Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To Eliminate Poverty and Family Violence in El Paso County.
Advertisements

“Strategic Plan ( ) and Agency Accreditation”
Lake County Employment Services Welfare-to-Work Process Flow
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Linkages Data Outcome Evaluation Jennifer Valencia Stanislaus County.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
By Tatyana Radchishina.  Mission Statement Family Services of Grant County believes people who experience physical, economical or cultural challenges.
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
ABORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT Engaging and Retaining ACWA Presentation August 2010 KARI ABORIGINAL RESOURCES INC. Casey Walpole and Isabelle Phillips.
State of New Jersey. Quick Context Lawsuit in 2004, revised in 2006 to MSA Reporting on 250 measures, including placement stability Started by “focusing.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
AB429: Family Reunification Program Presented by Phyllis Dobbins-Powell.
Module 7 Promoting Family Engagement and Meaningful Involvement.
Linkages How do we work together to help families in Humboldt County meet their needs?
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Working with Families in THP- Plus Julie Jackson, Bill Wilson Center Angela Martinez, Bill Wilson Center Amber Goggia, St. Anne’s Peggy Perry, Larkin Street.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
Ashley Howell.  Children's Administration works with children and families to identify their needs and develop a plan for services which support families.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
Client Assessments and the Reemployment of Low-Income Workers: Lessons from the Field OWRA: An Online Tool for Supporting Self-Sufficiency Chicago, Illinois.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
Welcome to the Sanctioned Families Webinar! The panel on the right of your screen shows other attendees and has a Question box below. Can’t see the panel?
Linkages Program Mark Twain Mark Twain.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Department of Social Services Local Efforts to Achieve the Vision.
Stanislaus County Children and Family Services Families In Partnership After Care Program A Parent Mentor Program.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Welcome to the ER/CalWORKs Webinar! You should have a panel on the right of your screen that shows other attendees and has a box at the bottom to write.
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Seeing the Forest AND the Trees: Customer Satisfaction and Comprehensive Family Services November 14, 2003 Child Welfare League of America “Tools that.
A Valuable Bridge How Linkages Can Advance Other Initiatives Leslie Ann Hay, MSW Hay Consulting (206)
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Child Welfare in Georgia: How Effective Are We? Andrew Barclay, Barton Child Law and Policy Clinic (Founder), Emory University School of Law.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
1. DFCS Performance Update Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council September 16, 2015.
Family-Centered Care Collaboration: Practice Components Unit II 1.
The CalWORKs System and Linkages in a C-IV County Sandra Wakcher, Statistical Analyst San Bernardino County’s Legislation and Research Unit.
Co-located GAIN Services Worker Los Angeles County Linkages Initiative.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Responding to Children in Vulnerable Families Christine Gibson and Helen Francis.
Scrutiny Commission on Domestic Violence Amanda Bradley, Head of Children and Families Social Care 24 th November 2011.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
Principles Of Women Empowerment
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Educational Advocacy And The CASA Volunteer.
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ October 25, 2016
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Linkages How do we work together to help families in Humboldt County meet their needs?
RISE T4T Child Welfare Curriculum
Presentation transcript:

Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II

Self-sufficient families and safe children in a responsible and caring community.

To coordinate services between CalWORKs and Child Welfare in Tehama County to help families achieve self- sufficiency and ensure child safety and well being.

 We believe services must be strength based, family-centered and tailored to individual needs.  We believe services must be accessible, comprehensive and delivered in the least intrusive way possible.  We believe services must be coordinated across systems in a smooth and seamless practice.  We believe services must protect the rights of families, must be culturally sensitive and are delivered in a respectful and caring manner.  We believe that parents want to be self-sufficient and to have a safe home for their children. Our job is to provide families with the tools, resources and opportunities to achieve these goals.  We believe that families are on a journey, which includes awareness that there is a different and better way of life, a desire for this new way of life and a belief that this way of life is achievable.  We believe that the door to services must remain open so families can flourish when they are ready.

 190 employees at TCDSS  Red Bluff office has 161 (84.7%) of total staff  Corning office has 29 (15.3%) of total staff  Staff can informally talk when they see each other in the office.

 Employment Services:  412 Ongoing Cases  65 New Cases/Applications  Child Welfare Services  291 Current Case Counts  168 Referrals / 113 Evaluated Out 6 Linked Cases

 Engage: Ask Questions?  Who, What, When, Where & Why?  Assess Strengths & Weaknesses  What is working? What is not?  Relationships  Building the Network.  Risk Assessments  Signs of Safety/Danger

 Identify the families safety plan components already in place  Assessment – Build onto plan already in place  Monitor progress/concerns – continued involvement  Children provide their own input.

 Differential Response  Family Stabilization  Strength Based Wrap-Around

 Percent of children with a substantiated recurrence of maltreatment after 3 months, 6 months, and/or 9 months.  Percent of children not removed from home with substantiated recurrence of maltreatment after 3 months, 6 months, and/or 9 months.  Percent of families that achieve reunification.  Time to reunification.  Percent of children who do not re-enter foster care.  Of children living at home, percentage whose Child Welfare case closed because the family stabilized and services were no longer needed.  Of children living in foster care, number of placements during the time their Linkages case was open, and within 6 and 12 months after their Linkages case closed.

 Percent of parents who have CalWORKs sanctions resolved.  Amount of monthly cash grant (without sanctions).  Amount of parents’ monthly earnings and wages.  Length of time parents receive cash aid.  Percentage of customers that meet Welfare-to-Work federal participation requirements when their Linkages case opens, and 6 and 12 months after that date.  Percentage of customers making progress toward meeting work rate requirements (education, vocational training, substance abuse treatment, domestic violence classes, etc.) at 6 and 12 months after their Linkages case opens.  Of those who resolve sanctions after entering Linkages, percentage who have subsequent sanctions.  Of customers not sanctioned at time of entry into Linkages, percentage who are sanctioned while in Linkages. Of families who exit CalWORKs/TANF, percentage who re-apply for CalWORKs/TANF aid.

LaDeena Coates Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips Social Worker, II