Digitalisation Heading Nowhere! TDSAT Seminar, Nainital (Uttarakhand)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India An introduction.
Advertisements

Policy and Regulatory Challenges – Technology Providers View February 14 Challenges for Successful Implementation of ICT Projects Challenges for Successful.
Dispute Resolution Scenario in Cable & Broadcasting Sectors TDSAT SEMINAR December 2009 This presentation expresses the personal views of the speaker and.
Video Cord-cutting: Much ado about nothing? Consulting. Research. DigiWorld Institute 20 th November 2013 Contact Florence LE BORGNE Head of TV & Digital.
Presentation By Mrs Roop Sharma President, Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) On Dispute Resolution in Broadcasting Sector 17 th July, 2010, Raipur,
What Regulations apply? The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, 2004 amended eight times till date. Which.
Presentation By Presentation By Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) We need to Review the DAS Law and Regulations TDSAT Seminar, Gangtok (Sikkim)
MANJUL BAJPAI Indore – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
Stake Holders Broadcasters Multi System Operators (MSO) Franchisees/cable Operators (LCO) End Subscribers TRAI /Government.
1 The Making of Broadcast Media Disorder: A Political Economy Perspective Hamilton Cheng, PhD. Public Television Service a Taiwan Response at CWM 2004.
Parameswaran N., Principal Advisor (Broadcasting & Cable Services) Telecom Regulatory Authority of India.
Overview of Telecom Scenario in India (Telecom, Cable & Broadcasting) Overview of Telecom Scenario in India (Telecom, Cable & Broadcasting) K Sridhara.
Pay Channel Market: Realities & Reforms TDSAT Presentation May 2010.
STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS Fixed-Mobile Convergence Regulatory Point of View Daniel Rosenne Director General, Ministry of Communications,
TDSAT Seminar 20 th October, 2007 Srinagar Consumer Rights under the TRAI Act, 1997 & Redressal of Consumer Grievances by Indu Malhotra Sr. Advocate Supreme.
1 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Regulation of Broadcasting & Cable TV Services TDSAT Seminar on Dispute Resolution & Redressal of Consumers’ Grievances.
Regulation & Implementation of Mobile Internet Quality of Service: Role & Scope of Civil Society Organisations PRESENTATION BY: NEHA TOMAR, RESEARCH ASSOCIATE,
Game of Life. Making the right choice  Before you begin decide how much you can afford to spend  Decide which car models and options interest you 
Iמשרד התקשורת Israel Ministry of Communications Internet (over-the-top) services and challenges to regulation Adi Cahan-Gonen Senior Professional Advisor.
1 STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN BROADCASTING SECTOR IN INDIA. 20/10/2007 By : Jawahar Goel President Indian Broadcasting Federation.
Confidential Starz Deal Overview of Benefits for Sony-owned Platforms January 9, 2009.
Economics Introduction:
APRESENTATIONTO TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (TDSAT) Presented by Presented by Jawahar Goel Jawahar GoelPresident Indian Broadcasting.
Cable TV Industry – INDIA
PRESENTATION ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND PROTECTION OF CONSUMER RIGHTS IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS UPAMANYU HAZARIKA Advocate HYDERABAD.
Advisor : Kuang Chiu Huang Group : Ting Wei Lin,Ting Huei Lee, Kuei Chin Fan Transit & peering Taiwan Internet Interconnection problem.
Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General CUTS International Jaipur, India CONSUMER REDRESSAL IN THE TELECOM AND CABLE SECTORS.
Develop A Foundational Knowledge Of Pricing To Understand Its Role In Marketing.
Telecom: Content Competition "The Future of Competition and the Evolution of the Marketplace” Insight Conference: 7 th Annual Telecommunications Forum.
INDIAN C&S MARKET– DISTRIBUTION PERSPECTIVE December 18, 2005 Presentation by Shri Anuj Gandhi, President, SET Discovery Pvt. Ltd. at TDSAT Open House.
MSO and the Regulatory Framework. TRUTH AT THE GROUND LEVEL  The charges payable by MSOs to broadcasters are fixed on mutually agreed / lump–sum amounts.
Technical Implication and Aspects of DAS Regulatory Framework and Dispute Resolution in Telecom, Broadcasting and Cable Services Sector” in Nainital, Uttrakhand.
9 October 20152Profitability Management 9 October 20153Profitability Management Revenue COGS Opex OR With ↑ Rev Opex OR With ↑ Rev.
National Communications Commission 2006 International Digital Cities Convention - Broadband Policies and Regulatory Reform - NCC Chairman, Dr. Su Yeong-Chin.
Charge It Right. 2 You Will Know  The characteristics of a credit card  The costs of using a credit card  The potential problems with credit card use.
Digital Addressable Systems
Liberalization of Telecommunications in Europe Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006 Verona.
NEED FOR TRANSPARENT REGULATION OF INDIAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA INDUSTRY NEED FOR TRANSPARENT REGULATION OF INDIAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA INDUSTRY A presentation.
DAS - THE FUTURE REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS IN DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS (DAS) KUNAL TANDON ADVOCATE.
1 A Case of Merger Remedies Sangmin Song Korea Fair Trade Commission.
Delivering Video over IP
Seminar on Dispute Resolution in Telecom and Broadcasting Sectors TDSAT 20 th November 2010, Bangalore.
Cable and Satellite Industries. Lil Context Cable + Satellite= –Multi-Channel Television Industries 87-90% of U.S. TV households get programming. 60%
DTT and the evolution of TV market in Europe Hervé Michel– France Televisions, Deputy Director, International Affairs. Approaches for Growth and Sustainability.
Presentation By R K Arnold I.T.S. Secretary, TRAI TDSAT Seminar, Chennai on Dispute Resolution in Telecom.
TDSAT SEMINAR DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN BROADCASTING SECTOR (March 13, 2010) Presented by: A. Mohan Executive Vice President.
1. Overview One of the most popular clubs in Germany. (measured in number of members). Top 25 attendance in Europe – attending in average. Long.
TDSAT SEMINAR “D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION S CENARIO IN B ROADCASTING S ECTORS ” 30/08/2008 Presented by : Avnindra Mohan ZEE NETWORK.
IOS APP STORE PRICING MODELS AND LICENSING POLICIES.
PRESENTED AT THE STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CONSUMER EXPERIENCE LAICO REGENCY HOTEL Creating Space for Consumer Rights in.
Confidential Starz Deal Overview of Benefits for Sony-owned Platforms January 9, 2009.
A look back at convergence strategies Philippe Coste Director of International Development, IDATE Europe Is moving on… Content issues: doubt.
Nov 26th, 06 STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM (FOR TELECOM & BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA Submitted to: submitted by: Tanushri mukherjee Anshul.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD – “REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM, BROADCASTING AND CABLE SERVICE SECTORS”
MANJUL BAJPAI Mumbai – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
The European way to think the Digital World Technological convergence and new business models: the example of TV over DSL Extending ICT Opportunities.
COST OF DELIVERING CABLE TV SERVICES VIKKI CHOUDHRY National Cable & Telecommunications Association.
Pine Grove, California Rural CableTV affiliate of The Volcano Telephone Company (ILEC) Licensed as an MVPD by FCC exemption in1983 Serving portions of.
Impact of New Technologies October We are seeing the start of an OTT world  OTT - Delivery of video content over IP, typically on open networks,
DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS Vibhav Srivastava Advocate
Consumer rights under the TRAI Act 1997 Presentation by K V P Baskaran, CEO & Director, Aircel Limited.
DR. MADABHUSHI SRIDHAR Cable TV Networks (Regulation) Act 1995.
Presentation By Mrs Roop Sharma President, Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) On Redressal of Consumer Grievances December 18th, 2005, Guwahati.
Digital Addressable Systems, Challenges & Way Forward
MANJUL BAJPAI Lucknow –
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM
Digital Addressable Systems
GOING DIGITAL NORTH-EAST PERSPECTIVE
Would you survive financially in the real world?
Presentation transcript:

Digitalisation Heading Nowhere! TDSAT Seminar, Nainital (Uttarakhand) Presentation By Mrs. Roop Sharma President Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) Digitalisation Heading Nowhere! TDSAT Seminar, Nainital (Uttarakhand) 22 August 2015 Mobile: 9810069272 roopsharma21@gmail.com

Digitalisation Law Introduced for - Transparency a) Revenue to Government. b) Pay Broadcasters to get full revenue. c) Correct TRPs. Consumers to get good quality cable service, Broadband, Internet at reasonable rates. A-la-carte choice and lowered billing to consumers. LCO/ LMO not to go out of business. Increase in ARPUs through VAS like VoD, Games, e-Services.

NEW ERA- NAYA DIGITAL ZAMANA Digitalisation is good but ….. Regulations are biased in favour of broadcasters & MSOs Method of implementation is WRONG. Time lines are not practical/ Prerequisite not done. REVENUE SHARE NOT FAIR FOR LMOS- TOO LESS TO SUSTAIN BUSINESS.

Before Digitalisation

After Digitalisation

Tariff Order :dt. 30.04.12 (No 3 of 2012) TRAI’s Draconian Regulations that are Dangerous to Cable Operator’s Business Tariff Order :dt. 30.04.12 (No 3 of 2012) Interconnect regulation dt. 30.04.12 (No 9 of 2012) Quality of Service regulations: dt:14.05.2012 ( No 12 of 2012) Consumer Complaint Redressal (DAS) Regulations dt:14.05.2012 (No.13 of 2012)

Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Fourth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff (First Amendment) Order, No.3 of 2012 dt 30 Apr 2012 Revenue share of LCO to be decided by MSO after mutual negotiations. LCO does not get a fixed revenue per subscriber to survive his business as done in CAS. Clause 4(a) of Tariff Order : FTA & Bouquet of FTA Channels, Revenue share of MSO-55%, LCO-45% as a fallback arrangement. Clause 4(b) of Tariff Order: Pay Channels and their Bouquet. Revenue Share of MSO- 65%, LCO- 35% as fallback arrangement.

Tariff Order No. 3 of 2012 Dt. 30 Apr 2012 (Contd) Clause 6(1) (B) of Tariff Order: MSO to decide rate of BST Bouquet- Not to exceed Rs 100, can be lower than this, thus revenue share of LCO can also go down lower than Rs 45. Clause 6(1) (D)Tariff Order: subscriber of DAS to subscribe a basic service tier or basic service tier and one or more pay channel or only free to air channels or only pay channels or pay channels and free to air channels. (Note: If subscriber subscribes only a few pay channels, LCO share will further go down). Clause 6(1) (E) Tariff Order: MSO will decide rate of Pay channels or their bouquet with a minimum monthly subscription, not exceeding Rs 150 (exclusive of taxes) per month.

Revenue Share BONE OF CONTENTION LCO/LMO Builds, Operates, Maintains Network and provide Service to consumer, collect Tax but MSO DECIDES HIS REVENUE LMO/ LMO Share - 35% of Pay Channels 45% OF BST (Basic Service Tier of FTA Channels) NEGOTIATION/ OFFER OF MSO on Revenue share is Temporary, only an EYEWASH to trap and divide LMOs. MSOs provide same CONTENT but different offers. Payment of Taxes TRAI should Relook on MSO/ LCO relationship & Revenue Share. NOW MSO Negotiations an Eye-Wash. If fails, only 35% for LCO/ LMO

Average Content Cost per Subscriber based on RIO Particulars In Rs Total RIO Rate( Without 27.50%) Total RIO Rate(with 27.50%) 490 625 DTH and Cable Industry Estimated Average Content cost per Subscriber 90-100 % of Total RIO Rate(Without 27.50%) % of Total RIO Rate(With 27.50%) 19-20% 15-16% Cable TV estimated average content cost for Pay Broadcaster affiliated MSOs 30-40 % of Total RIO Rate (Without 27.5%) % of Total RIO Rate(With 27.5%) 7-8% 5-6% Cost to OTT subscribers for same content Free

Unfair Revenue Share

Set Top Box MSO- Purchased low quality STBs No BIS Standards No BEE Ratings Old MPEG2 technology, not MPEG4 No Interoperability No Local repairs, No guarantee/ Warranty card Consumers do not own the STBs Regulations demand STBs available in open market No receipts given for the cost paid Did not sell on paper to avoid tax (VAT) Activation fee is not permitted but no action by TRAI on MSOs who refuse to stop collecting it.

Why Such regulations? LACK OF KNOWLEDGE of LMOs/ LCOs Pay Broadcasters and MSOs are too Active in capturing the ground (game plan) Vertical integrated MSOs played Active Role. MSOs kept their JV/Distributors too happy and busy –(Foreign Trips/ Parties).

Why Such regulations? (contd) They did not pass information to LCO/LMOs. LCO/ LMO – Completely unaware, Fragmented, infighting, Got busy in alternate business as suffering losses Never answered any TRAI consultation or attended any Open House. Government’s awareness drive not sincere. LCO representation kept minimum in Task Force Vertical Integrated MSOs took advantage of situation and lobbying in TRAI & I&B. MSOs and Aggregators used ‘divide and rule’ on LCOs  

This is what TRAI Regulations did

Don’t Let This Happen to You

Mobile: 9810069272 roopsharma21@gmail.com Mrs. Roop Sharma Mobile: 9810069272 roopsharma21@gmail.com