Angular resolution study of GLD Calorimeter 2006/Dec/21 ILC-sousei Annual Meeting M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Selected topics from the recent GLD studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK 19 July, 2006 GLD lunch time meeting At VCLW06.
PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
1 Search for one large extra dimension with the DELPHI detector at LEP 2009/5/25 論文会 M1 齋藤智之 Eur. Phys. J.C (2009) 60:17-23.
Angular resolution of LAT Agnieszka Kowal University of Science and Technology, Cracow TESLA Workshop on Forward Calorimetry Cracow, 10 October 2003.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
March 6th, 2006CALICE meeting, UCL1 Position and angular resolution studies with ECAL TB prototype Introduction Linear fit method Results with 1, 2, 3,
Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty. LCWS05 Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty2 Introduction Primarily interested in exploring the.
 Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter.
About N em cut: 20 GeV neutron N(em)=0 N(em)
LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera1 Jet/Calorimeter Cluster Energy Corrections – Status Goal: To improve the individual jet energy determination based.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
Cluster finding in CALICE calorimeters Chris Ainsley University of Cambridge, UK General CALICE meeting: simulation/reconstruction session 28  29 June.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Effect of the Shape of the Beampipe on the Luminosity Measurement September 2008 Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY.
Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/ ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO collaborated with Acfa-Sim-J.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Beam test results of Tile/fiber EM calorimeter and Simulator construction status 2005/03/05 Detector Niigata University ONO Hiroaki contents.
1 ACFA8, July , 2005, Youngjoon Kwon (Yonsei Univ.) Simulation / Recon. Workgroup summary for ACFA8  The Framework for Sim./Recon. Status report.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Instrumentation of the very forward region of the TESLA detector – summary of the Workshop on Forward Calorimetry and Luminosity Measurement, Zeuthen,
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
Cluster finding in CALICE calorimeters Chris Ainsley University of Cambridge, UK LCWS 04: Simulation (reconstruction) parallel session 20 April 2004, Paris,
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
R&D status of the Scintillator- strip based ECAL for the ILD Oct LCWS14 Belgrade Satoru Uozumi (KNU) For the CALICE collaboration Scintillator strips.
Feasibility Study of Forward Calorimeter in ALICE experiment Sanjib Muhuri Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre Kolkata.
Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Particle-flow Algorithms in America Dhiman Chakraborty N. I. Center for Accelerator & Detector Development for the International Conference.
1 Some results from LumiCal Monte Carlo Studies Michał Karbowiak, B. Pawlik, L. Zawiejski Michał Karbowiak (*), B. Pawlik, L. Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Tungsten-Silicon Luminosity Detector with Flat Geometry Ronen Ingbir Tel Aviv University High Energy Physics Experimental Group.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Study of Calorimeter performance using the LC full simulator The 8th ACFA Workshop Yoshihiro Yamaguchi (Tsukuba U.) M. -C. Chang (RCNS, Tohoku U.) K. Fujii.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
1 Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/5 ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
HCAL Leakage Studies CLIC Physics & Detector Meeting 10. November 2008 Christian Grefe CERN.
On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group
CEPC ScECAL Optimization for the 3th CEPC Physics Software Meeting
PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
The Optimized Sensor Segmentation for the Very Forward Calorimeter
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Status of ECAL Optimization Study
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Argonne National Laboratory
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
GLD IR optimization and background study
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

Angular resolution study of GLD Calorimeter 2006/Dec/21 ILC-sousei Annual Meeting M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO

Motivation Measurement of the direction of non-pointing photon is important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios. To identify a non-pointing photon, we have to need to measure angular resolution of this Detector (Calorimeter). We have studied using full-simulator (Jupiter) [m] decay length : IP ECAL

GLD detector can be changed !! GLD detector has large-radius and fine-segmented EM Calorimeter. Calorimeter cell size 0.5~10 [cm] It’s very important for cost performance. R [m]Z [m] ECAL Structure W/Scinti./gap 3/2/1(mm) x 33 layers X0X0 26 ECAL geometry in Jupiter : (barrel) (endcap)

θ, φ resolution study of cluster 1. Shoot Single-gamma from IP with random direction 2. Clustering - use hit data from ECAL(,HCAL) 3. Search central point of cluster 4. Find θ, φ of a central point 5. Compare with MC truth θ ( φ ) resolution [rad] = θ ( φ ) MC – θ ( φ ) meas IP central point γ

Clustering 1. Find the highest energy deposit cell 2. Make a cone with centering around it 3. Define cells which are inside of a cone as one cluster 4. Find a central point by energy weighted mean clustering angle = 10° IP Judging by inner product IP

1cell ( 1cm x 1cm ) θ, φ z=0 ( |cos(θ)|=0 ) max θ 1cell 210cm IP 1cm θ ( φ ) 1cell = 1/210 ≒ 4.7 [mrad] z=280 ( |cos(θ)|=0.8 ) min θ 1cell IP θ 1cell ≒ 1.71 [mrad]

event (random direction) θ resolution meansigma |cos(θ MC )| mean [rad] sigma [rad]

event (random direction) φ resolution meansigma mean [rad] |cos(θ MC )| sigma [rad]

Result (θ, φ resolution) θ,φ resolution θ barrel : 0.430±0.004 [mrad] θ endcap : 0.282±0.006 [mrad] φ barrel : 0.423±0.004 [mrad] φ endcap : 0.699±0.014 [mrad] θ 1cell ≒ 1.71 ~ 4.70 [mrad] Angular resolution is good as well as cell size (1x1cm)

1. Clustering 2. Find a central point of each layer by energy weighted mean 3. Fit each point with least-square method 4. Find an angle between IP and reconstructed line Angular resolution study of reconstructed line IP γ reconstructed line

Fitting method Find a central point of each layer by energy weighted mean x y weighted by energy deposit Fitting 2-dimentions (x-y) y’ z Fitting new 2-dimentions (y’-z) Distance[cm]

2-dimension normal distribution r histogram F(r)

Distance (d) and angle angle [rad] = d/r fitting function IP central point of cluster r d rd γ reconstructed line

Linearity(1,2,5,10,50 GeV) dependence with cell size 2x2 cm 1x1 cm

Angular resolution dependence with cell size 1 [cm] : ± 0.29 [mrad] 0.5 [cm] : ± 0.29 [mrad]

Linearity  LDC : 55mrad/√(E/GeV) (by DOD)  GLD : 122mrad/√(E/GeV) Identify ( 1x1[cm] ) Summary σ= 48.26±0.29[mrad] 3σ= 144 [mrad] IP ECAL We can identify non-pointing photon !! θ> 144 [mrad] (3σ) θ cell size [cm] 0.5x0.5 1x1