program (907) , fax (907)
Youth Justice Convention 24 November 2010 Kelvin Doherty Assistant Director Youth Justice Agency.
Restorative Justice for Juvenile Justice:
Hennepin County School/Shared Social Work Project Social Work Project May 16, 2013 Mark Griffin Senior Assistant County Attorney.
Restorative Practices before Accusation Diversion for Promoting Compensation for Victims in Austria Karin Bruckmüller University of Vienna Best practices.
Introduction to Restorative Justice Borbala Fellegi Training for Commissioners in Serbia 12 June 2007, Belgrade.
Restorative Justice & Crime Presented at Annex Business Mediation, Toronto, Ontario, June 10, 2015 Presented by Mark Yantzi, Restorative Opportunities.
Prevention and Early Intervention Linking Long-Term Vision with Short-Term Costs J effrey P oirier, B.A. M ary M agee Q uinn, Ph.D. American Institutes.
Chapter 11 SENTENCING AND SANCTIONS 1. Purpose of Criminal Sanctions  Criminal Sanctions – A penalty imposed for violating accepted social norms. A sanction.
M EDIATION WITH OUR OWN COLLEAGUES ? Cooperation between courts, prosecutors and mediators Borbala Fellegi, PhD. Foresee Research Group, Hungary Mediation.
Better Courts 2015 Lord Alex Carlile of Berriew CBE, QC.
Restorative Justice Programs Alternatives to Traditional Sentences.
Collective efficacy and restorative justice as a crime prevention strategy Frederick P. Roth, PhD. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Marshall University.
Restorative Justice: Processes and Practices. Navajo Peacemaking Formal community response to help people in need Formal community response to help people.
Vicki Smith Restorative Justice Worker
Raise the Age Lessons from the first 2 years. Background: CT added 16-year-olds to the juvenile system January 1, 2010.
Week 28.  an act that would be considered a crime if committed by an adult.
Community Accountability Boards Creating Opportunities for the Peaceful Resolution of Crime.
Mediation in the cases of juvenile offenders in Croatia Antonija Žižak, PhD University of Zagreb Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences “European.
What is Restorative Justice?  Restorative justice is a response to crime that focuses on restoring the losses suffered by victims, holding offenders.
Qualifications and trainings for mediators in Germany 1.General overview 2.Legal framework 3.Training courses by the VOM service office.
European Forum for Restorative Justice National Commission for Restorative Justice Workshop Presentation.
Youth Justice in Canada Eva Moore, MD, MSPH University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Presented at SAHM, Austin, TX 2014.
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE. What is Restorative Justice? ■ Restorative justice involves individuals who have a stake in a particular offence, including the victim,
CJA 204 Week 5 Individual Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Crime Article To purchase this material click
CJA 374 Week 3 Learning Team Juvenile and Adult Courts A Comparative Analysis Write a 1,000 to 1,500 word paper comparing and contrasting Juvenile Court.
CJS 200 Week 9 Final Project Juvenile Crime Paper Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
CJS 240 Week 5 DQ 1 And DQ 2 Week 5 DQ 1 What is more important - freedom of press to publish pictures and names of juvenile offenders or juvenile's rights.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Restorative Justice in Canada
Nova Scotia Restorative Justice Program
Research Design and Outcomes
1. RJ inside/outside the criminal justice system
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE EVALUATIONS: WHAT WORKS?
What is Restorative Justice?
CJS 245 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
CJS 245 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
CJS 245 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
CJS 245 STUDY Education for Service-- cjs245study.com.
CJS 245 Inspiring Innovation-- snaptutorial.com
What is our Youth Justice System Like?
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
PEACEBUILDING MINISTRIES
Illinois Balanced and Restorative Justice
Restorative Justice Dialogue: Key Ethical Standards
CHAPTER 1 Juvenile Justice: Definitions, Measurements and Process
UNDERSTANDING restorative APPROACHES
Presentation transcript:

Cross-National Impact of Victim Offender Mediation Mark S. Umbreit, Ph.D. Center for Restorative Justice & Peacemaking University of Minnesota College of Education & Human Development School of Social Work

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Total Aggregate Sample ____ victims ____ victims ____ offenders (juveniles) Multiple Sites - Albuquerque - Austin, TX - Oakland, CA - Minneapolis

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Victim Satisfaction Referral of Case to VOM 79% of victims of juvenile crime were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation: victims in VOM were significantly more likely to be satisfied than those in the comparison group (normal court process).79% of victims of juvenile crime were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation: victims in VOM were significantly more likely to be satisfied than those in the comparison group (normal court process).

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Offender Satisfaction Referral of Case to VOM 87% of juvenile offenders were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation.87% of juvenile offenders were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation.

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Victim Perception of Fairness of VOM Process 83% victims of juvenile crime felt mediation process was fair.83% victims of juvenile crime felt mediation process was fair.

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Victim Perception of Fairness of VOM Process Victims in VOM were significantly more likely to experience fairness than those in the comparison group (normal court process).Victims in VOM were significantly more likely to experience fairness than those in the comparison group (normal court process).

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Offender Perception of Fairness of VOM Process 89% of juvenile offenders felt the mediation process was fair.89% of juvenile offenders felt the mediation process was fair.

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Victim Satisfaction with Mediation Outcome 90% of victims of juvenile crime were satisfied with mediation outcome.90% of victims of juvenile crime were satisfied with mediation outcome.

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Offender Satisfaction with Mediation Outcome 91% of juvenile offenders were satisfied with mediation outcome.91% of juvenile offenders were satisfied with mediation outcome.

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Restitution Completion Juvenile offenders in VOM were significantly more likely to complete restitution payment to victims (81%) than similar offenders in the comparison group (normal court process).Juvenile offenders in VOM were significantly more likely to complete restitution payment to victims (81%) than similar offenders in the comparison group (normal court process).

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Recidivism Juvenile offenders in VOM were significantly less likely to commit a new offense (18%) than similar offenders in the comparison group (27%).Juvenile offenders in VOM were significantly less likely to commit a new offense (18%) than similar offenders in the comparison group (27%).

UNITED STATES Multi-Site Study of 4 Programs in 4 States (Umbreit, 1994) Victim Fear of Re-victimization Victims of juvenile crime were significantly less fearful of being victimized by the offender after meeting them (10%), than before (23%).Victims of juvenile crime were significantly less fearful of being victimized by the offender after meeting them (10%), than before (23%).

CANADA Multi-site Study of 4 Programs in 4 Provinces (Umbreit, 1995) Victim Satisfaction Referral of Case to VOM Referral of Case to VOM 78% of victims of adult and juvenile crime were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation: victims in VOM were significantly more likely to be satisfied than those in the comparison group (normal court process).78% of victims of adult and juvenile crime were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation: victims in VOM were significantly more likely to be satisfied than those in the comparison group (normal court process).

CANADA Multi-site Study of 4 Programs in 4 Provinces (Umbreit, 1995) Offender Satisfaction with Referral of Case to VOM 74% of adult and juvenile offenders were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation: offenders in VOM were significantly more likely to be satisfied than those in the comparison group (normal court process).74% of adult and juvenile offenders were satisfied with the justice system referral of their case to mediation: offenders in VOM were significantly more likely to be satisfied than those in the comparison group (normal court process).

CANADA Multi-site Study of 4 Programs in 4 Provinces (Umbreit, 1995) Victim Perception of Fairness of VOM Process 80% victims of adult and juvenile crime felt mediation process was fair: victims in VOM were signifi-cantly more likely to experience fairness than those in the comparison group (normal court process).80% victims of adult and juvenile crime felt mediation process was fair: victims in VOM were signifi-cantly more likely to experience fairness than those in the comparison group (normal court process).

CANADA Multi-site Study of 4 Programs in 4 Provinces (Umbreit, 1995) Offender Perception of Fairness of VOM Process 80% of adult and juvenile offenders felt the mediation process was fair: offenders in VOM were significantly more likely to experience fairness than those in the comparison group (normal court process).80% of adult and juvenile offenders felt the mediation process was fair: offenders in VOM were significantly more likely to experience fairness than those in the comparison group (normal court process).

Victim Satisfaction with Mediation Outcome 89% of victims of adult and juvenile crime were satisfied with mediation outcome.89% of victims of adult and juvenile crime were satisfied with mediation outcome. CANADA Multi-site Study of 4 Programs in 4 Provinces (Umbreit, 1995)

Offender Satisfaction with Mediation Outcome 91% of juvenile offenders were satisfied with mediation outcome.91% of juvenile offenders were satisfied with mediation outcome.

CANADA Multi-site Study of 4 Programs in 4 Provinces (Umbreit, 1995) Victim Perception of Fairness of Restitution Agreements 92% of victims of adult and juvenile crime felt the mediated restitution agreement was fair.92% of victims of adult and juvenile crime felt the mediated restitution agreement was fair.

Offender Perception of Fairness of Restitution Agreements 92% of adult and juvenile offenders felt the mediated restitution agreement was fair.92% of adult and juvenile offenders felt the mediated restitution agreement was fair. CANADA Multi-site Study of 4 Programs in 4 Provinces (Umbreit, 1995)