I-95 Managed Lanes CORSIM Analysis Status Meeting 11-15-07 Presented by David Stroud, PE, AICP Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration
Advertisements

© 2014 HDR, all rights reserved. I5-Broadway Weilder – Safety Analysis Jon Makler, ODOT Miranda Wells, HDR OR ITE Winter Workshop February 26 th, 2015.
Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Simulating I-710 Corridor Presented in the Western ITE Annual Meeting Santa Barbara, California.
I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force March 18, 2004.
Fargo-Moorhead Metro COG Wade E. Kline, AICP.  Depict existing freeway operations: I-94 & 1-29 Metro Area  Model existing conditions (2008), 2015, and.
An Analytical Framework for Managed Lane Facility Performance Evaluation Xiaoyue Cathy Liu University of Washington To Be Presented at the Western ITE.
Conference Center of the Americas US SOUTHERN COMMAND
City of Portland SW 6 th Avenue & Jackson Street Intersection Solution Study 1 Presented By: Josh Crain Robert Acevedo Xiaowei Wu Chengxin Dai.
S.R. 690 (118th Avenue) (C.R. 296). Agenda Introduction Alternative Analysis –Comparison of Compressed ROW and Viaduct –Why the Viaduct –Flyover Alternative.
Signs Keep it Simple. Which are on ramps? Exits?
Interchange Design Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
MODULE 6 Objectives: Students will learn about using risk reducing strategies to manage multiple-lane roads at speeds up to 65 mph in complex risk environments.
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
75 Express Lanes Segments A&B Construction From NW 170 Street to South of Miramar Parkway Community Meeting Presentation Tuesday April 28, 2015.
3/17/06Michael Dixon1 CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 22: Diverge Area Special Cases, Influence Area Speeds, and Freeway Weaving Sections.
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Public Involvement Meeting June 11,  Introduce the project  Provide history and current status of the project  Explain the benefits of the project.
Southern Nevada HOV Plan Update ITE Luncheon July 17, 2014 Jeff Lerud, Project Manager.
Ramps & Weaving.
Transpo 2012 The Future of Traffic Incident Management, October 30, 2012 Javier Rodriguez, P.E., ITS Operations Engineer Joe Snyder, TMC Manager FDOT District.
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
Route 1 Project Study Report Overview. A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost.
75 Express Lanes Project From NW 170 Street to I-595 TIM Meeting Wednesday, September 2.
DRAFT 1 Significant Changes for the 2006 Constrained Long-Range Plan March 3, 2006.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Presenter: Dewayne Johnson, P.E. SE Region Director/Bureau of Traffic Operations Director.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Section 3 (Day 6) Basic Maneuvering Tasks: Low ,
Virginia Department of Education
Challenged Detectors – Volume- Occupancy Plots & Maps.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Problem 4: Okeechobee Road Stopped Control Analysis.
AND TRAFFIC SETTINGS ENVIRONMENTS. RESIDENTIAL STREETS FACTORS???? DRIVING PATTERNS SPEED PEDESTRIANS PARKED CARS TRAFFIC LAWS.
Virginia Department of Education
Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments Topic 1 -- Characteristics of Expressways Topic 2 (through Lesson 1)-- Entering, Changing Lanes, and.
Public Involvement Meeting December 10,  Introduce the project  Explain the benefits of the project  Discuss tasks completed since last public.
September 15, 2011 Presented by: Clay Harris, PMP - City of Austin Federico Mendoza, PE, PTOE – Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc. Todd Lane Alternative Geometric.
Design Manager: Chris Thomas CEAL July 17, Interstate 8 (I-8) to Interstate 5 (I-5) Connector Widening and Auxiliary Lane Project.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
DRIVING THE FREEWAYS ALABAMA DRIVER MANUAL CHAPTER 8.
Metro Highway Program Presentation to CMAA Abdollah Ansari
A Sketch Planning Assessment of Managed-Lane Options for the I-5 Freeway Corridor Master Plan William R. Loudon, DKS Associates.
Program Manager Administrator
OBJECTIVES  We will understand the characteristics of expressways  We will apply risk-reducing strategies to enter and exit traffic, steer, establish.
HCM 2010: FREEWAY FACILITIES PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
Major Project Scoping Committee.  Two previous studies to develop improvements for the I-35W Corridor ◦ Project Limits were from 42 nd to I-94 ◦ Project.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
ENVIRONMENTS AND TRAFFIC SETTINGS CHAPTER NINE. FACTORS AFFECTING RES. STREET DRIVING EXPECT SURPRISES, DRIVE THE SPEED LIMIT! PEDESTRIANS HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
Status Report on the Regional Value Pricing Study Ronald F. Kirby, Director of Transportation Planning November 15, 2006 Item 11.
Development of Traffic Simulation Models Course Instructors: Mark Hallenbeck, Director, UW TRAC Tony Woody, P.E., CH2M HILL Offered By: UW TRANSPEED xxxxx,
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7 Problem 2.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation BARRIER DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR CRASH MITIGATION SE 2 nd Avenue and Biscayne Blvd Way (SE 4 th Street)
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan
Friday, December 16th.
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Study Goals Analyze traffic operations along the corridor and at the two study interchanges Provide safety enhancements Improve multimodal performance.
State Route 55 Improvement Project from Interstate 5 to State Route 91
Presentation transcript:

I-95 Managed Lanes CORSIM Analysis Status Meeting Presented by David Stroud, PE, AICP Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc.

Presentation Overview Purpose Purpose Traffic Traffic Weave Types Weave Types Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics -HOT Lane Access at 81 st -HOT Access at GGI

95 Express CORSIM Scope PurposePurpose –To model operational characteristics of the I-95 Express project. Evaluate HOT ingress/egress locations based on weaving and access/proximity to interchanges.Evaluate HOT ingress/egress locations based on weaving and access/proximity to interchanges. Assessment based on freeway system operationsAssessment based on freeway system operations Project ScopeProject Scope –Stage 1: South of I-395 to North of GGI plus IOAR –Stage 2: North of GGI to North of I-595 –Stage 3: Corridor Assessment of HOT ingress/egress

Existing Demand – Build Scenario 2,200 HOT Lanes GP Lanes 78% 10,000 vph 7,800 22% * * SERPM 2010 Build 1,660 vph/ln 1,100 vph/ln 1,950 vph/ln

Speed – Flow – Density

Weaving –Type A Weave All weaving vehicles must make one lane change to complete their maneuver successfully

Weaving – Type B Weave One weaving movement can be made without making any lane changes while the other weaving movement requires at most one lane change

Weaving – Type C Weave One weaving movement may be made without making a lane change while the other weaving movement requires two or more lane changes

81 st Street HOT Access 10,0007,8007,3007,800 2,9002,500 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover Entrances From I-195/SR 112 NW 62nd St NW 69th St NW 81st St Total Ramp Vol. 2,350 vph 780 vph 260vph 870vph 4,260 vph Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike 6,600 I-95 Northbound 2, NW 81st St NW 95th St 7,900 Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type C Weave 4 Service Interchanges 950 vph Weave Vol. 465 vph 198 vph 67 vph 220 vph 950 vph 100 1,500 2,200

81 st Street HOT Access 10,000 7,800 7,3007,800 2,9002,500 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover 7,9006,600 NW 95th St I-95 Northbound 2,500 7,3007, ,400 2,900 2, ,500 6,400 NW 81st St Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type A Weave 950 vph + 1,400 vph Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike 100 1,500 2,200

81 st Street HOT Access 10,0007,8007,3007,800 2,9002,500 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover 6,600 Ramp Vol. 445 vph 660 vph 680 vph 390 vph 685 vph 150 vph 3,010 vph Exits to NW 95th St NW 103rd St NW 119th St NW 125th St NW 135th St NW151st St Total I-95 Northbound 2, NW 81st St NW 95th St 7,900 Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type C Weave 6 Service Interchanges 1,400 vph Weave Vol. 234 vph 234vph 234 vph 234 vph 419 vph 45 vph 1,400 vph Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike 100 1,500 2,200

81 st Street HOT Access 10,0007,8007,3007,800 2,9002,500 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover Entrances From I-195/SR 112 NW 62nd St NW 69th St NW 81st St Total Ramp Vol. 2,350 vph 780 vph 260vph 870vph 4,260 vph 6,600 Ramp Vol. 445 vph 660 vph 680 vph 390 vph 685 vph 150 vph 3,010 vph Exits to NW 95th St NW 103rd St NW 119th St NW 125th St NW 135th St NW151st St Total I-95 Northbound 2, NW 81st St NW 95th St 7,900 Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type C Weave 4 Service Interchanges 950 vph –Type A Weave 950 vph + 1,400 vph –Type C Weave 6 Service Interchanges 1,400 vph Weave Vol. 465 vph 198 vph 67 vph 220 vph 950 vph Weave Vol. 234 vph 234 vph 234 vph 234 vph 419 vph 45 vph 1,400 vph Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike 100 1,500 2,200

GGI HOT Access 10,000 7,800 7,3007,800 2,9002,500 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover 7,9006,600 NW 95th St I-95 Northbound NW 81st St 1,600 7,9008, ,600 2,500 2, , Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type C Weave 6 Service Interchanges 700 vph –Type A Weave 700 vph + 1,600 vph –Type C Weave to I-95 NB exits Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike 100 1,500 2,200

GGI HOT Access 10,0007,800 7,3007,800 2,9002,500 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover 700 vph 7,9007,300 NW 95th St I-95 Northbound NW 81st St 900 7,9009,500 1,600 2,500 2, , Exit to PNR Exit to Turnpike ,200 Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type C Weave eliminated –Type A Weave changes to Type B –Type C Weave to I-95 NB exits

GGI HOT Access (81 st Closed) 10,000 7,800 7,300 2,900 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover 7,3006,400 NW 95th St I-95 Northbound NW 81st St 1,600 7,3008, ,900 2,900 2, ,700 1,000 Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike 100 1,600 2,200 Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type C Weave 6 Service Interchanges 600 vph –Type A Weave 700 vph + 1,600 vph –Type C Weave to I-95 NB exits

GGI HOT Access (81 st Closed) 10,0007,800 7,300 2,900 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover 700 vph 7,3007,000 NW 95th St I-95 Northbound NW 81st St 1,000 7,3009,200 1,900 2,900 2, ,900 1,000 Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike ,200 Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Type C Weave eliminated –Type A Weave changes to Type B –Type C Weave to I-95 NB exits

Turnpike Access (81 st Closed) 10,0007,800 7,300 2,900 Exit to HOT Lane Entry from I-195 Flyover 700 vph 7,3007,000 NW 95th St I-95 Northbound NW 81st St 2, ,900 1,000 Exit to PNR Exit to Flyover Exit to Turnpike ,200 Operational Characteristics Operational Characteristics –Complex ! ?

Turnpike Access HOT HOV TPK Existing Lane Configuration Existing Lane Configuration Biscayne Canal

Turnpike Access HOT HOV TPK Alternate 1 Alternate 1 Biscayne Canal

Turnpike Access HOT HOV TPK Alternate 2 Preferred Alternate 2 Preferred Biscayne Canal