Brian L. Thomas, Ph.D. Baldwin-Wallace College Berea, Ohio USA.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Theories of Learning Chapter 4 – Theories of Conditioning

Advertisements

Facebook Group: The group is called: Psych281 Spring08 Available only to University of Alberta network Sorry to be rude but… Please don’t add me as a friend.

PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 4 – Theories of Conditioning.

Spontaneous Recovery of Responding following Forward and Backward Blocking Oskar Pineño, Kouji Urushihara and Ralph R. Miller State University of New York.

Factors Influencing Respondent & Operant Learning: Part 2 Lesson 10.

Extinction of Learned Behavior Lesson 14. Extinction of Reinforced Behavior n Behavior changes relatively permanent l Modifiable if situation changes.

Inhibitory Pavlovian Conditioning Stimuli can become conditioned to signal the absence of a US— such learning is called Inhibitory Conditioning CS+ = excitatory.

THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS OF AVERSIVE CONDITIONING Chapter 7 1.

There’s never just one reinforcer Hmm…what to do?

Lecture 20: Extinction (Pavlovian & Instrumental) Learning, Psychology 5310 Spring, 2015 Professor Delamater.

Extinction of Conditioned Behavior Effects of Extinction Extinction and Original Learning Paradoxical Effects in Extinction.

Lectures 7&8: Pavlovian Conditioning (Determining Conditions) Learning, Psychology 5310 Spring, 2015 Professor Delamater.

PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 5 – The Role of Conditioning in Behavior.

PSY 402 Theories of Learning

Extinction of Conditioned Behavior Effects of Extinction Extinction and Original Learning Paradoxical Effects in Extinction.

PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 4 – Theories of Conditioning.

PSY402 Theories of Learning Chapter 4 (Cont.) Indirect Conditioning Applications of Conditioning.

Classical Conditioning

 Classical Conditioning – The type of learning in which a stimulus acquires the capacity to evoke the response initially evoked by another stimulus ◦

Chapter 6: Learning 1Ch. 6. – Relatively permanent change in behavior due to experience 1. Classical Conditioning : Pairing 2. Operant Conditioning :

The Effect of Zinc and Zinc Plus Copper on Memory Tizoc Perez-Casillas Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia FURTHER INFORMATION:

CHAPTER 4 Pavlovian Conditioning: Causal Factors.

Chapter 6 Learning.

Dr. Ramez. Bedwani.  Different methods of learning  Factors affecting learning.

Psychology 2250 Last Class Characteristics of Habituation and Sensitization -time course -stimulus-specificity -effects of strong extraneous stimuli (dishabituation)

Pavlovian, Observational and Instructed Fear Learning: Emotional Responses to Unmasked and Masked Stimuli Andreas Olsson, Kristen Stedenfeld & Elizabeth.

Unit 7: Learning. Learning is what makes us human. Adaptability –Ability to cope with new and changing circumstances Does history always repeat.

CP-154,526, a CRF type-1 receptor antagonist, attenuates the cue-and methamphetamine-induced reinstatement of extinguished methamphetamine- seeking behavior.

Conditioning / I. Learning / A. Any relatively permanent change in behavior as a result of practice or experience. Changes due to growth or maturation.

Learning Experiments and Concepts.  What is learning?

Disrupting Reconsolidation of Drug Memories: Potential Treatment Target for Attenuating Drug- Seeking and Relapse Elicited by Drug-Associated Stimuli Barry.

Factors Influencing Conditioning  CS and US Intensity, and Attention to the CS  Temporal relationship  Predictiveness  Preparedness  Redundancy 1.

Acquisition curve of Eyeblink CR

Chapter 4: Classical Conditioning: Basic Phenomena and Various Complexities Basic Terms Two Extensions Three Limitations Additional Phenomena.

Counterconditioning as a Treatment for Conditioned Fear? Marlo Cutler Baldwin-Wallace College.

Extinction of Conditioned Behavior Effects of Extinction  the rate of responding decreases  response variability increases  experiment by Neuringer,

Associative Learning Honors AP/IB Psychology. Motivating Questions You are a psychologist treating a patient who is addicted to smoking. Explain how you.

Blocking The phenomenon of blocking tells us that what happens to one CS depends not only on its relationship to the US but also on the strength of other.

Effects of Ventral and Dorsal CA 1 Subregional Lesions on Trace Fear Conditioning J.L. Rogers, M.R. Hunsaker, R.P. Kesner.

PSY402 Theories of Learning Friday January 17, 2003.

Extinction of Conditioned Behavior Chapter 9 Effects of Extinction Extinction and Original Learning What is learned during Extinction.

Long lasting change in behavior due to experience.

PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 3 – Nuts and Bolts of Conditioning (Mechanisms of Classical Conditioning)

ATTRIBUTES OF LEARNING AND CLASSICAL CONDITIONING.

Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Emotional Perseveration: The Memory for Prior Extinction Training Maria A. Morgan, Jay Schulkin, Joseph E. LeDoux.

Becoming Extinct. Extinction of Conditioned behavior Extinction is a typical part of the learning process – Pavlovian or Instrumental contingency can.

Rescorla-Wagner Model  US-processing model  Can account for some Pavlovian Conditioning phenomena: acquisition blocking unblocking with an upshift conditioned.

More Extinction.

PSY402 Theories of Learning

Extinction of Conditioned Behavior

Prior cocaine exposure disrupts extinction of fear conditioning

Classical Conditioning

Classical Conditioning & Drug Effects

How do animals “know” when a schedule is on extinction?

PSY 402 Theories of Learning

Chapter 6: Learning Ch. 6.

Extinction of Learned Behavior

Attributes of Learning and Classical Conditioning

Aim: How does classical conditioning impact behavior?

L. Pain, A. Launoy, N. Fouquet, P. Oberling

PSY 402 Theories of Learning

PSY402 Theories of Learning

Ki A Goosens, Jennifer A Hobin, Stephen Maren Neuron

How do animals “know” when a schedule is on extinction?

Fig. 3. Mice which experienced MS or MSEW did not exhibit impairments in hippocampal and amygdala-dependent fear-related emotional memories. In the acquisition.

Learning Learning is a relatively permanent change in behavior that occurs as a result of experience. Associative Learning- learning to associate 2 events,

How do animals “know” when a schedule is on extinction?

Fear conditioning, extinction, extinction recall and renewal.

Presentation transcript:

Brian L. Thomas, Ph.D. Baldwin-Wallace College Berea, Ohio USA

Acquisition of fear in Context A  Tone -> Foot Shock Extinction of fear in Context A or B  Tone -> No shock  Tone -> No shock and No Tone -> Shock Test for relapse in Context A  Tone -> No Shock

Nonreinforcement of CS alone Allows for spontaneous recovery of fear after a retention interval Allows for renewal of fear outside of the extinction setting Allows for reinstatement of fear after re- exposure to the US Allows fear to relapse

Nonreinforcement of CS alone plus unsignaled USs Prevents spontaneous recovery of fear after a retention interval Prevents renewal of fear outside of the extinction setting Prevents reinstatement of fear after re- exposure to the US Prevents fear relapse

How does the intensity of the shock given during EU extinction affect extinction and relapse?  All rats received pairings of the CS with a 0.06 mA shock during Acquisition.  During Extinction:  Group EU received 4 CSs intermingled with 2 USs at 0.6 mA  Group EU/D received 4 CSs intermingled with 2 USs at 0.2 mA  Group EU/I received 4 CSs intermingled with 2 USs at 1.0 mA  Group E/B received 4 CSs  Group FC did not receive and CSs or USs

How does the number of shocks per extinction session affect extinction and relapse?  Every extinction session had 4 nonreinforced CSs.  The number of shocks per session varied between groups (1, 2 or 4)  Shocks were either intermingled (EU) or given after the 4th CS (CU).

What role do contextual stimuli play in EU extinction?  Experiment 1:  Group EU received 4 CSs and 2 USs intermingled during the same session.  Group E-U received 4 CSs and 2 USs during separate, alternating sessions in the same context.  Group E/U received 4 CSs and 2 USs during separate, alternating sessions and CSs were delivered in a different context from USs.

What role do contextual stimuli play in EU extinction?  Experiment 2:  Group EU/PreB received preexposure to the extinction context prior to EU extinction.  Group EU/PreC received preexposure to a non- extinction context prior to EU extinction.  Group EU/HC remained in their home cages during the Preexposure phase.

Does the US provided during EU extinction have to be the US that caused fear acquisition?  Group EU/SS received a shock US during Acquisition and Extinction.  Group EU/SN received a shock US during Acquisition and a loud noise US during Extinction.

EU extinction prevented the relapse of fear most effectively when:  The US provided during extinction was at least as intense as the US experienced during fear acquisition.  The US provided during extinction was intermingled among the CSs and at least 2 USs were given in each extinction session.  The USs provided during extinction were presented in the same context as the CSs.  The subject had not received exposure to the extinction context prior to the Extinction phase.  When the US provided during extinction was either a foot shock or a loud noise.

Cheryl Novak, Associate Lab Director David Revta, Technician Drina Vurbic Stephanie Damas Marlo Cutler