SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Allowable and Unallowable Costs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Advertisements

A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Time and Effort Reporting Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) 3/1/2014.
Title III Supplemental Guidance & Allowable Expenses Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Ph.D. Title III Consultant Fall 2013.
ESEA Title I Supplement, Not Supplant, and American Reinvestment and Recover Act (ARRA) funds.
California Department of Food and Agriculture
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
Consolidated Application Budget Detail and Fiscal Issues.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
Title I: An Allowable Cost or Not? Fall Title I Statewide Conference November 5, 2014.
Carl D. Perkins Career & Technical Education Act of 2006 The Law, The Myths, The Legends February 2015.
Financial Rep Meeting July 14, SPONSORED RESEARCH ROBERTA MCMANUS 2.
Uses and Budgeting of Title I, II, III and VI Funds January 13, 2010 Bambi Perrigin and Edmund Moore.
Teresa A. Burgess, Coordinator Elmira Feather, Federal Grants Specialist 2014 Update Title II-A: Consolidated Federal & State Grant Application (CFSGA)
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT Denise Dusek Federal Funding Specialist December 7, 2011.
Fiscal Compliance Why it matters… University of Delaware.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 11 Title III LEP/Immigrant Technical Assistance: Required Annual Update of the Local Educational.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Supplement or Supplant Was it in place last year? Was it affected by cuts in unrestricted funding? Is it part of the district’s core program? Is it aligned.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
Title Grants Division Illinois State Board of Education 1 NCLB TITLE GRANT MANAGEMENT ISBE Illinois Association of Title I Directors Annual Fall Conference.
Don’t Take It For Granted! Sarah Averill and Audrey Hukari Division of Grants Administration Texas Education Agency.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Head Start Fiscal Training April 2009 Trainer: PhuongY Nguyen.
OREGON 1. Arizona Department of Education Career & Technical Education Section Phoenix, AZ
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Time and Effort Reporting. Where is the Requirement? Time and effort reporting is required under the Federal Office of Management and Budget’s Circular.
Federal Transit Administration Direct and Indirect Cost Essentials.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 16, 2010 Sacramento,
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Financial Management  Subgrantees shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures to insure proper distribution of and accounting for Federal.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
New Directors’ Training Title II-A 101 Teacher/Principal Quality Teresa.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Consolidated Federal and State Grants Application (CFSGA)
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Maximizing Multiple Funding Sources Belinda Rinker, Senior Policy Analyst Office of Head Start Developing a recipe for high.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
What is Title I-A? Purpose – help disadvantaged children meet high academic standards Purpose – help disadvantaged children meet high academic standards.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Georgia WIC District Nutrition Services Directors (NSD) Meeting Presented by: Program Administration Date: March 22, 2016.
Title I, Part A Allowability of Costs Association of Compensatory Educators of Texas (ACET) Conference-Austin, Texas April 7, 2015 Anita Villarreal, State.
PAPFC Annual Conference May 3-6, 2015 Presented By: Cindy Rhoads Division of Federal Programs Pennsylvania Department of Education.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
COS RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS MEETING
Presentation transcript:

SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Allowable and Unallowable Costs

All Costs Must Be: 1.Necessary, Reasonable and Allocable 2.Consistently treated as either direct cost or an indirect cost 3.Conform with federal law & grant terms 4.Consistent with state and local policies 5.In accordance with GAAP 6.Not included as match 7.Net of applicable credits ( ) 8.Adequately (properly) documented SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE C.F.R Part 200. Subpart E-Cost Principles

Allowable and Unallowable Costs Necessary Cost Not “nice to have.” If you catch yourself or someone else saying, “It would be nice to have …”, then most likely it is not necessary to accomplish the objectives of the program in that it is not vital or required. “Necessary” means it is vital or required in order to meet the objectives of the grant or for the grant to be successful. SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Unallowable Entertainment Expenses SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE (1) An invited speaker is in town to present a seminar. While here, you take him to dinner and a sporting event to show your appreciation. The above costs are for “amusement, diversion, and social activities and any costs directly associated with such costs (such as tickets to shows or sports events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation, and gratuities)” and therefore are examples of unallowable entertainment costs.

Unallowable Entertainment Expenses (2) It is the end of the Fiscal Year and you have survived another one. You decide to have a year end party for your department to lift morale. Catering delivers a luncheon in the conference room and everyone in the department gets together to socialize and unwind. The above costs are for “amusement, diversion, and social activities and any costs directly associated with such costs (such as tickets to shows or sports events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation, and gratuities)” and therefore are examples of unallowable entertainment costs. SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

Allowable and Unallowable Costs Reasonable Cost Necessary to carry out objectives Reasonable in cost- comparable to current fair market value SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Allowable and Unallowable Costs Allocable Cost Assignable or chargeable to the grant in accordance with relative benefits received by the grant during the grant period. Must demonstrate how a particular cost benefits the specific population being served in the grant (ex: homeless students). Allocability = proportionality If cost benefits 1 grant program, entire cost can be charged to that single grant program. If cost benefits more than 1 grant program, cost must be allocated among the grant programs (i.e., split-funded) in accordance with the relative benefits received by each program. SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Allowable and Unallowable Costs Supplement not Supplant What does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean? Supplement – to add to; to enhance; to expand; to increase; to extend; to create something new. Supplant – to take the place of; to replace by something else. An LEA must be able to operate its schools and its core foundation programs without any federal funds. Federal grant funds may be used only to supplement the educational programs generally offered with state and local funds. They may be used only to provide supplemental services that would not have been provided had the federal grant funds not been available. SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Allowable and Unallowable Costs Am I supplanting? SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Ask yourself : If I didn’t have federal funds available to conduct this activity/service, would I still conduct it with state or local funds anyway ? Yes If the answer is yes, you are most likely supplanting because it is no longer a supplementary activity. You must be able to demonstrate that you could not conduct the activity if it weren’t for the federal funds.

Allowable and Unallowable Costs SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Direct Costs Cost that can be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective. "Cost Objective" means a function, activity, award, contract. Typical costs: Compensation of employees who work on that award, their related fringe benefits, the costs of materials and other items of expense incurred for the Federal award. Administrative and Clerical ONLY IF (1)Administrative or clerical services are integral to a project or activity (2) Individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity (3) Such costs are explicitly included in the budget or have the prior written approval (4) The costs are not also covered for indirect costs Indirect Costs Cost occured for common or joint purposes benefiting more than one cost objective. Cost can be specifically identfied with a particular cost objective without effort disproportionate to the results achived. Typical Costs: General administration, director’s office, accounting, Human Resources, Payroll Administrative and Clerical The salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect (F&A) costs.

Allowable and Unallowable Costs All Costs Must Be: 1.Necessary, Reasonable and Allocable 2.Consistently treated as either direct cost or an indirect cost 3. Conform with federal law & grant terms SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Allowable and Unallowable Costs Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) cover only general Cost Principles applicable to all education grants. In addition to general cost principles, each program has specific program requirements and restrictions. Contact the State Coordinator assigned to each program. SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Allowable and Unallowable Costs New: Title I, Part A guidance: Allowable and Unallowable Costs  Examples of allowable costs  Examples of unallowable costs  Difference between schoolwide and targeted assistance program expenditures Please us a feedback SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Today’s presenters: Title I-A Basic Karen Seay: Director, Federal Policy/ESEA Kathy Gauby: Title I-A Coordinator, Federal Policy/ESEA Elmira Feather: Federal Grant Specialist, Federal Policy/ESEA Title II-A Teacher & Principal Quality Teresa Burgess: Coordinator, Federal Policy/ESEA Title I-D: Neglected/Delinquent Education, Title VI-B: Rural & Low-Income Schools Title X-C: McKinney-Vento Tina Naillon: Coordinator, Federal Policy/ESEA IDEA, Part B Wendy Lee: Coordinator, Special Education SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Title II-A Teacher & Principal Quality SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Title II-A Allowable Activities -Professional Development (On Site or Off Site) -Salaries/Stipends (Mentors, Instructional Coaches, Title II-A Program -Director, Substitutes for Title II-A PD Coverage) -CFSGA Plan/Activities/Budget/Expenditures – all must align (Notes section of CFSGA is VERY important in checking the history of the plan approval and correspondence) -Class Size Reduction (Limited Use with Criteria) *Criteria on next slide ** iPads, laptops, computers, software – NOT allowable

Title II-A Teacher & Principal Quality SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Class Size Reduction ** NOTE: Information from USDE indicates that CSR will no longer be an option once reauthorization happens. 1. Based upon a needs assessment, 2. Must reduce class size to 17 or fewer, 3. In grades k-3, 4. In classes taught by highly qualified teachers who adjust instructional strategies to fit reduced-class size, 5. For schools with at risk populations of students, 6. Where the effort is sustained for the cohort group for at least 2 years

IDEA Allowability Checklist: SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Is the cost allowable under EDGAR (2 CFR 200)? Is the cost allowable under IDEA Part B? Tied to allowable IDEA purpose? Is the cost allowable under IDEA’s fiscal rules? i.e. Maintenance of Effort, Supplement Not Supplant, Excess Cost (B)(7) NEW: Required written procedures for determining allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E Cost Principles Identifies procedures on how to determine if the cost is needed to carry out the grant program properly and efficiently: explain how grants dollars or costs are necessary for the operation and or act as efficient performance of the federal award. Identifies protocol on how the LEA followed sound business practices. The procedures must explain all factors affecting allowability of costs, and the said document must act as guide and or training tool for employees

IDEA Necessary and Reasonable Practical Questions SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Practical Questions Do I really need this? Is the expense targeted to valid programmatic/administrative need? In your plan? If not in the plan, it is not necessary. Required in a student’s IEP? Required for Child Find Activities? Is this the minimum amount I need to spend to meet my need? Do I have the capacity to use what I am purchasing? Did I pay a fair rate? If I were asked to defend this purchase, would I be able to? Are the costs adequately documented? In general, necessary and reasonable means to an objective observer who could easily understand the decision to spend funds on an activity and or program needs.

IDEA Excess Cost SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE For a particular cost to be allowed, it must be an excess cost of providing special education and related services. Only allowed costs may be charged to IDEA Part B or Preschool grants. When determining whether a cost is an excess cost, ask the following guiding questions: In the absence of special education needs, would this cost exist? If the answer is… a.No, then the cost is an excess cost and may be eligible. b.Yes, then the cost is not an excess cost and is not allowed. Is this cost also generated by students without disabilities? If the answer is… a.No, then the cost is an excess cost and may be eligible. b.Yes, then the cost is not an excess cost and is not allowed. If it is a child specific service, is the service documented in the student’s IEP? If the answer is… a.No, then the cost is an excess cost and may be eligible. b.Yes, then the cost is not an excess cost and is not allowed.

IDEA Part B Funding Manual SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Allowable and Unallowable Costs SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE