Cascade and Flasher Workshop Welcome! n Logistics n Agenda n Goals Spencer Klein, LBNL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sean Grullon w/ Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
Advertisements

10 Aug 2010PC Analysis PC Schedule Tuesdays fortnightly Provisional dates 10 Aug 24 Aug 7 Sept 21 Sept But it’s holiday season so they may vary –
PMT Calibration Results and the MC simulation Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University
SPICE Mie [mi:] Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison. Updates to ppc and spice PPC: Randomized the simulation based on system time (with us resolution) Added the.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
IceCube Offline Database Overview Georges Kohnen Université de Mons-Hainaut IceCube Software Bootcamp.
EHE Neutrino Search with the IceCube Aya Ishihara The University of Wisconsin - Madison for the EHE Verification working group.
Sean Grullon Waveform-Based Reconstruction for EHE Cascades.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
MEASURE Evaluation MEASURE Evaluation’s Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop for Tuberculosis Programs.
High Energy Verification Status and plan for PY Shigeru Yoshida (Chiba University)
Phun with Photonics Phun with Photonics Berkeley IceCube Collaboration Meeting Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley March 20, 2005.
November 24, 2004 Rolf Nahnhauer1 PROJECT : IceCube Digital Optical Module Production at DESY Zeuthen.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
Phone: Website: *This PowerPoint is available on.
High Energy - Engineering Working Group IceCube PY8 Spring Collaboration Meeting Apr 29, 2009 Jim Baccus.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
Mrs. Grant’s and Mrs. Juneau‘s Second Grade Classes Welcome!
C. Seez Imperial College November 28th, 2002 ECAL testbeam Workshop 1 Pulse Reconstruction Worth considering the experience of other experiments using.
Time calibration IceCube reconstruction workshop UMD, November 2004 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
Photon propagation and ice properties Bootcamp UW Madison Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison r air bubble photon.
Erik Blaufuss University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
November 2013 Review Talks Morning Plenary Talk – CLAS12 Software Overview and Progress ( ) Current Status with Emphasis on Past Year’s Progress:
J. Vandenbroucke N. Bramall, M.D’Agostino, A. Morey, P. Sandstrom, M.Solarz, I.Taboada Calibration of the Standard Candle: How Standard Is It? IceCube.
Standard Candle, Flasher, and Cascade Simulations in IceCube Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley PSU Analysis Meeting June 21-24, 2006.
Ice Investigation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW (photon propagation code)
Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
IceCube simulation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison, 2010.
MCMC reconstruction of the 2 HE cascade events Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison.
Feature Extraction IceCube Collaboration meeting in Berkeley, March 2005 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.
Calibrations Accomplishments in PY03 Plans for PY04 Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 lead – Detector Characterization.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
Feasibility of acoustic neutrino detection in ice: First results from the South Pole Acoustic Test Setup (SPATS) Justin Vandenbroucke (UC Berkeley) for.
Welcome to Rankin Elementary -- 4 th Grade Mrs. Vicari Room 30.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
GPU Photon Transport Simulation Studies Mary Murphy Undergraduate, UW-Madison Dmitry Chirkin IceCube at UW-Madison Tareq AbuZayyad IceCube at UW-River.
IceCube simulation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison, 2010 effective scattering coefficient (from Ryan Bay)
DirectFit reconstruction of the Aya’s two HE cascade events Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison Method of the fit: exhaustive search simulate cascade events with.
Mrs. Grant’s and Mrs. Juneau‘s Second Grade Classes Welcome!
Deployment Monitoring & Drill Logging (offline) at Pole Kurt Woschnagg IceCube collaboration meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Muon Energy reconstruction in IceCube and neutrino flux measurement Dmitry Chirkin, University of Wisconsin at Madison, U.S.A., MANTS meeting, fall 2009.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Intra-String Muon Timing
Light Propagation in the South Pole Ice
Doug Cowen/High-Level Analysis Preparation/SAC Meeting
South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.
An expected performance of Dubna neutrino telescope
Calibrations What’s new in Kurt Woschnagg, UCB
Auto-Assign Led by Bethany Boyle & Dave Kritz
String 21 Flashers and AMANDA
Freeze-In and Hole Ice Studies with Flashers
Time resolution measurement with Madison test-DAQ
Light Sources for AMANDA/IceCube Cross-Calibration
Time calibration Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL UC Berkeley, November 2004.
Ice Investigation with PPC
String-21 Flasher Analysis
Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data
Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers
Tau Neutrinos in IceCube
Summary of yet another Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005.
Reconstruction of the SC with rime
Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005 Going the last mile…
Presentation transcript:

Cascade and Flasher Workshop Welcome! n Logistics n Agenda n Goals Spencer Klein, LBNL

Logistics n Talks Monday and Tuesday mornings u Otherwise: Work Time F Small groups and individuals u Progress Reports Wed. morning and closeout Wed. afternoon. n Monday, Tuesday in Perseverance Hall n Wednesday in Bldg. 2, Room 100B n Separate ‘breakout’ room available in afternoons n Wireless in all conference rooms u Some ethernet available. Ask for a cable if you need one

Talks on the web n I will put all of the talks on the web n Please me your talks!

Talks n Monday: u ???: A users guide to the flashers” Mark Krasberg u “Flashers, Brightness Calibrations and Module Orientation” Chris Wendt u “Flasher Analysis with AMANDA” Kurt Woschnagg u “How to simulate cascades and flashers” Tom McCauley u “Characteristics of Flasher data” (Sourav Mandal) n Tuesday u “Flashers and Hole Ice” (Doug Rutledge) u “Analyzing flasher events with Renew” (Tom McCauley) u “Waveform based reconstruction” (Sean Grullon) u “String 21 flashers in AMANDA" Dave Hardtke u “Flasher reconstruction” (Dima Chirkin) u TBC: “Characteristics of Cascade Simulations” Spencer Klein

Goals n Goals: Push forward with cascade and flasher analysis u Produce Flasher verification plots F What are the most appropriate plots? Ice properties, timing, geometry, … u Simulate Cascades and Flashers F Find problems in simulations E.g. 1.pe. Pulses in simulation are ~ 2-3X larger than in data u Develop cascade algorithms using flasher (& simulation) data

Flasher Verification n What can the flashers tell us about how well IceCube is working? n What can the flashers tell us about ice quality? u We are ~ 300 m from AMANDA – is the ice any different? n What can the flashers tell us about hole ice? n Do we need additional runs with different configurations? u Not all LEDs? u AMANDA lasers

Flashers - Specific Tasks n Understand Flasher characteristics (nhits,…) n Systematic Timing verification (new flasher data) u Simulation for comparison data u Solve for individual resolution n Geometry verification (LLH reconstruction) u Location of DOM 60? u Start on inter-string geometry calibrations n Energy/Brightness calibrations n Ice properties n Hole Ice (probably not) n Orientation effects n Photonics for flashers? n Comparison of flasher data and cascade simulations n AMANDA looking at IceCube flashers

Cascade and Flasher simulation n IceTray simulations may finally be ready for physics use u Input/output & calibrations working u Photonics tables n Generate events and look at them n Compare flasher data and flasher simulations

Cascade Algorithm Development & Testing n Many different cascade algorithms, in different stages of development n What are similarities vs. differences? n What are appropriate metrics for comparing algorithms & how should they be weighted? u Vertex & energy reconstruction accuracy u Background rejection u Speed & robustness (for use at pole) n Can we make more progress by working together? u Common framework u Common simulations