BPA’s DR Experience Karen Meadows Bonneville Power Administration May 2, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Fully Engaging Demand: Lessons and Insights from the Olympic Peninsula GridWise ® Demonstration Demand Response Town Meeting June 2-3, 2008 Washington,
NAESB Smart Grid Task Force PAP 03 Update Robert B. Burke – NAESB Task Force Co-Chair Jim Northey.
1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
© USCL Corporation - All Rights Reserved USCL Corporation 2737 Eastern Avenue Sacramento, California A managed approach to the successful.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
1 Cost-Effectiveness Screening Issue for RTF August 30, 2007.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
SmartGridCity™: A blueprint for a connected, intelligent grid community Presented to the Utah Public Service Commission May 13, 2009.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
1 Total Resource Cost Effectiveness Test Utility Brown Bag Series by Tom Eckman, NWPCC Ken Keating, BPA October 4, 2006.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Omni-Pro Software, Inc Internet Energy Systems, Inc. Load Management Advanced Automated Meter Reading SCADA & Custom System Integration Jim Enga President.
November 2001 CHRISTENSENASSOCIATES RTP as a Demand Response Program – How Much Load Response Can You Expect? Peak Load Management Alliance Fall Conference.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
System Reliability Procurement: Non-wires Alternatives in Rhode Island Tim Roughan National Grid.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Conservation & Demand Management July 2004 – September 2007 Joyce McLean Director, Strategic Issues Toronto Hydro
OPPD’s Sustainability Efforts Denise Kuehn. Omaha Public Power District Public Utility –336,000 Customers –2,200 Peak –Generation (2,550 MW) –Transmission.
Increasing Access to the Grid NIPPC September 8, 2005 Brian Silverstein VP, Operations and Planning Bonneville Power Administration.
Rick Counihan, VP Regulatory Affairs
Efficiency and Demand Response NARUC Washington, DC February 14, 2006 Steve Specker President & CEO.
Overview of OpenADR May 4, 2011 Integrating Demand Response, Efficiency, Renewables and Smart Grid Sila Kiliccote Deputy, Demand Response Research Center.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
FirstEnergy / Jersey Central Power & Light Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (IDER) Joseph Waligorski FirstEnergy Grid-InterOp 2009 Denver, CO November.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
Distributed Generation Benefits and Planning Challenges CREPC/SPSC Resource Planners’ Forum October 3, 2012 Arne Olson.
Demand Response Robert Balzar Conservation Resources Director.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Smart grid in the Pacific Northwest – best practices from the largest demo project in.
Team Intelli-heat: Guilherme Aguiar, Sissi Du, Karan Goel, Marty Johnson, Soshi Kumamoto, Robert Murphy, Steven Near, Andrea Odle, Matt Staniszwski, David.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
BPA Tier 2 FY Load Forecast Tier 2 Power Supply/Strategic Planning Workshop June 7, 2011 Philip D. Lusk Power Resources Manager
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Improving Access to the Federal Columbia River Transmission System: The IPP Perspective NIPPC September 8, 2005 Stephen Hall Partner Stoel Rives, LLP.
1 Kansas Wind Energy A Municipal Utility Perspective KANSAS CITY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Blake Elliott – Director Electric Supply Planning September.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Demand Response
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CITY OF LEOMINSTER. Customer Charge The cost of providing customer related service such as metering, meter reading and billing. These fixed costs are.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
Portland State University Smart Grid Class Enabling active consumer participation 20 April 2009 Presentation: History Politics Economics Technology.
Distributed Energy Storage
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Direct Use Program Proposal Washington Gas Light Co. For Discussion with EmPOWER Maryland Stakeholders January 27, 2012.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
SMECO Demand Response filing
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
NW Demand Response Symposium
Conserving electricity For a better tomorrow
Partnering For Our Future
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Can DER Defer Traditional Distribution Capital Investments?
Demand Response and Kootenai Electric Shawn Dolan, P.E
Southern California Edison Sacramento, California 95821
NYS Department of Public Service
Presentation transcript:

BPA’s DR Experience Karen Meadows Bonneville Power Administration May 2, 2007

Recent DR Pilots Past DR pilots include: –Demand Exchange (TBL) Day-ahead demand reduction bidding (includes buyback and dispatchable backup generation) Up to 60 MW contracted Delivered range vary widely (5-60 MW) Demand Exchange (PBL) is currently available under BPA’s dry year strategy (56 MW contractually) –Irrigation Motor Load Control Remote two way control and communications capable Farmers all elected manual control upon request of host Average about 4 MW load reduction from 7 farms Represents about 10% of load reduction

Recent DR Pilots –Ashland (direct load control) Direct control of water heaters and set back of programmable thermostats via 2-way communication Utilized City of Ashland’s hybrid fiber network Very small pilot of about 100 residential participants Averaged 2+ kW load reduction per home –Olympic Peninsula (direct load control) Direct control of water heaters and central heating systems (i.e. FAF and heat pumps) Approx 1500 one-way residential install Prelim analysis indicate about 2 kW load reduction per home –Gridwise partner Demo of price sensitive thermostats and grid friendly appliances (hot water heaters and clothes dryers)

DR Efforts BPA’s pilot program ran 2004-early 2007 No new DR pilots or programs planned at this time The pilot program was under the auspices of BPA’s Non- Wires Solutions initiative Total cost for the portfolio of measures is measured against the avoided cost of an identified transmission project We do recognize there are potential shared distribution benefits, (i.e. distribution system improvement and economic savings) No AMI, BPA is a wholesaler

Non-Wires Solutions (NWS) The Bonneville Power Administration wants to ensure it is providing the most cost-effective solutions for the region’s transmission needs, from an engineering, economic, and environmental perspective BPA is investigating how to fully and effectively integrate non-wires solutions into its transmission planning process Goal: Successfully defer system improvement projects through NWS