Retention Factors in the Workforce: Turnover Statistics As reported in the 2008 Public Child Welfare Workforce Study California Social Work Education Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengthening Diversity in the Mental Health Workforce: A Driver for System Change 7 th International Conference on Social Work Los Angeles June 24, 2013.
Advertisements

April 26, 2013 Kimberly Mayer, MSSW California Institute for Mental Health (CiMH) 1.
Interagency Refinery Task Force (IRTF) History – Triggered by Chevron Richmond fire (August, 2012) – Governor designated Interagency Working Group on Refinery.
Workforce Trends and Needs In the Energy Efficiency Sector National Network of Sector Partners May 20, 2009.
Turnover and Retention 13 th Annual Tile IV-E Federal Region VI Conference May 28, 2009 Jane Burstain, PhD, Senior Policy Analyst Unless otherwise noted,
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
California’s Solar Industry: Preparing the Workforce Presented by: John Carrese SF Bay Center of Excellence City College of San Francisco.
Annual Age-Adjusted Hepatitis C Mortality Rates, CA & U.S., Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. An Analysis of Hepatitis.
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
California’s 1115 Waiver Renewal: Demographics and Workforce Projections Sunita Mutha, MD, Joanne Spetz, PhD, Janet Coffman, PhD, and Margaret Fix, MPH.
Director Bobby Cagle Georgia Division of Family and Children Services DHS Board Meeting April 15, 2015.
1 Supporting Effective Child Welfare Supervision #2: Moving Forward Teleconference Presentation June 16, 2009.
Bachelor’s Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity * and Gender: *U.S. citizens and permanent residents. SOURCE: NSF/SRS, Science and Engineering Degrees,
Evidence-based Strategies for Improving Child Welfare Performance, Staff Retention and Client Outcomes XIX ISPCAN International Congress on Child Abuse.
Source: Burning Glass Technologies Inc., Labor Insight Prepared by New Jersey Department of Labor & Workforce Development – July, 2013 Occupational Listings.
CSWE Child Welfare Symposium Child Welfare Workforce Retention Research in New York State New York State Social Work Education Consortium.
June 24, 2007 County of Los Angeles Public Health Department Nutrition Program Christopher J. Jarosz, Ph.D. Supplement: Parallels to California’s Agricultural.
GLOBAL Competition: Who, What and Where are California’s Biggest Threats? FuturePorts Annual Conference 2014 June 23, 2014 Darin Chidsey Director of Strategy,
Factors Influencing the Retention of Specially Educated Public Child Welfare Workers Nancy Dickinson, UNC Chapel Hill Robin Perry, Florida State University.
California 511 T3 Webinar January 9, 2008 Caltrans “provides its travel information directly to the public, through commercial/media information services,
This Bridge Called My Web Survey: Collecting, Weighting and Displaying Workforce Data Richard J. Smith, MFA, MSW Sherrill J. Clark, LCSW, PhD Skills Workshop.
State Employee Compensation Virginia Department of Human Resource Management Virginia Governmental Employees’ Association Annual Meeting DoubleTree by.
The effects of an organizational intervention on child welfare agency atmosphere and workforce stability Jessica Strolin, PhD Jim Caringi, LiCSW Thank.
South Service Planning Area (SPA 6) and King-Drew Medical Center Health Needs Planning Data 2004 Compiled by LAC DHS Office of Planning, 2004.
Stakeholder Training Activating Key Empowerment (STAKE) “Effective & Meaningful Client Stakeholder Participation A Training for the Community Planning.
Southern California Job Growth Trends Southern California Total San Diego County Orange County Riverside/San Bernardino Counties (The Inland Empire) Los.
SEPTEMBER 2, 2015 CALIFORNIA CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL.
HOW FAR DOES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REACH? Distance-Decay.
CalSWEC Data Sets. 2 Since its inception in 1990, CalSWEC has collected data on:  The career interests of MSW students in California  The retention.
California Workforce Association, Youth Conference Long Beach, California January 17, 2008 Luis Chavez Career Ladders Project Career Pathways.
Korean American Homicides Los Angeles County
October 23, 2001 Enumeration of the Public Health Workforce in the United States, 2000 Kristine Gebbie, RN, DrPH, Jacqueline Merrill, MPH, RN,C Center.
CWDA Champions Orientation Webinar to the Statewide Coordinated Training System 4/25/13 1.
Powered by Needs Assessment Friday, June 27, 2014.
State of Delaware: The Department of Services for Children, Youth and Their Families DELAWARE CHILDREN’S DEPARTMENT ‘Think of the Child First’ CWLA NATIONAL.
Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS) Planning for Success 2012 – 2014 Initiatives.
Career Pathways: Recent Innovations TA3 January 14, 2010.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
2005 Report Building Education/Service Partnerships: The Service Perspective California Institute for Nursing & Health Care Optimizing the Health of Californians.
© Global Foresight 2010 all rights reserved   California’s People Weaving a Multicultural Web for.
Clark County Overview Clark County is the largest and most complex governmental agency in the State because it provides both REGIONAL and TOWN (municipal)
New Trainer Orientation Webinar bayareaacademy.org.
California Water Briefing APRIL 2006 Department of Water Resources.
 Background on CalSWEC and data sources  Review of Key Findings from analysis of CalSWEC data on the child welfare workforce: ◦ Latino/a ethnicity ◦
August 2, FY 2014 City Budget Comparisons2 Population of Largest Cities.
Child Welfare Training Evaluation in California Update on the Strategic Planning Process RTA All Staff SPS | March
Analyst Resource Center Transforming Information for the Future Innovative Solutions October 29, 2008.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Finding & keeping workers Social care’s new recruitment and retention hub.
Minnesota is Aging Fast
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Managing Talent Through Workforce Planning, Recruitment, and Retention
2018 Directors’ Road Map – County Focus
Top Five Reasons Los Angeles County Needs WaterFix
Transportation Professionals Advisory Committee (TPAC)
Creating the Conditions for CPM to THRIVE
390 children living in poverty 41% of all residents live in poverty
Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
420, , , ,000 1,300,000 One commercial 680, , ,000 1,200,000 1,800,000 Two commercial 680,000.
240 children living in poverty 14% of all residents live in poverty
Top Five Reasons Los Angeles County Needs WaterFix
420, , , ,000 1,300,000 One commercial 680, , ,000 1,200,000 1,800,000 Two commercial 680,000.
CSAC Institute: Realignment 301 ALAMEDA COUNTY December 13, 2012
Child Welfare: Mark Lapiz (Santa Clara County)
Presentation transcript:

Retention Factors in the Workforce: Turnover Statistics As reported in the 2008 Public Child Welfare Workforce Study California Social Work Education Center Sherrill J. Clark

Table 1 Statewide Turnover Rates For All Types Of Turnover By Position FY Social work ass’ts NON Case- carrying social workers Intake Case- carrying social workers Ongoing Case- carrying social workers SupesMgrs/ program mgrs AdminsTotal EXTERNAL TURNOVER: left the agency % % % combined % % % % INTERNAL TURNOVER: left child welfare but not the agency % % % 37 combined % 1 0.2% % INTERNAL TURNOVER: changed positions within child welfare % % % 315 combined % % 9 8.% % Total turnover numbers by position Combined turnover rates for external turnover and internal turnover leaving the department 6.3%6.1%9.4%5.3%5.1%11.5%8.2% Combined turnover rates reported in 2008 for ALL kinds of turnover 10.1%12.4%17%9.8%12.7%19.5%14.8% Population: Full and Part time (excluding extra hire & CDSS)

Table 2 External Turnover for All Positions by RTA (48 Counties Reporting External Turnover Data For FY ) RTA RegionSW Ass’ts Non Case- carrying SWs Intake Case- carrying SWs Ongoing Case- carrying SWs SupervisorsManagers/ Program managers Admin.Total Northern (29 of 29 reporting) Turnover rates- -Northern 7.9%7.1%13.9%12.5%5.9%9.7%13%10.9% Bay Area (9 of 12 reporting) Turnover rate— Bay Area 5.5%6.4%13.4%11.95%8.7%12.5%16.7%10.4% Central (9 of 11 reporting) Turnover rate-- Central 8.2%9.6%10.3%11.4%3.2% 8.3%9% Southern (4 of 5 reporting) Turnover rate-- Southern 11.5%7.1%12.1%23.2%10%8.8%10%14.4% Los Angeles2not reported223Combined with intake Turnover rate – Los Angeles 0.8%n/a7%3.9%2%30%6.1% Total external turnover Turnover rate by position 6.4%7.5%10.6% combined 5.7%6.5%14.1%9.9%

Table 3 Percentages Of External Turnover Reported By Region For All Positions Comparison Years AllNorthernBay areaCentralSouthernLos Angeles 1998 Direct service workers & Supervisors (combined SWs and supervisors) 11.8** *** 2004 Child welfare social workers 9.5 (excluding Los Angeles) (child welfare workers and analysts) 2004 Supervisors 7.4 (with Los Angeles) Child welfare social workers Supervisors