SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soil Exploration Part II
Advertisements

SITE INVESTIGATION.
PILE FOUNDATION.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing on Airport Subgrade Soils
Objectives Be able to use basic volume weight equations
Course : S0705 – Soil Mechanic
SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
TRENCHING AND EXCAVATIONS
Unified Soil Classification System Training
Time-dependent increase in CPT tip resistance following explosive compaction. Time-dependent increase in V s following explosive compaction, as measured.
Review of Relative Density Principles v Relative Density principles apply to compaction of relatively clean, coarse- grained soils. v Relatively clean.
Soils in Construction (Engineering)
SPECIALTY WORKSHOP: SITES TRAINING AND INTRODUCTION TO WINDAM ASDSO Dam Safety 2008 PART 2 – SITES EARTH SPILLWAY EVALUATION EVALUATION B. Earth Spillway.
Insitu Testing Methods Breakout Session Research Collaboration Field Testing Research Needs Ken Stokoe, Breakout Moderator.
  AN-najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil engineering Department Prepared by: Eng. Imad A. F. Jarara’h. Submitted.
The Use of Full Flow Penetrometers in an Intermediate Soil; Silt By: Alan Abad & Mark Jones.
Textural Identification Properties of Soil Topic D.
Field Borings and Cone Penetration Testing
Engineering Properties of Soils Soil Types
CWB Tunnel (North Point Section) and IEC Link HY/2009/19 Presentation on: Date: Presented by: Presentation on: 17 April 2015 Chun Wo-CRGL-MBEC Joint Venture.
Classification, Engineering Properties & Consolidation Methods.
GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES (CE1203)
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
Soil Classification N. Sivakugan Duration: 7 min. 20 s.
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
SOIL EXPLORATION Module 1 -2K6 -March GCEK.
 Soil grains come from weathering of bedrock ◦ Physical weathering – granular soils ◦ Chemical weather – creates clay  Soil is either residual or transport.
Shear Strength of Soils
Characterizing the Headcut Erodibility Index (Kh) 3) for Cohesive Soils PART 2 – SITES EARTH SPILLWAY EVALUATION B. Earth Spillway Integrity Analysis b.
Importance of Anchors Determining Necessary Load Capacities Types of Anchors Determining Holding Capacity of Soil Types Choosing Anchors Overview Tower.
Reference Manual Chapter 9
CE 317 Geotechnical Engineering Dr. Tae-Hyuk Kwon
EARTH EROSION THEORY SITES WORKSHOP: March 31 – April 2, 2009 Phoenix, AZ.
1 Kh Training April Gudiance on the selection of Kh Soil Soil to Rock Rock Soil Soil to Rock Rock.
Introduction to Soils.
Settlement Criteria  f f f for clays, silty clays, plastic silts: Chapter 5 (short term) Chapter 7 (long term, i.e., consolidation)  i i i in this.
PART 1 - INTRODUCTION TO SITES B. History and Focus of the SITES Software and its Application SPECIALTY WORKSHOP: SITES TRAINING AND INTRODUCTION TO WINDAM.
THE NATURE OF SOIL By Sarik Salim. The nature of Soil Soil is defined as a collection of mineral particles that was formed due to the weathering process.
Geotechnical Engineering
1 VIRGINIAWORKSHOP Feb. 28 – Mar. 3, 2006 INTRODUCTION to SITES for WATER RESOURCE SITE ANALYSIS.
Name : Abdulrahman Al-bedah ID : KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA KING SAUD UNIVERSITY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CE DEEP COMPACTION.
Bearing Capacity from SPT and PLT
EROSION TECHNOLOGY for SITES Earth Spillway Integrity Analysis Phase 2: Inputs and Equations EROSION TECHNOLOGY for SITES Earth Spillway Integrity Analysis.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II CFAC Review Conventional Facilities Geotechnical Conditions Tom Joos Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering.
Wave Equation Applications 2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
SITES SOFTWARE APPLICATION SEMINAR INTRODUCTION to SITES __________________________ SITES 2005 INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT for WATER RESOURCE SITE.
SITE INVESTIGATION.
PART 2 – SITES EARTH SPILLWAY EVALUATION B. Earth Spillway Integrity Analysis i. Three phase model of spillway performance ii. Phase 1 and phase 2 inputs.
SUB SURFACE INVESTIGATION. PREPAID BY : (1) LAD PARTH J: (2) PATEL RIYA K: (3) RATHWA AARTI : (4)TANDEL HETAL J:
Soil Properties determination
SITE INVESTIGATION ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE-DHARI
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute Of Technology,Vasad.
Chapter 15 Soil-Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundations
Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya Gujarat Technological University
Chapter 13 Lateral Earth Pressure – Curved Failure Surface
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Site Investigation and Field Tests
Mr. Vedprakash Maralapalle, Asst. Professor
The Engineering of Foundations
DARSHAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Piezocone Penetration
QuakeCoRE Project Update
Aspek Geoteknik.
Aspek Geoteknik.
TOPIC 1: SITE INVESTIGATION FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
Classification, Engineering Properties & Consolidation Methods
PAT GEOTECHNIC INTRODUCTION TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Presentation transcript:

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 PART 2 – SITES EARTH SPILLWAY EVALUATION B. Earth Spillway Integrity Analysis b. Characterization of geologic materials: iii. Characterizing the Headcut Erodibility Index (Kh) 2) for Cohesionless Soils SPECIALTY WORKSHOP: SITES TRAINING AND INTRODUCTION TO WINDAM ASDSO Dam Safety 2008 Earth Spwy Evaluation

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Objectives State the common range of the Kh parameter for soils Identify plot of rate of headcut migration versus Kh parameter and explain sensitivity of plot to values of Kh Using example soil data, assign a value to the Kh parameter accurately Identify tests used to characterize soils for estimating the Kh parameter Earth Spwy Evaluation 2

Typical values for the Kh Factor SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Typical values for the Kh Factor 0.01 Soil 0.2 Weathered Rock 0.5 Soft or Jointed Rock 10 Hard Rock Earth Spwy Evaluation 3

Available Tools For Estimating Kh SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Available Tools For Estimating Kh NEH 628, Chapter 52, Appendix B Soil Catalog on SITES CD Earth Spwy Evaluation 4

Chapter 52, Appendix B - Soils SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Chapter 52, Appendix B - Soils If the PI greater than 10 – Cohesive If the PI is < 10, soil is Cohesionless Earth Spwy Evaluation 5

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Soil Weathered Rock Poor Quality Rock 0.2 Earth Spwy Evaluation 6

Available Tools For Estimating Kh SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Available Tools For Estimating Kh Spreadsheet Uses soil properties from field and laboratory tests or table estimates NEH 628, Chapter 52, Appendix B Soil Catalogue Earth Spwy Evaluation 7

Examples of Catalog Soils SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Examples of Catalog Soils Catalogue Soils are on SITES CD Earth Spwy Evaluation 8

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Soil Catalog Existing catalog for soils (assuming that Kh value is < 0.2) is ten samples Only Three Cohesionless Soils. Catalog listings with Kh values of 0.01 to 0.03 for cohesionless soils Experience with recent Oklahoma spillway shows Kh values may be less than 0.01 for nonplastic non-cemented sands. Earth Spwy Evaluation 9

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Soil Catalogue Soil descriptions are very brief Some wording confusing – example index value based on laboratory strength notation for nonplastic ML soil from Oklahoma Earth Spwy Evaluation 10

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Only Three Cohesionless Soils in Catalogue Earth Spwy Evaluation 11

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Kh – 0.01 Buck and Doe Run 33, MO SM, very loose sand with little bonding;deep deposit Earth Spwy Evaluation 12

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Kh – 0.02 Rush Creek 45, Oklahoma ML, cohesionless, headcut; index value based n laboratory strength test Earth Spwy Evaluation 13

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Chapter 52, Appendix B Is the PI greater than 10 – Cohesive If the PI is < 10, soil is Cohesionless Following summary next discusses cohesionless soils Earth Spwy Evaluation 14

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Kh – 0.03 Big Sand 3, MS ML, some apparent bonding; headcut Earth Spwy Evaluation 15

Material Strength Number, Ms SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Material Strength Number, Ms For Cohesionless Soils Values for Kh and Ms are related to relative density estimates and SPT values (Table 52-2) Earth Spwy Evaluation 16

Table 52-2. Ms for Cohesionless Soils SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Table 52-2. Ms for Cohesionless Soils Relative Density Ms Very loose < 0.02 Loose 0.02 – 0.05 Medium Dense 0.05 – 0.10 Dense 0.10 – 0.20 Very Dense 0.20 – 0.45 Earth Spwy Evaluation 17

Field Estimates for Relative Density SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Field Estimates for Relative Density Relative Density Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Very Dense Description 1/2” Reinforcing rod can be pushed easily by hand into soil Earth Spwy Evaluation

Field Estimates for Relative Density SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Field Estimates for Relative Density Relative Density Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Very Dense Description Can be excavated with a spade. A wooden peg 2”x 2”can easily be drive to depth of 6 ”. Earth Spwy Evaluation

Field Estimates for Relative Density SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Field Estimates for Relative Density Relative Density Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Very Dense Description Easily penetrated with a 1/2” reinforcing rod driven with a 5 pound hammer Earth Spwy Evaluation

Field Estimates for Relative Density SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Field Estimates for Relative Density Relative Density Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Very Dense Description Requires a pick for excavation. Wooden peg 2”x 2”is hard to drive beyond 6 ”. Earth Spwy Evaluation

Field Estimates for Relative Density SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Field Estimates for Relative Density Relative Density Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Very Dense Description Penetrated only a few centimeters with a 1/2” reinforcing rod driven with a 5 pound hammer Earth Spwy Evaluation

Other estimates for relative density SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Other estimates for relative density Estimate Relative Density from SPT tests Field Tests – Based on Reinforcing Rod and Wooden Stake Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Earth Spwy Evaluation 23

Dual Mass Dynamic Cone Penetrometer SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Dual Mass Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Earth Spwy Evaluation 24

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 very dense – Kh > 0.20 Dense – Kh = 0.10 – 0.20 Medium – Kh = 0.05 – 0.10 Loose – Kh = 0.02-0.05 very loose – Kh < 0.02 Earth Spwy Evaluation 25

SITES Workshop-Phoenix, AZ Mar 31-Apr 2, 2009 Summary The rate of upstream migration of a headcut predicted by the SITES program is extremely sensitive in the range of values of the Kh parameter which are typical for soils Cohesionless soils (PI < 10) have typical values of Kh less than 0.05 Earth Spwy Evaluation 26