Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity. The Central Issue l When you move from single to multiple group research the big concern is whether the groups.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability and Validity
Advertisements

Increasing your confidence that you really found what you think you found. Reliability and Validity.
Validity and Reliability
Defining Characteristics
Inadequate Designs and Design Criteria
Group Discussion Describe the fundamental flaw that prevents a nonequivalent group design from being a true experiment? (That is, why can’t these designs.
Get Ready to Play Publish or Perish! Please select a team. 1.Reeses 2.KitKat 3.Milky Way 4.Snickers 5. 3 Musketeers.
Internal Threats to Validity
Chapter 9. Internal Validity Threats to Internal Validity Alternative explanations Alternative hypotheses The DV is NOT dependent upon the IV but instead.
Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity Two or More Groups Social Threats.
Research Methods Research Design.
Research Design and Validity Threats
Educational Action Research Todd Twyman Summer 2011 Week 1.
Who are the participants? Creating a Quality Sample 47:269: Research Methods I Dr. Leonard March 22, 2010.
1 Exploring Quasi-Experiments Lab 5: May 9, 2008 Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and.
Group Discussion Describe the similarities and differences between experiments , non-experiments , and quasi-experiments. Actions for Describe the similarities.
Chapter 11 Quasi-Experimental Designs ♣ ♣ Introduction   Nonequivalent Comparison Group Design   Time-Series Design   Regression Discontinuity Design.
Probability Sampling uses random selection
Quasi-Experimental Designs Whenever it is not possible to establish cause-and-effect relations because there is not complete control over the variables.
Utilizing PBS “Cyberchase” Math Computer Games with Struggling Math Students Michelle Brennan Education 7202T Seminar in Applied Theory and Research II.
Probability Sampling uses random selection
EVALUATING YOUR RESEARCH DESIGN EDRS 5305 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & STATISTICS.
Experimental Research Take some action and observe its effects Take some action and observe its effects Extension of natural science to social science.
Quasi-Experiments. The Basic Nonequivalent Groups Design (NEGD) l Key Feature: Nonequivalent assignment NOXONOONOXONOO.
The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes.
2.4. Design in quantitative research Karl Popper’s notion of falsification and science – If a theory is testable and incompatible with possible empirical.
Types of Experiments & Research Designs UAPP 702: Research Design for Urban & Public Policy Based on notes from Steven W. Peuquet. Ph.D.
Applying Science Towards Understanding Behavior in Organizations Chapters 2 & 3.
Research Methods for Counselors COUN 597 University of Saint Joseph Class # 5 Copyright © 2015 by R. Halstead. All rights reserved.
BY MARIA LACAVA FALL 2013 CBSE 7202 ADHD in the classroom: What techniques work best for addressing ADHD / ADD in the classroom?
Between- Subjects Design Chapter 8. Review Two types of Ex research Two basic research designs are used to obtain the groups of scores that are compared.
Professor James Byrne Oct. 30 th  The Classic experiment has three components:  1. independent and dependent variables  2. pretesting and post-testing.
INTERNAL VALIDITY AND BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN. Internal Validity  the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships.
By: Valerie Passalacqua Alana Goldstein Gloren Brown.
Single-Group Threats to Internal Validity. The Single Group Case Two designs:
Threats to validity in intervention studies Potential problems Issues to consider in planning.
Research methods and statistics.  Internal validity is concerned about the causal-effect relationship in a study ◦ Can observed changes be attributed.
Experimental Research
Establishing a Cause-Effect Relationship. Internal Validity The “treatment” and the “outcomes”The “treatment” and the “outcomes” The independent and dependent.
Regression to the Mean.
Internal Validity. All about whether the research design (and data analysis) warrants the conclusions. Concerned with: – Causal relationships – Various.
Experimental & Quasi-Experimental Designs Dr. Guerette.
Chapter 11.  The general plan for carrying out a study where the independent variable is changed  Determines the internal validity  Should provide.
Chapter 8 Experiments Topics Appropriate to Experiments The Classical Experiment Selecting Subjects Variations on Experimental Designs An Illustration.
KNR 295 Research Design Slide 1 Design Ch. 6 – Internal Validity.
How to Develop Balanced Biliteracy in Language Minority Children Education Fall 2010 Romina G. Ladner.
Career and Technical Education: An Alternative Approach to Educating At-Risk Youth Seminar in Applied Theory and Research II By Nicole Morris Midterm Presentation.
Journalism 614: Experimental Methods Experimental Research  Take some action and observe its effects –Extension of natural science to social science.
The Integration of Smartboards in the ESL English Language Instruction
CHAPTER 8 EXPERIMENTS.
Experiments.  Labs (update and questions)  STATA Introduction  Intro to Experiments and Experimental Design 2.
Research Design: Causal Studies l Quick Review: Three general forms of quantitative research studies –Descriptive: Describes a situation –Relational :
Experimental Research Design Causality & Validity Threats to Validity –Construct (particular to experiments) –Internal –External – already discussed.
EMR 6550: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Kristin A. Hobson Fall 2013.
1. /32  A quasi-experimental design is one that looks like an experimental design but lacks the key ingredient -- random assignment. 2.
Can you hear me now? Keeping threats to validity from muffling assessment messages Maureen Donohue-Smith, Ph.D., RN Elmira College.
School of Public Administration & Policy Dr. Kaifeng Yang 研究设计 : 实验研究的基本问题.
Creating Effective Cooperative Groups in 3 rd Grade Math Classes Rebecca R. Kish Dr. Sharon O’Connor-Petruso Brooklyn College CBSE 7202T.
William M. Trochim James P. Donnelly Kanika Arora 8 Introduction to Design.
Research Designs for Explanation Experimental, Quasi-experimental, Non-experimental, Observational.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Research
Experiments Why would a double-blind experiment be used?
The Non-Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Strategies:
Types of Designs.
Quantitative design: Ungraded review questions
Introduction to Design
The Nonequivalent Groups Design
External Validity.
Types of Designs: R: Random Assignment of subjects to groups
Presentation transcript:

Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity

The Central Issue l When you move from single to multiple group research the big concern is whether the groups are comparable. l Usually this has to do with how you assign units (for example, persons) to the groups (or select them into groups). l We call this issue selection or selection bias.

The Multiple Group Case AdministerprogramMeasureoutcomesMeasurebaseline Alternativeexplanations AlternativeexplanationsXOOOO Do not administer program MeasureoutcomesMeasurebaseline

ExampleExample l Compensatory education in math for 1st graders l Pre-post program-comparison group design l Measures (O) are standardized achievement tests (at start of grade 1 and start of grade 2; forms A & B)

Selection Threats l Any factor other than the program that leads to posttest differences between groups. l For example, because of group differences, kids in one group watch Sesame Street more frequently and pick up more math concepts. XOOOO

Selection-History Threat l Any other event that occurs between pretest and posttest that the groups experience differently. l For example, kids in one group pick up more math concepts because they watch more Sesame Street. XOOOO

Selection-Maturation Threat l Differential rates of normal growth between pretest and posttest for the groups. l They are learning at different rates, even without program. XOOOO

Selection-Testing Threat l Differential effect on the posttest of taking the pretest. l The test may have “primed” the kids differently in each group or they may have learned differentially from the test, not the program. XOOOO

Selection-Instrumentation Threat l Any differential change in the test used for each group from pretest and posttest l For example, change due to different forms of test being given differentially to each group, not due to program XOOOO

Selection-Mortality Threat l Differential nonrandom dropout between pretest and posttest. l For example, kids drop out of the study at different rates for each group. XOOOO

Selection-Regression Threat l Different rates of regression to the mean because groups differ in extremity. l For example, program kids are disproportionately lower math scorers and consequently have greater regression to the mean. XOOOO