Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Advertisements

Out of Region Market Assumptions Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 6 th, 2011.
California Energy Action Plan Joint Public Meeting Electricity System Reliability Activities California Energy Commission July 17, 2003.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
NERC’s Long-Term Reliability Assessment (LTRA) Workshop: Natural Gas Dependency in New England Michael I. Henderson ISO New England Inc.
Preliminary Review of July 24 th Extreme Temperature Event & Implications for Pilot Capacity Standard Mary Johannis & Wally Gibson PNW Resource Adequacy.
What’s Needed for Rational Discussion of Resource Adequacy: A Framework and Some Facts * presented by Kevin Woodruff, Principal, Woodruff Expert Services,
Status Report: Resource Adequacy (RA) and Long Term Procurement Planning (LTPP) CPUC Energy Division Molly Tirpak Sterkel cpuc.ca.gov; Tel:
Ad Hoc West-wide Resource Assessment Team (WRAT) : Assessment of Western System Adequacy in the Short-term Jeff King Northwest Power Planning Council Presentation.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
WECC PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT July 16, 2014.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
Announced Coal Unit Retirements: Effect on Regional Resource Adequacy Council Meeting January 16, 2013 Portland, Oregon Boardman Centralia 1.
California SONGS\OTC Plants Assumptions TEPPC – Data Work Group Call Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2009 Draft Resource Program Released: September 30, 2009 Accepting Comments until: November 30,
California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20071 Estimating the Generation Resource Mix of Electricity Imports to California – Energy Commission.
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
1 Resource Adequacy - California Exports to the PNW May 25, 2004 “The crisis you have to worry about most is the one you don’t see coming” -Senator Mike.
Page 1© 2009 Quanta Technology LLCPage 1 November 2007 BGE January 4, 2008 Strategic Midwest Area Renewable Transmission (SMART) Study October 06, 2009.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
RELIABILITYFIRST CORPORATION Long Term Resource Assessment 2010 – 2019 Board of Directors Meeting September 30, 2010 Presented by Jeff Mitchell.
Proposed Contract to Perform Regional Sustained Hydro Peaking Capability Study Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee January 29, 2008.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
June 27, Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2010 and 2012 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting Northwest Power Pool.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Relationship of Regional Resource Adequacy Standards to Utility Planning PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting June 27, 2007.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
2009 Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment Resource Adequacy Technical Committee October 16, 2009.
1 PNW Regional Contingency Resources Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 6 th, 2011.
2010 Work Plan Steering Committee January 29, 2010.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting April 13, 2007.
Capacity Metric & Hydro Capacity Assessment Decisions Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Out of Region Market Assumption Resource Adequacy Technical Committee December 1, 2011.
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2011 and 2013 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
Long Term Study Resource Expansion Process: Study Findings and Lessons Learned Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray RPG May 21, 2013.
Slide 1 Overview of Conservation in the Pacific Northwest Energy Efficiency Options in the Northwest Post-2011Meeting March 4, 2008.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Planning the Networked Grid Transmission Planning J.E.(Jeff) Billinton Manager, Regional Transmission - North Building the Networked Electricity Grid –
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Steering Committee Meeting March 9, Why talk about assumptions? Garbage in, garbage out! “Let’s go dumpster diving!” Results sensitive to key.
2010 Northwest Regional Forecast Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 22, 2010.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
1 Portfolio Analysis Update Power Committee Discussion August 30, 2004.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Out of Region Market Assumptions
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Progress on Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2017
Base on maximum operating wind capacity at end of planning period
Presentation transcript:

Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011

Key Assumptions

Adequacy Assessment Assumptions

Assumptions (cont.)

Out of Region Market Supply

 The 2008 Adequacy Standard has seasonal assessments of resource adequacy: summer and winter (3 months each)  The winter assessment assumes that 3,000 MW of out of region market is available on any hour (not the dispatch – just the capability)  The summer assessment assumes 0  Proposed new adequacy standard will be an annual assessment  Need to update out of region market assumptions for not just winter and summer, but also for the shoulder months  Update the assessment by analyzing:  The California PUC Resource Adequacy Assessment to determine “surplus”  The rolling 5 year actual Intertie (A.C. and D.C. South to North) to determine the minimum transfer capability

CPUC RA Assessment (April 2011)  Assessment includes all IOUs and Community Choice Aggregators  Purpose of RA is mandatory LSE acquisition of capacity to meet load and reserve requirements  Results include unit-contingent, import contracts, DWR contracts, physical resources, and RMR capacity  Only net qualifying capacity is considered based on historical performance and other factors – designed to get the expected value of capacity (GADs data)

CPUC RA Assessment (April 2011)  Normal demand (1:2) plus a 15 percent adequacy requirement is the load that has to be met  Modified the analysis by:  Assume that demand response programs (1,000 to 2,300 MW) are not available for ‘export’  The CPUC RA looks backward (2010); the PNW RA looks forward (2015) – so include gas-fired plants that are not in the CPUC RA, but are under construction (4,767 MW)  Removed California imports as resources for exports

Gas-Fired Plants Under Construction  The CPUC RA assessment does not include these plants in their analysis

Modified RA Assessment + Transfer Capability

Conclusion:  In 2015, there is enough surplus in the state of California and enough transfer capability to support 3,000 MW of imports October to April  From May to September, California relies heavily on imports to support their resource adequacy efforts and therefore no import capability should be assumed

Demand-Side Management and Small Miscellaneous Resources (non-modeled resources)

2008 Adequacy Standard  The 2008 Adequacy Standard included 3,000 MW (capacity) and 28,800 MWhrs (energy) as a proxy for emergency generation and/or demand response that are not modeled in Genesys  These thresholds are applied post processing to games that have events; those that exceed these thresholds are counted as “Loss-of-Load”  Proposal for new standard is to count specific resources that are available to utilities and are not modeled in Genesys  Emergency generators not owned or under contract with utilities are not considered (they number in the thousands of megawatts)

Demand-Side Management  Demand-side management (DSM) for irrigation pumps, A/C, and flexible load control (programs for use every year)  Most of these resources are on AGC or prescheduled by utilities  DSM geared towards summer peaking utilities  By 2010, Idaho and PacifiCorp have developed over 600 MW of DSM  However, the Genesys load forecast for 2015 incorporates these programs in the demand forecast  Only incremental demand response programs beyond 2010 can be included (to avoid double counting)

DSM

Small Miscellaneous Resources  Includes resources and load management actions utilities have rights to  Not generally used on an annual basis, but rather used only during periods of stress

Small Miscellaneous Resources

Appendix

Appendix - Power Plant Development in California  During the past 11 years there as been substantial resource development within the state of California – most of it gas-fired  Charts includes all resources built in state regardless of owner  Bar Chart “net addition” includes the impact of plant retirements in the state (but also including Mohave)

Source: Ventyx MW Natural Gas21567 Wind1378 Geothermal211 Biogases219 Hydro275 PV157 Biomass87 Misc.21

Net Additions = cumulative additions – cumulative retirements California Cumulative and Net Resource Additions