Updates on the P0D reconstruction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Space Models. Let { x t :t T} and { y t :t T} denote two vector valued time series that satisfy the system of equations: y t = A t x t + v t (The.
Advertisements

Pattern Recognition in OPERA Tracking A.Chukanov, S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.Gornushkin OPERA collaboration meeting, Ankara, Turkey, 1-4 of April 2009 JINR, Dubna.
Kalman’s Beautiful Filter (an introduction) George Kantor presented to Sensor Based Planning Lab Carnegie Mellon University December 8, 2000.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester Vittorio Paolone University of Pittsburgh MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 13-15, 2007.
1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.
Prepared By: Kevin Meier Alok Desai
Study of the semileptonic decays at 4170 MeV Koloina Randrianarivony Marina Artuso (Syracuse University)
Estimation and the Kalman Filter David Johnson. The Mean of a Discrete Distribution “I have more legs than average”
Bill Atwood - July 2002 GLAS T 1 A Kalman Filter for GLAST What is a Kalman Filter and how does it work. Overview of Implementation in GLAST Validation.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Novel approach to nonlinear/non- Gaussian Bayesian state estimation N.J Gordon, D.J. Salmond and A.F.M. Smith Presenter: Tri Tran
Tracking with Linear Dynamic Models. Introduction Tracking is the problem of generating an inference about the motion of an object given a sequence of.
Simulation of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for the Neutrino Factory Malcolm Ellis & Alan Bross Fermilab International Scoping Study Meeting KEK,
Application of Kalman filter methods to event filtering and reconstruction for Neutrino Telescopy A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design.
Slam is a State Estimation Problem. Predicted belief corrected belief.
KM3NeT detector optimization with HOU simulation and reconstruction software A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 - Paris,
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
A. Kiselev BNL, 06/20/2013 EicRoot status report and calorimeter code development.
P. Vahle, Fermilab Oct An Alternate Approach to the CC Measurement— Predicting the FD Spectrum Patricia Vahle University College London Fermilab.
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 19 Temporal models.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 19 Temporal models.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
November 6, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Particle ID, energy resolution, neutrino flavor tagging, efficiencies, backgrounds,
Cognitive Computer Vision Kingsley Sage and Hilary Buxton Prepared under ECVision Specific Action 8-3
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
August, 7ILC1 Kudzanayi Munetsi-Mugomba supervised by Dr. Caroline Milstene Software Infrastructure for the Charged Particles Reconstruction at the International.
Processing Sequential Sensor Data The “John Krumm perspective” Thomas Plötz November 29 th, 2011.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Pattern Recognition in OPERA Tracking A.Chukanov, S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.Gornushkin OPERA collaboration meeting, Mizunami, Japan, of January 2009 JINR,
An Introduction to Kalman Filtering by Arthur Pece
V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Short Introduction to Particle Filtering by Arthur Pece [ follows my Introduction to Kalman filtering ]
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Using Kalman Filter to Track Particles Saša Fratina advisor: Samo Korpar
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
Kalman Filtering And Smoothing
Tracking with dynamics
Nonlinear State Estimation
Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.
1/13 Future computing for particle physics, June 2011, Edinburgh A GPU-based Kalman filter for ATLAS Level 2 Trigger Dmitry Emeliyanov Particle Physics.
The Unscented Kalman Filter for Nonlinear Estimation Young Ki Baik.
Bo LI Kalman filter algorithm for tracking 2  Kalman filter prediction provides a good criterion for hit selection;  Kalman filter accumulates.
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
M. Martemianov, ITEP, October 2003 Analysis of ratio BR(K     0 )/BR(K    ) M. Martemianov V. Kulikov Motivation Selection and cuts Trigger efficiency.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Zhaoxia Fu, Yan Han Measurement Volume 45, Issue 4, May 2012, Pages 650–655 Reporter: Jing-Siang, Chen.
CHEP ’06 GEANT4E 1 GEANT4E: Error propagation for track reconstruction inside the GEANT4 framework Pedro Arce (CIEMAT) CHEP 2006, Mumbai, 13-17th February.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
GenFit and RAVE in sPHENIX under Fun4All
A Kalman Filter for HADES
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
P0D reconstruction/analysis update
Muon stopping target optimization
Dongwook Kim, Beomjun Kim, Taeyoung Chung, and Kyongsu Yi
Hellenic Open University
Hellenic Open University
Lecture 17 Kalman Filter.
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Presentation transcript:

Updates on the P0D reconstruction LE PHUOC TRUNG SUNY@STONY BROOK Track fitting using Kalman filter Extrapolation tracks from the TPC T2K US-ND280 meeting, June 24, 2008

Track fitting overview Warning: not P0D actual scintillator plane layout! Particle trajectory Scintillator plane Recon. position + direction Before fitting: only a set of hits, no track parameters Calculate the best estimates of position and direction of the particle trajectory at each scintillator plane. After fitting: track parameters: position and direction

The Kalman filter System matrix Process noise State to be estimated A linear discrete-time system: System matrix Process noise State to be estimated Measurements Measurement noise Measurement matrix State notation: State estimate BEFORE using measurement k The key element in the Kalman filter is the Kalman filter gain. State estimate AFTER using measurement k Iterative formula: Prediction step: Kalman filter gain Update step: Contain new information

Kalman filter for track fitting State: Dynamic system: zero-mean Gaussian Mention deltaz, Random, small direction change Measurement:

Forward-backward smoothing Measurement: charge-weighted position Forward filtering Backward filtering Forward/backward direction is not important, just pick a direction. Kalman filter update step uses measurements up to and including measurement k, we want to use as much information as possible in the estimation => smooth Smoothing Calculated from forward, backward cov. matrices

Fitting results Evaluate performance: Use muon MC with small step length, 1mm  Save more trajectory points At each plane, calculate the x,y deviations of the recon. position from the true position The true position is the true GEANT4 track point that is z closest to the recon. point. mm mm

TPC track extrapolation Motivation: improve 0 purity P0D TPC Muon track obscured by showers P0D TPC 0 sample after all 0 selection cuts Muon track obscured by showers A CC event passing all 0 selection cuts

Extrapolation procedure and result Extrapolate using Kalman filter: 4cm gate TPC k k-1 scintillator planes Need to mention that fact that extrapolation is fully 3D Hits within the gate are used as new position measurement. Measurement update the filter. If the gate is empty, stop extrapolating. Note: 3D extrapolation, alternate x,y scintillator planes A TPC track successfully extrapolated into the P0D

Summary and to-do list Summary: To do: Track fitting using Kalman filter Extrapolation TPC tracks To do: Full-spill reconstruction  Through-and-through muon tracking  Muon decay tagging  Improve 0 reconstruction

Forward-backward smoothing Forward filtering Backward filtering Smoothing Forward/backward direction is not important, just pick a direction

Fitting results Angle (degrees) Delta z(mm)

Charge-weighted position Original hits Charge weighted position MC hits and weighted positions