12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background  Hypertrigliceridaemia is common in patients with HIV, especially those taking protease inhibitors (PIs) or with lipodystrophy.  Although,
Advertisements

Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Is monitoring for CD4 counts still needed for the management of patients with long- term HIV RNA suppression? Andrew Hill, Liverpool University, UK.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Background There is uncertainty regarding the frequency, predictors, and outcomes of IRIS events Prior studies on IRIS have been limited to convenience.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
The Immunologic Efficacy of Antiretroviral Therapy among HIV-infected Patients in North America and Africa Elvin Geng* 1, Eric Vittinghoff 1, Jean Nachega.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES AT THE BOTSWANA- BAYLOR CHILDREN’S CLINICAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE: A REPORT TO THE WHO TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP ON PEDIATRIC CARE.
TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.
Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV-Infected Subjects on HAART: Prevalence and Associations Kevin Robertson *1, Kunling Wu 2, Thomas Parsons 1, Ron Ellis.
INTRODUCTION Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients Starting Antiretroviral Therapy During Hospitalization Leigh E. Efird, PharmD 1, Manish Patel, PharmD 1,
Immune Discordance on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Can Still be Regarded as a Therapeutic Success Nur F. Önen MD, MRCP 1, Rachel Presti MD PhD.
HIV-1 dynamics Perelson et.al. Science 271:1582 (1996) Infected CD4 + lymphocytes Uninfected, activated CD4 + lymphocytes HIV-1 t 1/ days t 1/2.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
1 The impact of ongoing illicit drug use on virologic suppression in HIV-infected injection drug users receiving HAART Authors: Harout Tossonian, Jesse.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
A randomized open study comparing the impact of reducing stavudine dose vs. switching to tenofovir on mitochondrial function, metabolic parameters, and.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV) Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in Antiretroviral.
Long-Term Changes in Lipids and Glucose/Insulin among HIV-Infected Antiretroviral Naïve Persons Randomized to PI vs. NNRTI vs. PI+NNRTI-based strategies:
Long-Term Comparison of Nevirapine Versus Efavirenz When Combined with Other Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-1 Positive Antiretroviral-Naïve Persons- The NNRTI.
Figure 2: Trends in currently prescribed antiretroviral therapy % prescribed HAART increased from 74% to 83% Trends in ART use, HIV viral load, and CD4.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 From: Report of the NIH Panel To Define Principles of Therapy of HIV Infection* Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(12_Part_2):
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
Short-Term Efficacy and Tolerance of ddI, 3TC, EFV regimen Once-Daily in HIV-1–Infected African Children: ANRS (Burkiname). Operational lessons from.
Previous SVR With Interferon-Based Therapy for HCV Lowers Risk of Hepatotoxicity in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Individuals on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on:
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Effects of Switching ZDV-3TC to TDF-FTC or ABC-3TC SWAP
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
XVI International AIDS Conference
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Switch from EFV plus ABC-3TC to EFV-TDF-FTC ROCKET-1 Trial
Switch RPV-TDF-FTC from NVP-Based Regimen NEAR-Rwanda Trial
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Switching to TDF-FTC from ABC-3TC for Hyperlipidemia ROCKET II
LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Naïve MONARK Trial
Switching the NRTI Backbone to Tenofovir DF-Emtricitabine TOTEM
St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, United Kingdom
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Differential Detection of M184V/I Between Plasma Historical HIV Genotypes and Proviral DNA from PBMCs N Margot, R Ram, IR McNicholl, R Haubrich, C Callebaut.
INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION
Presentation transcript:

12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching From Regimens Combining Protease Inhibitors and Zidovudine plus Lamivudine to Once-daily Emtricitabine, Didanosine and Efavirenz. A Sub-study of the ANRS 099 ALIZE Trial JM Molina 1, M Bentata 2, M Garre 6, F Collin 7, J Hinkle 8, C Leport 3, Y Levy 4, C Goujard 5, N. Adda 8, JB Quinn 8, C Rancinan 7, and F Rousseau 8 1 Saint-Louis, 2 Avicenne, 3 Bichat, 4 Henri-Mondor, and 5 Kremlin Bicetre Hospitals, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, 6 CHU de Brest, 7 INSERM U 59 Bordeaux, France, and 8 Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA

Introduction Anemia is a relatively common manifestation of HIV infection and AIDS and is an independent risk factor for decreased survival among HIV- infected patients (Berhane K et al, JAIDS, 2004, 37: ) HAART therapy is associated with resolution of anemia, but several nucleoside analogues used for the treatment of HIV-infection are myelosuppressive and may contribute to the incidence and the severity of anemia (Moyle G et al, Clinical Therapeutics, 2004, 26:92-97) Anemia and neutropenia associated with HIV-infection and antiretroviral therapy may impact the quality of life of patients, and are well known treatment limiting side-effect of drugs such as zidovudine (ZDV) It is unclear however if patients tolerating long-term therapy with ZDV- including regimens will benefit from a switch to non-ZDV-including HAART

Objective To assess the hematological benefit of switching from an ZDV+3TC+PIs containing regimen to a once-daily FTC+ddI+EFV regimen in long term virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients

Methods ANRS-099 was a randomized, open label, 48-week switch study in 355 patients on a stable PI-containing HAART regimen with plasma HIV RNA levels <400 copies/mL in the previous 6 months. Patients were randomized to continue the PI regimen or switch to the entirely once-daily regimen of FTC+ddI+EFV (Figure 1) A subset of enrolled patients (n = 152) who were taking ZDV+3TC as a component of their stable PI HAART regimen at entry were identified. Amongst those patients, 74 patients were randomized to once-daily FTC+ddI+EFV, and the remainder were randomized to continue their ZDV+3TC+PI regimen. Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count, hemoglobin and neutrophils were compared between randomized treatment arms at Week 48 in this population and compared using a two sample t-test Week 48 plasma HIV-1 RNA comparisons were made using differences in binomial proportions (% < 400 copies/mL ) between treatment groups with p-values from the associated normal distribution

ANRS-099 Study Design HIV-infected patients with undectectable Plasma HIV- RNA (N = 355) Week 48 ZDV+3TC+PI (N = 78) FTC+ddI+EFV (N = 74) Subset ofZDV+3TC+PI (N = 152) Assess change from Baseline: Hemoglobin Neutrophils CD4+ cell % < 400 copies/mL HIV-infected patients with undectectable Plasma HIV- RNA (N = 355) Week 48 ZDV+3TC+PI (N = 78) FTC+ddI+EFV (N = 74) Subset ofZDV+3TC+PI (N = 152) Assess change from Baseline: Hemoglobin Neutrophils CD4+ cell % < 400 copies/mL

Baseline Characteristics Demographic/Characteristics ZDV + 3TC + PI (n = 78) FTC + ddI + EFV (n = 74) Total (n = 152) Gender: n (%) Male67 (86)62 (84)129 (85) Female11 (14)12 (16)23 (15) Mean Age (years) (SD)45 (11.6)45 (10.3)45 (11.0) Median [range] HIV-1 RNA (log copies/mL) 1.54 [ ]1.65 [1.20 – 2.94]1.60 [ ] Mean CD4+ (cells/mm 3 ) Median [range] Prior ART (years) 3.4 [ ]3.2 [ ]3.3 [0.6 – 11.6] Median [range] Prior ZDV+3TC (years) 3.3 [ ]3.1 [ ]3.2 [ ]

Results In this ZDV+3TC+PI subset population, the median duration of HAART was 3.3 years at study entry. The prior median duration of ZDV+3TC was 3.2 years. A significant improvement in hemoglobin and neutrophil count was observed in patients switching to the entirely once-daily regimen of FTC+ddI+EFV while maintaining virologic control and immunologic response Change from baseline results for hemoglobin, neutrophils, CD4+ T-lymphocytes and plasma HIV-1 RNA are shown in Table 2

Change from Baseline in Hemoglobin and Neutrophils at Week 48 by Treatment Group Lab ParameterAnalysis Variable ZDV + 3TC + PI (n = 78) FTC + ddI + EFV (n = 74) differencep-value Hemoglobin (g/dL) Baseline Mean ± SD14.0 ± ± W48 Change from Baseline <0.01 Neutrophils (x10 9 /L) Baseline Mean± SD3083 ± ± W48 Change from Baseline <0.03 CD4+ (cells/mm 3 ) Baseline Mean± SD483 ± ± W48 Change from Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA W48 <400 c/mL (%)90%95%5%0.26

Mean Change from Baseline in Hemoglobin by Treatment Group and by Week Hemoglobin (g/dL) BaselineWk8Wk16Wk24Wk32Wk40Wk48 Mean Change from Baseline ZDV + 3TC + PI FTC +ddI+ EFV P-value < Hemoglobin (g/dL) BaselineWk8Wk16Wk24Wk32Wk40Wk48 Mean Change from Baseline ZDV + 3TC + PI FTC +ddI+ EFV P-value < ZDV + 3TC + PI FTC +ddI+ EFV P-value < ZDV + 3TC + PI FTC +ddI+ EFV P-value <

Mean Change from Baseline in Neutrophils by Treatment Group and by Week

Conclusions Even in patients who received and tolerated ZDV+3TC+PI for approximately 3 years, a statistically significant improvement in hemoglobin levels and neutrophils percent was observed at Week 4 continuing through Week 48 after switching to the entirely once-daily regimen of FTC+ddI+EFV Virologic and immunologic responses were maintained after the switch An FTC+ddI+EFV regimen can be substituted for a ZDV+3TC+PI regimen in order to reverse bone marrow toxicity while maintaining antiviral and immunological efficacy