Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/2222.5.2006 Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.
B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
CMS Software and Physic project at HIP V. Karimäki Scientific Advisory Board Helsinki, June 5, 2006.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
CLASHEP 2011 Angela Romano on behalf of Group A. Group Leader E. Fraga Argentina G. Sborlini Brazil C. Baesso E. Basso A. Custódio M. Griep M. Martins.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Napoli Doct. School 9 JULY 07 1 DRELL-YAN /Z/Z q q e,e, e+, +e+, +
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS Helsinki b/tau workshop Lauri A. Wendland / HIP.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
ATLAS Trigger Development
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
HIGH GRANULARITY CALORIMETER ANALYSIS SARAH MARIE BRUNO CMS - CALTECH GROUP SUPERVISORS: ADOLF BORNHEIM, LINDSEY GRAY, MARIA SPIROPULU.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry and Cross Section of Inclusive  0 Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at 200 GeV Outline  Introduction  Experimental.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Samples and MC Selection
Presentation transcript:

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the e/ working group and connected physics analysis. –electron HLT: jet rejection by pixel matching –electron isolation studies –simulation and reconstruction validation –fast simulation validation –photon position and energy corrections –error estimates in photon energy measurement. Test beam studies of ECAL module –cluster containment as a function of  Online selection and pilot run physics. New: HIP involvement in User Support.  Motivation and goals

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation2/ Activities in e/ group: Motivation and goals The participation to the e/ activities motivated by: –experience in the previous H   studies –possibility of an efficient and visible contribution –connection to the tracker activities (converted photons, electrons) –possibility of participating in beam studies before the LHC start-up. We have achieved –wide recognition of the quality of our work –understanding of the e/ physics in the CMS environment –thorough knowledge of the photon and electron reconstruction and online selection.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation3/ Jet rejection for electrons at HLT The event rate of electron at the High Level Trigger (HLT) is dominated by neutral pions from jets –An algorithm developed and optimized by us for an early and quick identification of electron by looking at the corresponding hit in the inner tracking system. Electron efficiency vs accepted jets Each point: different search areas in pixel layers

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation4/ Validation of the new G4 simulation We have validated the electromagnetic part of the new G4 simulation in CMS –at the transition phase GEANT3 (cmsim)  GEANT4 (OSCAR) –at several OSCAR releases. OSCAR_3_6_0 OSCAR_2_4_5

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation5/ Validation tools for fast simulation A tool was developed for an easy comparison between full (OSCAR) and fast (FAMOS) simulation –E and pos. resolution –shower shape variables.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation6/ Photons Several items studied: –converted photons –photon energy corrections –photon position measurement –photon energy uncertainties and their impact on H mass resolution –implementations of these items in the PhotonCandidate class in the reconstruction software. People involved: –KLP –Jukka Nysten, graduate student –former members: Mikko Voutilainen, summer student, Masters’ thesis Timo Aaltonen, summer student.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation7/ Energy corrections The correction logic: –First, shift the peak to E rec /E true = 1 (a single scaling factor). –The corrections bring the tail in, but should not move the peak Photons (5x5) barrel with E 9 /E sc > away from module borders  eff = 0.99% eff = 0.96%  eff = 0.87%

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation8/ Energy resolution for corrected energies Photons from H, p t > 40, 25 GeV/c Photons at the module borders excluded

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation9/ Position measurement The position optimized for electrons gave a visible shift for unconverted photons. The depth parameter T0 was optimized for photons. The position of photon candidates is now recalculated with the new value.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation10/ Endcap: unconverted photons, position Eff.RMS = 3.66%Eff.RMS = 2.88%Eff.RMS = 1.18%Eff.RMS = 1.80%

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation11/ Module border corrections The measured energy is reduced at the module borders as the particle goes through less material. Module Module borders E1E1 E2E2

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation12/ Module border corrections Corrections defined Exclusion region where the spread is so large that correction cannot be made

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation13/ Super clusters Correction functions Overall scale “ADC to GeV” r9 = E 9 /E SC  Containment r1 = E 1 /E 9 Containment log(E 1 /E 2 ) +Module borders Module borders 5x5 Overall scale “ADC to GeV”  r9 = E 9 /E SC Containment r1 = E 1 /E 9 or log(E 1 /E 2 ) Module borders Old Now Correction logic was implemented in the PhotonCandidate class The implementation was streamlined with the transfer of the code to the new CMSSW in mind: readability of the code, no fancy technicalities.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation14/ Error estimate for photon E measurement The precision of the photon energy measurement is crucial for an early discovery of the H signal. Photon energy measurement may be degraded due to several factors: –shower shape (due to the conversions in the tracker material) –shower position with respect to the crystal boundaries and module boundaries –shower position in  (due to different geometrical shape of the crystal array) –shower energy (a feature of the calorimeter). These uncertainties have been estimated from simulated data and parameterized as functions of r 9 = E 9 /E sc, r 1 = E 1 /E 9, , ln(E 1 /E 2 ) at module borders and E. The total uncertainty is taken as a maximum of different estimates: –take  = max( r9, r1, mod.borders, E ) Each photon is given an uncertainty estimate which can be used in the event selection.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation15/ Example: uncertainty due photon energy BarrelEndcap Number of events in each bin E<60GeV excluded E<30GeV excluded from further fits Divide E meas /E gen in bins of E For each bin, compute eff. RMS

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation16/ Higgs mass resolution Select events with the combined uncertainty below a threshold.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation17/ ECAL test beam studies Motivation: –many energy correction have only been studied with simulated data, now, there is a chance to validate them with real data. Goals: –study the effect of shower position in  to the energy containment in a limited size cluster. –comparison with the simulation. Simulation Test beam data

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation18/ Activities in e/ group: Conclusions We have contributed to many areas in the photon and electron reconstruction. Many of the items we have been active in do not produce publications –this is a known risk career-wise (and for evaluations…) –we feel that our choice has been correct and our engagement to not so grateful tasks has been highly valued in the collaboration. The physical ideas have been turned to software, now in CMS we are transferring this knowledge to a new software system (ORCA  CMSSW). We have decided to reduce our activities in the area of reconstruction software development –as a small institute and as physicists (and not sw engineers) we think that rewriting the same code is not where we can best contribute. But: we will continue test beam analysis and connected studies in other areas such as online selection at the LHC start-up.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation19/ Online selection Motivation: –data-taking is approaching: quick involvement with the early LHC data. Goals: –get a thorough understanding of the triggering process and its impact on the physics analysis. Projects: –cross-trigger studies –e/ connected items: rate studies for start-up run minimum bias signal from ECAL.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation20/ Cross-trigger studies: L1 rates (kHZ), L = cm -2 s -1 Muon +Jet E t > 60 GeV Jet E t > 100 GeV MET E t > 40 GeV MET E t >60 GeV p t >5 GeV/c p t >10 GeV/c Electron +Jet E t > 60 GeV Jet E t > 100 GeV MET E t > 40 GeV MET E t >60 GeV p t >10 GeV/c p t >15 GeV/c p t >20 GeV/c Muon +Electron p t > 10GeV/c Electron p t > 15GeV/c p t >5 GeV/c p t >10 GeV/c Muon from another event in the same bunch crossing

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation21/ User support CMS has opened Computing positions inviting contributions from participating countries. We have decided to contribute ½FTE to the post of CMS User Support Coordinator starting from May, the 1 st, –to supervise the documentation for computing and software processes –to setup a unified user support gateway –to continue analysis in order to be well familiar with the tools. Our proposal has been accepted by the CMS management –the experience with the CMS software and analysis and the background as a physicist and user were especially appreciated. Motivation: –possibility of a visible and useful contribution –user support knowledge in an institute is valuable. Goals: –to understand the needs of the user support for a collaboration like CMS –to build a user-friendly and up-to-date documentation system –to monitor the evolution of the user support needs in time.

Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation22/ Conclusions and plans We have had a fruitful and long-term involvement in the e/ working group. With the data-taking approaching, we are modifying our priorities –reduced activities in the electron and photon reconstruction software development –continuing involvement in the ECAL test beam analysis –new activities in the online selection. New engagement as a CMS User Support Coordinator. We are looking forward to the start of the data-taking!