1 Performance Management Presentation Support Foreign Staff Exchange Program Team Members: Team Leader: Candelario Zapata Team Members: Brian Daly, Stephanie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Practices Conference 2009 Multi-State, Multi-Site Engagement: Efficient and Effective Methods with Reduced Resources and No Travel Presenters: Karen.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Project Management Concepts
Arlene Paxton Advanced Training 2014
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
1  AGA-DC and GWSPCA 6 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE OMB Circular A-123, Appendix A Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Innovative Approaches Jerome A. Vaiana.
1 FY 2004 Performance Management Plan Presentation Conduct Fire Prevention Services Team Members: J. P. McCabe, P.E. Fire Marshal, DFM, ORS Samuel A. Denny,
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE Maltepe University Faculty of Engineering SE 410.
What is a project? Project Management Institute definition
project management office(PMO)
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Lesson 10: IT Project and Program Management. Lesson 10 Objectives  Identify resources for technical data  Identify project management fundamentals.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
1 Performance Management Presentation Access Control Team Members: Major Billy Alford, Team Leader Bill Brosius, Alex Salah, Cassandra Harris ORS National.
Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Developing an Effective Call Center within the Financial Aid Office Texas Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Fall 2010 Conference.
1 Performance Management Presentation Team Members: Ken Ryland and Marianne Bachmann, Hugh Malek, Karla Terney, Alice Hardy, Joseph Kristofik, Dan Shoen.
Procurement Analyst Position Update Procurement Training Forum August 24, 2010.
Technical Services Assessment in Pennsylvania Academic Libraries Rebecca L. Mugridge University at Albany, SUNY American Library Association ALCTS Affiliates.
1 Performance Management Presentation Provide Library Services Team Members: Ted Crump, Rosalie Stroman, Jennifer Vrettos, and Susan Whitmore (Team Leader)
1 Performance Management Presentation Team Members: Gil Kruemmel, Paulette Mills ORS National Institutes of Health 9 January 2004 Provide Printing and.
ORF 1 Performance Management Presentation Team Members: Division of Policy and Program Assessment Farhad Memarzadeh, Sheri Bernstein, Reza Jafari, Robert.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
Software Quality Assurance Activities
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
ORF 1 Performance Management Presentation Team Members: Melissa Richardson, Veronica Crawford-Robinson, Jim Phelan, Stewart Hill 9 January 2005 Lease,
N = By Number of Plans State Agencies with Approved SNAP-Ed Plans Approved Federal Funding Total = $379,088, ’s Funding.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
The Value of Geospatial Metadata Metadata has tremendous value to Individuals within your organization, as well as to individuals outside of your organization.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Short Term Economic Statistics Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
1 FY04 ORS Performance Management Manage Information Technology Team Members: Charlie Jones, Ben Ashtiani, Denny Bermudez, La'Tanya Burton, Ron Edwards,
1 Performance Management Presentation Provide Basic Animal Life Support Team Members: Eileen Morgan, Dr. Charmaine Foltz, Jim Weed, Dennis Barnard, Andy.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
VOICE OF REASON CONSULTING Our Process. OVERVIEW  Revenue  Expenses  People  Marketing  Sales  Operations  Finance.
1 FY02 ASA Presentation Provide Administrative Support (2) Presented by: Genia Bohrer Office of Research Services National Institutes of Health 18 November.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
1 FY02/FY03/FY04 Evaluation Summary Security and Emergency Response Program Division of Fire Rescue Services “NIH Fire Department”
1 Performance Management Presentation (7) Manage and Administer Worksite Enrichment Program Worksite Enrichment Program Team Lead: Timothy Tosten Members:
ORF 1 Performance Management Presentation List your Service Group Team Members: List Leader and Members ORS National Institutes of Health Date.
Office of Human Resources1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 2008 AT HKS.
EOSDIS FY2009 Annual Metrics Report Prepared By: Hyo Duck Chang Adnet, Inc. Brian Krupp Adnet, Inc. Lalit Wanchoo Adnet, Inc. March 2010.
Increasing Efficiency in Data Collection Processes Arie Aharon, Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
Efficiently Completing and Updating Campus Greenhouse Gas Inventory University of Wisconsin-Stout Applied Research Center (ARC) Wisconsin’s Polytechnic.
1 FY03 PMP Presentation Package Security and Emergency Response Program Division of Fire Rescue Services “NIH Fire Department”
1 Performance Management Report Service Group: Provide Police Services Team Leader: Major Ophus Robertson Team Members: Lieutenant Jensen Lieutenant Cox.
1 Performance Management Report Service Group: Provide support services to security, fire, police, and emergency management Team Leader: Major Bill Alford.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
Grid Operations Report To ERCOT Board Of Directors December 16, 2003 Sam Jones, COO.
EOSDIS FY2008 Annual Metrics Report Prepared By: Ed Sofinowski SGT, Inc. Donna Rahmani SGT, Inc. March 2009 ESDIS Project GSFC Code 423.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda February 11, 2010 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Short Term Economic Statistics Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
Microsoft Project 2010 ® Tutorial 4: Assigning Resources and Costs.
The Marketing Plan Chapter 2. Section 2.1: Marketing Planning  Good marketing requires good planning Research your company Study your business environment.
Purchasing Cards. What is a Purchasing Card? It is a type of commercial credit card, used by organizations for payment of goods and services. This tool.
Managing multiple projects or services? Have a mix of Microsoft Project and more simple tasks? Need better visibility and control?
Huntsville City Schools Centralized Registration
Team Leader: Major Patricia Haynes Team Members: Lawrence Brown
Performance Management Presentation
Columbus Education Association Time Waste Survey
Best Practice Strategies for Maximizing Clinic Efficiency: Part 1
NetSuite’s Value Propositions
BCS Template Presentation February 22, 2018
Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Management Presentation Support Foreign Staff Exchange Program Team Members: Team Leader: Candelario Zapata Team Members: Brian Daly, Stephanie Hartsock, Vivian Weaver, Amy Powers, Michelle Mejia ORS National Institutes of Health 14 Jan 04

2 Table of Contents Main Presentation PM Template ……………………………….……………………… 3 Customer Perspective……………………….…………………… 5 Internal Business Process Perspective……………………………………… 20 Learning and Growth Perspective…………………………………………… 28 Financial Perspective……………………………………… 37 Conclusions and Recommendations………………………………………….. 49 Appendices…………………………………………………………..51

3

4 Relationship Among Performance Objectives

5 Customer Perspective

6

7 Customer Scorecard Methodology DIS Team met with OQM to determine optimal customer assessment methodology Customized ORS Customer Scorecard into two surveys to meet Team’s needs Survey of ICs Survey of Visiting Program Participants Determined method of survey distribution Distribute survey to IC Admin Staff with completed document-preparation package Distributed survey for Foreign Scientist at orientation sessions Data collected during the months of August - Nov 2004 Completed surveys were returned to OQM Survey data were entered into a database, analyzed, and reviewed with OQM/ DIS team Results were compared with prior year Methodology was slightly adjusted to ensure data integrity

8 Survey Results of IC Satisfaction FY04 compared to FY03

9 FY04/FY03 Satisfaction Ratings on Specific Service Aspects by Role UnsatisfactoryOutstanding Mean Response N = 15 N = 36 N = 30 N = 35 N = 34 N = 36 N = 30 N = 36 N = 14 N = 2 Groups significantly different (p <.05) ** FY04 Responses include only those who have taken training in the past.

10 FY04 Satisfaction Ratings on Specific Service Aspects by Role (cont.) UnsatisfactoryOutstanding Mean Response N = 35 N = 37 N = 35 N = 37 N = 35 N = 37 N = 34 N = 36 N = 37 N = 32 N = 2 N = 37 * Groups significantly different (p <.05)

11 Survey Results of Visiting Program Participants FY04 compared to FY03

12 FY04 Satisfaction Ratings on Specific Service Aspects by Role UnsatisfactoryOutstanding Mean Response N = 45 N = 111 N = 45 N = 110 N = 45 N = 107 N = 113 N = 20 Groups significantly different (p <.05) ** Groups significantly different (p <.01)

13 FY04 Satisfaction Ratings on Specific Service Aspects by Role (cont.) UnsatisfactoryOutstanding Mean Response N = 48 N = 109 N = 48 N = 108 N = 48 N = 107 N = 46 N = 107 N = 100 N = 43 N = 23 N = 99 Groups significantly different (p <.05) ** Groups significantly different (p <.01)

14 C1b: Date in/ Date Out (avg time from case logged in to completion) Avg for FY04 is approximately 35.5 days Avg for FY03 was approximately 42 days

15 Customer Perspective (cont.)

16 C2a: Volume of s, phone questions, on dates/status (based on 24-week sample compared to DynCorp study sample in ‘02) Note: “Avg” displays the avg number of hours spent by each professional on these activities in each year

17 C2b: Number of Seminars & Workshops Held Number Held

18 Customer Perspective What does the data tell us? We met our customer satisfaction goal but need to continue to find ways of providing them answers to their questions, and improved turn-around. To accomplish this, we need to find ways to decrease the volume of and telephone (status check) traffic so that our professionals can focus on processing cases. (Our current estimates-based on the Dyn Corp study, tells us that we are dedicating 1.5 FTEs to this issue alone). We need to continue to provide training to our customers so that they know how to get the data they need in a timely and “user-friendly” manner.

19 Customer Perspective What actions are planned? Refine and conduct “point of sale” customer survey (Customer Scorecard) in 2005 to ensure customer satisfaction is increased. Conduct customer “out reach” activities to better educate customers: Handbooks Flyers Updated websites Festival participation Continue to increase and leverage the number of group training opportunities for customers.

20 Internal Business Process Perspective

21 Internal Business Process Perspective

22 IB1a. Pending Cases (FY03 & FY04) Note: Average Pending cases for FY 03 was 358 Average Pending cases for FY 04 was 327 Trend shows a gradual reduction in pending cases Cases

23 IB1b. Volume of Scientists Served compared to Pending Cases (FY03 & FY04) Trend shows an increase in volume of cases Volume Note: We are gradually reducing our backlog, even though volume is increasing

24 Volume of Daily Visits

25 IB1c. Number of Redundancies Eliminated According to DynCorp study, at one point we entered duplicate data,such as name, (into various systems or onto forms) up to 11 times. We planned to reduce this duplication of effort by 75% with the implementation of new automation. We now only re-enter data on average 2.76 times We reduced this duplication of effort by 75% with the implementation of new automation.

26 Internal Business Process Perspective What does the data tell you? Our initiatives and action items are helping us to reduce our backlog even though the volume (demand) is growing We have eliminated redundancies that were inherent in our processes. We need to continue doing this. It is clear from the data that we have reduced re-entry of data on over 360 cases from 11 times to an average of We will continue to reduce this number.

27 Internal Business Process Perspective Actions We plan to implement a significant upgrade to our automated systems that should help eliminate re- entry work by an additional 25%. This action, when examined with some of our other actions, should help us to significantly reduce our backlog of pending cases; This upgrade should also help us file and access our data, and The upgrade should help provide our customers with quicker answers to their questions by offering online access.

28 Learning and Growth Perspective

29 Learning and Growth Perspective

30 L1a. Training Expenses by FY

31 L1b. Percent of people sent to training

32 Learning and Growth Perspective (cont.)

33 L2a. Number of staff (contract/ in- house) assigned to admin tasks (Data from DynCorp Study) Note: If we assume that there are 1800 (adjusted) hours in a person year, then 9500 hours would justify 5FTEs. 4.5 staff are currently assigned

34 L2b.Number of Hours Spent on Data Entry Projected Data based on FY 02 DynCorp study estimating the average time required to enter J1 Visa data. Hours

35 Learning and Growth Perspective What the data tells us Due to the nature of visa processing activity, we have, and will continue to have, overwhelming administrative demands (forms, data entry, phone inquiries, etc). Our professionals continue to stay current and trained, however much of their time is dedicated to administrative issues. We feel we are underutilizing our professionals. We need to reduce the backlog of cases (discussed earlier) while continuing to address the administrative requirements. We significantly decreased the number of times data needed to be entered, and therefore reduced the overall time ISs must dedicate to data entry. We must continue to provide the right tools for our staff to enable them to do their jobs.

36 Learning and Growth Perspective Actions Last year we reallocated admin functions to support staff. This enabled our professional staff to be better utilized and we should see a decrease in our backlog. In addition, the admin group centralized functions and re-organized. We plan to supplement our support staff with contractor staff as well as leverage in-house support staff. We also believe that our new software modules will significantly reduce data entry requirements and, therefore, reduce the time ISs must spend entering data.

37 Financial Perspective

38 Financial Perspective

39 F1a. Percent of New System Modules Implemented We had to adjust our implementation plan to accommodate more thorough testing

40 F1b. Percent of Budgeted amount spent for new modules 40%80% 100%

41 Financial Perspective (cont.)

42 This year we gathered data to support our calculation of unit cost. Our plan included: Track the total number volume of our services by IC Track the usage of service by type of visa Track the time spent on each visa type to determine the average Divide this number into our budget number to determine our “unit” cost. Work with the budget office to formalize our unit cost. F2a. Unit Cost

43 F2a. Total Visas Processed by Type and IC Number Processed IC Type of Visa

44 F2a (cont.) Visas Processed (by IC) The biggest demand for our services comes from NCI

45 F2a (cont.) Visas Processed by IC (FY 04) Most of the Visas Processed are J-1’s

46 F2a. (cont.) Visas Processed by Fiscal Year and Type Total Visas Processed Demand is fairly consistent, but has increased slightly every year

47 Financial Perspective What the data tells us? Our strategy and objectives are relying heavily on automation to relieve much of our current bottle-neck and eliminate redundancies. Although we did not get the modules implemented during FY 04 (as originally planned): We have a preliminary design for these new modules. We have a budget and spending plan for the implementation of new system modules. We have tracked and analyzed volumes (visas processed by IC and by type)

48 Financial Perspective A ctions We will closely monitor and track the progress of implementing new automation. This includes applying our detailed schedule and monitoring the spending plan to ensure that progress is made. We also have developed and justified our definition of “unit” so that we can rationalize our unit and total cost. We have decreased the time it takes to process each case, and are handling a larger volume. We have increased our capacity without increasing our costs to provide these services.

49 Conclusions

50 Conclusions from PMP Our Workload is high and continues to grow. We must continue to find better ways of completing our administrative tasks so that we can reduce our backlog and increase customer satisfaction with the services we provide. We have relieved our professional staff of some of the clerical burden by shifting these admin tasks to support staff. We have also moved away from individual orientations and to more “group” orientations. Our major initiatives for ’04 included our focus on upgrading our automated systems and on establishing and justifying our unit costs. Development is close to complete- we still need to complete testing; We have developed a better handle on our definition of unit for our unit cost calculations Although the volume we handle has gone up, the data shows that our efficiency has improved.

51 Appendix Page 2 & 3 of template (see pages 52 & 53) Internal Business Process Perspective IB2a: Customer Participation………………………………………… 54 IB2b: Number of “clicks”……………………………………………. 55 IB2c: Number of customers attending training……………………. 56 IB3a: Number of SOPs Completed………………………………. 57 IB3b: Results of Audit……………………………………………. 58

52 Template Detail (Page 2)

53 Template Detail (Page 3)

54 IB2a. Customer Participation in Data Entry (Forecasted Data only) This forecast is dependent on completion of system implementation

55 IB2b. Number of “clicks” Note: Volume of hits to our web site went up dramatically in the past 18 months, which means our customers are using the site more.

56 IB2c. Number of Customers attending Seminars and Workshops (by type) (thro Dec)

57 I3a. Number of SOPs Completed Note: 5 SOPs are needed, 2 have been completed so far -forecasted-

58 I3b. Results of Audits (files) for consistency (forecasted data) Audit procedure has not yet been developed