Syntax IV November 20, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Structure of Sentences Asian 401
Advertisements

Sentence Construction and the Syntactical Tree forms Lecture 6 Feed back of mid-test.
Basic Sentence Construction
Lecture 7 Syntax Transformations.
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
Syntax: The Sentence Patterns of Language
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
The study of how words combine to form grammatical sentences.
MORPHOLOGY - morphemes are the building blocks that make up words.
LING NLP 1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Martha Palmer April 19, 2006.
Syntax 2nd class Chapter 4.
Syntax: The Sentence Patterns of Language Deny A. Kwary Airlangga University.
Syntax Phrase and Clause in Present-Day English. The X’ phrase system Any X phrase in PDE consists of: – an optional specifier – X’ (X-bar) which is the.
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 2.
Syntax: The analysis of sentence structure
1 CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing Fall 2009/ Outline of English Syntax.
Syntax: The analysis of sentence structure
Syntax.
Constituency Tests Phrase Structure Rules
Syntax Nuha AlWadaani.
THE PARTS OF SYNTAX Don’t worry, it’s just a phrase ELL113 Week 4.
Phrases and Sentences: Grammar
LI 2013 NATHALIE F. MARTIN S YNTAX. Grammatical vs Ungrammatical.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 14, Feb 27, 2007.
Syntax III March 27, 2012.
Lecture Four Syntax.
Syntax November 14, Welcome Back! Now give me your phonology homeworks!
Syntax March 20, The Last Quick Write Flashback Way back when, we talked about how it’s possible to produce infinitely long sentences in a language.
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
Syntax IV November 23, Weekday Update Syntax homework will be posted after class today …due on Wednesday (November 28th) Next week, we will start.
Syntax V November 26, Weekday Update Syntax homework will be posted after class today …due next Wednesday (December 1st) On Monday, we will: wrap.
NLP. Introduction to NLP Is language more than just a “bag of words”? Grammatical rules apply to categories and groups of words, not individual words.
Today Phrase structure rules, trees Constituents Recursion Conjunction
By: Hannah Gettings.  Definition of pronoun: a word used in place of a noun.  Example: She gave him the book. *say for example the names of the people.
Notes on Pinker ch.7 Grammar, parsing, meaning. What is a grammar? A grammar is a code or function that is a database specifying what kind of sounds correspond.
Syntax III November 19, Sentences The basic phrase types include: NP, VP, AP, PP A basic sentence is an “inflectional phrase” (IP). The head of.
Syntax V November 23, Weekday Update Syntax homework will be posted after class today …due on Friday. On Wednesday, we will work on a few more practice.
Linguistic Essentials
Culture , Language and Communication
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
Syntax III November 21, Just So You Know Phonology homeworks have been graded! Syntax homework will be posted on Friday… And will be due on Wednesday.
Making it stick together…
1 Syntax 2. 2 Now let’s change the NP rule again Such that we have – S  NP VP – VP  V NP – NP  (DET) (ADJ) N Now you can diagram this sentence – The.
Syntax II “I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences.” --Gertrude Stein.
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006-Lecture 2.
SYNTAX.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
Syntax 3rd class Chapter 4. Syntactic Categories 1. That glass suddenly broke. 2. A jogger ran toward the end of the lane. 3. These dead trees might block.
Syntax IV March 29, 2012.
TYPES OF PHRASES REPRESENTING THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PHRASES 12/5/2016.
Basic Syntactic Structures of English CSCI-GA.2590 – Lecture 2B Ralph Grishman NYU.
Welcome to the flashcards tool for ‘The Study of Language, 5 th edition’, Chapter 8 This is designed as a simple supplementary resource for this textbook,
Week 3. Clauses and Trees English Syntax. Trees and constituency A sentence has a hierarchical structure Constituents can have constituents of their own.
Chapter 4 Syntax a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 King Faisal University.
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation
Syntax 2.
Beginning Syntax Linda Thomas
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
BBI 3212 ENGLISH SYNTAX AND MORPHOLOGY
Intensive verb Syifa Khoirunnisa.
SYNTAX.
Chapter Eight Syntax.
Part I: Basics and Constituency
BBI 3212 ENGLISH SYNTAX AND MORPHOLOGY
Chapter Eight Syntax.
Introduction to Linguistics
Linguistic Essentials
Structure of a Lexicon Debasri Chakrabarti 13-May-19.
Presentation transcript:

Syntax IV November 20, 2009

Wrap-up Let’s check out the remaining practice sentences… One note on syntactic abbreviations: The triangle notation

Check This Out A phrase structure rule for NPs looks like: NP  Det N’ (Det = the Specifier) And a PP can be a complement of a head noun: N’  N PP And an NP can be a complement of a prepositional phrase: PP  (Deg) P’ P’  P NP Where can this combination of rules take us?

Whoa, Nellie There is a possibility for infinite recursion. NP  Det N PP NP  Det N P NP NP  Det N P Det N PP NP  Det N P Det N P NP NP  Det N P Det N P Det N PP, etc. Example: the book from the library in the city near the airport beside the apartment complex with the playground of the children from the school behind the train tracks... The fact that our grammar can generate phrases like this is why we need to know patterns of patterns.

More Patterns of Patterns Awhile back, we heard about potentially infinite sentences that sounded like: Jean knows that Charlie said that Sue suspects that Bill thinks that Beth hopes that Barry is a genius. Or: In order to understand the (potentially infinite) structure of sentences like these, we need to know more about: Sentence structure Verb complements

Sentences The basic phrase types include: NP, VP, AP, PP A basic sentence is an “inflectional phrase” (IP). The head of the IP is the tense of the verb. I = INFL = inflection = [past], [future], [present], etc. The specifier of the IP is the subject NP. The complement of the I is a VP. If that complement is an NP, then it is called the object of the verb. Note: verbs have lots of different complement options.

Sentence Structure IP NP I’ Det N’ I VP the N [+past] V’ NP coach V Det N’ dropped the N ball Sentence Structure Note: the V in the VP must agree in tense with the I tense marker.

Sentence Structure IP NP I’ Det N’ I VP the N will V’ NP coach V Det N’ drop the N ball Sentence Structure Note: Auxiliaries show up in the I slot. (Verbs after auxiliaries don’t display tense)

A Note on Tenses There are only two tenses in English that are marked without an auxiliary preceding the verb: past [+past] = dropped, ran, sang, watched, lost, etc. present [-past] = drop/drops, run/runs, sing/sings, watch/watches, etc. For this class, if there is an auxiliary verb in the I slot, it is not necessary to put an explicit tense marker there. Otherwise, choose between [+past] and [-past].

Sentence Terminology IP NP I’ Det N’ I VP the N will V’ NP coach V Det N’ drop the N ball Sentence Terminology The subject of a sentence (in English) is: the NP specifier of the sentence IP.

Sentence Terminology IP NP I’ Det N’ I VP the N will V’ NP coach V Det N’ drop the N ball Sentence Terminology The object of a sentence (in English) is: an NP complement of the main VP.

English Case Marking The form of some English pronouns changes, depending on whether they are subjects or objects. For Example: I know you. You know me. He knows them. They know him. We know her. She knows us. But word order is still constrained: *Her know we. *Them knows he.

Subject/Object Marking In other languages, subjects and objects are specified by morphological inflections on nouns. Example: Russian case marking ja tita-ju knig-u “I read the book.” I read-1st pers-sing. book-object alternate order : ja knig-u tita-ju alternate order: knig-u ja tita-ju knig-a byla v komnat-e book-subject was in room-object “The book was in the room.”

Potential Problems There are some limitations on the extent to which the syntactic rules can ignore the specific words that fit into each phrase. Example (from last week’s Quick Write): Is it possible to “dance a horse”?

Sub-categorization It turns out that it is necessary to break lexical categories down further, into sub-categories. For instance, some verbs must be followed by a noun phrase: I devoured the sandwich. *I devoured. I met the teacher. *I met. Other verbs must not be followed by a noun phrase: I sprinted. *I sprinted the ball. I slept. *I slept the dog. I danced. *I danced the horse.

Verb Sub-Category #1 Intransitive Verbs (Vi): must not be followed by an NP = they do not take an object NP as a complement. VP  Vi  *VP  Vi NP Examples: sneeze, sprint, fall, elapse, snorkel Good: The boy slept. Bad: *The boy slept the dog. Good: The girl fell. Bad: *The girl fell the dog.

Verb Sub-Category #2 Transitive Verbs (Vt): must be followed by an NP = they must take an object NP as a complement. VP  Vt NP  *VP  Vt Examples: devour, defy, harm, invite Good: The children harmed the dog. Bad: *The children harmed. Good: The zombies invited the vampires. Bad: *The zombies invited.

Verb Sub-Category #3 Ditransitive Verbs (Vdt): must be followed by two objects = either two NPs or a combination of {NP, PP}. VP  Vdt NP NP  *VP  Vt Examples: give, sell, send, put Good: The boy gave the dog a bone. Bad: *?The boy gave the dog. Good: The students sold the professor a chew toy. Bad: *?The students sold the professor. Alternative: The students sold a chew toy to the professor.

A + N Sub-categories Adjectives and nouns can have complement requirements, too--often for particular PPs: Mary is fond of John. *Mary is fond. *Mary is fond by John. Some nouns require specific prepositional phrases: George talked about our reliance on oil. *George talked about our reliance. *George talked about our reliance for oil. This information has to be included in the lexicon for each word.

Verb Sub-Category #4 Sentential Verbs (Vs): = include a sentence in their complement. Examples: know, believe, wonder, think… Marge thinks that [Homer ate the cake]IP. Don wondered whether [Sidney scored a goal]IP. Phoebe believed that [Chandler married Monika]IP. Gandalf knew if [Frodo had the ring]IP. Notice that the sentence in the VP complement is always preceded by a funny kind of word: that, whether, if…

Complementizer Phrases New lexical category: complementizers (C). Ex: if, that, whether Complementizers function as the heads of complementizer phrases. (CPs) The complement of the CP is another IP (sentence). Ex: Marge thinks [that [Homer ate the cake]IP]CP. Matrix clause = highest-level sentence “Marge thinks…” Complement, or embedded clause = within the CP “Homer ate the cake.”

CP Example matrix clause IP NP I’ Marge I VP [-past] V’ CP V C’ thinks C IP that NP I’ Homer I VP [+past] V’ V NP ate the cake embedded clause CP Example

Infinite Recursion, part 2 It is possible to create infinitely long sentences by embedding complementizer clauses within complementizer clauses… John said [that Mary thought [that Robin knew [that Angela hoped [that Quinton wished [that Bronwen believed that…]]]]] VP  V CP V CP CP  C IP V C IP IP  NP VP V C NP VP VP  V CP V C NP V CP etc.

Infinite Recursion, part 3 There is one other (very boring) way to produce inifinitely long sentences in language: I like baseball and basketball and hockey and football and soccer and rugby and cricket and ultimate frisbee and polo and lacrosse…. Sentences like this take advantage of the syntactic phenomenon of coordination. Coordination combines phrases or words of the same type with a conjunction (and, but, or…) to create a phrase or word of the same type. General coordination rule: Xn  Xn Con Xn

Coordination Examples NP  NP and NP NP  The fat man and the little boy VP  VP or VP VP  fish or cut bait IP IP but IP IP  Ringo plays drums but Paul plays bass. Coordination of individual words works the same way: P  P and P She went [[above]P and [beyond]P]P the call of duty.

Ambiguity Coordination can lead to a very simple kind of structural ambiguity.  I like green eggs and ham. Interpretation #1: just the eggs are green. I like [[green eggs]NP and [ham]NP]NP. Interpretation #2: both the eggs and ham are green. I like [green [[eggs]N’ and [ham]N’]NP. Let’s check out the trees…

Interpretation #1 Only the eggs are green: IP NP I’ Pro I VP I [-past] V’ V NP like NP Con NP AP N’ and ham green N eggs

Interpretation #2 Both the eggs and ham are green: IP NP I’ Pro I VP I [-past] V’ V NP like AP N’ green N’ Con N’ N and N eggs ham

Further Ambiguity Let’s try another one: The police shot the terrorists with rifles. Why is this sentence is ambiguous? (How can you describe the ambiguity, structurally?) Interpretation #1: the terrorists have rifles. [with rifles] is a PP embedded in the object NP. Interpretation #2: the police have rifles. [with rifles] is a PP that modifies the main VP. Let’s check out some more trees…

Interpretation #1 IP NP I’ the police I VP [+past] V’ V NP shot Det N’ the N PP terrorists P’ P NP with rifles In this one, the terrorists have the rifles.

Interpretation #2 IP NP I’ the police I VP [+past] V’ PP V NP P’ shot Det N’ P NP the N with rifles terrorists In this one, the police are using the rifles to shoot the terrorists. The PP is a modifier of the VP here, not a complement. = it’s not required by the verb.