FOREST PLAN REVISION Release of Draft Topic Papers INYO NATIONAL FOREST MAY - JUNE 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST.
Land. Land Use in the World US Public Lands Types of Forests 1) Old-growth (primary) forests – uncut or regenerated forest not hugely impacted by.
Thanks for joining us. We’ll be starting soon. To join the teleconference, dial , passcode # To download handouts : Click the Handouts.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Sierra Cascades Dialog, May Deb Whitall Region 5, Social Scientist FOREST PLAN REVISION AND THE DRAFT BIO-REGIONAL ASSESSMENT.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
“ We are in the business of healthy ecosystems.” A Business Plan For Ecosystem Health & Large-Scale Watershed Restoration In the Northern Region.
FOREST AND RANGELANDS ASSESSMENT STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting and Webinar November 7, 2013 Green Infrastructure, Open Spaces, Sustainable Recreation, and.
SOUTH COAST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office California Desert District.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Working in the Urbanizing Landscape: Changing Roles for Natural Resource Professionals Oregon Department of Forestry “Stewardship in Forestry”
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Slide 1 Our Mission: “Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for.
Knowledge on HIA IN CAMBODIA Constructing a Caring and Sharing Community Roles of HIA 4-6 October 2012 Bangkok.
HUMANS IN THE BIOSPHERE. A Changing Landscape  Growing populations depend on the limited natural resources of earth for survival.  Humans rely on ecological.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
The stock is the present accumulated quantity of natural capital. It is a supply accumulated for future use; a store. The natural income is any sustainable.
Landsat Discussion NGAC Meeting March 17-18, 2011.
Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach Brian Kaestner Saint Mary’s Hall Brian Kaestner Saint Mary’s Hall Thanks to Miller and Clements.
Sierra Water Workgroup Summit 2013 Kings Beach, CA Don Yasuda Regional Analyst USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLAN Wallowa-Whitman National Forest March 2008 Nez Perce Tribe Update Nez Perce Tribe Update.
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
INYO NATIONAL FOREST - TRAVEL ANALYSIS PROCESS Public Meeting – April 21, 2015.
Key Concepts Ch. 23  Human land use  Types and uses of US public lands  Forests and forest management  Implications of deforestation  Management of.
Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 14 th Edition Chapter 11 G. Tyler Miller’s Living.
Chapter 14. Objectives 1.Distinguish between urban and rural land. 2.Describe three major ways in which humans use land. 3.Explain the concept of ecosystem.
Land Chapter 14. How we use land  Land usage- –Rangeland= used for grazing and wildlife –Forest land= used for harvesting wood, wildlife, fish, and other.
Resource Management Plan (RMP) Revision for the Las Vegas and Pahrump Field Offices Muddy Mountains.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
What is Rangeland?. What is rangeland? Uncultivated land dominated by native plants: grasses, grass-like plants, forbs, or shrubs. All land that is not.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Fig. 10-4, p. 193 Support energy flow and chemical cycling Reduce soil erosion Absorb and release water Purify water and air Influence local and regional.
Science and the Environment Chapter 1 Section 1: Understanding Our Environment Section 2: The Environment and Society Chapter 1 Section 1: Understanding.
On – Site Training Overview LAND USE PLANNING FOR PRIORITY SPECIES AND VEGETATION March 11, 2010.
Jonathan Long and Carl Skinner With Contributions from the Science Synthesis Team USDA FS Pacific Southwest Research Station SocialEcological.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Welcome Opportunity to Learn – Public, Groups, Agencies and FS Patience Respect Ask.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Land, Public and Private Chapter 10. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change.
BIODIVERSITY Objectives: Explain biodiversity and its importance.
Chapter 12- Biodiversity
Biodiversity: Who cares?. What do you think biodiversity means?
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Chapter 10 Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 14 th Edition Chapter 11 G. Tyler Miller’s Living.
What are Rangelands? Presentation (ppt.)
Chapter 1 – Environment, Sustainability, and Science.
Forest Planning and IRWMPs in the Sierra Nevada Sue Britting June 11, 2013.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Land Use Ch. 14. Land Use and Land Cover Urban land –Land covered mainly with buildings and roads Rural land –Land that contains relatively few people.
Bell Work Define what you think an indicator is.
Climate Resilience for the Upper Columbia River Workshop Climate Change Group Activity Mike Sanders, F&W, Manager, Strategic Initiatives.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Section 4: Resources and Conservation
Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach
Chapter 17 Land Resources.
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
7-3 How Have We Affected the Word’s Terrestrial Ecosystems?
Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach
Inner Terrestrial Planets
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: The Ecosystem Approach
Presentation transcript:

FOREST PLAN REVISION Release of Draft Topic Papers INYO NATIONAL FOREST MAY - JUNE 2013

Meeting Objectives Provide an overview of the forest plan revision process Introduce the draft topic papers currently available for public review

What is a Forest Plan? Required for all national forests/grasslands Provides broad resource management direction Programmatic, not site- specific Ten to fifteen year planning period All uses of the forest need to conform with plan direction

The Inyo’s Forest Plan Completed in 1988; multiple amendments Established management direction for forest resources such as wildlife, recreation, and timber Delineated geographic management areas and prescriptions

Assessment Plan Revision Monitoring Three Phases to Revise a Forest Plan

Multi-year process 2012 Develop Inyo NF Collabor- ation Plan 2013 Complete Assessment Reports Begin identifying Need for Change 2014 Complete Need for Change Develop and analyze Proposed Plan 2015 to 2016 Public review of draft Plan and EIS Approve revised Plan Monitoring

First Phase: Assessment Social Conditions Economic Conditions Ecological Conditions

Assessment is being conducted at two scales Sierra Nevada Bioregion Inyo National Forest

Inyo NF Assessment Report Provides a source of information and context for plan revision Conducted rapidly, using existing information and data Resource “topic paper” chapters will form the foundation of the Assessment Report Describe current conditions and expected trends Identify information or knowledge gaps Draft topic papers available for public review through June 30 th Draft Assessment Report available for review in October, finalized in December, 2013

Assessment Topic Papers Ch. 1: Ecosystem Condition (Terrestrial, Aquatic, Riparian Ecosystems) Ch. 2: Air, Soil, and Water Resources Ch. 3: System Drivers and Stressors (wildfire, climate change, insects and disease, etc.) Ch. 4: Carbon stocks Ch. 5: At-risk wildlife and plant species Ch. 6: Social, Cultural, and Economic Conditions Ch. 7: Ecosystem Services and Benefits Ch. 8: Multiple Uses (Water, Range, Timber, Hunting/Fishing/Plant Collection) Ch. 9: Recreation and Scenic Character Ch. 10: Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy and Mineral Resources Ch. 11: Infrastructure Ch. 12: Areas of Tribal Importance Ch. 13: Cultural & Historic Resources Ch. 14: Land Status and Ownership Ch. 15: Designated Areas (wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, research natural areas, inventoried roadless areas)

Ecosystem Condition & Trend (Ch. 1) Pinyon-juniper forests have become increasingly dense, with trees encroaching into surrounding shrublands. Sagebrush and desert shrublands are experiencing greater fire frequencies than during the past. Jeffrey pine forests have increased tree densities, smaller tree diameters, and elevated surface fuels. Recreation, grazing, water diversions, dams, and introduction of non-native species (esp. trout) have affected aquatic ecosystems.

Water Resources & Uses (Ch. 2 & 8) Water from the forest provides 25-75% of the supply for Los Angeles, plus local municipal/domestic water supply. Water quality is generally good, except for local areas with streamflow diversions and high erosion rates. Four water bodies on State 303(d) list of impaired water bodies. Altered streamflow is the major stressor for water-related resources.

At-risk Species (Ch. 5) Populations and habitats for most species expected to be stable over the next 20 years. Populations of willow flycatcher, mountain yellow-legged frog, others are at risk. Population and distribution of endangered Sierra bighorn are increasing. Bi-State sage-grouse populations remain stable, and are increasing in some areas. Habitat quality is being reduced by expansion of pinyon and Jeffrey pine into sagebrush.

Economics & Social Conditions (Ch. 6) Travel and tourism comprise 50% of jobs in Inyo, Mono, Esmeralda, and Mineral Counties. Mining jobs comprise 0.8% of jobs, agriculture 1.3% of jobs. Recreational activities on the forest provide a significant economic contribution. Support 12.5% of all jobs and over 9% of all labor income. Recreation expected to increase both in numbers of visitors and types of recreational opportunities desired.

Recreation & Designated Areas (Ch. 9 & 15) 2.5 million visits to the forest in Sustaining recreation operations is a challenge due to declining budgets. Partnerships expected to be even more critical for sustaining recreation activities and services in the future. Designated areas include wilderness, wild & scenic rivers, inventoried roadless areas, national scenic area, etc. Special management applies, affecting the types of activities that can occur.

How to Get Involved The draft topic papers are available for public review through June 30, 2013! The papers are available on: The Living Assessment Wiki ( The Forest website ( A hard copy is available at the Forest Supervisor’s Office in Bishop.

How to Provide Feedback Edit the topic papers directly in the Living Assessment Wiki ( your input to Send written input to Inyo National Forest, Attn: Forest Plan Revision, 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 200, Bishop CA Input due June 30 th !