THE COORDINATED RESPONSE TO REENTRY Alameda County Reentry Network.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
Institute of Medicine Report:
Overview of the RWJF Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the IOM
Orientation Plan Pre-Test Overview of ADEA How students fit in Student leadership What happens at this meeting Post-Test.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
RESOLVE, Inc. National Geothermal Collaborative An Overview January 20, 2004.
Burke County 2009 Point in Time Count of homeless people Martha Hemphill, Facilitator Burke County Continuum of Care For the Homeless.
 Who is Involved in Decision Making?  Governing Bodies Roles and Responsibilities  Specific Points for Success  Systems and Services  Policy Council.
As a leader in our community, we ask you to: Keep Our Families Strong and Healthy.
Advocacy and Coalition Building Molly Cole Executive Director FAVOR, Inc. June 29, 2006.
Presentation on CCELP. For more information: Presented to Bay Area Funders By: Members of.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city.
Oral Health in Maryland Florida Oral Health Conference The Nuts and Bolts of Coalitions August 23, 2012 Penny Anderson, M.S.W. Executive Director.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Why the Alliance was Formed Rising rates of overweight and obesity; 50% of adults are not active enough for health benefits; Concern about dietary practices.
Children’s Mental Health: An Urgent Priority for Illinois.
Reflecting on 20 Years of Advocacy. The Parent Support Network Is Formed In 1989, both the federal and state government put their money on the table and.
Homelessness Services in Nipissing District [DNSSAB’s Role] Presentation for the Board of Directors October 10, 2007 Bob Barraclough, Director of Operations.
Transportation Coordination & Federal Transportation Administration Programs Marianne Freed, MSW/LSW Office of Transit Ohio Department of Transportation.
Where Texas is Today and Where Texas Needs to Be DOWD Conference Dallas, Texas Tuesday, April 6, 2010, from 10:45 am - 12:15 pm A-6 Re-Entry Policy Highlights.
Afterschool and STEM National Network of Statewide Afterschool Networks.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
THE GREATER RESPONSE TO REENTRY Alameda County Reentry Network.
Santa Clara County Older Adult Summit Held on June, 1, 2011 Summary Report to the Mental Health Board March 12,
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Using Intermediary Organizations to Gain Access to Quality Internships Presented by: Deanna Hanson, California Director, NAF.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
AAMC Council of Faculty and Academic Societies (CFAS) Pamela N Peterson, MD MSPH Associate Professor of Medicine Kevin Lillehei, MD Professor and Chair,
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
... Emerging ideas, inventions, discoveries and innovations that are not yet trends, but have the potential to impact areas within 3-8 years.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Juvenile Justice Standing Committee March Board Update 2014.
10/22/2015 5:20:08 PM EEC IT Strategic Plan June Board Meeting June 12, 2007 Quinsigamond Community College Harrington Learning Center 670 West Boylston.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
HEADING HOME: Kitsap Homeless Housing Plan 2008 Update Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council.
Proposed Recommendations of the West Virginia Formulation Council Subcommittee Sean Litteral, Chairman West Virginia Department of Transportation GIS Manager.
ORIENTATION TO ADEA ADEA Council of Students, Residents and Fellows.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the United States Departments of Education, Health.
Alameda County Reentry Network Annual Plan
Alameda County Reentry Network Priorities
A Journey Together: New Maryland Healthcare Landscape Baltimore County Forum Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission June 2015.
AGING & DISABILITY SERVICES DRAFT AREA PLAN ON AGING Presentation to Seattle Planning Commission September 10, 2015 Maureen Linehan, Director.
1 MODULE II How are UCEDDs Connected?. 2 Topics of Presentation 1. Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) 2. Association of University Centers.
Governance Charter Continuum Membership Participation Opportunities.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
A WORK IN PROGRESS Kansas Department of Health and Environment Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Senate Select Committee on Aging and Long Term Care Final Report and Progress in 2015 Suzanne Reed, Chief of Staff Senator Carol Liu (Chair)
History Group of transportation supporters gathered to discuss ideas to address Missouri’s transportation infrastructure investment Reviewed efforts and.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Behavioral Health Initiatives $17,000,000 seems like a large amount, however due to a lack of Medicaid funding, this money will be spent quickly. In order.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
Brief Overview of the Winners’ Circle Model WINNERS’ CIRCLE PRESENTATION Brought to you by the Center for Health and Justice at TASC Presented by Phillip.
Community Violence Prevention Collaborative Summit #1: MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE February 13, 2014.
Richmond Kids First: Building Power thru a Ballot Effort.
Board of Early Education and Care Strategic Planning Update October 14, 2008.
Website Report: America Council on Education Michael A. Smith.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Idaho Infant Toddler Program and the
City Afterschool System Framework
Beaver County Behavioral Health
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
Continuum of care for the homeless
Fulton County Justice & Mental Health Task Force
Involving Parents in Systems of Care.
Presentation transcript:

THE COORDINATED RESPONSE TO REENTRY Alameda County Reentry Network

Presentation Overview Reentry in Alameda County Constructing the Alameda County Reentry Network Operating the Reentry Network Role of the Reentry Network

UNDERSTANDING THE REENTRY POPULATION POPULATION SIZE GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION DEMOGRAPHICS SERVICE NEEDS Reentry in Alameda County

Reentry Continuum Incarceration – period while incarcerated before pre- release planning has begun Pre-Release – planning phase leading up to release Reentry – establish long- term solutions for health, housing, employment etc. Release - Released from institution and transition to community, ideally in accordance with pre-release plan OUTSIDE INSIDE

Reentry Population in Alameda County As of June 2007 Alameda County had 20,092 adults under criminal justice supervision 1 in 100 persons in Alameda County and 3 in 100 persons in Oakland are currently under criminal justice supervision Oakland and Hayward comprise 59% of all of parolees and probationers in Alameda County with East and West Oakland having the highest concentrations

Reentry Population Demographics Alameda County parolee population is: Overwhelmingly male (91%) Under 50 years old (97%) with the largest proportion in the age range People of color (84%) with African Americans comprising the largest ethnic group constituting 67% of the parolee population

Reentry Population Service Needs Housing: a safe place to live that does not place the recently released person at risk of violating the terms of their release Income: sufficient income to handle the transitional period between release and a first pay check Health Care: continuity of care from incarceration to community especially for persons with chronic conditions.

A NEEDED RESPONSE TO A RISING DEMAND Constructing the Alameda County Reentry Network

Need to Coordinating Efforts Alameda County and its cities have begun to address reentry through a series of initiatives and programs Recognizing the need to coordinate, various groups have begun to regularly convene and meet with other stakeholders The Alameda County Reentry Network establishes an infrastructure that brings these various groups together and facilitates coordination and collaboration

Theory Method Theoretical Foundation of Reentry Network

Reentry Network Goals 1. To provide a centralized infrastructure for sharing information and improving the coordination of reentry services across Alameda County 2. To ensure the effective and efficient use of public and private funding for reentry services and infrastructure within Alameda County and its cities 3. To present city, county, state and federal decision makers with clear and concise policy and program recommendations that will improve outcomes for the reentry population and their families

ALAMEDA COUNTY RE-ENTRY NETWORK

Decision Makers Committee Meets twice a year to approve the Annual Plan for the upcoming year and then six months later to receive a Mid-Year Review presented by the coordinating Council Composed of elected officials, city/county agency heads and foundation leadership

Coordinating Council Meets monthly Responsible for the coordination of the Annual Plan and the Mid-Year Review Hub through which information of new and current reentry programs, activities, practices, policies and funding opportunities is disseminated throughout the Network Representative body composed of chair from each Reentry Network Committees as well as staff from county/city agencies, elected officials, service providers and community organizations

Implementation Committee Meets every other month Works to improve implementation of current reentry initiatives as well as expanding effective initiative- level reentry efforts across Alameda County and the cities Composed of service providers and city/county agency staff working on initiatives (e.g. Measure Y)

Networking and Professional Development Meets monthly Composed of servicer providers and community organizations Vehicle for service providers and others to regularly communicate with one another as well as identifying and providing professional development activities

HOW DOES THE REENTRY NETWORK FUNCTION Operating the Reentry Network

Communication Coordinating Council receives input from chairs of each committee and maintains website with all information related to reentry Chairs report back to respective committees keeping all Reentry Network members current Coordinating Council consolidates feedback from each table and produces annual plan and mid year report to deliver concise message to Decision Makers

Coordination Each committee brings together colleagues involved in similar work New programs can be easily connected with existing programs working in a similar area Coordinating Council provides birds eye view to ensure planning across Reentry Network For example, the Coordinating Council will develop a plan for how the County should prepare to deal with the second chance funding that will be coming shortly

Advocacy Task Forces develop recommendations on specific issues that are included in the final report and advocated for by the Coordinating Council Reentry Network works with members and county/city leadership to be efficient in advocacy activities

Role of the Reentry Network

Reentry Network is a Resource Serves as a resource for all stakeholders from grassroots to policymakers Provide access to needed data and information Place to generate and explore new and emerging programs and policies

Reentry Network is a Promoter Vehicle for promoting what works Gives Alameda County a more cohesive voice to ensure that the needs of the formerly incarcerated are prioritized