4 th Amendment More limited in schools. Supreme Court  Has ruled that school officials DO NOT need warrants to search students  All that is needed is.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Due Process and Search and Seizure- 4 th and 14 th Amendments.

Advertisements

The Great Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused vs

Supreme Court Case Presentation By Nicholas Childers.

The Fourth Amendment and Public Schools

Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule.

Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.

New Jersey v. T.L.O (1985) David Kumar. Table of Contents Background Progression Through Courts Constitutional Issues Supreme Court Ruling.

: Amendments #2, 3, 4 Do not copy! If true, write true. If false, write false and change the underlined word to the correct one. 1.No government at all.

+ Protecting Individual Liberties Section 1 Chapter 14.

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. I. OVERVIEW A. Due Process: The government, in whatever it does, must act fairly and follow established rules. 1.5 th Amendment:

Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.

The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools.

Street Law Fourth Amendment Rights

MAPP V. OHIO Rachel Simmons. Background & Freedom at Issue  The 4 th and 14 th Amendments  With reasonable suspicion of a bomb at the house, the police.

Analyzing a Court Decision An overview of Student Searches presented by Bart Fennemore.

469 U.S. 325 January 15, 1985 Circumstances of the Case On March 7, 1980 a teacher at Piscataway High School found T.L.O with a friend smoking cigarettes.

Bill of Rights #1. #1The ___ says that illegally obtained evidence can't be used in court. Reasonable suspicion rule Search rule Warrant Rule Exclusionary.

“9 Fundamentals of Search & Seizure Law for South Dakota School Administrators” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.

 Brown v. Board of Education  Engle v. Vitale  Gideon v. Wainwright  Lemon v. Kurtzman  Mapp v. Ohio  Marbury v. Madison  McCulloch v. Maryland.

New Jersey v. T.L.O By Luke Wills and Caroline Weschler.

Grady L. Hunt Locklear, Jacobs, Hunt & Brooks (910) The information contained in this presentation is intended for general.

Rights of Criminal Defendants Are the due process rights and the procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.

Search & Seizure Question : Privacy vs. Need for Law and Order.

The 4 th Amendment Chapter The 4 th Amendment Prevents Writs of Assistance Blanket Search warrants “The right of people…against unreasonable search.

THE 4 TH AMENDMENT The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.

Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.

Journal 1.Can a police officer “stop and frisk” you? 2.True or False - The 4th amendment protects us against all searches and seizures 3.Do the police.

 Most cases are handled by state courts  Arrest: When a person suspected of a crime is taken into custody Arrest warrant v. probable cause  A judge.

New Jersey vs TLO By Sarah Shelleh.

DO NOW – Tuesday, December 10 Take out your homework On your Do Now sheet: Is it easy to get a warrant? Why / Why not? When can the police search someone.

What does it all mean?! The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. This means that law enforcement.

FREEDOM & SECURITY OF THE PERSON Pgs th Amendment  Ended slavery in  States & National Govt. could no longer allow slavery.

Unit 1: Constitutional Interpretation and the Bill of Rights.

Fourth Amendment Rights “The young man knows the rules, but the old* man knows the exceptions.” Oliver Wendell Holmes *Please note that some of us prefer.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;

The 4 th amendment. The 4 th amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported.

*Most cases are handled by state courts Analyze Figure 12.1 on page 127 to see an overview of the entire criminal justice process.

Strip search th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches.

CALL TO ORDER  Have you or someone you’ve known ever been searched by the police, legally or illegally?  What do you know about the rules that police.

T HE R IGHT TO B E L EFT A LONE Essential Question: How has an individual’s right to privacy changed over time?

Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?

Vernonia School District V Acton Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials recognized higher rate of drug use among athletes Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials.

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

3 rd Amendment What is the 3 rd Amendment? Why do we have the 3 rd Amendment?

Chapter 12: Criminal Justice Process ~ The Investigation Objective: Student should be able to correlate how the constitution relates to an investigation.

DO NOW – Thursday, December 12 Take out your homework Review this definition: Reasonable suspicion – information which is enough to give an officer a reasonable.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases Proving that the Bill of Rights protects you.

Eliseo Lugo III.  In Weeks v. United States, 1914, the Court ruled that evidence obtained by police illegally is not admissible in federal court—a practice.

New Jersey v TLO Trevor B. & Akilia R.. Facts about the case : In 1980, a teacher at Piscataway in NJ discovered two girl smoking in a restroom This was.

The Warren Court (1950s-1960s) How did the Supreme Court (under the leadership of Earl Warren) expand the rights of individuals?

Substantive Due Process

Crime and Due Process There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.

The 4th Amendment Notes 5-3.

Introduction to the Federal Court System

Chapter 14 Searches and Seizures

Bill of Rights Edition.

Chapter 16 Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial

The 4th Amendment Notes 5-3.

Introduction to Federal Court System

By Ethan Hornung and Robert Pierri.

4th Amendment Jorge Gonzalez.

4th Amendment According to the Fourth Amendment, the people have a right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable.

Right Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures

October 16, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:

Film Clip: Crash Course - Legal System Basics: #18

Vocabulary Activity Exclusionary Rule

Rights of the Accused Test

4th Amendment: Search and Seizure

Alexzandria Rosser 469 U.S. 325 (1985)

New Jersey v. T.L.O. 469 US 325 (1985) By Sage Miller.

Presentation transcript:

4 th Amendment More limited in schools

Supreme Court  Has ruled that school officials DO NOT need warrants to search students  All that is needed is REASONABLE SUSPICION (less than probable cause)

New Jersey v. TLO  School officials are NOT “in loco parentis” (stand-ins for parents)—they are officials of the state  There is a need to balance student expectation of privacy with the school’s right and responsibility to provide a good learning environment  Reasonableness of searches makes them okay

EXCLUSIONARY RULE  If an illegal search takes place, the evidence may not be used  This applies to evidence obtained directly from the search AND evidence obtained indirectly because of the search.  Mapp v. Ohio—extended the exclusionary rule to the states V.V.