Tuesday 30 October 2007 09:00 Introduction (30') Paschal Coyle (CPPM) 09:30 Lepton and cherenkov light propagation with mmc&photonics (30') Claudio Kopper.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Apostolos Tsirigotis KM3NeT Design Study: Detector Architecture, Event Filtering and Reconstruction Algorithms XXV Workshop on recent developments in High.

Advertisements

Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.

Using HOURS to evaluate KM3NeT designs A.Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S.E.Tzamarias In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study VLVnT Athens, 15 October.

ANTARES and KM3NeT John Carr Centre de Physique de Particules de Marseille IN2P3 / MICINN meeting Madrid, 12 Jan 2009.

WP2: Physics Analysis and Simulation Objectives & Priorities Deliverables & Milestones Manpower Optimisation considerations P. Coyle, J. Brunner, CPPMarseille.

Neutrino Astronomy with KM3NeT  The KM3NeT physics case  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards.

ANTARES aims, status and prospects Susan Cartwright University of Sheffield.

Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.

Application of Kalman filter methods to event filtering and reconstruction for Neutrino Telescopy A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design.

Special Issues on Neutrino Telescopy Apostolos G. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University School of Science & Technology Particle and Astroparticle Physics.

Antares/KM3NeT M. de Jong. neutrinos  p Scientific motivation: – origin cosmic rays – birth & composition relativistic jets – mechanism of cosmic particle.

KM3NeT detector optimization with HOU simulation and reconstruction software A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 - Paris,

S. E. Tzamarias The project is co-funded by the European Social Fund & National Resources EPEAEK-II (PYTHAGORAS) KM3Net Kick-off Meeting, Erlangen-Nuremberg,

Paolo Piattelli - KM3NeTIAPS - Golden, 6-8 may 2008 KM3NeT: a deep-sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea Paolo Piattelli - INFN/LNS Catania (Italy)

KM3NeT The Birth of a Giant V. Popa, KM3NeT Collaboration Institute for Space Sciences, Magurele-Bucharest, Romania.

HOU Reconstruction & Simulation (HOURS): A complete simulation and reconstruction package for Very Large Volume underwater neutrino Telescopes. A.Leisos,

C.DistefanoCRIS 2008 – Salina, September The KM3Net Consortium Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Towards a km3-scale.

Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.

Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.

Status of KM3NeT (Detector Design Optimisations) Christopher Naumann, CEA Saclay – IRFU / SPP for the KM3NeT consortium 44 th Reconcontres de Moriond,

KM3NET 24 September 2004 Gerard van der Steenhoven (NIKHEF)

RICH th International Workshop for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters September 15 th – 20 th 2007, Trieste – Italy September 15 th – 20 th 2007, Trieste.

Petten 29/10/99 ANTARES an underwater neutrino observatory Contents: – Introduction – Neutrino Astronomy and Physics the cosmic ray spectrum sources of.

Antoine Kouchner Université Paris 7 Laboratoire APC - CEA/Saclay for the ANTARES collaboration Neutrino Astronomy: a new look at the Galaxy Astronomy Neutrino.

Neutrinos as Cosmic Messengers in the Era of IceCube, ANTARES and KM3NeT Uli Katz ECAP / Univ. Erlangen Vulcano Workshop 2012 Frontier Objects.

CEA DSM Irfu The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope A status report Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond February.

Piera Sapienza – VLVNT Workshop, 5-8 october 2003, Amsterdam Introduction and framework Simulation of atmospheric  (HEMAS and MUSIC) Response of a km.

WP2 meeting, Oct 2006, CPPM Claudine Colnard - NIKHEF Claudine Colnard, Ronald Bruijn, Eleonora Presani, Siemen Meester, Paul Kooijman (presented by Maarten.

V.Bertin CPPM / ANTARES Coll. - Moriond ANTARES : A deep-sea 0.1 km² neutrino telescope Vincent Bertin - CPPM-Marseille on behalf of the Antares.

Susan Cartwright IDM2000 ANTARES : vStatus u site evaluation u demonstrator u detector design vProspects u physics aims u neutralino detection status and.

XXIII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand Contacts:

Tools and Methods for Underwater, High Energy Neutrino Telescopy A.G.Tsirigotis, A. Leisos, S.E.Tzamarias Physics Laboratory, School of Science and Technology,

Tools and Methods for simulation and evaluation of Very Large Volume Cherenkov Neutrino detectors: Optimization and Evaluation of proposed KM3NeT designs.

Antares Neutrino Telescope Jean-Pierre Ernenwein Université de Haute Alsace (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration) Rencontres de Moriond, 13/03/2005.

Neutrino Diffuse Fluxes in KM3NeT Rezo Shanidze, Thomas Seitz ECAP, University of Erlangen (for the KM3NeT consortium) 15 October 2009 Athens, Greece.

Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.

Alexander Kappes Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics for the ANTARES collaboration IAU GA, SpS 10, Rio de Janeiro, Aug Status of Neutrino.

1 WP2Monday 16 April 2007 modify pass=wp20407 Introduction (15') P. Coyle (CPPM) Status of Sirene (30') E. Presani (Nikhef) Graphical User Interface for.

ANTARES Results-Venezia Introduction.  astronomy 2. ANTARES. Optical detection. Infrastructure 3. Downgoing muons 4. Preliminary  data 5. Exotica.

R. Coniglione, VLVnT08, Toulon April ‘08 KM3NeT: optimization studies for a cubic kilometer neutrino detector R. Coniglione P. Sapienza Istituto.

PHY418 Particle Astrophysics

June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.

Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.

Status report on the Antares project Luciano Moscoso (DSM/DAPNIA, CEA/Saclay F Gif-sur-Yvette) (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration)

Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.

R. Coniglione, VLVnT09, Athens october ‘09 Studies of the sensitivity to point-like sources for a flexible-tower geometries for KM3NeT R. Coniglione.

WP2: Physics Analysis and Simulation Objectives & Priorities Deliverables & Milestones Manpower Optimisation issues Discussion conclusions Some plots P.

KM3NeT kickoff meeting, Erlangen 11 April 2006M. Circella, INFN contribution to WP2 1 INFN in WP2 Marco Circella on behalf of the collaboration Bari Bologna.

Search for diffuse cosmic neutrino fluxes with the ANTARES detector Vladimir Kulikovskiy The ANTARES Collaboration 3-9 August 2014ANTARES diffuse flux.

Alexander Kappes Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics XIV Lomonosov Conference Moscow, August 25, 2009 High-energy neutrinos from Galactic sources.

Parallel session WP2 - Physics analysis and simulation (9:30 ->12:30) 09:30 Diffuse Galactic Flux -Andrew Taylor (DIAS) 09:55 MUPAGE status– Giada Carminati.

C.Distefano KM3NET ‘Physics and Simulation (WP2)’ Oct 24 – 25, 2006 LNS NEMO software Carla Distefano for the NEMO Collaboration KM3NET ‘Physics and Simulation.

Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.

Stéphanie ESCOFFIER CPPM Marseille, France on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration research goals detector setup selected results summary.

Alexander Kappes ECAP, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg for the KM3NeT Consortium 2009 EPS HEP, Krakow, 16. July 2009 The KM3NeT project: Towards a km 3 -scale.

Status of ECAP Simulations for the KM3NeT TDR KM3NeT WP2 meeting Rezo Shanidze Paris, December 2008.

Large Area Telescopes Cosmic Rays – Gamma Rays – Neutrinos P.Kooijman.

KM3NeT P.Kooijman Universities of Amsterdam & Utrecht for the consortium.

Optical Modules in the KM3NeT optimization studies in Erlangen

Sebastian Kuch University Erlangen-Nürnberg

The Antares Neutrino Telescope

Astronomy session: a summary

Simplified Study of Storey Configurations

Calculation of detector characteristics for KM3NeT

Optimization studies of a tower based km3 detector

MC studies of the KM3NeT physics performance Rezo Shanidze

Hellenic Open University

Hellenic Open University

P. Sapienza, R. Coniglione and C. Distefano

Presentation transcript:

Tuesday 30 October :00 Introduction (30') Paschal Coyle (CPPM) 09:30 Lepton and cherenkov light propagation with mmc&photonics (30') Claudio Kopper (Univ.Erlangen) 10:00 Status of the KM3Tray software framework (30') Ralf Auer ((Univ. Erlangen)) 10:30 break (30') 11:00 Design studies for the KM3NeT neutrino Telescope in Erlangen (30') Rezo Shanidze (Erlangen) 11:30 Simulations of hexagon geometries using NESSY (30') Damien Dornic (CPPM) 13:00 lunch (1h00') 14:00 status of simulations using direction sensitive PMs (30') Mauro Taiuti (Genova) 14:30 New filtering and reconstruction techniques for KM3NeT (30') Apostolos Tsirigotis (HOU) 15:30 break (30') 16:00 Simulation of extended sources: SNR RXJ (30') Carla Distefano (LNS-INFN) Wednesday 31 October :30 KM3 geometries with the Antares software (30') Rosa Coniglione (LNS-INFN) 10:00 Simulation of ring geometries using SIRENE (30') Paul Koojiman (Nikhef) 10:30 break (30') 11:00 UHE neutrinos (15') Jean-Pierre Ernenwein (Mulhouse) 11:15 A status report on simulations using GEANT at Demokritos (15') Petros Rapidis (Demokritos) 11:30 General discussion (1h30') 13:00 lunch (1h00') 14:00 More discussion-if necessary! (1h00) AGENDA ( Manage password: wp20710

Pending Issues Physics Priority –< 1 TeV:Dark matter –1-100 TeV:HESS sources, GRBs –>1 PeV:Diffuse flux, GZK, AGN Evaluation of NEMO geometry Evaluate effect of energy measurement on sensitivity Rejection of downgoing atmospheric muons Cost Model Reconstruction of electron and tau neutrinos energy resolution, direction resolution Specification of front end? Time resolution, dynamic range, 2 track separation, 1 vs 2 photon separation, dead time….

More Issues Standard simulation/analysis framework ANTARES/NEMO soft (KM3, geasim….) NESSY-mathematica SIRENE/MMC+PHOTONICS KM3TRAY KM3NET internal notes For us For reference in CDR CDR writing framework Word, latex, something else? Extrapolation of Auger observations Manpower

WP2 and the CDR Major contributions to writing of: Physics Case Detection techniques Optimisation studies Physics performance CDR Workshop: Monday morning (10-13h)Parallel session Wedsnesday morning (1h30)Plenary session This meeting: status of ongoing work choice of reference effective area/resolution plan for documents allocation of writing tasks

Contributions Source modelling: INFN, CEA, DUBLIN Atmospheric muons: INFN Galactic (CR) neutrinos: INFN, UK, CEA Galactic (HESS) sources: Erlangen, IN2P3, CEA, INFN Dark matter: INFN, Erlangen, IN2P3, UK, FOM Diffuse flux:INFN, Erlangen Extragalactic pt sourceUK, IN2P3 GRBs:Erlangen, FOM UHE:UHA-GRPHE, APC Neutrino flux generator: INFN software: FOM, IN2P3, Erlangen Multi-PMT geometry: FOM Directional PMT:INFN simulation of triggerINFN, FOM, Demo, HOU, Erlangen, IN2P3 Reconstruction algorithms: Erlangen,INFN, IN2P3, HOU, FOM, CEA Time,position calibration: UK, Valencia, Erlangen, INFN Absolute positioning : INFN(moon), HOU(surface array) Optimisation of design:ALL physics and analysis software calibration

Plan of WP2 CDR Documents Part 1: Physics of KM3NET Part 2: Detection technique Part 3: Geometry Optimisation studies Part 4: Physics performance

Part 1: Physics of KM3NET Introduction Galactic sources Aharonian –SNRs, PWN –Compact binary systems –Galactic centre diffuse emissionJouvenot –No conterparts –Hidden sources Extragalactic sources –Diffuse fluxSpurio –AGNsWhite –GRBsPetronovic –GZK, top-downErenwein, Kouchner Neutrino Flavour ratios ? Dark matter annihilation Motz Magnetic monopoles Popa Other physics –Cosmic raysLyons? –Neutrino oscillationsBrunner –Lorentz invariance, quantum gravity etc.? New phenomenon Aharonian, coyle

Part 2: Detection techniques Introduction Neutrino interactions The Cherenkov effect Backgrounds –Atmospheric muons –Atmospheric neutrinos –40K –Bioluminescence Effective area Angular resolution Energy resolution Observable sky –Cf. ICECUBE –Match to HESS, Auger Markou, coyle

Part 3: Optimisation studies Simulation Software –AntaresBrunner –NESSYDornic –SIRENE/KM3TRAYPresanora, Auer Track finding and reconstruction Cost model Katz Photodetection studies –10’’ PMT –20’’ PMT –Multi-small PMTs –Hybrid PMs –Direction sensitive PMsTauiti Geometry Optimisation –Hexagonal/cuboid –Cluster –Ring/Square –NemoSapienza –reference effective area& angular resolution Effect of site parameters –Absorption length, scattering, depthConglione Beyond 1KM3 Absolute pointing calibration –Moon shadowDistefano –Surface arrayTsirigotis Carr, shandize, Sapienza, coyle

Part 4: Physics Performance Introduction –Methods for discovery/limit settingShanidze –MRF, MDF Galactic sources Kappes? –SNRs, PWN –Compact binary systemsDistefano –Galactic centre diffuse emissionJouvenot Extragalactic sources –Diffuse fluxSpurio –AGNsWhite –GRBsPetronovic –GZK, top-downErenwein, Kouchner Neutrino Flavour ratios? ? Dark matter annihilation Motz Magnetic monopoles Popa Other physics? –Cosmic raysLyon? –Neutrino oscillationsBrunner? New phenomenon Shanidze, Coyle

Nikhef NWO Investment Proposal 2007

Nikhef NWO Investment Proposal 2007

Agenda Amsterdam Monday 10h00-13h00Parallel session Cost model softwareUli Katz SNR Gilles Maurin Galactic diffuse emission Fabrice Jouvenot WB boundAndrew Taylor Neutrino from SNRStefano Gabici … Weds (1h30)Plenary session Physics F. Aharonian Detector OptimisationP. Coyle

The Ball Park Construction costs~?/km3 Meuros Angular resolution~0.1 degrees above 100 TeV Effective surface area>2 km 2 above 100 TeV Number of structures:~ Number of PMs:~ Distance between structures90-130m Distance between storeys15-40m first storey height~100m Total height m Number of PMs per storey3-6 Timing precision~3ns (TTS+dispersion+electronics+positioning) (Assumes PMs not dominant cost)