Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR and Linked Institutional Planning and Budgeting Lisa Marie McCauley, Kings College, VP/CFO.
Advertisements

Compilation of Recommendations Prepared for Annual Faculty Retreat 4/06.
Closing the Gaps: Facilities Development and Planning Systems Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board February 26, 2004.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
Office of Information Technology FY’03 Budget Presentation Presented by Stephen Landry, Ph.D. Chief Information Office January 4, 2002.
See the Present… Know the Future…. RECAPP ® Markets Telecom Facilities Municipalities Government Transportation.
Peralta Community College Budget Allocation Model BAM November 17, 2014.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Equipment Replacement & Support Information Technology Services Board Retreat – February 7, 2009.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
South Seattle Community College BUDGET HEARING Fiscal Year June 7, 2005.
Information Technology Assessment Review Presented to the Board of the State Center Community College District.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Using Total Cost of Ownership To Make Decisions League of Innovation Conference March 13, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services.
FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)
Workshop of the Medical Education Subcommittee of the Strategic Planning/Educational Policy Committee Board of Governors July 20, 2005.
The Faculty Leadership Role on Accreditation Julie Bruno, Sierra College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Richard Mahon, Riverside.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Reviewed by Kim Davis EDLD 5362 Final Project May 15, 2011.
1 Budget Conversations Vice President of Administration and External Affairs.
February 9, 2012  Partner with the community  Provide an effective educational experience  Prepare every student to find success in our complex society.
Enrollment Management Institute Peralta Community Colleges Goals, Objectives and Expected Outcomes.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
College Wide Planning Process and College Wide Master Plan (CWMP) Brought to you by : Institutional Effectiveness Committee Presenters: Kathy Werle.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
(Assessment). Mission, Vision, Goals PlanDoCheckAct Drill Down.. 2.
Accreditation Kevin Bontenbol Julie Bruno Michelle Grimes-Hillman 1.
Informational Update Student Success Fee Funded Project Status Emerging Technologies & Instructional Technologies Committees IT Governance Executive Committee.
The Library’s Place in UTSA’s Growth Projections Stefanie Wittenbach Assistant Dean for Collections October 2007.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
Strategic Planning February 15,2012. Southwest Minnesota State University during the Academic year collected information from external constituencies.
Leadership 2007 HOT TOPICS Mark Wade Lieu Jane Patton ASCCC Leadership Institute 2007.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Recommendations for: Upgrading Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces Upgrade of Computers in Open & College Labs IT Governance Executive Committee January.
Strategic Planning Linked to Long Range Planning Presentation to Faculty and Staff February 13-14, 2008
Funding Technology at Mission College Challenges and Recommendations.
Budget Call Diana Keelen, Budget Commiteee Co-Chair Dr. Irit Gat, Budget Committee Co-Chair Administrative Council Meeting, November 17, 2015.
Information Technology Assessment Findings Presented to the colleges of the State Center Community College District.
Standard III Resources Effective Practices in Accreditation ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC At-large.
Presentation to the Finance and Administration Advisory Group ▸Implementing a New Space Request Process ▸Process for requesting additional space.
6/13/20161 South Seattle Community College College-wide Meeting Budget Planning for FY March 10, 2008.
Superior Infrastructure – Phase One Lenora Chapman & Michelle Stevenson Presenting.
1 District Office Administrative Services Unit Review (ASUR) and Annual Operational Planning November 7, 2013 Presented by Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.
Institutional Self Study in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Laney College 900 Fallon Street Oakland, CA Accrediting Commission for Community.
Program Review Presentation April 30th, 2014
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Enterprise Systems Management – ESM821S
All About Resources: Standard III
Standard III – Resources
Measure E Technology Update
Budget Development Process
Standard III Resources
Technology Committee Report to the Budget Committee & College Planning Council March 7, 2012.
Program Review and Accreditation
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Distance Learning Benchmarking
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Presentation transcript:

Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations

Total Cost of Ownership Definition Definition  Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a type of calculation designed to help managers assess both direct and indirect costs related to the purchase of any (IT) equipment.

Total Cost of Ownership Accreditation Standard III, Sect. B, 2a Accreditation Standard III, Sect. B, 2a  “Long-range capital plans support institutional improvement goals and reflect projections of the total cost of ownership of new facilities and equipment.” Accreditation Standard III, Sect. C, 2 Accreditation Standard III, Sect. C, 2  “Technology planning is integrated with institutional planning.”

Total Cost of Ownership The TCO model was utilized by California Community Colleges’ Tech II Strategic Plan The TCO model was utilized by California Community Colleges’ Tech II Strategic Plan

Total Cost of Ownership The TCO model was adopted as a guide for the creation of the Mission College Technology Plan. The TCO model was adopted as a guide for the creation of the Mission College Technology Plan.  hplan42104.doc hplan42104.doc hplan42104.doc

Total Cost of Ownership Challenges for Mission College Challenges for Mission College  Lack of a college budgetary model for acquiring, maintaining, upgrading or replacing computer equipment  Growth in the number of computer labs and demo rooms (17 new labs and demo rooms for )  Growth in the number of instructional servers (7 new servers for 2004/05)  Very high computer to staff support ratio  High level of maintenance caused by aging equipment  Increased reliance upon computer technology for course delivery and student access  Substandard computers for faculty and staff

Total Cost of Ownership The TCO model recommends the following: The TCO model recommends the following:  1 technician for every 300 computers.  1 server administrator for every 4000 FTES.  3-year replacement cycle for computers and related equipment. Mission College currently has: Mission College currently has:  One full-time technician maintaining more than 1000 computers and 20 printers.  One half-time server systems administrator engineering and maintaining 25 servers for 10,000 FTES.  No consistent budgetary support for replacing computers and related equipment.

Total Cost of Ownership We need stability and support in funding to implement the required plans for investments in purchasing new technologies, replacing the old equipment and hiring classified staff. We need stability and support in funding to implement the required plans for investments in purchasing new technologies, replacing the old equipment and hiring classified staff.

Total Cost of Ownership The Mission College Technology Plan recommends a process for budget development that reflects the total costs of acquiring, maintaining and updating campus technology. The Mission College Technology Plan recommends a process for budget development that reflects the total costs of acquiring, maintaining and updating campus technology. (Strategic Objective 6: “Evaluate and recommend a College budget process that will ensure the successful implementation of this technology plan” (Strategic Objective 6: “Evaluate and recommend a College budget process that will ensure the successful implementation of this technology plan”

Total Cost of Ownership The Technology Committee has officially requested that CBAC start the discussion to revise the college budget model and that the Technology Committee members participate in the revision process. The Technology Committee has officially requested that CBAC start the discussion to revise the college budget model and that the Technology Committee members participate in the revision process.