Irradiation Facilities in the US David Christian May 29, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Advertisements

Short-range, high-LET recoil tracks in CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector E. R. Benton 1, C. E. Johnson 1, J. DeWitt 1, N. Yasuda 2, and E. V. Benton.
Tenth lecture Last lecture.
Radiation Tolerance D. C. Christian, J. A. Appel, G. Chiodini,
Ribbon Electron Beam Profile Monitor For Bunched Beam Tomography Muons, Inc. Innovation in research.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
RaDIATE 1 st Annual Collaboration Meeting May Cost-effective Irradiations Discussion Radiation Damage In Accelerator Target Environments.
An Advanced Linear Accelerator Facility for Microelectronic Dose Rate Studies P.E. Sokol and S.Y.Lee Indiana University.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Radiation Effects in Microelectronics EE-698a Course Seminar by Aashish Agrawal.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
ALPHA Project Safety Assessment Document Vladimir Anferov.
FFAG Fixed Field Alternating Gradient synchrotrons, FFAGs, combine some of the main advantages of both cyclotrons and synchrotrons:  Fixed magnetic field.
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
Activities of Superconducting RF Accelerators at Nanjing University Sun An Proton Linear Accelerator Institute Institute of Energy Sciences, Nanjing University.
Radiation Nonionizing Ionizing
Single Event Effects in microelectronic circuits Author: Klemen Koselj Advisor: Prof. Dr. Peter Križan.
Laser Stripping and H 0 monitor systems 10/18/2011B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI1.
Radiation Test Facilities G. Spiezia. Engineering Department ENEN Radiation tests facilities  Radiation test in the accelerator sector  External facilities.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Radiation Tolerant Electronics New Policy? Ph. Farthouat, CERN.
American Detector Irradiation Facilities Erik Ramberg FNAL 22 March, 2011 ALCPG11.
ISIS operational update David Findlay Accelerator Division ISIS Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory / STFC DL-RAL Joint Accelerator Workshop, RAL.
The Materials Test Station: An Accelerator Driven Neutron Source for Fusion Materials Testing Eric Pitcher Presented at: Sixth US-PRC Magnetic Fusion Collaboration.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
RaDIATE October Technical MeetingOctober BLIP Irradiation Planning Radiation Damage In Accelerator Target Environments.
VIEW on RAD HARDNESS TESTS of STS FEE IN MEPHI. Simakov A.B. – Head of “Special Microelectronics” Lab.
Radiation Tolerant Electronics Expected changes Ph. Farthouat, CERN.
Beam test possibilities at JINR and Fermilab V. Pronskikh Fermilab 02/15/2012.
The Use of Accelerator Beams for Calibration and Characterization of Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors Eric Benton Department of Physics Oklahoma State.
Experiment Electronics UMC 0.18µm radiation hardness studies Progress since last Collaboration Meeting Sven Löchner GSI Darmstadt 15 th CBM Collaboration.
High Rate Tracking Test Beam Area David Christian & Richard Coleman.
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
| kvi - center for advanced radiation technology 1 KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology M.A. Hofstee 19-sep-2014 RADSAFE Kick-off, CERN.
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
Introduction to Irradiation Facilities 1. Challenges at LHC and Why we need Irradiation Facilities (Mar CAPEANS) 2. PH Department Proton and Neutron Facilities.
Activities within the ARDENT- project: November 2012 – June 2013 Benedikt Bergmann Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Czech Technical University.
June 3, 2004G.W.Foster - Proton Driver Proton Driver Project Development, Tactics & Strategy G. W. Foster Fermilab User’s Meeting June 3, 2004.
M.Moll, M.Silari, H.Vincke – 3.April Mixed field irradiation -- Who answered ?  In total 36 forms filled / 34 persons answered: 38% 62% CERN:
Neutron exposure at CERN Mitsu KIMURA 19 th July 2013.
Overview on the Proposal for a new Gamma Irradiation Facility at CERN GIF++ Mar CAPEANS April 29 th, 2009 April 29, 091M.C.
Investigating latchup in the PXL detector Outline: What is latchup? – the consequences and sources of latchup – techniques to reduce latchup sensitivity.
Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to MRaD Doses Bruce Schum UC Santa Cruz June
Mixed field irradiation -- Who answered ?  In total 36 forms filled / 34 persons answered: 38% 62% CERN: mainly LHC related topics CERF: beside LHC topics.
Summary of radiation shielding studies for MTA Muon production at the MiniBooNE target Igor Rakhno August 24, 2006.
Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.
Fermilab Test Beam and Irradiation Facilities Erik Ramberg 10 January, 2013.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Facilities for Detector R&D Erik Ramberg Fermilab 9 January, 2013.
Radiation Damage Experience: SiPM & QIE Cards Proton Cyclotron - Mass General Hospital (& MIT Research Reactor) Larry Sulak with Sergey Los*, Jim Freeman*,
1 RHIC NSRL LINAC Booster AGS Tandems STAR 6:00 o’clock PHENIX 8:00 o’clock 10:00 o’clock Polarized Jet Target 12:00 o’clock RF 4:00 o’clock (AnDY, CeC)
Proton and neutron irradiation facilities in the CERN-PS East Hall Maurice Glaser and Michael Moll CERN- PH-DT2 - Geneva - Switzerland 6 th LHC Radiation.
Upgrade of the irradiation facilities in the PS East Hall Maurice Glaser, Michael Moll 30 April 2010 – PH-DT steering board meeting activities are part.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
K2K and JHF-nu muon monitor Jun Kameda (KEK) 1. K2K muon monitor 2. JHF-ν muon monitor 3. Summary International workshop on Neutrino Beam Instrumentation,
ISIS operational update
CALIFES 2015 run preliminary results
Rad (radiation) Hard Devices used in Space, Military Applications, Nuclear Power in-situ Instrumentation Savanna Krassau 4/21/2017 Abstract: Environments.
Plans for Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to 1 GRaD Doses SLAC Testbeam Workshop March
The BLAIRR Irradiation Facility Hybrid Spallation Target Optimization
Prospecting for Gold: Particle Detectors
Electron Beamlines Safety Workshop at ELI Beamlines April 2016
K2K and JHF-nu muon monitor
Particle Physics LECTURE 7
Results from the first diode irradiation and status of bonding tests
of secondary light ion beams
Irradiation Facilities Questionnaire
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
The HIE-ISOLDE Design Study and the CATHI Fellow Participation
Presentation transcript:

Irradiation Facilities in the US David Christian May 29, 2015

Types of Radiation Damage 1.Total Ionizing Dose – CMOS Electronics (to ~1 Grad) – Materials 2.Single Event Effects – Primarily Digital Electronics 3.Total Hadronic Dose – Crystals, including silicon (to ~1E16/cm 2 ) – Bipolar transistors

Total Ionizing Dose (TID) Caused by charged particles or photons. Testing with photons or [low energy] electrons is preferred because material is not activated (can also use protons with KE < ~3 MeV). Best US option = Sandia Gamma Irradiation Facility ( 60 Co = 1 MeV  s). Alternatives = Other sources (universities, BNL,…) or X-rays (can be integrated w/probe station; this is how CERN tests electronics).

Sandia Gamma Irradiation Facility Building holds 3 shielded “cells” in high bay area. 18 foot deep pool of deionized water located under most of high bay area. – Acts as shielding for arrays of 60 Co. – Facility houses ~0.5MCi of 60 Co. Purchased from Nordion (Chalk River, Ontario). 59 Co + n  60 Co 60 Co  60 Ni + e - + antineutrino + 2  s (1.17 & 1.33 MeV), 5.27 year halflife. – Not high enough energy to activate materials. – Dose rate at GIF up to ~5 Mrad/hr (1 Grad in ~10 days) – 7-10 minute wait after irradiation to allow ozone to be exhausted. Inside “Technical Area V” – No personal cameras allowed. – Escort required at all times. – Must be US Citizen? Fermilab has an open PO. – Cost for 1 Grad < $10k. – Can either do tests in person or send material for exposure.

Single Event Effects Caused by locally heavy ionization. – Hadrons w/KE>Coulomb barrier & neutrons interact w/silicon (germanium) & create recoil nuclei or nuclear fragments; can produce large dE/dx in a “sensitive volume.” – Can produce single event upset (bit flip), single event failure (gate rupture), or circuit disruption (latch-up). Best testing uses ion beams to determine cross section as a function of Linear Energy Transfer (LET). Best US Option = BNL NASA Space Radiation Laboratory. Alternatives: spallation neutrons, reactor neutrons, or protons can provide gross estimate of cross section. – We used 200 MeV protons from the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility (now shut down) in the past.

NASA Space Radiation Laboratory Uses beam from the BNL 2.5GeV Booster. Ions p – Au can be provided. Typically ~.3 sec slow spill every 4 sec. (7.5% duty factor). Up to 5E14 protons/hr, lower flux of ions. Beam spot ~1cm FWHM (1 GeV) up to ~20cm x 20cm. Dosimetry (2-3%) & beam monitoring provided. Facility funded by NASA. Cost ~$5000/hr for non-NASA users. Don’t yet have a contract or user experience. I guess a well-designed SEE test would use 5-15 hrs. of beam time. Web site says, “NSRL operates 1,000–1,200 hours per year in three running cycles — typically early spring, early summer and autumn periods.” Might be able to get beam outside these times as a non- NASA paying customer.

Facility covers >4 orders of magnitude in LET

Total Hadronic Dose Hadronic interactions create crystal defects (primarily vacancies and interstitials). – In silicon, these are sources of leakage current. – They can also trap mobile charges. Reduces effective signal. Modifies electric field (double junction effect in silicon). – Relevant dose for HL-LHC = up to ~1E16/cm 2. Currently no great US option (IUCF is closed). – Some have used medical accelerators (Mass General). – UNM has facilitated use of the LANL 800 MeV LINAC 2x/yr. – It would be possible to create a facility at Fermilab.

LANSCE = Los Alamos Neutron Science Center 800 MeV LINAC accelerates H - and H + (can be interleaved). Primary users: – Proton radiography – Lujan Neutron Scattering Center – Weapons Neutron Research – Ultra-cold Neutron Facility Accepts proposals annually LANL provides no beam instrumentation for radiation damage users.

UNM Facilitates use of LANSCE UNM HEP group has facilitated the use of LANSCE since 2007 (and also has an agreement with Sandia for use of the GIF & neutron sources). See presentation by Sally Seidel in January 2013 (ANL CPAD meeting): 50# # Sally collects requests for beam exposure, writes, and submits a proposal to LANL annually. UNM typically requests 2 exposures of 2E16/cm 2 (~72 hours each). UNM prepares a stack of samples together with foils to measure dose and a diode array to measure the beam profile (good to ~1E15/cm 2 ). Foil activation is measured by UNM HEP group. UNM HEP group staffs shifts at LANL and encourages collaborators to take shifts also. No charge for beam time at LANL or use of facilities at Sandia exposures are scheduled for September & December.

Possible Fermilab Facility MuCool Test Area (MTA) built to support R&D on muon cooling technologies (large cryogenic RF cavities, 5T superconducting magnet, LH2). Uses 400 MeV beam from the LINAC. Will operate as MTA through April LINAC group uses upstream area to measure LINAC parameters. Continued operation for accelerator R&D after 4/16 is anticipated.

Compatibility MTA areas are sufficiently shielded to allow very high dose exposures. – 9.6E15/hr (600 pulses) upstream. – 9.6E14/hr (60 pulses) downstream. However, no area currently exists where devices can be irradiated without activating devices throughout the area. I believe we, working together with AD/APC, could establish a radiation test area that could be used with minimal impact on accelerator R&D. – Should we further explore this possibility?