Water Quality Criteria: Implications for Testing Russell Erickson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

Application of ERICA outputs and AQUARISK to evaluate radioecological risk of effluents from a nuclear site J. Twining & J. Ferris Objectives of this study.
Numerical benchmarks: proposed levels and underlying reasoning
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing Water Quality Standards Workgroup Meeting June 26, 2007.
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Risk Assessment.
Identifying HPV Chemicals of That May Pose a Risk to the Great Lakes Fishery Lynda Knobeloch & Henry Anderson Wisconsin Dept of Health & Family Services.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Environmental risk assessment of chemicals Paul Howe Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK.
1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Results of Technical Review of USEPA 2001 Cadmium Criteria Document Basic Standards Workgroup September 10, 2004 September 2004.
Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Sandy Raimondo Mace G. Barron Office of Research and Development/NHEERL Gulf Ecology Division 2 November 2005 Development and Improvement of ICE/ACE for.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
and Environmental Risk Assessment
PROTECTFP Numerical Benchmarks for protecting biota against radiation in the environment Methodology to derive benchmarks, selected methods used.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
Effects of copper on marine invertebrate larvae in surface water from San Diego Bay, CA Gunther Rosen 1, Ignacio Rivera-Duarte 1, Lora Kear-Padilla 2,
Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceutical Mixtures: - empirical knowledge, gaps and regulatory options Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg
Toxicity Evaluation of Chemicals with Limited Toxicity Data Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Division - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
PROTECTFP Derivation of Environmental Radiological Protection Benchmarks an overview
©CropLife America 2014 Perspectives on the Derivation of Aquatic Life Criteria for Pesticides Jeffrey Giddings 1 and Dwayne Moore 2 on behalf of CropLife.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Charge Question 5-1 Comment Summary for HHCB Peer Review Panel Meeting January 9, 2014.
“The Dose makes the Poison”
MJ Paul Tetra Tech Inc. Center for Ecological Sciences RTP, NC USING BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES IN NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT: APPLICATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES,
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 29, 2003 CAL/EPA.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant Department of Toxicology University of Würzburg Germany Risk, Hazard, and Innovation.
1999 U.S. EPA Ammonia Criteria Technical Review Update Prepared by: Chadwick Ecological Consultants, Inc. Basic Standards Workgroup September 10, 2004.
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Narcosis as a Reference Gilman Veith.
Criteria for Inherently toxic (iT) in CEPA, UNEP Proposed iT criteria for non-human organisms –aquatic acute effects levels of < 1 mg/L –above 1 mg/L.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
McKim Workshop on Strategic Approaches for Reducing Data Redundancy in Cancer Assessment Duluth, MN, USA 19 May, 2010.
Environmental Aspects Focal Area Summary Second Meeting of the Global Alliance to Eliminate Lead Paint Bangkok, Thailand, 9-11 July 2012.
Biology-Based Modelling Tjalling Jager Bas Kooijman Dept. Theoretical Biology.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Selenium Aquatic Life Criteria and Implementation ORSANCO Technical Committee Meeting October 21, 2009 Holly Green, USEPA Office of Science and Technology.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
The Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR), a tool that uses both exposure and toxicity data to determine when cumulative assessments are most necessary Paul Price.
Alternative Evaluation Framework for Managing Dioxins/Furans in Dredged Material Proposed for Open-Water Disposal Tad Deshler Windward Environmental LLC.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
MEASUREMENT OF TOXICITY By, Dr. M. David Department of Zoology, Karnatak University Dharwad.
C.P.Martinez and L.M. Porticos
Presented to Citizens Advisory Council June 21, 2016
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Human Health & Aquatic Life Criteria
Chloride in Urban Streams in Maine
Module 17: MIXING ZONES A limited area or volume of water where initial dilution of a discharge takes place and where numeric water quality criteria.
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
Susan Makris U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development
Decision Contexts in a Changing Toxicology Paradigm
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
A Short Update on Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS)
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Criteria: Implications for Testing Russell Erickson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA The McKim Conference on the Use of QSARs and Aquatic Toxicology in Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

U.S.EPA Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life Aquatic Life Criteria (ALC) issued by the U.S.EPA Office of Water define limits on chemical exposures which are considered sufficient to preclude unacceptable effects on aquatic communities. Procedures are described in “Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses” (Stephan et al., 1985, U.S.EPA). Used in regulatory programs to limit discharge of toxic chemicals, in evaluations of aquatic resource condition from monitoring data, and in setting clean-up goals for Superfund sites and other assessments.

1-hr average exposure concentrations are allowed to exceed the CMC only once in three years on average. The “Criterion Maximum Concentration” (CMC) is set equal to one-half of the FAV. U.S.EPA Aquatic Life Criteria Acute Toxicity Data Use Mean LC50s for tested species & genera are designated “Species/Genus Mean Acute Values” (SMAVs, GMAVs). The “Final Acute Value” (FAV) is set equal to the fifth percentile of GMAVs, or a SMAV of an important species. 48- or 96-hr LC50s are required for at least eight aquatic animal species encompassing a specified range of taxa.

U.S.EPA Aquatic Life Criteria Chronic Toxicity Data Use “Chronic values” (CV) are set to the EC20 or the mean of the NOEC&LOEC for the most sensitive of survival, growth, or reproductive endpoints from tests with minimum duration of several days to a few months, depending on species. The “Final Chronic Value” (FCV) is set equal to the fifth percentile of GMCVs for at least eight animal genera, the FAV divided by the average SMAV:SMCV ratio for at least three species, or an SMCV of an important species. The “Criterion Continuous Concentration” (CCC) is set equal to the FCV or a value based on plant toxicity data. 4-day average exposure concentrations are allowed to exceed the CCC only once in three years on average.

Protection of endangered/threatened species must be based on extrapolations from tested species. Testing requirements do not reflect different modes-of- action among chemicals. U.S.EPA Aquatic Life Criteria Test Data Issues For chemicals barely meeting minimum acute toxicity data requirements, important taxa might not be addressed. For chronic toxicity, important response endpoints as well as important taxa might not be addressed. Although minimum acute toxicity data requirements are limited, most chemicals do not meet these requirements.

U.S.EPA Aquatic Life Criteria Benefits from Predictive Toxicity Tools Extrapolation tools for relative effect concentration differences among chemicals, species, and endpoints. Methods to predict toxicity mechanisms for different taxonomic groups to guide acute and chronic testing strategies. QSARs for point estimates or lower bounds of effect concentrations for species and endpoints of interest.