Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Node Locations 01-16-08 WMS Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TNT Commercial Operations Working Meeting Betty Day, Kenneth Ragsdale, BJ Flowers April 6&7, 2004.
Advertisements

Distributed Generation (DG)
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Raine Cotton  Registered DG settlement is in accordance with Protocol Section as Real-Time Energy Imbalance at a Load.
TPTF Presentation Registration of PUN Facilities December 19, 2007.
1 Dead Bus Pricing Issue/CRR Performance Issue TAC 3 February, 2010.
1 GENMAP Registration Workshop Jan 14, 2010.
December 2, 2011 QMWG Summary of Potential Issues with NPRR385 Price Floor ERCOT.
1 Market Trials Congestion Revenue Rights Weekly Update May 21, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
CRR Auction Scope John Moseley. To outline aspects of the CRR market process to assure that these proposed CRR market protocols (as interpreted by ERCOT.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Mar 13, 2009.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
SIMPLE TRANSMISSION OUTAGE. Nodal Protocol Definition 2.26 Simple Transmission Outage A Planned Outage or Maintenance Outage of any Transmission Element.
Texas Nodal Section 9: Invoicing ERCOT, Settlements & Billing SDAWG - August 2007.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Private Use Networks SIG Paper Review TPTF Meeting (version :15)
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
April 28, 2008 Constraint Competitiveness Tests, an Overview Congestion Management Working Group.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call June Data Collection Window Aug 14, 2009.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal LFC Testing Review Review of materials presented at TAC Changes in Market Trials schedule and activities.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
EMS Users Conference 1 September 23rd – 26th CIM in the Network Model Management System Joel Koepke Network Model Engineer, ERCOT.
Nodal MIS Portal Project MIS Functions to Support EDS 3, Release 5 September 11, 2007.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Registration Kick-off Meeting Matt Mereness June 6 th, 2007.
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Electrical Buses – 2Texas Nodal Electrical Bus Definition as Proposed in NPRR 63 Electrical Bus A physical transmission element.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Day-Ahead CRR Settlements Business Requirements TPTF Presentation ERCOT Settlements.
DREAM November Meeting. Agenda Introduction and Expectations Path to becoming a Resource Node – ERCOT Registration process for non-modeled resources –
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Mar 27, 2009.
1 Update to NATF on Resource Registration Feb 2, 2010.
2% Shift Factor rule and associated price discrepancies Kris Dixit 1.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager NATF 31 August 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS 3 Early Delivery System Plan TPTF April 02, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
NDSWG Report June 16, NDSWG Report Regular meeting held May 16 in Taylor Telemetry / State Estimator Update Naming Convention Electrical Bus Designation.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 TPTF Update Trip Doggett.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Node Locations WMS Subgroup Meeting.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Data Update Aug 25, 2008.
Resource Registration Update Dana Showalter Patrick Coon March 4, 2008.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS 4 Early Delivery System Plan TPTF May 22 nd, 2007.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Reduction of MMS Vendor Effort for TPTF January 8, 2008 Murray Nixon Sai Moorty.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager TAC 2 September 2010.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations June 27, 2012 – ETWG Meeting.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
CRR Network Model One-Line Diagram Beth Garza TPTF April 22, 2008.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Real Time Voltage Support Settlements Business Requirements.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
EDS 3 Release 5 SCED Testing Update - TPTF Daryl Cote August 28, 2007.
SYNERGY INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS4 - Approach 11/28/2007.
Texas Nodal Electrical Buses and Outage Scheduling.
TAC Update Kyle Patrick. 2 Nodal ERCOT Program Update –Nodal Market Go-Live (Vote)- vote passed in which TAC certified full nodal systems for Dec 1, 2010.
Nodal Planning Go Live Austin, TX February 3, 2011
CRR Deration and NPRR821 WMS 09/06/2017.
Nodal Program Update to Cops
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
John Dumas Director, Wholesale Market Operations
Presentation transcript:

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Node Locations WMS Meeting

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 2 Agenda Introduction Discussion Points Information and Answers to Questions Example Diagram for discussion Questions

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 3 Introduction – ERCOT Actions To Date 1)The spreadsheet posted had most of the Resource Nodes designated to be the “low side” of the Generation Step Up (GSU) transformer. 2)Tests have been conducted by ABB using the low side. 3)ERCOT has identified pros and cons for assigning the Resource Node to the low side or to the high-side of the GSU transformer.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 4 Discussion Points Pros: Low-side approach has been tested by ABB. Using the low-side is a more straight forward for Network Model management. No problem with voltage support. Either way will use measured Vars from Pi. Both ways result in the same LMP’s. Cons: Using the low side increases the instances in which the CRR’s are not included in the Deration Factor (DRF) calculation. Pros: No problem with voltage support. Either way will use measured Vars from Pi. Both ways result in the same LMP’s. Using the high side decreases the instances in which the CRR’s are not included in the DRF calculation. Cons: Resource Node on the high side introduces Network Model mapping complexity. May require more clarity to protocol definition. High side approach remains to be confirmed and tested. LOW-SIDEHIGH-SIDE

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 5 With the Resource Nodes (on low side of the GSU Xfrmer) 1)The model will have the “Connectivity Node” of the generator to the ERCOT system. This info will be passed to MMS as the Resource Node. 2)The model will have the locations of the CT’s used by the EPS meters to provide Settlement Quality measurement of the injections and withdrawals. These EPS locations are where the 15 minute price will be calculated and used for “RT Energy” settlement. 3)The ratings of the GSU Xfrmers are provided by the Resource Entity through the RARF and are entered into the model. These “elements” will NOT limit the flow by the CRR system. 4)A 15 minute price will be calculated for the Resource Node in the event that the Resource is off-line. 5)A 15 minute price will be calculated for the Resource Node in the event that the GSU Xfrmer is de-energized for maintenance. (The15-minute price is calculated as the average of other prices in the substation). 6)A 15 minute price will be calculated for a Resource Node in the event that the part of the substation or the entire substation with the Resource Node is de-energized. (A separate calculation would be performed that essentially sets the price to be equal to the substation average or the system wide average.)

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 6 With the Resource Nodes (mostly on the high side of the GSU Xfrmer) 1)The model will have the “Connectivity Node” of the generator which will indicate the generator’s connection to the ERCOT System. This info will be passed to MMS for power flow analysis. 2)The model will have the designated Resource Node for each Resource. This will be the point in which Offers are submitted, CRR’s are bought and sold, and Energy Only offers and bids can be made. DAM awards are settled at these Resource Nodes. 3)The model will have the locations of the CT’s used by the EPS meters to provide Settlement Quality measurement of the injections and withdrawals. These EPS locations are where the 15 minute price will be calculated and used for “ RT Energy” settlement. 4)The ratings of the GSU Xfrmers are provided by the Resource Entity through the RARF and are entered into the model. These “elements” will NOT limit the flow by the CRR system. 5)A 15 minute price will be calculated for the Resource Node in the event that the Resource is off-line. 6)A 15 minute price will be calculated for the Resource Node in the event that the GSU Xfrmer is de- energized for maintenance (without special sub-routine). 7)A 15 minute price will be calculated for a Resource Node in the event that the part of the substation or the entire substation with the Resource Node is de-energized. (A separate calculation would be performed that essentially sets the price to be equal to the substation average or the system wide average.)

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 7 Current Definition of Resource Node Resource Node (Current Definition) The Electrical Bus defined in the Network Operations Model at which a Resource's measured output is settled. For a Generation Resource that is connected to the ERCOT Transmission Grid only by one or more radial transmission lines that all originate at the Generation Resource and terminate in a single substation switchyard, the Resource Node is an Electrical Bus in that substation. For all other Generation Resources, the Resource Node is the Generation Resource's side of the Electrical Bus at which the Generation Resource is connected to the ERCOT Transmission Grid.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 8 Diagram for Discussion

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 9 Questions Other concerns not addressed. Timeline for performing analysis and finalizing direction. Questions ?