Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review. 2 TEST A 1.What is the single most important property of vibrating structure? 2. What happens when structure is vibrating in resonance? 3.What.
Advertisements

Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
Rainflow Cycle Counting for Random Vibration Fatigue Analysis
MEEG 5113 Modal Analysis Set 3.
Shock Special Topics Unit 42 Vibrationdata 1.Accidental Drop Shock 2.Half-Sine Shock on Drop Tower 3.Half-Sine Shock on Shaker Table 4.Waveform Reconstructions.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 22 Integration and Differentiation of Time Histories & Spectral Functions.
1 Sine Vibration Vibrationdata Unit 2. 2 Vibrationdata Sine Amplitude Metrics.
Response Of Linear SDOF Systems To Harmonic Excitation
Vibrationdata AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS 1 A Time Domain, Curve-Fitting Method for Accelerometer Data Analysis By Tom Irvine.
Unit 41 PSD Special Topics Vibrationdata Band-Splitting
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 4 Random Vibration. Vibrationdata 2 Random Vibration Examples n Turbulent airflow passing over an aircraft wing n Oncoming turbulent.
Vibrationdata 1 Non-Gaussian Random Fatigue and Peak Response Unit 36.
Unit 40 Shock Fatigue Vibrationdata
Multi-degree-of-freedom System Shock Response Spectrum
NESC Academy 1 Unit 27 SRS Synthesis 1. Wavelets 2. Damped Sinusoids.
Circuit Board Fatigue Response to Random Vibration Part 2
Spacecraft Structure Development - Vibration Test - (60 minutes)
Unit 6: Structural vibration An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Structural vibration Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should.
Sine-on-Random Vibration
MODULE 12 RANDOM VIBRATION.
Vibrationdata 1 SDOF Response to Power Spectral Density Base Input Unit 13.
Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of
Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future An Alternate Damage Potential Method for Enveloping Nonstationary Random Vibration Tom Irvine Dynamic Concepts,
Chapter 13 Oscillatory Motion.
Ch 3.9: Forced Vibrations We continue the discussion of the last section, and now consider the presence of a periodic external force:
S1-1 SECTION 1 REVIEW OF FUNDAMENTALS. S1-2 n This section will introduce the basics of Dynamic Analysis by considering a Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF)
General Method for Calculating the Vibration Response Spectrum
Dynamic Concepts, Inc. Huntsville, Alabama
Leakage & Hanning Windows
The Stress-Velocity Relationship
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 5 The Fourier Transform. Vibrationdata 2 Courtesy of Professor Alan M. Nathan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Lecture 1 Signals in the Time and Frequency Domains
Power Spectral Density Function
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Two computations concerning fatigue damage and the Power Spectral Density Frank Sherratt.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 17 SDOF Response to Applied Force Revision A.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
MODULE 09 Inman chapter 5.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 5 The Fourier Transform. Vibrationdata 2 Courtesy of Professor Alan M. Nathan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 9 White Noise FFT. Vibrationdata 2 Fourier Transform, Sine Function A Fourier transform will give the exact magnitude and frequency.
Unit 14 Synthesizing a Time History to Satisfy a Power Spectral Density using Random Vibration.
Along-wind dynamic response
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
Using Fatigue to Compare Sine and Random Environments
NESC Academy Response to Classical Pulse Excitation Unit 23.
Basic structural dynamics I Wind loading and structural response - Lecture 10 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 6a The Fourier Transform. Vibrationdata 2 Courtesy of Professor Alan M. Nathan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Two-degree-of-freedom System with Translation & Rotation
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 32 Circuit Board Fatigue Response to Random Vibration.
Power Spectral Density Functions of Measured Data
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 20 Digital Filtering, Part 2.
1 MIDTERM EXAM REVIEW. 2 m 081.SLDASM REVIEW Excitation force 50N normal to face k=10000N/m m=6.66kg Modal damping 5%
Vibrationdata Synthesizing a Time History to Satisfy a Power Spectral Density using Random Vibration Unit 14 1.
Vibrationdata 1 Power Spectral Density Function PSD Unit 11.
February 14, John Anderson GE/CEE 479/679 Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 8. Fourier Spectra John G. Anderson Professor of Geophysics.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 18 Force Vibration Response Spectrum.
Pyrotechnic Shock Response
Force Vibration Response Spectrum
Mechanical Vibrations
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
SDOF Response to Applied Force Revision A
Integration and Differentiation of Time Histories & Spectral Functions
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
Equivalent Static Loads for Random Vibration
Chapter 15 Oscillations.
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
Unit 2 Vibrationdata Sine Vibration.
FEA PSD Response for Base Excitation using Femap, Nastran & Matlab
Two-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
Presentation transcript:

Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain

Vibrationdata 2 Introduction n Steady-state response of an SDOF System n Base Input: PSD – stationary with normal distribution

Vibrationdata 3 Miles Equation n Miles Equation is the simple method for calculating the response of an SDOF to a PSD n Assume white noise, flat PSD from zero to infinity Hz n As a rule-of-thumb, it can be used if PSD if flat within + 1 octave of the natural frequency

Vibrationdata 4 Miles Equation The Miles equation is a simplified method of calculating the response of a single- degree-of-freedom system to a random vibration base input, where the input is in the form of a power spectral density. The Miles equation is P is the power spectral density level at the natural frequency f n is the natural frequency where is the overall response Q is the amplification factor

Vibrationdata 5 SDOF System, Base Excitation The natural frequency fn is The amplification factor Q is The damping coefficient C is

Vibrationdata 6 SDOF Free Body Diagram The equation of motion was previously derived in Webinar 2.

Vibrationdata 7 Sine Transmissibility Function Either Laplace or Fourier transforms may be used to derive the steady state transmissibility function for the absolute response. After many steps, the resulting magnitude function is where where f is the base excitation frequency and fn is the natural frequency.

Vibrationdata 8 The base excitation frequency is f. The natural frequency is fn. Frequency Ratio (f / fn)

Vibrationdata Transmissibility Curve Characteristics 9 The transmissibility curves have several important features: 1. The response amplitude is independent of Q for f << fn. 2. The response is approximately equal to the input for f << fn. 3. Resonance occurs when f  fn. 4. The peak transmissibility is approximately equal to Q for f = fn and Q > The transmissibility ratio is 1.0 for f =  2 fn regardless of Q. 6. Isolation is achieved for f >> fn.

Vibrationdata Exercises 10 vibrationdata > Miscellaneous Functions > SDOF Response: Steady-State Sine Force or Acceleration Input Practice some sample calculations for the sine acceleration base input using your own parameters. Try resonant excitation and then +/- one octave separation between the excitation and natural frequencies. How does the response vary with Q for fn=100 Hz & f =141.4 Hz ?

Vibrationdata “Better than Miles Equation” 11  Determine the response of a single-degree-of-freedom system subjected to base excitation, where the excitation is in the form of a power spectral density  The “Better than Miles Equation” is a.k.a. the “General Method”

Vibrationdata Miles Equation & General Method 12 n The Miles equation was given in a previous unit n Again, the Miles equation assumes that the base input is white noise, with a frequency content from 0 to infinity Hertz n Measured power spectral density functions, however, often contain distinct spectral peaks superimposed on broadband random noise n The Miles equation can produce erroneous results for these functions n This obstacle is overcome by the "general method" n The general method allows the base input power spectral density to vary with frequency n It then calculates the response at each frequency n The overall response is then calculated from the responses at the individual frequencies

Vibrationdata General Method 13 The general method thus gives a more accurate response value than the Miles equation. The base excitation frequency is f i and the natural frequency is f n The base input PSD is

Vibrationdata Navmat P-9492 Base Input 14 PSD Overall Level = 6.06 GRMS Frequency (Hz) Accel (G^2/Hz) Frequency (Hz) Accel (G^2/Hz)

Vibrationdata 15 Apply Navmat P-9492 as Base Input fn = 200 Hz, Q=10, duration = 60 sec Use: vibrationdata > power spectral density > SDOF Response to Base Input

Vibrationdata 16  4.5-sigma is maximum expected peak from Rayleigh distribution  Miles equation also gives 11.2 GRMS for the response  Relative displacement is the key metric for circuit board fatigue per D. Steinberg (future webinar) SDOF Acceleration Response = 11.2 GRMS = 33.5 G 3-sigma = 49.9 G 4.5-sigma SDOF Pseudo Velocity Response = 3.42 inch/sec RMS = 10.2 inch/sec 3-sigma = 15.3 inch/sec 4.5-sigma SDOF Relative Displacement Response = inch RMS = inch 3-sigma = inch 4.5-sigma

Vibrationdata Pseudo Velocity  The "pseudo velocity" is an approximation of the relative velocity  The peak pseudo velocity PV is equal to the peak relative displacement Z multiplied by the angular natural frequency  Pseudo velocity is more important in shock analysis than for random vibration  Pseudo velocity is proportional to stress per H. Gaberson (future webinar topic)  MIL-STD-810E states that military-quality equipment does not tend to exhibit shock failures below a shock response spectrum velocity of 100 inches/sec (254 cm/sec)  Previous example had peak velocity of 15.3 inch/sec (4.47-sigma) for random vibration 17

Vibrationdata 18 Peak is ~ 100 x Input at 200 Hz Q^2 =100 Only works for SDOF system response Half-power bandwidth method is more reliable for determine Q.

Vibrationdata 19 Peak Design Levels for Equivalent Static Load Author Design or Test Equation Qualifying Statements Himelblau, et al 33 However, the response may be non-linear and non-Gaussian Fackler 33 3  is the usual assumption for the equivalent peak sinusoidal level Luhrs 33 Theoretically, any large acceleration may occur NASA 3  for STS Payloads 2  for ELV Payloads Minimum Probability Level Requirements McDonnell Douglas 44 Equivalent Static Load Scharton & Pankow 55 See Appendix C DiMaggio, Sako, Rubin nn See Appendices B and D for the equation to calculate n via the Rayleigh distribution AhlinCn See Appendix E for equation to calculate Cn

Vibrationdata 20 Rayleigh Peak Response Formula Maximum Peak fn is the natural frequency T is the duration ln is the natural logarithm function is the standard deviation of the oscillator response Consider a single-degree-of-freedom system with the index n. The maximum response can be estimated by the following equations. a.k.a. crest factor

Vibrationdata Conclusions 21  The General Method is better than the Miles equation because it allows the base input to vary with frequency  For SDOF System (fn=200 Hz, Q=10) subjected to NAVMAT base input… We obtained the same response results in the time domain in Webinar 14 using synthesized time history!  Response peaks may be higher than 3-sigma  High response peaks need to be accounted for in fatigue analyses (future webinar topic)

Vibrationdata Homework 22  Repeat the exercises in the previous slides  Read T. Irvine, Equivalent Static Loads for Random Vibration, Rev N, Vibrationdata 2012 T. Irvine, The Steady-state Response of Single-degree-of-freedom System to a Harmonic Base Excitation, Vibrationdata, 2004 T. Irvine, The Steady-state Relative Displacement Response to Base Excitation, Vibrationdata, 2004