Integration and Plasma Control D.A. Gates, M.G. Bell NSTX 5-Year Plan June 30-July 2, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.
Advertisements

ARIES-Advanced Tokamak Power Plant Study Physics Analysis and Issues Charles Kessel, for the ARIES Physics Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan.
XP 1157 Increasing the CHI start-up current magnitude in NSTX B.A. Nelson et al. 1.
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
Standard and Advanced Tokamak Operation Scenarios for ITER
The Reversed Field Pinch: on the path to fusion energy S.C. Prager September, 2006 FPA Symposium.
Introduction to Spherical Tokamak
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
Summary Session October 10, 2008 The Joint Meeting of 4th IAEA Technical Meeting on Spherical Tori and 14th International Workshop on Spherical Torus.
C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory For the NSTX National Team DOE Review of NSTX Five-Year Research Program Proposal June 30 – July 2, 2003.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
NSTX The Resistive Wall Mode and Beta Limits in NSTX S. A. Sabbagh 1, J. Bialek 1, R. E. Bell 2, A. H. Glasser 3, B. LeBlanc 2, J.E. Menard 2, F. Paoletti.
9/20/04NSTX RESULTS REVIEW NSTX rtEFIT implementation progress results NSTX 2004 RESULTS REVIEW September 20&21, 2004 REAL-TIME EQUILIBRIUM RECONSTRUCTION.
Facility Status and Plans M.G. Bell 5-Year Plan Review June 30 – July 2, 2003.
Macroscopic Stability Research Timeline FY Physics Optimize shaping, RWM/TM control (n≥1 using the second SPA), validate internal mode physics.
Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
NSTX S. A. Sabbagh XP501: MHD spectroscopy of wall stabilized high  plasmas  Motivation  Resonant field amplification (RFA) observed in high  NSTX.
JT-60U Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Study on JT-60U Go Matsunaga 松永 剛 Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Japan JSPS-CAS Core University Program 2008 in ASIPP.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgements: M. G. Bell 2, R. Kaita 2, H. W. Kugel 2, R. Raman 3, A. L. Roquemore 2 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
S.A. Sabbagh for NSTX Macrostability TSG Macrostability TSG Suggested FY-12 Milestones – Address key ReNeW issues for ST development 1) Assess sustained.
1 CHI Summary Transient CHI (XP606) –All systems operated reliably without any faults Edge Current drive (XP533)
Mid-Run Assessment - ISD S. Kaye, D. Gates 10 May 2006.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Demonstration of 200 kA CHI Startup Current Coupling to Transformer Drive on NSTX B.A. Nelson, R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe, University of Washington D. Mueller,
PF1A upgrade physics review Presented by D. A. Gates With input from J.E. Menard and C.E. Kessel 10/27/04.
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
NSTX-U cryo/particle control discussion #8 December 19, 2012 What have we done, or plan to do to be responsive to PAC questions, and in prep for 5 year.
Absorber arc mitigation during CHI on NSTX D. Mueller, M.G. Bell, A.L. Roquemore, R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, T.R. Jarboe and the NSTX Research Team DPP09 Meeting.
CHI Run Summary for March 10-12, 31 & April 9, 2008 Flux savings from inductive drive of a Transient CHI started plasma (XP817) R. Raman, B.A. Nelson,
XP817: Transient CHI – Solenoid free Plasma Startup and Coupling to Induction Office of Science R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
Progress on NSTX towards steady state at low aspect ratio D. A. Gates, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory on behalf of the NSTX Research Team Supported.
EJD IAEA H-mode WS,, September 28, Overview Introduction — steady-state performance requirements -Global DIII-D and NSTX progress Plasma control.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
L. Zanotto – 10 February 2011 – RFX-mod programme workshop TF2: Active control of RFP and tokamak plasmas Report on experimental proposals L. Zanotto,
The influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: Modelling results and Proposals for TEXTOR experiments S. Günter, V. Igochine, K. Lackner, Q. Yu IPP.
Low-density Start-up D. Mueller, M. Bell, S. Gerhardt, J. Menard, R. Raman, S. Sabbagh NSTX FY12 low density discussion: May 12, 2011.
Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.
1 Progress in Spherical Torus Research Roger Raman University of Washington, Seattle and the NSTX National Research Team ICC Workshop May 2003, Seattle,
SMK – PAC 151 FY2004 Research Plan S. M. Kaye for the NSTX Research Team PPPL, Princeton Univ. NSTX PAC-15 Meeting Princeton, N.J January 2004.
MHD Issues and Control in FIRE C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability Austin, TX 11/3-5/2003.
Solenoid Free Plasma Start-up Mid-Run Summary (FY 2008) R. Raman and D. Mueller Univ. of Wash. / PPPL 16 April 2008, PPPL 1 Supported by Office of Science.
MCZ MCZ NCSX Mission Acquire the physics data needed to assess the attractiveness of compact stellarators; advance understanding.
NSTX-U Run Planning Guidance for 2015 NSTX-U Research Forum 1 FY2015 (and 2016) research milestones will guide prioritization of eXperimental Proposal.
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
Martin Peng NSTX Program Advisory Committee Meeting (PAC-14) January 21 – 22, 2003 PPPL Princeton, NJ PAC-13 Action Items Supported by Columbia U Dartmouth.
Gary Taylor presented on behalf of the NSTX Research Team Non-Inductive Operation 5-Year Research Plan NSTX Program Advisory Committee Meeting (PAC-14)
FY WEP TSG Goals & WEP-Relevant Diagnostic Upgrades NSTX Supported by WEP TSG Meeting September 14,
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
1PAC-37, Plasma control algorithm development on NSTX-U using TRANSP, M.D. Boyer, 1/26/2016 Dan Boyer for the Integrated Scenarios science group Plasma.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
Design of Coaxial Helicity Injection on SUNIST Li ZENG Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University Supervised by.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
NSTX SAS – GMS Mtg. 12/1/04 S. A. Sabbagh and J. E. Menard NSTX RWM Active Feedback System Implementation Plan Discussion NSTX Global Mode Stabilization.
Presented by Gary Taylor In collaboration with Cynthia Phillips, Phil Ryan, Randy Wilson and The NSTX RF Research Team NSTX Wave-Particle Physics, Heating.
1 The Five Year Plan review went well on all counts Review held June 30 - July 2 > 1.5 days of presentations by the Team Panel of nine (Hooper, Bravenec,
NSTX APS-DPP: SD/SMKNov Abstract The transport properties of NSTX plasmas obtained during the 2008 experimental campaign have been studied and.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
For the NSTX Five-Year Research Program 2009 – 2013 M.G. Bell Facility and Diagnostic Plans.
SMK – RR ‘041 Stanley M. Kaye PPPL, Princeton University NSTX Results Review 20 September 2004 FY04 Run Coordination Wrap-Up.
OVERVIEW OF THE DIII–D PROGRAM AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS
Presentation transcript:

Integration and Plasma Control D.A. Gates, M.G. Bell NSTX 5-Year Plan June 30-July 2, 2003

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/03 2 IPPA & FESAC Have Established Ambitious Goals for NSTX IPPA goal : “integrate high confinement and high beta” FESAC 5-year Objective #2.1 “...assessing high-beta stability, confinement, self-consistent high-bootstrap operation, and acceptable divertor heat flux, for pulse lengths much greater than energy confinement times” Each component represents a challenge in itself Integration requires accommodating competing discharge requirements –Achieving compatibility of conditions for long pulse will be particularly challenging

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/03 3 Considerable Progress Achieved Towards Goal of High  and  E During 2002, NSTX achieved in a discharge –  N ≈ 6%·m·T/MA –  E ≈ 50ms, H 89P ~ 2.5 – duration ~400ms, ~ 8  E

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/03 4 Advanced Plasma Control Necessary for Achieving “Integration Goals” Equilibrium –I p, R p, Z p, , , stabilizer gaps Heating and current drive –P NBI, R NBI, P HHFW, k ||, [J(r)], [EBW coupling] Fueling and density control –gas [supersonic], pellets, [edge pumping] Instabilities –Vertical, , error fields and RWM, NTM Edge power and particle fluxes –Divertor strike point sweeping, edge density, divertor density, divertor radiation, [lithium module]

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/03 5 Elements of Control Diagnostics –Configuration, profiles (p, v , J), instabilities, fluxes Real-time processing –Equilibrium, stability limits, mode structure, driven current Actuators –Coils & power supplies, NBI, HHFW, [EBW], CHI, fueling, pumping Telemetry –Fast, flexible, expandable data communication –Will require upgrade of power supply data link

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/03 6 Control System Hardware High Speed low-latency (4  s) data acquisition FPDP + Fiberchannel 50MB/s sustained data rate “Skybolt 2” computer (8  333MHz G4  20GFlop) Expandable up to 64 processors in one chassis Up to 768 channels of data Control Room NSTX Test Cell Clock VME crates Junction Area Storage USP-1 (Workstation) Digital link to Power Supplies Skybolt 2 Analog inputs Fiberchannel Links Digitizer Magnetics Class 3 CHI potential PC VME Controller Clock Analog inputs FIMM Magnetics Class 4 “Ground” Potential PC VME Controller Clock Analog inputs Digitizer VME bus to gas injectors Ethernet Link Operator Terminals

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/ – 2005: Control of Plasma Shaping and Heating Power StatusPlasma shape with programmed currents –  ≈ 2.5 transiently; highest  with  ≈ 2.0,  ≈ 0.8 higher  would facilitate high  at high f bs –full control with rt-EFIT during ‘03 run 20041) Develop routine feedback control for shape ( , , gaps) with rt-EFIT analysis 2) Investigate prospects for higher  20051) Upgrade control for higher   –  faster power supply link 2) Feedback control of NB power (PWM) to control 

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/ – 2008: Inclusion of Profile Data in Real-Time Equilibrium Analysis Statusrt-EFIT has operated with only magnetic data –inclusion of profile data will substantially increase utility of analysis  profile control 20051) Include MPTS data for p e (c.f. offline EFIT) – expand real-time diagnostic data acquisition 2) Initiate real-time assessment of stability limit – may be based on l i, F p in first instance 2006Include MSE-CIF polarimetry data 2007Include MSE-LIF |B| data 2008Develop real-time stability assessment

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/ – 2006: Control for Resistive Wall Modes StatusRWM growth inferred from development of kink- like perturbations for  above no-wall limit and rapid slowing of plasma rotation 2004Detailed measurements of RWM structure with newly installed set of B r, B p pickup coils 2005Installation of RWM control coils (B R ) and power supplies –null “average” B R perturbation with preprogrammed currents 2006Implement feedback control to counteract mode drag and maintain plasma rotation

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/ – 2004: Control for Coaxial Helicity Injection Status400kA toroidal current in 300ms discharge –Preprogrammed currents - no feedback control –Absorber arcs terminated most discharges New absorber insulator and nulling coils in 2002 opening ) Assess new absorber insulator and need for local field control in absorber 2) Assess HIT-II “forced reconnection” scheme and add programmed inductive drive 20041) Absorber field control, if needed 2) Feedback control of CHI plasma to –promote reconnection –diagnose profiles and MHD activity

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/ – 2008: Control of Neoclassical Tearing Modes Status – NTMs identified at high  P with q min < 3/2 But not seen in recent high  P plasmas with higher q min – Expect control through localized current drive 2004Assess conditions for and impact of NTMs –Develop NTM detection & localization methods 2005Develop control of localized HHFW-CD 2006Combine real-time detection and localized HHFW- CD to control NTMs Assess EBW for localized current drive 2008EBW-CD for NTM control

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/ – 2009: Integrating Techniques for Particle & Power Flux Management Status- Continuous density rise during H-mode - Divertor heat fluxes probably acceptable for 2s but marginal for 5s pulses at full power 2003Control of new HFS gas injector 2004Control supersonic gas injector Assess density control with Li pellet coating 2005Install & control deuterium pellet injector Assess density control with Li evaporation crucible Assess and integrate cryo-pump Strike-point control for power flux mitigation 2009Density control with lithium wall module

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/ – 2008: Integrating Techniques for Solenoid-Free Startup & Sustainment StatusIndications of HHFW-CD, 1 – 2 MW 2005Integration and control of HHFW-CD with CHI Assess PF only startup 2006Reduce role of induction for current sustainment 2007Integration and control of EBW-CD with CHI initiation 2008Demonstration of fully non-inductive startup & sustainment with increasing pulse length

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/03 14 Integration & Control Builds on Progress in Facility, Diagnostics & Topical Research FY03FY04FY05FY06FY07FY08 rt-EFIT Error Suppress RWM assess RWM control +pressure+MSE+|B| Stability calc’n HHFW-CD assess EBW-CD control EBW-CD assess High-  control High-  assess Stabilizer reconfig. HHFW-CD control Heating control NTM control NTM assess Stability control & optimize

DAG / 5-Year Review / 06/30/03 15 Integration & Control Timeline (2) CHI abs. assess CHI abs. control CHI+OH control CHI+OH assess CHI+HHFW control CHI+EBW control EBW-CD assess HFS gas control Pellet fueling Li pellet coating Li-wall module Supersonic gas fueling Power flux assess Power flux control Cryo- pump FY03FY04FY05FY06FY07FY08 CHI+HHFW assess Solenoid-free startup & sustainment Particle control Power flux management