Toward a physics design for NDCX-II, a next-step platform for ion beam-driven physics studies * A. Friedman, D. P. Grote, W. M. Sharp, LLNL E. Henestroza,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.
SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory ARIES-IFE Meeting Atlanta, Georgia September 4, 2003 “Modular Solenoid with Assisted Pinch” by S. Yu,
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
Carbon Injector for FFAG
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
FETS H - Ion Source Experiments and Installation Scott Lawrie, Dan Faircloth, Alan Letchford, Christoph Gabor, Phil Wise, Mark Whitehead, Trevor Wood,
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Alex Friedman Fusion Energy Sciences Program, LLNL (for the NDCX-II team) ARPA-E Visit to LBNL, September 4, 2013 * This work was performed under the auspices.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
1 Development and testing of a pulsed helium ion source for probing materials and warm dense matter studies Qing Ji a, Peter Seidl a, Will Waldron a, Jeff.
LBNL 88'' cyclotron operations Status of the 88-Inch Cyclotron High-Voltage upgrade project December 14, 2009 Ken Yoshiki Franzen.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Heavy Ion Fusion Sciences Virtual National Laboratory Warp simulations illustrate the novel acceleration strategy Design Studies for NDCX-II W. M. Sharp,
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
I. D. Kaganovich, R. C. Davidson, M. A. Dorf,
In order to satisfy the requirements of focusing high-power density for high-energy-density physics and inertial-fusion targets, we should be able to transport.
A. Friedman, J. J. Barnard, R. H. Cohen, D. P. Grote, S. M. Lund, W. M. Sharp, LLNL A. Faltens, E. Henestroza, J-Y. Jung, J. W. Kwan, E. P. Lee, M. A.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory The collective effects on focusing of intense ion beams in neutralized drift compression I. D.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 PRoy LINAC06 Neutralized Drift Compression and Related Experiments* P. K. Roy 1, W. L. Waldron.
RF source, volume and caesiated extraction simulations (e-dump)
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Question 1: Assess and document target preheat effects from beams and plasma for the various options.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Collective Focusing of a Neutralized Intense Ion Beam Propagating Along a Weak Solenodial Magnetic Field M. Dorf (LLNL) In collaboration with I. Kaganovich,
Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory 1 NDCX beam experiments and plans Peter Seidl Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, HIFS-VNL 11th Japan.
Target Highlights Scaling (gain curves) and progress on “hybrid “ targets Fast ignition scaling and physics Improved models of fluid instabilities New.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
Warp LBNL Warp suite of simulation codes: developed to study high current ion beams (heavy-ion driven inertial confinement fusion). High.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Ion Source and Injector Experiments at the HIF/VNL J. W. Kwan, D. Baca, E. Henestroza, J. Kapica, F. M.
Oct 6, 2009 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 NDCX-II Project Joe Kwan Project Manager Sept. 7, 2009 San Francisco US-Japan Workshop.
Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Erik P. Gilson** PPPL 15 th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion June 9 th, 2004 Research supported.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Sharp 10/28/09 NDCX-II Tweaks W M Sharp, A Friedman, D P Grote - LLNL L L Reginato, W L Waldron, J-L Vay - LBNL 12 January 2011.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Beam dynamics simulation with 3D Field map for FCC RF gun
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Toward a physics design for NDCX-II, a next-step platform for ion beam-driven physics studies * A. Friedman, D. P. Grote, W. M. Sharp, LLNL E. Henestroza, M. Leitner, B. G. Logan, W. L. Waldron, LBNL APS-DPP, Dallas, Nov , 2008 *This work was performed under the auspices of the Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, by LLNL under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344, and by LBNL under Contract DE-AC02-05CH Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 2 LITHIUM ION BEAM BUNCH Final Beam Energy: 3-4 MeV Final Spot Size : ~ 1 mm diameter Total Charge Delivered: 30 nC (~ 2x10 11 particles or I max ~ 30 A) Exiting beam available for dE/dx measurement For Warm Dense Matter studies, the NDCX-II beam must be accelerated to 3-4 MeV and compressed to ~1 ns (~1 cm) THIN TARGET

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 3 NDCX-II will enable studies of warm dense matter and key physics for ion direct drive

30 ATA induction cells with pulsed 1-3T solenoids final energy correction induction cell 100mA, 500ns Li + ion injector final focus and target chamber with diagnostics neutralized drift compression region with plasma sources water-filled Blumleins oil-filled transmission lines At least 40 ATA cells are available for NDCX-II Estimated cost: $6M (includes contingency)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 5 ATA cells are in good condition and match NDCX-II needs well Cells will be refurbished with stronger, pulsed solenoids solenoid water cooling They provide short, high-voltage accelerating pulses: –Ferrite core: 1.4 x Volt-seconds –Blumlein: kV for 70 ns At front end, longer pulses need custom voltage sources; < 100 kV for cost Test stand allows us to study cells in detail

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 6 Some issues were resolved; favorable features emerged Issues: An accelerating gap must be “on” while any of the beam overlaps its extended fringe field –To shorten the fringe, the 6.7-cm radius of the ATA beam pipe is reduced to 4.0 cm Some pulses must be “shaped” to combat space charge forces –We’ll do this via inexpensive passive circuits Space is limited –30-cell design (20 Blumleins + 10 lower-voltage sources) fits easily Favorable features: Most of machine uses modular 5-cell “blocks” Induction cells can impart all or most of final ~8% velocity “tilt” Current of compressed beam varies weakly w/ target plane over ~40 cm

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 7 A simple passive circuit can generate a wide variety of waveforms Waveforms generated for various component values: charged line induction cell & accelerating gap impedance ATA “compen- sation box”

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 8 We are well on our way toward a physics design for NDCX-II Accel-decel injector produces a ~ 100 keV Li + beam with ~ 67 mA flat-top Induction accelerates it to 3.5 MeV at 2 A The 500 ns beam is compressed to ~ 1 ns in just ~ 14 m From 1-D code: (  C/m) E k (MeV) entering linac at focus (  C/m) z (m) E k (MeV)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 9 Principle 1: Shorten Beam First (“non-neutral drift compression”) Compress longitudinally before main acceleration Want < 70 ns transit time through gap (with fringe field) as soon as possible ==> can then use 200-kV pulses from ATA Blumleins Compress carefully to minimize effects of space charge Seek to achieve velocity “tilt” v z (z) ~ linear in z “right away”

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 10 Principle 2: Let It Bounce Rapid inward motion in beam frame is required to get below 70 ns Space charge ultimately inhibits this compression However, so short a beam is not sustainable –Fields to control it can’t be “shaped” on that timescale –The beam “bounces” and starts to lengthen Fortunately, the beam still takes < 70 ns because it is now moving faster We allow it to lengthen while applying: –additional acceleration via flat pulses –confinement via ramped (“triangular”) pulses The final few gaps apply the “exit tilt” needed for Neutralized Drift Compression

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 11 Pulse length (m) vs. z of center-of-mass

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 12 Pulse duration vs. z

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 13 Voltage waveforms for all gaps

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 14 A series of snapshots shows how the (E k,z) phase space and the line charge density evolve (  C/m) E k (MeV) entering linacmid-compression peak compression z (m) expanding exiting at focus

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 15 Video: line charge density and kinetic energy profiles vs. time

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 16 We use the Warp code to simulate the NDCX-II beam in (r,z) 500 ns 1500 ns 2500 ns 3500 ns 3835 ns 3855 ns Transverse emittance growth (phase space dilution) is minimal

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 17 Preliminary Warp (r,z) beam-on-target is encouraging; transverse dynamics and focusing optics design is still at an early stage Longitudinally: the goal is achieved; most of the beam’s 0.1 J passes through the target plane in ~1.2 ns Transversely: peak fluence of 17 J/cm 2 is less than the 30 J/cm 2 desired; 78% of beam falls within a 1 mm spot

1-D code (top) & Warp (bottom) results agree, with differences (  C/m) E k (MeV) z (m) 1680 ns 2580 ns 2880 ns (  C/m) E k (MeV) z (m)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 19 We look forward to a novel and flexible research platform The design concept is compact and attractive –It applies rapid bunch compression and acceleration –It makes maximal use of ATA induction modules and pulsed power –Beam emittance is well preserved in simulations … but considerable work remains before this is a true “physics design” NDCX-II will be able to deliver far greater beam energy and peak power for Warm Dense Matter physics than NDCX-I We will soon begin to develop an NDCX-II acceleration schedule that delivers a ramped-energy beam, for energy coupling and hydrodynamics studies relevant to direct-drive Heavy Ion Fusion

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 20 See Bill Sharp’s poster this afternoon: Session UP6, Marsalis A/B 2:00-5:00, #73 (& other interesting posters in 60’s, 70’s, 80’s)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 21 Abstract Toward a physics design for NDCX-II, a next-step platform for ion beam-driven physics studies 1 A. FRIEDMAN, D. P. GROTE, W. M. SHARP, LLNL; E. HENESTROZA, M. LEITNER, B. G. LOGAN, W. L. WALDRON, LBNL --- The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory, a collaboration of LBNL, LLNL, and PPPL, is studying Warm Dense Matter physics driven by ion beams, and basic target physics for heavy ion-driven Inertial Fusion Energy. A low-cost path toward the next- step facility for this research, NDCX-II, has been enabled by the recent donation of induction cells and associated hardware from the decommissioned Advanced Test Accelerator (ATA) facility at LLNL. We are using a combination of analysis, an interactive one-dimensional kinetic simulation model, and multidimensional Warp-code simulations to develop a physics design concept for the NDCX-II accelerator section. A 30-nC pulse of singly charged Li ions is accelerated to ~3 MeV, compressed from ~500 ns to ~1 ns, and focused to a sub-mm spot. We present the novel strategy underlying the acceleration schedule and illustrate the space-charge-dominated beam dynamics graphically.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 22 Extras

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 23 NDCX-II represents a significant upgrade over NDCX-I Baseline for WDM experiments: 1-ns Li + pulse (~ 2x10 11 ions, 30 nC, 30 A) For experiments relevant to ion direct drive: require a longer pulse with a “ramped” kinetic energy, or a double pulse.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 24 NDCX-II uses an accel-decel injector in which the “einzel lens” effect provides transverse confinement ground +102 kV pulsed source +68 kV DC -170 kV DC solenoid 10 mA/cm 2 extraction electrode accel electrode

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 25 Physics design effort relies on PIC codes 1-D PIC code that follows (z,v z ) –Poisson equation with transverse falloff (“HINJ model”) for space charge g 0 = 2 log (r pipe / r beam0 ) k  2 = 4 / (g 0 r beam0 2 ) –A few hundred particles –Models gaps as extended fringing field (Ed Lee’s expression) –Flat-top initial beam with parabolic ends, with parameters from a Warp run –“Realistic” waveforms: flat-top,“triangles” from circuit equation, and low-voltage shaped “ears” at front end –Interactive (Python language) Warp –3-D and axisymmetric (r,z) models; (r,z) used so far –Electrostatic space charge and accelerating gap fields –Time-dependent space-charge-limited emission

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 26 These snapshots show how the (v z,z) phase space and the line charge density evolve (note the auto-scaling) (  C/m) v z (m/  s) entering linac mid- compression peak compression z (m) expanding exiting at focus t = 3118 ns

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 27 Ohm’s law 3x10 13 plasma 3x10 12 plasma Current and radius z = 197 cm Sub ns pulse Simulations of NDCX-II neutralized compression and focus suggest that a plasma of density ~ cm -3 is desirable Idealized beam, uniform plasma, so far: –Li +, 2.8 MeV, 1.67 eV temperature –2-cm -5 or -6.7 mrad convergence –uniform current density;  = 24 mm-mrad –0.7-A with parabolic 50-ns profile –applying ideal tilt for 30 ns of beam ½ mm 1-ns beam has 2x10 13 cm -3 density Tilt gap plasma 5-kV e-trap (LSP runs by D. Welch; others by A. Sefkow, M. Dorf; Warp code starting to be used) Radius

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 28 We simulate injection from Cathodic-Arc Plasma sources 1.2 ns 4.5 ns This run corresponds to an NDCX-I configuration with 4 sources It was made by Dave Grote using Warp in 3-D mode LSP has been used extensively for such studies

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 29 Progress has been encouraging; much remains to be done Proper accounting for initial beam-end energy variation due to space charge (the 1-D run shown was initiated with a fully-formed uniform-energy beam) –Other 1-D runs used a “model” initial energy variation and an entry “ear” cell; they produced compressed beams similar to the one shown –However, that variation was not realistic; a Warp run using the 1-D-derived waveforms yielded inferior compression Better understanding of beam-end wrap-around (causes and consequences) A prescription for setting solenoid strengths to yield a well-matched beam Optimized final focusing, accounting for dependence of the focal spot upon velocity tilt, focusing angle, and chromatic aberration Assessment of time-dependent focusing to correct for chromatic effects Development of plasma injection & control for neutralized compression & focusing (schemes other than the existing FCAPS may prove superior) Establishment of tolerances for waveforms and alignment Major goals remain: –a self-consistent source-through-target design, including assessment of tolerances etc., for WDM studies –a prescription for modifications offering multiple pulses, ramped energy, and/or greater total energy, for ion direct drive studies