Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center July 2, 2002 Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center July 2, 2002 High Brightness Electron Beam Magnetic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results CSR Workshop.
Advertisements

Nominal and no CSR (R 56-1 = 55 mm, R 56-2 = 59 mm, R 56-3 = 0) L1 phase = 21 deg, V 3.9 = 55 MV CSR OFF BC3 OFF Elegant Tracking  z1 = mm (post.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Approaches for the generation of femtosecond x-ray pulses Zhirong Huang (SLAC)
ICFA Sardinia July 1-6, 2002 Z. Huang CSR Microbunching: Gain Calculation Zhirong Huang & Kwang-Je Kim Argonne National Laboratory.
P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Low-Charge LCLS Operating Point Including FEL Simulations P. Emma 1, W. Fawley 2, Z. Huang 1, C.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Accelerator Issues and Design Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
P. Emma, SLACICFA XFEL July 29, 2004 Electron Bunch Measurements with a Transverse RF Deflector P. Emma ICFA XFEL 2004 Workshop July 29, 2004 ICFA.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Longitudinal Space Charge in LCLS S2E Z. Huang, M. Borland, P. Emma, J.H. Wu SLAC and Argonne Berlin S2E Workshop 8/21/2003.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
Simulation of Microbunching Instability in LCLS with Laser-Heater Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
Beam Modulation due to Longitudinal Space Charge Zhirong Huang, SLAC Berlin S2E Workshop 8/18/2003.
Yujong Kim The Center for High Energy Physics, Korea DESY Hamburg, Germany Alternative Bunch Compressors.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
Change in Program Tuesday Morning Review of 2002 CSR Workshop (T. Limberg, 20 min) CSR calculation Models (M. Dohlus, 40 min) The 3D Codes TraFiC4 and.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
PAC-2001, Chicago, IL Paul Emma SLAC SLAC Issues and R&D Critical to the LCLS UCLA LLNL.
S2E (start-to-end) Simulations at DESY T. Limberg TESLA Collaboration Meeting in Frascati, May 2003.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II Accel. Phys., J.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
A. Zholents (ANL) and M. Zolotorev (LBNL)
1 Short Electron Pulses from RF Photoinjectors Massimo Ferrario INFN - LNF.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
Emittance Growth in the SPPS Chicane P. Emma, P. Krejcik, C. O’Connell, M. Woodley; SLAC, H. Schlarb, F. Stulle; DESY.
A single-shot method for measuring fs bunches in linac-based FELs Z. Huang, K. Bane, Y. Ding, P. Emma.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Accelerator Physics Challenges of X-Ray FEL SASE Sources
MULTI-TeV BUNCH COMPRESSOR STUDIES
CSR Microbunching in the Zeuthen-Workshop Benchmark Chicane
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Design of Compression and Acceleration Systems Technical Challenges
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback System and Bunch Length Monitor Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS DOE Review, February 08, 2006 LCLS longitudinal.
Enhanced Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission
Presentation transcript:

Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center July 2, 2002 Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center July 2, 2002 High Brightness Electron Beam Magnetic Compression: Physics and Compressor Design

“Any fool with four dipoles can compress a bunch” — anonymous “Any fool with four dipoles can compress a bunch” — anonymous OK, but there may be a few details to consider…

Magnetic Bunch Compression z0z0 z0z0  z z zz zz under- compression V = V 0 sin(  ) RF Accelerating Voltage Voltage  z = R 56  Path Length-Energy Dependent Beamline Path Length-Energy Dependent Beamline …or over- compression  z z E/EE/E E/EE/E z z ‘chirp’

TESLA XFEL at DESY X-FEL Integrated into linear collider Å 3 compressors

X-FEL based on last 1-km of existing SLAC linac LCLS at SLAC LCLSLCLS Å 2 compressors

eV z  eV 0 Single-Stage Bunch Compression final bunch length and energy spread… bunch length stability with RF phase jitter… T. Raubenheimer ‘chirp’

  t0t0 t0t0 t0t0 t0t0 t1t1 t1t1 late arrival, higher energy, less chirp late arrival, higher energy, less chirp longer bunch, less wake, more chirp longer bunch, less wake, more chirp t2t2 t2t2 Two-Stage Compression Used for Stability System can be optimized for stability against timing & charge jitter ~same bunch length

Types of Compressors wiggler FODO-cell arc TT TT SLC RTL, SLC arcs NLC BC2 SLC RTL, SLC arcs NLC BC2 LEUTL,… LCLS, TTF-BC1,2, TESLA-BC1 LEUTL,… LCLS, TTF-BC1,2, TESLA-BC1 TESLA-BC2,3 But T 566 > 0 in all cases… (bunch head at z < 0 ) > 0 reverse sign < 0 simple, achromatic < 0 achromatic, cancellation? LTLT LTLT 4-dipole chicane LBLB LBLB LcLc LcLc  

For chicane or wiggler (any ‘non-focusing’ compressor), the path length... Now add 2 nd order term of sinusoidal rf accelerating voltage... For a uniform temporal distribution [  z 0 4  = (9/5)  z0 4 ] and  z 0  0  = nd Order Compression Limitations r  T 566 /R 56

For chicane and accelerating phase, RF curvature and T 566 always add, limiting the minimum bunch length... eV z ee z ee r  T 566 /R 56 Decelerating phase can be used to compensate T 566, but not practical in low energy compressors (used in NLC and TESLA)... ee linear 2 nd -order R 56 /m  z /  m

 1   40°  x =  Slope linearized x = s /4 Harmonic RF used to Linearize Compression RF curvature and 2 nd -order compression cause current spikes Harmonic RF at decelerating phase corrects 2 nd -order and allows unchanged z -distribution avoid! 0.5-m X-band section for LCLS (22 MV, 11.4 GHz) 3 rd harmonic used at TTF / TESLA 4 th harmonic used at LCLS 3 rd harmonic used at TTF / TESLA 4 th harmonic used at LCLS  m  m

eV z ee z ee Reverse-Sign R 56 to Linearize Compression eV z ee z ee   TESLA-BC arc example   70° TESLA-BC arc example   70° chicane or wiggler R 56 < 0 FODO-cell arc R 56 > 0

SLAC S-Band: s 0  1.32 mm a  11.6 mm s < ~6 mm SLAC S-Band: s 0  1.32 mm a  11.6 mm s < ~6 mm Wakefield induced slope (–) RF slope (+ for chicane) For a uniform s -distribution (  s = 2  3  s )... Induced voltage along bunch: Longitudinal Geometric Wakefields V(s)/MV/nC/m s/  s FW 1 mm 500  m 250  m 100  m 50  m 50  m 25  m 25  m ss Longitudinal point-wake: K. Bane

L  550 m, N  6.2  10 9,  z  75  m, E = 14 GeV LCLS Example of Wakefield Use wakefield ‘OFF’ wakefield ‘ON’ for uniform distribution wake-induced energy spread  head    0.26 %  head   < 0.02 % end of LCLS linac

 Wake cancels energy chirp after compression (weaker chicane, less CSR),  but also forms current spikes during compression, Advantages and Disadvantages of Wakefield  …and transverse wakes may dilute emittance of long bunch  Best of both: use SC-L-band before compression and S- or C-band after ?

Synchrotron Radiation zz zz   1/3 Power Wavelength coherent power incoherent power vacuum chamber cutoff N  10 10

Incoherent synchrotron radiation (ISR) increases at high energies - dilutes ‘slice’ emittance... For, symmetric beta- functions, the effect is minimum when... And substituting R 56 for ... Total chicane length, L, set by tolerable  N (e.g.,  /  0  1% )… LCLS BC2 ( E = 4.50 GeV, |R 56 | = 22 mm ) needs L  6.4 m LCLS BC1 ( E = 0.25 GeV, |R 56 | = 36 mm) needs L  0.06 m LCLS BC2 ( E = 4.50 GeV, |R 56 | = 22 mm ) needs L  6.4 m LCLS BC1 ( E = 0.25 GeV, |R 56 | = 36 mm) needs L  0.06 m ISR Emittance Growth for Chicane xx xx LL LL LBLB LBLB L L   T. Raubenheimer

  x = R 16 (s)  E/E bend-plane emittance growth e–e–e–e– R Coherent Synchrotron Radiation (CSR) zzzz coherent radiation for  z overtaking length: L 0  (24  z R 2 ) 1/3  s s xx xx  Powerful radiation generates energy spread in bends  Causes bend-plane emittance growth (short bunch worse)  Energy spread breaks achromatic system  L0L0L0L0  CSR wake is strong at very small scales (   m )

B1 B2 B3 B4  x  1.52  m Projected Emittance Growth B1 B2 B3 B4    0.021%     0.043% Berlin Workshop Case x/mrad z /mm

Now rematch incoming beam  opt  1.37 m  opt   1.10  opt  1.37 m  opt   1.10   1.52  m  0 = 1.00  m  CSR   m Projected Emittance growth reduced by  -matching slice centroids after CSR    opt    opt    opt    opt   1.15  m  0 = 1.00  m  CSR   m

 x  244 mm  x  107 mm II R 56 =  21 mm R 56 =  4 mm Double-Chicane Emittance Growth Cancellation  s  50  m  s  200  m  s  20  m E 0 = 5 GeV

CSR Emittance Growth Reduced in Double-Chicane  x  1.01  m projected emittance growth is greatly reduced using double- chicane, however, microbunching can be more severe single-chicanesingle-chicane double-chicanedouble-chicane

CSR Microbunching* in LCLS SC-wiggler damps bunching    3  10  5 Super-conducting wiggler prior to BC increases uncorrelated E -spread (     ) R. Carr energy profile long. space temporal profile micro- bunching    3  10  fsec CSR can amplify small current modulations: *First observed by M. Borland (ANL) in LCLS Elegant tracking

 E /E 0 = 3  10  6  x0 = 0 ‘cold’ beam CSR Microbunching Gain in LCLS BC2 add 2% current & energy modulation after compressor

CSR Microbunching Animation E/E0E/E0 E/E0E/E0 f(s)  x

LCLS BC2 CSR Microbunching Gain vs. “theory”: S. Heifets et al., SLAC-PUB-9165, March 2002 Initial modulation wavelength prior to compressor Microbunching Gain ‘cold’ beam  x =1  m  x =1  m,   =3  10  5 see also E. Saldin, Jan. 02, and Z. Huang, April 02

…Energy Profile also modulated energy profile current profile Next set of bends will magnify this again…  ‘slice’ effects Next set of bends will magnify this again…  ‘slice’ effects  E/E vs. z

 x = 1  m curves: Z. Huang et al., PRSTAB April 2002 points: 1D tracking code LCLS BC1/BC2 Compound Gain Curve wavelength at entrance to BC2 Compound Gain    = 3  10  6 SC-wiggler:    = 3  10  5

Microbunching is damped by x -emittance or uncorrelated energy spread for wavelengths less than… Damping by Emittance and Energy Spread E. Schneidmiller, et al. (no compression) To reduce microbunching…  long bends, L b  large  x or  x  large uncorrelated energy spread,   u To reduce microbunching…  long bends, L b  large  x or  x  large uncorrelated energy spread,   u

Dipole Field Quality Quadrupole field component at radius r 0 Sextupole field component at radius r 0 Large beam size in chicane — need constant bend field over wide aperture LCLS BC2 B2 & B3 bends: |b 1 /b 0 | < 0.01 % |b 2 /b 0 | < 0.05 % LCLS BC2 B2 & B3 bends: |b 1 /b 0 | < 0.01 % |b 2 /b 0 | < 0.05 % at r 0 = 2 cm …causes dispersion error and beta-mismatch …causes 2 nd -order dispersion, with chromatic and geometric aberrations |b 1 /b 0 | is correctable…

 x   /2 ‘Tweaker’ quadrupoles allow dispersion correction with two quads… correct  and (  ), orthogonally with two quads… correct  and (  ), orthogonally LEUTL chicane (ANL) M. Borland

relative bunch length (  z ) BPM (  ) Feedback Systems , V Feedback at each compressor, plus charge-feedback at gun… …needs work (algorithm, diagnostics, full-system simulations) Feedback at each compressor, plus charge-feedback at gun… …needs work (algorithm, diagnostics, full-system simulations) tolerances: ~ 0.1 deg-S ~0.1%  V / V tolerances: ~ 0.1 deg-S ~0.1%  V / V

Final Comments  Many details need attention so that brightness is increased, not decreased after compression  Compression system design should be well integrated into entire machine  Stability  Emittance preservation  Diagnostics  Feedback systems may be critical  Progress made at SLC only after feedback systems up and running  Many details need attention so that brightness is increased, not decreased after compression  Compression system design should be well integrated into entire machine  Stability  Emittance preservation  Diagnostics  Feedback systems may be critical  Progress made at SLC only after feedback systems up and running