Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Test Security Policies and Procedures for Alternate Assessments Sheryl Lazarus Meagan Karvonen NCEO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Advertisements

IDEA® English Language Proficiency Tests (IPT)
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Training for Proctors Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational.
John F. Olson, Ph.D. President and Founder
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
CAPA California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Presented by Contra Costa SELPA with information provided by California Department of Education.
1 Test Administrator Training Grades 4, 8, & 10 Science SBA Spring 2015.
Accommodations Manual Manual available online on the Testing Students with Disabilities Accommodations page at
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Training for Proctors Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational.
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Training for Proctors Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational.
A CCOMMODATIONS (R EQUIRED FOR DTC S, STC S, AND TA S )
Grade 3 Portfolio Implementation Guide Training for School Test Coordinators and Instructional Coaches NHCS Implementation Support Discussion Group Edmodo.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
STAAR A STAAR Alternate 2 Changes to Mathematics Assessments Changes to Writing Assessments Students Receiving Instruction Above Grade Level Standardized.
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Calendar Highlights – STAAR Alternate 2 testing window has been expanded. – Administration date for STAAR grades 5 and 8 mathematics has shifted. – Report.
2015 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational Accountability 06/26/2013.
TEST ACCOMMODATIONS 2013 English Language Learners (ELLs) 1 Presented by: Leyda Sotolongo Title III Coordinator ESOL Department.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
ASSESSMENT ACCOMMODATIONS How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities Ohio.
2012 FCAT and YOU … the TVI! Suzanne A Dalton, Supervisor/FIMC-VI 01/30/12
PARA PROS Make The Difference! Guidelines for using paraprofessionals to support inclusive practices Presented by Melanie Lemoine, Ph.D. LaSPDG Co-Director.
Eva M. Kubinski, MS Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 2009 Children Come First Conference November 16, 2009.
Applying Principles of Universal Design to Assessment Item Modification Peter A. Beddow III Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN June 2008.
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
Alternate Assessment Attainment Task Part 2.1 Click here to download the Administration Guide Required for completion of this training Overview/Attainment.
2014 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio Screencast Training on How to Administer the Portfolio Assessment January 2014
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Balancing Test Security and Accessibility on Next Generation Online Assessments Martha Thurlow Sheryl.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Students with Disabilities: High School to College U.S. Department.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Test Security and Alternate Assessments Melissa Gholson West Virginia Department of Education.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training.
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Incorporating Universal Design Principles in Next Generation Assessment Item Design Sheryl Lazarus.
Session 1 Achievement Testing Pre-Test Training
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Smarter Balanced Assessment System Accessibility Supports.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Accessibility and Accommodations December 16, 2015.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
2016 PAWS Test Administrator Training
Jan/Feb 2007CAPA Examiner Train-the-Trainer1 CAPA Training of CAPA Examiners.
February 2010 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 School Test Coordinator Training February 15, 2010 Special Populations.
Universal Design for Learning in Public Policy. The National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard NIMAS (2006) A harbinger of the future.
 The DPI provides a written translation accommodation for the paper/pencil WKCE for Science and Social Studies in grades 4, 8, and 10.  Wordlists and.
Development of Assessments Laura Mason Consultant.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
State Graduation Policies for Students with Disabilities
2012 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
2017 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
Test Blueprints for Adaptive Assessments
Improving the Accessibility of Locally Developed Assessments CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment 2016 Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction,
MANUALS READ THE MANUALS!!
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Kentucky Alternate Assessment
2017 PAWS Test Administrator Training
2011 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Accessibility Supports Training
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Accessibility Supports Training
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training
Accessibility Supports Training
2013 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Test Security Policies and Procedures for Alternate Assessments Sheryl Lazarus Meagan Karvonen NCEO University of Kansas Leila Williams Melissa Gholson Arizona Department of Education West Virginia Department of Education Toni Wheeler Idaho Department of Education National Conference on Student Assessment (NCSA) San Diego, CA June 22-24, 2015

Slide 2 II. Standards and Guidelines that Address Cheating or Test Security Standards for Educational and Psychology Testing (APA/AERA/NCME, 2014) Practices for Statewide Large-Scale Assessment Programs (ATP/CCSSO, 2013) Testing and Data Integrity in the Assessment of Student Achievement (NCME, 2012) National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)

Slide 3 Standards for Educational and Psychology Testing The Standards indicate that: “ Regardless of the purpose of testing, the goal of fairness is to maximize, to the extent possible, the opportunity for test takers to demonstrate their standing on the construct(s) that test is intended to measure. (p. 51) “ Test users must balance test security with the rights of all test takers and test users. (p. 117) National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)

Slide 4 Operational Best Practices for Statewide Large-Scale Assessment Programs National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) The Operational Best Practices indicate that the document addresses: “...best practices for achieving test security throughout the process of all paper-based and technology-based assessments, using methods that support the needs of students with disabilities and English learners. (p. 81)

Slide 5 Testing and Data Integrity in the Administration of Statewide Student Assessment Programs (NCME) National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) “ Policies and procedures must ensure that all students have appropriate, fair, and equal opportunities to show their knowledge, skills, and abilities. Students who need accommodations due to language differences or students with disabilities may require appropriate modifications to materials and administrative procedures to ensure fair access to the assessment of their skills.

III. Analysis. Analysis of States’ Test Security Policies Source: Test security and students with disabilities: An analysis of states’ test security policies (Synthesis Report 95). National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at:

Slide 7 State policies downloaded for the 50 states + DC Documents analyzed included: Test procedures or administration manuals, general test security documents, accommodations manuals Analyzed documents for both the regular and alternate assessments National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Procedures

Test Security & Alternate Assessments 27 States have test security policies that specifically addressed alternate assessments.

Slide 9 Reminder that AA-AAS Should be Treated Similarly to Other Assessments National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) “ [The Alternate Assessment] is a state assessment and should be treated as such. This means district and school administrators have the responsibility to develop policies regarding who can see a student's datafolio. “ [The AA-AAS] is a valid and reliable test. It is to be treated as securely as the general assessment in every way. Under no circumstances is this test to be used in any other way than as a summative assessment during the approved time frame. State Examples:

. Of these 27 states, the policies addressed:

Slide 11 Type of Assessment Affected How Security Was Addressed in Policy National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) State Examples Item-based performance tasks “ Test books and student answer documents must be kept secure. Students must not be exposed to test content before the actual testing. If students have prior knowledge of test content, results of testing can give a deceptive picture. Performance tasks “ The performance tasks are considered secure testing materials. “ Tasks are secure materials and should not be sent home with the student.

Slide 12 Type of Assessment Affected How Security was Addressed in Policy, Cont. National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) State Examples Portfolios “ Once the portfolios contain student identifying information, student testing materials, and student work, the portfolios become secure documents and must be treated with the same care as other secure testing materials, keeping them in a locked file cabinet. Checklist “ Checklist is not a secure document. This means that the checklist may be copied.

Slide 13 Duplication and Copying of AA-AAS Test Materials National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Allowed “ One week prior to the opening of the test administration window, the materials may be printed and then photocopied from a master copy for individual student use. Not Allowed “ The section of the manual that contains tasks may not be duplicated. Unauthorized copying or reuse of any questions within the Examiner’s Manual is illegal. Do not copy any part of the tests or test materials (excluding stimulus cards). State Examples

Slide 14 AA-AAS Administrator Qualifications National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) “ Only authorized district personnel are allowed to download, distribute, and/or enter student data for the Alternate Assessments. Authorized personnel include District Test Coordinators as well as individuals trained in the Alternate Assessment who also have the appropriate permissions (e.g., Qualified Trainers and Qualified Assessors) and security clearance on file at the district office. Most state policies make no distinction between regular assessment and regarding who may administer the AA-AAS... but a few specifically addressed AA-AAS administrator qualifications. State Example

Slide 15 Training Requirements (All Assessments) National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) “ Ensure all personnel involved with testing receive training on appropriate test administration, policies, and procedures including accommodations. State Examples Most state policies did not make training distinctions between administrators of the general assessment and AA-AAS.

Slide 16 Changes to Standard Test Procedures --Wording National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Allowed “ The instructions to be given to the student are specified for each task. In many cases, the detailed wording that is given in this section will need to be modified to make it appropriate for the particulars of the testing situation. The suggested wording is very simple and direct. The tester should give instructions that are as close as possible to the example, while making the instructions fit the testing situation. Not Allowed “ Test administrators must not change the wording or content of the task. Test administrators must not change the order of the answer options. State Examples

Slide 17 Considerations When Including Students with Disabilities in Test Security Policies Ask 1. Are all test administrators qualified? 2. Does everyone who accesses the assessment sign a test security/ confidentiality agreement? 3. Are adequate logs/records kept? 4. Are accessibility features and accommodations with the fewest security risks identified as preferred features and accommodations?. Available at:

Slide 18 Considerations When Including Students with Disabilities in Test Security Policies, Cont. Ask 5. Do test security policies and procedures address adaptive technology? 6. Are test security procedures in place for situations when a test is accessed prior to administration? 7. Are appropriate procedures used for small group and individual administrations? 8. Are appropriate test security procedures in place for alternate assessments?..

Slide 19 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) For More Information National Center on Educational Outcomes Sheryl Lazarus

Slide 20 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) References American Education al Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), National Council on measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author. Association of Test Publishers (ATP)/ Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) (2013). Operational best practices for statewide large-scale assessment programs. Washington, DC: Author. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013). Testing integrity symposium: Issues and recommendations for best practice. Washington DC: Institute of Education Sciences (IES). Washington DC: Institute of Education Sciences (IES). Retrieved from National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (2012). Testing and data integrity in the administration of statewide student assessment programs. Madison WI: author. Olson, J.F. & Fremer, J. (2013). TILSA test security guidebook. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).

Slide 21 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) The National Center on Educational Outcomes is supported through a Cooperative Agreement (#H326G110002) with the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. The Center is affiliated with the Institute on Community Integration at the College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota. The contents of this document were developed under the Cooperative Agreement from the U.S. Department of Education, but does not necessarily represent the policy or opinions of the U.S. Department of Education or Office within it. Readers should not assume endorsement by the federal government. Project Officer: David Egnor