Overview of Gene Therapy Surveillance Inspections Joseph P Salewski, Chief Bioresearch Monitoring Branch CBER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Advertisements

What FDA Looks for When Inspecting IRBs and Sponsors Marian J. Serge Nurse Consultant Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for.
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
How to Survive an FDA Inspection
What is involved? What are your responsibilities? May 2013: Research Institute, Clinical Research Administration Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Common Mistakes & Audits 05/21/2014. Summary of audit findings by category.
Audit Ebru Mutlu-Omega CRO. General Purpose to help quality (to maintain quality at present) to assure quality (make sure that quality in future is maintained)
The IND and Clinical Trial Management Frances Richmond Director International Center for Clinical Trials.
The FDA Inspection Process
Guideline for Monitoring of Clinical Trials for Cooperative Groups, CCOP Research Bases, and the Clinical Trials Support Unit (CTSU) Lore Lagrone Program.
VALIDATION What is the new guidance?. What is a Compliance Policy Guide? Explain FDA policy on regulatory issues CGMP regulations and application commitments.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Good Clinical Practices Regulatory Guidelines for the Conduct of Clinical research Introduction to Research Pharmacy Services Javier Palacios, R.Ph. Sponsored.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Vernon D. Toelle, Ph.D. Team Leader Pre-Market Compliance and Administrative Actions Team (BIMO Team) Overview of CVM Bioresearch Monitoring.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
Good Clinical Practices and FDA Inspections
MAGI's Clinical Trial Agreements, Budgets & Regulatory Conference FDA Inspections of Investigator Sites Paul Below Clinical Research Consultant P. Below.
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents:
INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG SERVICES IN THE HOSPITAL Sheree Miller, Pharm.D. University of Washington Medical Center
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Research Office (HSRO) University of Miami and Affiliated Institutions.
FDA Regulatory Requirements and FDA’s Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Program Constance Lewin, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Director for Human Subject Protection.
Ensuring Quality in Medical Device Clinical Trials
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
KFDA Inspection Program for Quality and Compliance Efforts Young-Ok Kim Clinical Trials Management Div. Korea Food and Drug Administration.
Carolyn Hommel Good Clinical Practice Program FDA February 25, 2004
“The FDA Inspector Cometh”
Audits and Inspections in Clinical Research Jobin Kunjumon Vilapurathu.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Preparing the IRB and Investigators for an External Audit/Site Visit
Device Clinical Trials and More… Michael E. Marcarelli, PharmD Director, Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for Devices and.
Monitoring, Audits, and Inspection Oh my! Rachel Sheppard Regulatory Director, OCRSS.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
Read the SMALL PRINT of the 1572 The Essential GCP Document.
Building Clinical Infrastructure and Expert Support Michael Steinberg, MD, FACR ULAAC Disparity Project Centinela/Freeman Health System.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Process of FDA New Drug Approval: 1- New Compound with promising preclinical data 2- Sponsor applies to FDA for an IND (Investigational New Drug Application)
FDA Regulation of Pharmaceuticals and Devices. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of the Commissioner Center.
Copyright FDA Inspections: Where Do Things Go Wrong? Diana Naser RN, MS, CCRP Executive Director Clinical Research Administration Clinical Research.
Module C FDA Regulations Regulatory Documents Patricia E. Koziol 1Module C Final Version 10-apr-2010.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
1 BIORESEARCH MONITORING AND IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS SYBIL WELLSTOOD, PH.D. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF BIORESEARCH MONITORING.
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
Patrick Herbison Quality Improvement Specialist Division of Human Subjects Protection DHSP Quality Improvement Activities Including Site Audits, Consent.
BIORESEARCH MONITORING & IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES Presented by Jean Toth-Allen, Ph.D. Biophysicist/Consumer Safety Officer Division of Bioresearch Monitoring.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
FDA Facility Evaluation Douglas Stearn Deputy Director for Policy and Analysis Office of Compliance Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Korea Food & Drug Administration Deputy director Kwang-Soo Joo Korea FDA Sep. 29, 2000 : Korean Good Clinical Practice & Relative Guidelines How to Manage.
Compliance Update Allergenic Products Advisory Committee Meeting March 15, 2002 Teddi Lopez DCM/OCBQ Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators

Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Clinicaltrials.gov Update
The Information Professional’s Role in Product Safety
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Handle FDA Audits
Data Anomaly Detection in CDER: An Overview of Efforts and Methods
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Gene Therapy Surveillance Inspections Joseph P Salewski, Chief Bioresearch Monitoring Branch CBER

PURPOSE of BIMO To ensure the quality and integrity of data submitted to FDA in support of a marketing permit (IND, PLA/BLA, IDE, NDA) To ensure the protection of the rights and welfare of research subjects

FDA’s BIMO Program Each Center has a BIMO Program staff Program is coordinated by the Office of Regulatory Affairs/ Office of Enforcement Inspections are conducted by ORA field staff, with Center experts as needed

Bioresearch Monitoring Compliance Programs CP Nonclinical Laboratories CP Institutional Review Boards CP Sponsors, Monitors/Contract Research Organizations CP Clinical Investigators

When does BIMO become involved? Submission of PLA/BLA Referrals from CBER staff Referrals from other Centers

BIMO Involvement Complaints from Sponsors, IRBs, consumers Routine Surveillance

Typical 10 Month Review Cycle Day 0 Day 45 Day 10 Day 300 CBER Receives PLA/BLA Pre-PLA/BLA Meeting 1st Committee meeting Filing letter sent or RTF BIMO review of PLA -prepare assignments Internal Review Clinical and Manufacturing BIMO Inspections EIR’s come in BIMO Summary to Committee ACTION

Site Selection Factors Number of subjects at each site Geographical distribution of sites Inspectional history of investigators Inconsistency of data at site Review committee’s concerns

Site Selection Factors Number of subjects at each site Geographical distribution of sites Inspectional history of investigators Inconsistency of data at site Review committee’s concerns

Assignment Content Background info on study and product Specific concerns/questions of review staff –adverse events –protocol followed –blinding –dosage and schedule –endpoint met?

Classifications No Action Indicated (NAI) Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI): –objectionable conditions or practices are found, but the agency is not prepared to take administrative or regulatory action Official Action Indicated (OAI): –regulatory and/or administrative actions will be recommended

Correspondence Non-titled letter –for NAI and VAI classifications Titled letters –Warning Letters –Notice of Initiation of Disqualification Proceedings and the Opportunity to Explain

Administrative Actions Determination that data is unreliable Refusal to file PLA/BLA Clinical hold Termination of IND Disqualification Initiation of Application Integrity Policy

GT Inspections Randomized selection of 30 active INDs out of 211 active INDs Resulted in: 24 Sponsors 70 Clinical Investigators

GT Inspections Sponsors: –commercial6 = 25% –government1 = 4.1% –independent17 = 70.8%

GT Inspections Clinical Investigators: –commercial46 = 65.7% –government 5 = 7.1% –independent19 = 27.1%

GT Inspections Field time expended: –total hours hours –range24 hrs to 208 hrs –average74.86 hours/inspection –FTE equivalent4.44 operational FTEs

GT Inspections Overall results: –Wash Outs11 = 15.7% –NAI23 = 32.8% –VAI33 = 47.1% –OAI 3 = 4.2%

GT Inspections Voluntary Action Indicated: –objectionable conditions or practices are found but the agency is not prepared to take or recommend administrative or regulatory action Official Action Indicated: –regulatory and/or administrative actions will be recommended

GT Inspections Commercial sponsors46 CI WO 6 = 13%8.5% overall NAI14 = 30.4%20% " VAI23 = 50%32.8% " OAI 3 = 6.5% 4.2% "

GT Inspections Government:5 CIs WO0 NAI3 = 60%4.2% overall VAI2 = 40%2.8% "

GT Inspections Independent:19 CIs WO5 = 26.3%7.1% overall NAI6 = 31.5%8.5% " VAI8 = 42.1%11.4% "

GT Inspections a comparison NAIVAIOAI GT38%55.9% 5.0% 2000 total30.9%57.1%11.9% 2000w/o GT21.4%60%18.5% %54.2%17.1% %53%12%

GT Inspections The random surveillance inspections of Phase 1 and 2 gene therapy clinical trails indicates that the trials were being properly conducted with fewer deviations than found in Phase 3 studies.

GT Inspections most common deficiencies Failure to follow the protocol Inadequate Consent Form Lack of supporting data for CRF entries Discrepancies between source documents and CRFs Inadequate drug accountability records Failure to notify IRB of AEs and deaths Failure to notify IRBs of protocol changes