California Integrated Waste Management Board February 11, 2009 Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action AB 2296 Consulting Group Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
Advertisements

California Integrated Waste Management Board Contractor’s Report Framework for Evaluating End-of-Life Product Management Systems in California Presented.
GASB 49 –Accounting & Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations An Overview.
Rural Counties’ ESJPA Board December 13, 2007 Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance and Corrective Action Financial Assurances for Landfills.
The Process of Siting and Approving a New Landfill in Ontario
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Basic Assumptions Facilities managing MSW must go through Site Assignment Materials that are pre-sorted are not considered MSW Residuals remaining after.
Connecticut Remediation Programs Elsie Patton Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
Proposed Tire Broker Regulations Informal Online Workshop Wednesday, March 4, 2015.
EWL Legacy Mine Properties Perpetual Management Strategy
EPAs Proposed Ground Water Protection Standards 40 CFR 192 an Industry Perspective Peter Luthiger Mesteña Uranium LLC.
The Roll of GIS In School Board Planning. Presentation Overview ► Introduction ► Board’s Roll in the Planning Process ► GIS at York Catholic ► GIS At.
LEA Conference, Autumn 2007 Joseph Mello, Land Disposal Program Manager 1 WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR KRFR.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
E-Waste Management Policy and Strategy in Uganda
Icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved. “Study to Identify Potential Long-Term Threats and Financial Assurance Mechanisms for Long-Term.
AB 2296 Adopt Regulations by January 1, 2008 that:Adopt Regulations by January 1, 2008 that: –provide for an increase in the closure and PCM cost estimates.
ProFina - Project and Private Finance Feb 2002 Whither Private Sector Participation? Private Investment in the Utility Industries – Energy, Transport,
1 Stakeholder Workshop October 19, 2005 CIWMB Electronic Waste Recycling Program An Overview of Proposed Revisions to Emergency.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Strategic Policy Committee June 10, 2008 Item #15 (Committee Item G): Discussion And Request For Additional.
Icfi.com Study to Identify Potential Long-Term Threats and Financial Assurance Mechanisms for Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance and Corrective Action at.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
1 SAFEGROUNDS SAFety and Environmental Guidance for the Remediation of UK Nuclear and Defence Sites.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
Landfill Decomposition Time (yrs) Anaerobic Bioreactor Landfill Dry Tomb Landfill (dry site) Containment Failure Gas/Leachate Generation.
Beyond Collection: Washington State’s Beyond Waste Strategy for Reducing Hazardous Materials and Wastes Cheryl Smith Washington.
Slide 1 An Alfred McAlpine plc company. Thursday, 04 October 2007 Land Management Guidance (v2) Philippa Towler.
Financial Accounting and Its Environment Chapter 1.
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance and Corrective Action Cost Estimates and Financial Assurance Demonstrations for Landfills General Overview of Regulatory.
Overview of Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) Presentation made at the European Commission 7 th Framework Programme on Capacity Building Workshop.
Chapter 46 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Cal/EPA Building Room 550 Financial Assurances Phase II Informal Rulemaking Group Meeting May 12, :00 am to 12:00 pm Financial Assurances Phase II.
California Integrated Waste Management Board August 19, 2008 Item 6 Discussion And Request For Rulemaking Direction To Formally Notice The 45-Day Comment.
Sansone/Wal-Mart TIF Redevelopment Project Council Presentation April 18, 2012.
Revenue-Based Development Incentives Property Tax Revenues Bob Rychlicki Kane, McKenna and Associates, Inc.
INSTRUCTOR'S MANUAL Chapter 3 ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS.
How might a contaminated land regime work in N. Ireland? Dr Theresa Kearney Land and Resource Management Unit.
Preparing for 2017 RA Update March Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Board Meeting June 16, 2009 Item #8 Consideration Of Adoption Of The Recommendations To The Legislature In.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Tire Flow Study Along the California-Mexico Border Region Special Waste Committee Meeting California Integrated.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Update On Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action Financial Assurances Activities Permitting.
September 23, 2005 Local Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County Washington Program Funding.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
1 Public Meeting to Update the Board on Mandatory Commercial Waste Recycling October 21, 2011.
1 Program For Results Financing OP/BP 9.00 Agi Kiss WB Safeguards Training Workshop Almaty, December 2012.
Update On Landfill Long-Term Financial Assurances Activities For Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action.
Cal/EPA Building Room 550 Financial Assurances Corrective Action Workshop April 14, :00 am to 12:00 pm Financial Assurances Corrective Action Workshop.
California Integrated Waste Management Board January 12, 2009 Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action AB 2296 Consulting Group Workshop.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Strategic Policy Committee May 12, 2009 Committee Item E (Board #12) Discussion Of Information Related To.
Nov 2, Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions2. Overview of Oakland Special Education Landscape 3. Overview of Current Special Ed Arrangements in CA.
December 6, 2004CIWMB P&E Committee Workshop1 Postclosure Maintenance Postclosure Maintenance Beyond the Initial 30 Years and Financial Assurance Demonstrations.
Cal/EPA Building Room 550 Postclosure Maintenance Workshop March 10, :00 am to 12:00 pm Postclosure Maintenance Workshop March 10, :00 am to.
Public Workshop: Assembly Bill 274 State Solid Waste Postclosure and Corrective Action Trust Fund April 12,
California Integrated Waste Management Board Workshop July 9, 2009 AB 2296 Consulting Group Financial Assurances Phase II Rulemaking AB 2296 Consulting.
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
Pipeline Safety Program Stakeholder Workshop on Proposed Rulemaking PG – WAC (Annual Pipeline Fee Methodology - Gas) PL – WAC.
Principles for Recovery and Resolution of a Financial Market Infrastructure ACSDA Senior Leadership Summit – November 16 & 17, 2015.
Strategic Policy Development Committee May 12, 2009
Katherine Coates, Partner
Port Reception Facilities Directive
Presentation transcript:

California Integrated Waste Management Board February 11, 2009 Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action AB 2296 Consulting Group Workshop Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action AB 2296 Consulting Group Workshop 1

AGENDA 10: :15Introductions and General Overview 10:15 – 12:00Dealing with Divestiture Regulatory Add 5X Step-up for lack of continued performance Add Step-up to 15X for new owner/operator with Board waiver Change to 15X minimum for PCM Statutory Keep former owners/operators liable Make generators liable 12:00– 1:00Lunch 1:00 – 2:30Continue Morning Discussions (if necessary) 2:30 – 3:15Status of Pooled Fund Discussions 3:15 – 3:30Wrap Up and Next Steps 10: :15Introductions and General Overview 10:15 – 12:00Dealing with Divestiture Regulatory Add 5X Step-up for lack of continued performance Add Step-up to 15X for new owner/operator with Board waiver Change to 15X minimum for PCM Statutory Keep former owners/operators liable Make generators liable 12:00– 1:00Lunch 1:00 – 2:30Continue Morning Discussions (if necessary) 2:30 – 3:15Status of Pooled Fund Discussions 3:15 – 3:30Wrap Up and Next Steps 2

Managing Long-Term PCM Risk of Landfill System Scenario Assured Risk Unassured Risk Std Rural Publics Sgl Pvt Defaults Divest -itures Total 43X$5,5900$11$26$263$ X4,562$1, X2,9722, X2,1532, $ Status Quo 1,8223, $ in Millions over 100 years 3

How Long Does PCM FA $$ Last? 49X = perpetual 43X = 100 years 30X = 46 years 15X = 18 years 5X = 5 years 49X = perpetual 43X = 100 years 30X = 46 years 15X = 18 years 5X = 5 years 4

What is Current Phase II Reg Proposal? PCM and CA FA required as long as waste poses a threat 30X Annual PCM at start of period Annual Drawdown For First 15 Years 5X Step-downs For Good Performance Every 5 Years Minimum 5X PCM Throughout Period Non-water CA Uses Existing Reasonably Foreseeable CA FA PCM and CA FA required as long as waste poses a threat 30X Annual PCM at start of period Annual Drawdown For First 15 Years 5X Step-downs For Good Performance Every 5 Years Minimum 5X PCM Throughout Period Non-water CA Uses Existing Reasonably Foreseeable CA FA 5

Managing Long-Term PCM Risk of Landfill System ScenarioAssuredRiskUnassuredRiskStdRuralPublicsSglPvtDefaultsDivest-ituresTotal 43X$5,5900$11$26$263$ X4,562$1, X2,9722, X2,1532, $ Status Quo 1,8223, $ in Millions over 100 years 6

What is Effective Multiplier (Likelihood to Step-down)? Refine Exposure between 5X-15X PCM under proposed Phase II regulations Modeled No Corrective Actions during 5-year period Estimated participation in Enhanced Monitoring program during 5-year period Effective Multiplier equals 8X Refine Exposure between 5X-15X PCM under proposed Phase II regulations Modeled No Corrective Actions during 5-year period Estimated participation in Enhanced Monitoring program during 5-year period Effective Multiplier equals 8X 7

Proposed Regulation Impact Defaults/Divestitures (at 8X) ScenarioDefaultsDivestituresTotals PCM$209$433$642 Corrective Action Total $ in Millions over 100 years 8

Divestiture Problem Primarily an Issue for Private Landfills Becomes a Problem when PCM FA <15X Affects Both PCM and CA Exposure Stakeholders Seem to Agree Not to Address Through Pooled Fund Primarily an Issue for Private Landfills Becomes a Problem when PCM FA <15X Affects Both PCM and CA Exposure Stakeholders Seem to Agree Not to Address Through Pooled Fund 9

Types of Divestiture Sell to Another Company for Development or Other Postclosure Land Use Sell/Donate to Public Entity Sell to Another Waste Management Company Change in Control Sell to Company in the Business of Divestiture Sell to Another Company for Development or Other Postclosure Land Use Sell/Donate to Public Entity Sell to Another Waste Management Company Change in Control Sell to Company in the Business of Divestiture 10

Divestiture – Regulatory What? Change to Minimum 15X Add 5X Step-up Provision for lack of continued performance Add Step-up to 15X for New Owners/Operators Waiver provision for proven track record When? During Phase II Rulemaking What? Change to Minimum 15X Add 5X Step-up Provision for lack of continued performance Add Step-up to 15X for New Owners/Operators Waiver provision for proven track record When? During Phase II Rulemaking 11

Change to Minimum 15X Pros: Straightforward Addresses Divestiture Lessens Default Exposure Not Dependent on a Pooled Fund Not Dependent on a Change to Liability Scheme ? Cons Ties up more Operator Resources from Other Uses 15X Not Stringent Enough Some Exposure Remains May Result in Earlier Defaults ? 12

Add 5X Step-up For Lack of Continued Performance Pros: Indirectly Partially Addresses Divestiture Incentivizes Continued Maintenance Minimizes Moral Hazard ? Cons: Limited Effect on Divestiture Some Exposure Remains Enforcement/Litigation Difficulties Penalize for CA Beyond Operator’s Control Timing, Step-up When Funds Are Needed Most ? 13

Add Step-up to 15X for New Owner/Operators with Waiver Pros: Reduces Divestiture Discourages Marginal/Unproven Operators Ensures New Owner/Operator has Adequate Financial Resources? Cons: Not Stringent Enough Some Exposure Remains Increase Price/Affect Sales Doesn’t Address Change in Control ? 14

Add 5X Step-up and Step-up to 15X for New Owner/Operators Pros: Previous Pros Approaches 15X in Addressing Divestiture ? Cons: Previous Cons Convoluted ? 15

Nominal Group Options to Address Divestiture Statutory Keep Former Site Owners and Operators liable (Water Board-like) Make Generators, Arrangers, Transporters also liable (DTSC-like) Statutory Keep Former Site Owners and Operators liable (Water Board-like) Make Generators, Arrangers, Transporters also liable (DTSC-like) 16

Keep Former Site Owners/ Operators Liable Pros: Reduces Divestiture by Solvent Companies Incentive for Increased Due Diligence by Seller Increases Sources of Revenue ? Cons: Doesn’t Address Bankruptcy Increases Litigation Perpetual Liability Local Gov’t is Ultimately Responsible for Protecting PHSE ? 17

Make Generators, Arrangers, Transporters Also Liable Pros: Greatly Expanded Potential Sources of Revenue ? Cons: Lengthy Litigation for Limited Effectiveness Generators Have No Control Over Operation No Manifests Available Timely Resources Doubtful ? 18

Nominal Group Options to Address Divestiture Ballot Name (optional) Representing Regulatory Rank Top Two Choices (mark 1 and 2) Statutory Rank Top Two Choices (mark 1 and 2) Name (optional) Representing Regulatory Rank Top Two Choices (mark 1 and 2) Statutory Rank Top Two Choices (mark 1 and 2) 19

20