ISSI Jan 2009 Early Stages of Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling 1 NASA/MSFC 1 Currently at JAXA/ISAS, Sagamihara, Japan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.
Advertisements

RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of CMEs’ Source Regions Yingna Su Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Collaborators: Adriaan van Ballegooijen,
A solar eruption driven by rapid sunspot rotation Guiping Ruan, Yao Chen, Shuo Wang, Hongqi Zhang, Gang Li, Ju Jing, Xing Li, Haiqing Xu, and Haimin Wang.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
A flare compilation Lots of people including Louise Harra, Lidia van Driel Gesztelyi, Chris Goff, Sarah Matthews, Len Culhane, Cristina Mandrini, Pascal.
The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.
Evolution of the Filament’s Shape. Fig. 1a shows the filament (in absorption) almost one hour before eruption. Once the filament begins to erupt, it takes.
Abstract On 2004 November 10, TRACE observed an X2.5 flare in NOAA Active Region The observations were taken at very short cadence (~3.7 s) in the.
000509EISPDR_SciInvGIs.1 EIS Science Goals: The First Three Months…. Louise Harra Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Multiwavelength Study of Magnetic Reconnection Associated with Sigmoid Eruption Chang Liu BBSO/NJIT
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
2008/12/10Solar Cycle Napa1 Magnetic field activities at the photosphere for causing microflares in the corona Toshifumi SHIMIZU (ISAS/JAXA)
Discussion Group B: Progress on Initiation Mechanisms 1. Determine topology of initiating field –Initiate broad observational investigation on filament.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Magnetic Shear in Two-ribbon Solar Flares Yingna Su 1,2 Advisors: Leon Golub 1, Guangli Huang 2 Collaborators: A. A. Van Ballegooijen 1, E. E. Deluca 1,
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Hinode and the Flare/CME Connection: Events of 19 th May, 2007 J. L. Culhane University College London Mullard Space Science Laboratory UK Laura Bone,
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
NEWS, RESOURCES, AND MOST RECENT SOLAR WORKING DRAFTS (1) Mauna Loa Solar Observatory Newsletter Feb 2009 (2) Introduction to the Solar and Space Weather.
Working Group E: The Pre-CME Sun - Pre-eruption structure, evolution & energy release - Global issues: helicity, homologous CMEs - Inputs to CME initiation.
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.
Direct Evidence of Emergence of a Helical Flux Rope under an Active- Region Prominence Joten Okamoto Kyoto Univ. / NAOJ JSPS Research Fellow Saku Tsuneta,
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
ABSTRACT This work concerns with the analysis and modelling of possible magnetohydrodynamic response of plasma of the solar low atmosphere (upper chromosphere,
Flares in and their associations with CMEs N.V. Nitta, J.P.Wuelser, M. J. Aschwanden, J. R. Lemen (LMSAL), D. M. Zarro (Adnet, Inc.)
Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
Pre-flare activity of M1.2 flare 김수진 1,2, 문용재 1, 김연한 1, 박영득 1, 김갑성 2 1. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute 2. Kyung Hee University.
Napa 2008, WG F The Earliest Phases of Solar Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling 1 NASA/MSFC 1 Currently at JAXA/ISAS, Sagamihara, Japan.
KASI Low atmospheric reconnections associated with an eruptive flare Yong-Jae Moon(1), Jongchul Chae(2), Young-Deuk Park(1) 1: Korea Astronomy and.
Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
Small scale energy release can play an important role in many phenomena: solar flares, coronal heating, fast solar wind etc. However, microwave observations.
I. Evidence of Rapid Flux Emergence Associated with the M8.7 Flare on 2002 July 26 Wang H. et al. 2004, ApJ, 605, using high temporal resolution.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
IMAGING AND SPECTOROPIC INVESTIGATIONS OF A SOLAR CORONAL WAVE: PROPERTIES OF THE WAVE FRONT AND ASSOCIATED ERUPTING MATERIAL L OUISE K. HARRA AND A LPHONSE.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of the Flare/CME Event on 2010 April 8 Yingna Su Bernhard Kliem, Adriaan van Ballegooijen, Vincent Surges, Edward.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
1 SEP sources investigations with PHI aboard Solar Orbiter (SO) R. Bucik, D.E. Innes, J. Hirzberger, S.K. Solanki first ever investigations of the SEPs.
Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Implications for Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Storms Ron Moore, Alphonse Sterling, David Falconer, John Davis.
Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,
Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR Yingna Su 1,2 Collaborators: A. A. Van Ballegooijen 1, E. E. Deluca 1, Leon Golub 1 P. Grigis 1, B. Lites 3,
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
Multiwavelength Study of Solar Flares Chang Liu Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Seminar Day November 2, 2007.
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
The CME-Flare Relationship in Homologous Eruptive Events
Teriaca, et al (2003) ApJ, 588, SOHO/CDS HIDA/DST 2002 campaign
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Observations of emerging and submerging regions with ASP and Solar-B
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Solar Eruption Onset: Where Does the Action Begin?
Presentation transcript:

ISSI Jan 2009 Early Stages of Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling 1 NASA/MSFC 1 Currently at JAXA/ISAS, Sagamihara, Japan

ISSI Jan 2009 Introduction What happens at the start of solar eruptions? –Preflare phase. –Hints about the trigger mechanism? We can’t see the coronal field, but have been attempting to use filaments as tracers of the erupting field. “Slow rise phase” --> Flare+“fast rise phase” We have examined several individual events, but more still needed!

ISSI Jan 2009 Quiet-Region vs. AR Eruptions Some aspects of quiet-region events: Larger scale (filaments of up to a few 10 5 km). More slowly evolving (pre-eruptive motions typically several hours). OK for analysis with EIT (FOV = full disk; cadence = 12 min). Easy to find in EIT. (STEREO will be better, of course. Possible cavity connection. If we assume quiet-region eruptions and active-region eruptions are essentially the same, except for (basically) magnetic-field strength, can learn about all eruptions from quiet-region events (cf. Sterling & Moore 2005; Williams et al. 2005). AR eruptions: Faster, more energetic. Easier to identify heatings resulting from reconnections, etc. Study AR eruptions when possible (TRACE, Hinode, etc.)

ISSI Jan 2009 First, an Example

ISSI Jan 2009Sterling, Moore, Thompson (2001); Sterling & Moore (2004a)

ISSI Jan 2009 Sterling, Moore, Thompson (2001)

ISSI Jan 2009 Some Theories for Eruption Onset: Tether cutting. Breakout model. MHD Instability. (Generally, this applies to “fast eruption” onset, although slow rise might be part of the process.) These theories are testable (at least to within some limits) by our observations.

ISSI Jan 2009 Some Theories for Eruption Onset: Tether cutting. Moore & Labonte (1980); Sturrock (1989); Moore et al. (1997; 2001). (Also Chen & Shibata 2000; Lin et al. 2001; van Ballegooijen & Martens 1989 (?))  Fundamentally bipolar.  Energy release via reconnection deep inside the “core field.” Breakout model. Antiochos (1998); Antiochos et al. (1999).  Fundamentally multi-polar, with bipole core fields and restraining overlying fields.  Earliest energy release via slow reconnection at interface. MHD Instability. Sturrock et al (2001); Rust & LaBonte (2005); Fan & Gibson (2007); etc.  Rapid rise prior to reconnection onset.

ISSI Jan 2009 (Moore et al. 2001)

ISSI Jan 2009 Runaway Tether-Cutting Reconnection (Moore & Sterling 2006)

ISSI Jan 2009 Breakout Reconnection Moore & Sterling 2006

ISSI Jan 2009 Ideal MHD Instability Moore & Sterling 2006

ISSI Jan 2009 First example, revisited:

ISSI Jan 2009Sterling, Moore, Thompson (2001); Sterling & Moore (2004a)

ISSI Jan 2009

Cavity Examples

ISSI Jan 2009

HXT Lo 14 – 23 keV

ISSI Jan 2009 Perhaps tether cutting has trouble explaining observations of this event. In general however, fast rise and onset of brightenings in SXRs occur in close synchrony. Breakout signatures can occur earlier, but this is not definitive. Do we see the chewy n?

ISSI Jan 2009

Observed Characteristics Sample size. So far, we have examined about 12 (including 2 AR) events “in detail” (e.g., motions and intensity changes); mapped trajectories of about 25 additional events. Trajectory. Filament eruptions often undergo two stages: slow and fast (e.g., Tandberg-Hanssen et al. 1980, Bong et al. 2006; cf. Ohyama & Shibata 1997). Slow-rise linearity. In several events, slow rise is fit better with line than with a polynomial or exponential. (Slow-rise is sometimes complex, however; Akiyama & Sterling.) Flaring at start of fast eruption. Onset of SXR and HXR flaring coincides ``closely’’ with start of fast eruption. Breakout signatures. Occur close to time of start of fast eruption. (Moore & Sterling 2006; Bong et al. 2006)

ISSI Jan 2009 Bong et al. (2006) Breakout after start of fast eruption(?)

ISSI Jan 2009 Observed Characteristics – Cont. Dimmings. (Discussed by many workers; hard to generalize, e.g., Howard & Harrison 2004.) –Local dimmings. Intensity dimmings next to and along neutral line begin weakly during slow-rise phase (stretching of field lines), and become strong dimmings at start of fast-rise phase. –Remote dimmings (and brightenings). In some cases, dimmings and brightenings occur at locations far removed from main neutral line, consistent with breakout-type reconnection. Magnetic cavities. These show that filaments belong to a more extended magnetic environment; interaction with overlying fields can lead to remote brightenings/dimmings. (Cf. Gibson et al )

ISSI Jan 2009 We have made progress on the fast-eruption- onset question, but issue is still not settled. Hard to say for sure signatures for which mechanism “come first.” (And perhaps some operate in combination.) An equally fundamental question however, is: What triggers the slow rise? This question may be easier to address.

ISSI Jan 2009 An AR-event example from Hinode On-disk filament eruption of 2 March 2007, seen with TRACE, STEREO. Hinode: –SOT (FG V magnetogram), etc. –SXRs from XRT Also use MDI magnetogram

ISSI Jan 2009 TRACE

ISSI Jan 2009 TRACE on MDI

ISSI Jan 2009 Hinode XRT

ISSI Jan 2009

XRT on MDI

ISSI Jan 2009 XRT on MDI

ISSI Jan 2009 XRT on MDI

ISSI Jan 2009 SOT FG V magnetogram

ISSI Jan 2009 UT Time on 1-2 Mar 2007 Magnetic Flux in box ( ) :0000:0005:00 (Cf. flux of whole region: ~ Mx)

ISSI Jan 2009

This initial observation from Hinode of a filament eruption supports the idea that flux changes in or near the eruption site are responsible for pre- explosive phase (e.g., slow-rise phase) dynamics. Flux changes = flux emergence and/or flux cancelation (also: tether weakening, slow tether cutting). (E.g., van Ballegooijen & Martens 1989, Moore & Roumeliotis1992, Rust & Kumar 1996, Lin & Forbes 2000, Chen & Shibata 2000, Feynman & Ruzmaikin 2004, Williams et al. 2005, Sterling, Harra & Moore 2007, Mikic et al ) Discussion

ISSI Jan 2009 Conclusions from this Hiinode Event Supports that pre-eruption (pre-flare) filament slow-rise phase is due to early flux changes (in this case: cancelation; slowly- driven tether-cutting reconnection). During pre-eruption period, = ~ 5% of flux of total erupting system. Therefore, the cancelation triggers release of the energy contained in the sheared field; it does not power the eruption. A question: What triggers the fast-rise phase? Hard to determine; see, e.g., Moore & Sterling 2006, Chifor et al (Also, Liu et al. 2008, ApJ; suggest kinking plus internal tether cutting.)

ISSI Jan 2009 Quiet-region filament eruption of 28 Feb 2001 (Sterling, Harra, & Moore 2007; same event as Marque et al. 2002)

ISSI Jan 2009

Sterling, Harra, & Moore (2007) EITSXT

ISSI Jan 2009

Cf. Feynman & Ruzmaikin (2004) (also, e.g., Li et al. 2006, and many others).

ISSI Jan 2009 Sterling, Harra, Moore (2007) Slow-rise phase: Tether-Weakening Reconnection?

ISSI Jan 2009 Some Questons, and Objectives How common is the slow-rise phase? What triggers the fast-rise phase? (TC, breakout, instability, something else?) What triggers the slow-rise phase? I suspect B cancelation and/or emergence. Examination of several more good events needed. More broadly: –Larger-scale consequences of slow rise phase (e.g., hints for breakout?). –Dimmings and remote connections (dittio). Need: –More good e.g.s (AR or QS). –B data.

ISSI Jan 2009 Cavity Connections More examples are needed, of course! If there is a particularly good e.g., then it may be ripe for modeling. Rise of cavity with time: Over the long term, could be easier to see than with filaments alone. (Gibson et al. 2006; S. Martin, some talks and priv. com.) That is, could help understand the long-term evolution toward eruption. Observations of cavities in (probably) EUV with SXRs could help understand the role (if any) of tether cutting at time of eruption. Chewy N? Comparing with B evolution may help understand long-term evolution. (van Ballegooijen et al.?) This may be difficult in practice, however: B measured on disk while cavity height measured at limb; cavity-related fields may be too weak to measure changes do to cancelation, etc., accurately.

ISSI Jan 2009 Sterling & Moore (2003)

ISSI Jan 2009

Sterling (2004)

ISSI Jan 2009 Sterling & Moore (2003)

ISSI Jan 2009

01 August 2008 Eclipse from Jinta, Gansu, China

ISSI Jan 2009