Federico Alessio Zbigniew Guzik Richard Jacobsson TFC Team: A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb - Top-down approach -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XFEL 2D Pixel Clock and Control System Train Builder Meeting, DESY 4 December 2008 Martin Postranecky Matt Warren, Matthew Wing.
Advertisements

E-link IP for FE ASICs VFAT3/GdSP ASIC design meeting 19/07/2011.
1 Tell10 Guido Haefeli, Lausanne Electronics upgrade meeting 10.February 2011.
PCIe based readout U. Marconi, INFN Bologna CERN, May 2013.
The LHCb Online System Design, Implementation, Performance, Plans Presentation at the 2 nd TIPP Conference Chicago, 9 June 2011 Beat Jost Cern.
Study on buffer usage and data packing at the FE Federico Alessio, with inputs from Richard, Ken, Guillaume LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 11 April 2013.
LHCb DAQ Review, September LHCb Timing and Fast Control System TFC Team: Arek Chlopik, Warsaw Zbigniew Guzik, Warsaw Richard Jacobsson, CERN Beat.
Straw electronics Straw Readout Board (SRB). Full SRB - IO Handling 16 covers – Input 16*2 links 400(320eff) Mbits/s Control – TTC – LEMO – VME Output.
Trigger Supervisor (TS) J. William Gu Data Acquisition Group 1.TS position in the system 2.First prototype TS 3.TS functions 4.TS test status.
Calorimeter upgrade meeting - Wednesday, 11 December 2013 LHCb Calorimeter Upgrade : CROC board architecture overview ECAL-HCAL font-end crate  Short.
SODA: Synchronization Of Data Acquisition I.Konorov  Requirements  Architecture  System components  Performance  Conclusions and outlook PANDA FE-DAQ.
Start-up & synchronization sequence for Front-End LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 13 February 2014 F. Alessio, CERN.
GBT Interface Card for a Linux Computer Carson Teale 1.
PHENIX upgrade DAQ Status/ HBD FEM experience (so far) The thoughts on the PHENIX DAQ upgrade –Slow download HBD test experience so far –GTM –FEM readout.
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb Richard Jacobsson Zbigniew Guzik Federico Alessio TFC Team: Motivation Aims Overview of the board.
CERN Real Time conference, Montreal May 18 – 23, 2003 Richard Jacobsson 1 Driving the LHCb Front-End Readout TFC Team: Arek Chlopik, IPJ, Poland Zbigniew.
Evaluation of the Optical Link Card for the Phase II Upgrade of TileCal Detector F. Carrió 1, V. Castillo 2, A. Ferrer 2, V. González 1, E. Higón 2, C.
TELL1 The DAQ interface board for LHCb experiment Gong guanghua, Gong hui, Hou lei DEP, Tsinghua Univ. Guido Haefeli EPFL, Lausanne Real Time ,
Status of Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Sept 2001 Vienna CMS-group presented by A.Taurok.
Readout Control specifications for FE and BE in the upgraded LHCb readout system Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 26.
Muon Electronics Upgrade Present architecture Remarks Present scenario Alternative scenario 1 The Muon Group.
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu * †, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
Federico Alessio, CERN Richard Jacobsson, CERN A new Readout Control System for the LHCb Upgrade at CERN 18th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Conference, June.
Latest ideas in DAQ development for LHC B. Gorini - CERN 1.
Federico Alessio, CERN Zbigniew Guzik, IPJ, Swierk, Poland Richard Jacobsson, CERN A 40 MHz Trigger-free Readout Architecture for the LHCb experiment 16th.
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
01/04/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
Trigger Meeting: Greg Iles5 March The APV Emulator (APVE) Task 1. –The APV25 has a 10 event buffer in de-convolution mode. –Readout of an event =
Barcelona 1 Development of new technologies for accelerators and detectors for the Future Colliders in Particle Physics URL.
Links from experiments to DAQ systems Jorgen Christiansen PH-ESE 1.
A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb (II) 1. S-TFC on xTCA – Mapping TFC on Marseille hardware 2. ECS+TFC relay in FE Interface 3. Protocol and commands for FE/BE.
Timing and Readout Control of the Upgraded LHCb Readout System Updated system-level specifications Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Electronics.
TFC update and TFC simulation testbench Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 14 February 2012.
PhD Student, Federico Alessio Directeur de thèse, Renaud Le Gac Superviseur de thèse, Richard Jacobsson, CERN Beam and Background Monitoring and the Upgrade.
GBT-FPGA Interface Carson Teale. GBT New radiation tolerant ASIC for bidirectional 4.8 Gb/s optical links to replace current timing, trigger, and control.
FELIX Design FELIX Design Upgrades of detector readout meeting 9 June 2014 Lorne Levinson, for the FELIX group Upgrades of detector readout meeting, 9.
DAQ interface + implications for the electronics Niko Neufeld LHCb Electronics Upgrade June 10 th, 2010.
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu *†, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
Readout Control specifications for FE and BE in the upgraded LHCb readout system Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb FE specificiations Upgrade Meeting.
CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, LHCb Upgrade Front End  Back End Readout Architecture Proposal.
18/05/2000Richard Jacobsson1 - Readout Supervisor - Outline Readout Supervisor role and design philosophy Trigger distribution Throttling and buffer control.
ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR28 June 2004 TIM Requirements - John Lane1 ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR 28 June 2004 Physics & Astronomy HEP Electronics John.
LHCb upgrade Workshop, Oxford, Xavier Gremaud (EPFL, Switzerland)
Standard electronics for CLIC module. Sébastien Vilalte CTC
ROD Activities at Dresden Andreas Glatte, Andreas Meyer, Andy Kielburg-Jeka, Arno Straessner LAr Electronics Upgrade Meeting – LAr Week September 2009.
PC-based L0TP Status Report “on behalf of the Ferrara L0TP Group” Ilaria Neri University of Ferrara and INFN - Italy Ferrara, September 02, 2014.
The Data Handling Hybrid Igor Konorov TUM Physics Department E18.
CHEP 2010, October 2010, Taipei, Taiwan 1 18 th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics This research project has.
Timing and Fast Control of the Upgraded LHCb Readout System Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Upgrade Electronics Review 5 December 2012.
Eric Hazen1 Ethernet Readout With: E. Kearns, J. Raaf, S.X. Wu, others... Eric Hazen Boston University.
(Fast) flow control to the FE LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 13 June 2013 F. Alessio, K. Wyllie and conversations with many of you.
FF-LYNX: 2010 & H Luca Fanucci Pisa, 14 Giugno 2011.
Giovanna Lehmann Miotto CERN EP/DT-DI On behalf of the DAQ team
of the Upgraded LHCb Readout System
Use of FPGA for dataflow Filippo Costa ALICE O2 CERN
Status of NA62 straw readout
PANDA collaboration meeting FEE session
Electronics Trigger and DAQ CERN meeting summary.
The Data Handling Hybrid
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb
GBT-FPGA Interface Carson Teale.
Towards the final TFC architecture
John Harvey CERN EP/LBC July 24, 2001
Network Processors for a 1 MHz Trigger-DAQ System
- TFC status - Switch / RS
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Fixed Latency Serial Links with FPGA-embedded SerDes for SuperB
Presentation transcript:

Federico Alessio Zbigniew Guzik Richard Jacobsson TFC Team: A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb - Top-down approach -

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/082 General Reflections Assumptions: - Project in the cradle - 40 MHz readout with 25ns bunch spacing - Keep and maintain old TFC (?) - Minimum MEP packing factor (?) (5-10 with InfiniBand?) - (whatever is related to an upgrade is preceded by an “S-” ) 1. Partitioning of the detector in sub- systems 2. Intelligent throttle based on some local trigger conditions within S-ROBs 3. Destination assignment with load balancing of the farm 4. ODIN data bank 5. Calibration commands, reset commands for synchronization 6. Clock control (phase, low jitter) and reception/distribution (“synchronicity”) Overall requirements:

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/083 Reflections on Current TFC What is questionable? 1.A pool of identical ODINs 2.“Discrete” partitioning electronics  Switches THOR and MUNIN 3.A lot of “inter-board” connections based on single ended signaling over LEMOs 4.Separate network for TFC and Throttle based on different technologies 5.Dedicated (and separate) TFC links to FEE and ROBs Single ODIN Resource usage: ~25k logical elements 40/80 MHz clock speed Memory usage (L2 cache-like) 2.4 MByte Control resources (~400 logical/functional parameters) organized in ~ bit registers Monitoring resources readout via subscription mechanism, ~ bit registers (packing of monitored data by “TFC server” ) ODIN data bank 40 Bytes of data words

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/084 Old vs New FEE Obvious conclusions: - Many fewer optical TFC links (TFC distribution rides on GBT to FEE) - Shared serial link for TFC and Throttle signals (bidirectional) FARM TFC ROB L0DU TRIGGER TFC DATA TFC THROTTLE DATA ODIN DATA BANK MEP REQUESTS ECS S-FEE S-FARM S-TFC DATA ODIN DATA BANK MEP REQUESTS S-ROB S-ECS TFC, DATA, ECS TFC, THROTTLE Old New LHC S-LHC CLOCK

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/085 New: TFC wise To S-ECS (GbE) To S-ECS (GbE) S-LHC clock (ECL) To S-FARM Technology? Programmable Switch THOR & MUNIN x8 Instantiations of ODIN opt transceivers layer Super-ODINSuper-THOR MEP requests + S-ODIN data bank 2 FPGA-based boards: ODINs & THOR merged in Super-ODINODINs & THOR merged in Super-ODIN MUNIN & HUGIN merged in Super-THORMUNIN & HUGIN merged in Super-THOR server TFC server 1.PCI Express 2.NIOS II Embedded in FPGA 3.TCP/IP as IP core in FPGA Distance ~20m Distance ~20m Gb/s optical = #S-ROB crates (<24?) x20 To S-ROBs FAN-IN FAN-OUT core One S-THOR per S-ROBs crate Copper/backplane?

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/086 New: TFC protocol (1) Super-ODIN  Super-THOR link Current idea is TFC control fully synchronous protocol with 48+header  Gb/s 1.All TFC information encoded in 48 bits words sent every event 2.A minimum MEP factor could reduce this by having two different word lengths 3.Even though RS-encoding mainly for radiation environment, also used on TFC links for maximum reliability (header ~16 bits) Throttle(“trigger”) protocol 1. Must be synchronous (currently asynchronous)  Protocol will require alignment 2. Word length of 20 yes/no bits/event for a S-ROB crate + id + header Currently looking at how a subset of TFC control protocol can be incorporated on GBT link for FEE

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/087 New: TFC protocol (2) Super-THOR  Super-ROB link Copper or backplane technology TFC synchronous control protocol same as S-ODIN  S-THOR  One GX transmitter with external transmitter 20x-fan-out (PHYs) Throttle(“trigger”) protocol simplified using 20x SERDES interfaces <1.6 Gb/s In practice 20 HI-CAT bidirectional links

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/088 Super-ODIN Board with one big central FPGA (Altera Stratix IV GX or alt. Stratix II GX for R&D) Instantiate a set of ODINs cores to guarantee partitioning control for sub- detectors TFC switches become a programmable patch fabric: a layer in FPGA  no need of complex routing, no need of “discrete” boards #logical elements for TFC functionalities should be less than current ODIN More I/O interfaces based on bidirectional transceivers  depend on #S-ROBs crates No direct links to FEE Common server that talks directly to each instantiation:  DIM server in NIOS II or even VHDL … ? Flexibility to implement (and modify any protocol)  GX transceiver as IP cores from Altera Control average rate based on “yes/no recommendation” of local trigger logic within potentially each S-ROB “Absolute rate” can only be controlled if S-ROB output buffer is deterministic Bunch structure (predicted/measured) rate control

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/089 Board with FPGA entirely devoted to fan-out TFC information/fan-in throttle info Controlled clock recovery Shared network for Throttling (Intelligent) & TFC distribution All links bidirectional  1 link to S-ODIN, Gb/s, optical  1 link per S-ROB, 20 max per board (full crate) Technology for S-ROBs links could be backplane (ex. ATCA) or copper HI- CAT Protocol flexible: compatibility with flexibility of S-ODIN  We will provide the TFC transceiver block for S-ROBs’ FPGA to bridge data to FEE through GBT For stand-alone test benches, Super-Thor would do the work of a single ODIN instantiation Super-THOR

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/0810 Action list & plans Simulation framework of entire TFC in preparation  Thanks to Marseille team we have the GBT protocol in simulation Soft studies –Defining the TFC protocol ontop of GBT –Define TFC/throttle protocol between S-ODIN  S-ROBs –Both protocols should incorporate latency fidelity and allow alignment –Throttle latency  S-ROB buffering –Resource usage in S-ODIN and S-THOR –InfiniBand destination addressing? –Contents of an ODIN data bank Hard studies –Clock control, latency fidelity, and jitter through GX transceivers –TFC_server (DIM) in NIOS II We have good chances to get onto Altera Early Access Program for Stratix IV 230 GX  good contact with Field Application Engineer from Altera –Alternatively we could use Stratix II GX –Idea is to design S-ODIN prototype 2009Q2-Q3 for the hard studies and protocol tests

Electronics Upgrade Meeting 27/11/0811 Environmental Questions -To which extent is output buffer of S-ROB deterministic? -What are the jitter requirements for sub-detectors? -What is the planned protocol for DAQ?