Metacognition as Kludge Peter Carruthers with thanks to Logan Fletcher Maryland Metacognition Seminar, 12/9/11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Organizational Behavior?
Advertisements

LECTURE 6 COGNITIVE THEORIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Instructional Technology 6260 Cognitive Information Processing Theory.
Second Language Acquisition
Life-Span Human Development, Fifth Edition, Carol K. Sigelman and Elizabeth A. Rider Chapter 8 Chapter 8 Memory and Information Processing.
Universal Design for Learning October, What about reading? What part of the brain do we read with?
THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF HUMAN MEMORY Tulving’s “autonoetic” or “self- knowing” view Schacter: Remembering and the “role of the experiencer” Metacognition.
Responding When Students Don’t Get It Doug Fisher and Nancy Frey
 Metacognition refers to a learner’s ability to be aware of and monitor their own learning processes.  Usually defined by it’s component parts.
Metacognition & Executive Control By Ruth Garner Presented by Pat Edwards & Hakim Shahid Rdg. 707.
Organizational Notes no study guide no review session not sufficient to just read book and glance at lecture material midterm/final is considered hard.
Attention II Theories of Attention Visual Search.
What is Cognitive Science? … is the interdisciplinary study of mind and intelligence, embracing philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, neuroscience,
The Information-Processing Approach
Psychology of Music Learning Miksza Memory Processes.
User Interface Design Users should not have to adapt to a piece of software; the software should be designed to fit the user.
What is Cognitive Science? … is the interdisciplinary study of mind and intelligence, embracing philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, neuroscience,
Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies
Meaningful Learning in an Information Age
Social Cognition: Thinking About People
To accompany Baars & Gage - Chapter 2 1 Chapter 2: A framework. Elsevier web materials. Teaching materials. Powerpoints with movies, figures, and major.
Taxonomy of Language Learning Strategies
10 Things Every Teacher Should Know About Reading Comprehension 10 Things Every Teacher Should Know About Reading Comprehension Timothy Shanahan University.
TEACHING STUDENTS TO READ INFORMATIONAL TEXT Reference: Reference: What Research Has To Say About Reading Instruction, by Alan E. Farstrup (2002)
Language Learning Styles and Strategies. Objectives by the end of this lecture you will be able to: Distinguish between learning styles and strategies.
Metacognitive Issues in Student Engagement Jennifer Berg & Laura Baker.
Cognitive level of Analysis
Session 4 Pulling it All Together Building a Solid Number Foundation Strategies for Education Assistants 1.
Motivational Processes Affecting Learning
Attention as a Limited Capacity Resource
Organic Brain Syndromes in the Developmentally Disabled A new way of conceptualizing Dysfunction and Cognitive Restructuring Dr. Jay Rao M.B.,B.S., D.P.M.,
Implicit Memory SNU CSE Son, Suil. Contents  Question  implicit memory vs. explicit memory  Various ways of Experiment  Can learning occur without.
Learning Law Orientation: August 16, Synthesis Judgment 4. Problem Solving 3. Spotting Issues 2. Understanding 1. Knowledge 1. Recognition vs.
Basic concepts of language learning & teaching materials.
Cognitive Views of Learning Cluster 7
A Rainbow of Learning Styles Matching our teaching to student needs.
SLA Seminar, NSYSU 11/17/2006 Ch. 9 Cognitive accounts of SLA OUTLINE Cognitive theory of language acquisition Models of cognitive accounts Implicit vs.
C Pearson Allyn & Bacon Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Long-Term Memory Chapter 6.
Information Processing. History In response to Behaviorism, a cognitive model of mind as computer was adopted (1960’s, 70’s) Humans process, store, encode,
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, a Subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 8 The Cognitive Information- Processing.
Evolution of Control-Related Mental Models Crystal A. Brandon.
Applying Learning Strategies in the classroom, from theory to practice JOHN HOWARD GALINDO S ELT CONSULTANT
Information Processing Theories Based on computer model: input, processing, output Focuses on the learning process Biological changes in brain Environmental.
HOW CUSTOMERS THINK CHAPTER 2: A VOYAGE TO NEW FRONTIERS Presented by: Peter Atmali Michael Miyagishima.
Cognitive Processes Chapter 8. Studying CognitionLanguage UseVisual CognitionProblem Solving and ReasoningJudgment and Decision MakingRecapping Main Points.
Chapter 6 Memory 1.
Metacognition Neil H. Schwartz Psych 605. Three Terms: Organizing the Concept Exogenous Constructivism Endogenous Constructivism Spence Piaget Dialectical.
Human Abilities 2 How do people think? 1. Agenda Memory Cognitive Processes – Implications Recap 2.
KLI & selecting appropriate instructional principles Ken Koedinger 1.
How conscious experience and working memory interact Bernard J. Baars and Stan Franklin Soft Computing Laboratory 김 희 택 TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences vol.
CHAPTER 8 MEMORY & INFORMATION PROCESSING
The Information Processing Approach Chapter 8 By Eva Tantri Mahastri
Learner Strategies Gagne and Driscoll Chp. 7. Self-learners/Independent Thinkers: A priority goal  Seek self-generated strategies l that activate internal.
A Course Recapping Where we’ve been and where you’re going…
From NARS to a Thinking Machine Pei Wang Temple University.
Chapter 6 Memory. Copyright © 1999 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2 The Nature of Memory Memory –the retention of information over time –Psychologists.
Unit 5 Seminar Cognitive Development Developmental Theories (Piaget and Vygotsky)
Fluency, the Feeling of Rightness, and Analytic Thinking Valerie Thompson Gordon Pennycook Jonathan Evans Jamie Prowse Turner.
 What makes an Effective Incident Commander?  What is the best way to develop & practice command skills?  When should that development start?  How.
What do you think good language learners do as they learn? Seven Hypothesis about good language learners (Naiman et al.) 1.The good language learner is.
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc Chapter 5 – Cognitive Engineering HCI: Developing Effective Organizational Information Systems Dov Te’eni Jane Carey.
Florida State University Psychology Department Abstract Why are people cognitive misers? Cognitive miserliness saves costs of self-regulation. Ego depletion.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 30 Professional Reasoning in Practice Barbara A. Boyt Schell.
Chapter 8 Thinking and Language.
Chapter 6 Heuristics and Controlled Problem Solving
Pavle Valerjev Marin Dujmović
Learning Law Orientation: August 16, 2006.
Sensory memory and working memory
Implicit Memory SNU CSE Son, Suil.
Presentation transcript:

Metacognition as Kludge Peter Carruthers with thanks to Logan Fletcher Maryland Metacognition Seminar, 12/9/11

Outline 1.The theses 2.The meaning of “metacognition” 3.Metacognition of knowledge & learning 4.System 1 & System 2 5.Metacognition of reasoning & decision making 6.Conclusion 2

The theses 1.There is no adaptation for metacognition, but rather 1st-person use of mindreading faculty. 2.Metacognitive skills vary widely among people, depend on individual learning, and are generally not very effective. 3.Metacognitive monitoring is sensory-cue based, not direct. 4.Metacognitive interventions aren’t direct, but depend on indirect behavioral and attentional influence. 3

The Meaning of “Metacognition” 4 Metacognition involves self-directed meta- representation (either conceptual or nonconceptual). This is what psychologists mean – “thinking about [one’s own] thinking”. Some in cog. sci. seem to mean only: influencing or controlling a cognitive process. No quarrel. There are multiple monitoring-and-control processes of a non-metarepresentational sort.

Monitoring and Control of Action 5

Judgments of memory and learning are cue- based – Memory: ease of access of fragments of target or items related to target. Learning: fluency with which items are processed (e.g. fonts, time studying). Not what one would predict if metacognition evolved for purposes of cognitive control. One shouldn’t need to rely on indirect cues. 6 Metacog of knowledge & learning

Intention to learn has an effect on study patterns but no effect on learning & recall with study patterns controlled for. Most meta-learning strategies are behavioral focusing of attention, mental rehearsal, etc. Strategies are modestly effective at best; not a robust native competence. More likely: guided by mindreading faculty in the absence of direct access to the process. 7 Metacog of knowledge & learning

fMRI: metacognition = mindreading. Some studies contrast within metacognition. FOK vs TOT; past vs future-directed confidence using “don’t know” for contrast with both. But this is metacognitive too! Chua et al. (2006, 2009) contrast confidence and metamemory with first-order recognition. Medial prefrontal, posterior cingulate, temporo-parietal junction. 8

System 1 & System 2 9 In order to explain patterns of response to reasoning tasks and to explain individual differences many postulate dual systems: System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (reflective). Even those who get answers right still feel the “pull” of intuitive but incorrect response. System 2 is supposed to monitor output of System 1, intervening where needed.

10 System 1 & System 2 System 1 (“intuitive”) – is fast, parallel, unconscious; isn’t easily altered; is universal; is impervious to verbal instruction; is (partly) heuristic based; is (mostly) shared with other animals. Note: only the inputs and outputs of System 1 are available for monitoring by mindreading.  Evidence of any other form of monitoring is evidence of an adaptation for metacognition.

11 System 1 & System 2 System 2 (“reflective”) – is slow, serial, conscious; malleable; variable (by culture and individual); responsive to verbal instruction; influenced by normative belief; can involve application of valid rules. Note: System 2 processes are available for monitoring by mindreading.  Evidence of native competence is needed to support adaptation for metacognition.

System 1 & System 2 System 1 doesn’t depend on working memory. System 2 does. An executively controlled system that can call up and manipulate stored information. The cognitive basis of g - general intelligence. Plus disposition to reflect. Plus knowledge of reasoning rules and strategies. 12

System 1 & System 2 Monitoring of System 2 is sensory-cue-based visuo-spatial, inner speech, etc. Working memory uses executive resources to direct and focus attention calling up and manipulating conceptualized sensory representations exapting the “global broadcast” of attended sensory information (Baars).  Monitoring can be done by the mindreading faculty. 13

No natural competence to intervene in and improve our own System 2 reasoning. People are generally bad at reasoning about reasoning. Emerges late in development. Dependent upon culture and formal education. Not what one would predict if there were an adaptation for metacognition. 14 Metacognition of reasoning

Monitoring of System 1 output leads to System 2 processing? In some people – large individual variation. Most seem not to employ System 2 at all. Large variation in “mindware” – the reasoning rules appealed to in System 2. Variation in factors triggering System 2 – for some, disfluency; for others, content- dependent habits; etc.  No evidence of adaptation for the purpose. 15

Metacognition of affect Monitoring for affective influence on judgment isn’t routine – weather & happiness mood induction & judgments of risk. Attention needs to be called to possible sources of affect. For some people, drawing attention to affect makes the influence bigger, not smaller. Capacities to discount incidental affect vary often depend on folk knowledge. 16

Metacognition of decision making Willpower: the marshmallow test (Mischel). Need to monitor affect and imminent action & intervene. Intelligent direction of attention. Widely varying strategies: look away; sit on hands; play with another object; sing songs to oneself; etc.  Metacognition is a cobbled-together skill. 17

Conclusions No evidence that metacognitive monitoring is direct. o Rather, self-directed mindreading relying on sensorily-accessible cues. No evidence of a native competence for metacognition. o Rather, individual and cultural learning.  Metacognition is a kludge. 18