Developing a Common Strategy to Identify Communities at Risk and Prioritize Risk Reduction Projects - An Initial Review by SGSF GIS Task Force SGSF GIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems Presented By Cindy Donegan U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Advertisements

Calista AVCP Regional Energy Plan. Preliminary Planning and Stakeholder Involvement Resource Inventory and Data Analysis Develop and Review Draft Energy.
Bush Fire Risk Management Planning Community Participation Department of Lands, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Integral Energy, Rural Fire Service,
A Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona’s Forests A 20-YEAR ACTION PLAN.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
1 Watershed Condition Framework Overview SEAKFHP Strategic Planning Meeting Sheila Jacobson, Fisheries Biologist October 2012.
Science & Monitoring Team Meeting Sept 23rd. Agenda Introductions Overview of CPRW & CO Conservation Exchange Review draft charter/workplan Watershed.
National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy 1. What is the Cohesive Strategy? A national, collaborative approach to addressing wildland fire across all lands.
Resilient Landscapes - Fire Adapted Communities – Wildland Fire Response National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy & How State Fire Marshals Can Be Involved.
What are the key/critical elements?
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
The Challenge of Long-term Implementation Sustaining CWPP’s.
Key Factors that Influence the Collaborative Process Photo by Barb Tuttle, Carol DeSain, & Betsy BowenPhoto by Rachel BrummelPhoto by Stephanie Grayzeck.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 Changes to the Federal Hazard Mitigation Program.
BRIEFING TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON THE DPSA’S RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 12 MAY
Oregon’s Sage-grouse Action Plan Fire and invasives With more frequent and larger fires, and juniper continuing to expand, sage-grouse are dependent on.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Demystifying State Assessments Forest Service State & Private Forestry Redesign Version 2 December 10, 2008.
Syktyvkar, Komi Republic April 1, 2009 Presented by Marcelo Levy Responsible Forestry Solutions.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Storm Risk Management Planning.
Schmidt et al GTR RMRS-87.
LIS – impact of the impact survey! Bosnia and Herzegovina
Marine Systems Knowledge Cooperative Convened by NOAA 1.
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
Sustainability Issues
Technician Module 2 Unit 2 Slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 2 Planning, Assessment & Analysis.
Healthy Forests Initiative Al Murphy BLM, NIFC. In August 2002, President Bush announced the “Healthy Forests Initiative for Wildfire Prevention and Stronger.
Accelerating Vegetative Treatments to Improve Condition Class (also known as our Fuels Strategy Meeting!!!)
Cohesive Strategy How it approaches fire – the local fire chiefs perspective Shawn P. Stokes Assistant Director of National Programs.
Statewide Strategies for Coordinating Regional Transportation and Land Use Planning Katie Benouar, Senior Transportation Planner Office of Regional and.
GIS Applications in Interagency Fire Management Planning EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI Jeff Baranyi - ESRI EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI.
Global Partnership on Disability and Development What is the GPDD? Presentation to JICA Group Training Course HIV/AIDS Section Judith Heumann, Lead Consultant,
Forestry in the 2008 Farm Bill and Associated Federal Acts Craig McKinley NREM, OSU-Stillwater.
‘PPM-Nutrients’ Project Policy and Practice for Management of Nutrients Knowledge, policy and practice for sustainable nutrient management and water resources.
LAURIE GHARIS, PH.D. JENNIFER EVANS NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY REGIONAL READINESS COOPERATIVE TOM DARDEN, CONSULTING FOR DOD Implementing the Comprehensive.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District Armstrong Ave., Ste. 200 Mather, CA
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Erv Gasser Natural Resource Specialist nps Baer Field Manager National Interagency BAER Team Leader - North team National Park Service, Seattle, Wa BAER.
Sustaining Front Range Forests & Communities February 26, 2010.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study Application of Vulnerability Analyses U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Agency Update U.S. Forest Service Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
A Network Approach to Understanding Social Capacity for Landscape Management Forest, People, Fire ProjectBend WorkshopMay 28, 2014.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
Benefits & Challenges of Firewise Communities/USA ® Courtney Peterson Colorado State Forest Service March 27, 2015.
Trinity County Collaborative Group teams up with the Six Rivers National Forest.
For over 20 years, the Government Accountability Office, Office of Management and Budgets, Congress, a variety of stakeholders and various administrations.
National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy Background and Progress Update – March 2012 Dan Smith, Fire Director, National Association of State.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
National Association of Conservation Districts Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL February 2, 2010 The Next Generation of The Next Generation of Conservation.
Wildfire Integration with Mitigation Planning and Risk MAP Brett Holt Mitigation Planner Region 10 April 21, 2015.
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
JOINT FIRE SCIENCE PROGRAM 2015 FUNDING CALL October 9, 2014.
The Yin and Yang of Monitoring: Lessons Learned From Development of Monitoring Programs on Federal and Private Lands Brett Wolk Colorado Forest Restoration.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
Evidence2Success Session 2. 2 As a result of this session, you will be able to: Explain the strategic financing process and aims Identify common goals.
Guidelines for Updating Community Wildfire Protection Plans Xavier Anderson, New Mexico State Forestry Joy Esparsen, New Mexico Association of Counties.
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
Southwestern Region Wildfire Risk Assessment – USDA Forest Service
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
Slide 2 map of pilot project area- this is one of 3 pilot projects in the nation with the goal being to implement the Cohesive Wildfire Strategy.
KEY DRIVERS: THE SECRETARY’S VISION
Strategic Priorities and Actions:
What is a Community Wildfire Protection Plan(CWPP)
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Common Strategy to Identify Communities at Risk and Prioritize Risk Reduction Projects - An Initial Review by SGSF GIS Task Force SGSF GIS Annual Meeting Asheville, North Carolina November 3, 2010 Curt Stripling, Sue Leverette, Roy Boggs

Objectives Initial review and discussion will focus primarily on the first two commitments and expectations outlined in the briefing paper - Identification and Prioritization Review history and purpose for identifying and communities at risk Identify and review current issues Discuss future strategies for identifying communities at risk or alternately landscapes of similar risk Identify action items

History and Purpose for Identifying Communities at Risk Federal Register – Cohesive Strategy – “assessing the level of risk to communities” National Fire Plan - SGSF Briefing Paper – “ Each state will determine how many communities are at risk or alternately identify landscapes of similar risk and will establish methodology for assessing community risk.’

# 1 - Identification “Each state will determine how many communities are at risk or alternately identify landscapes of similar risk and will establish methodology for assessing community risk. Statewide Forest Resource Assessments will also aid in determining priority areas of wildfire risk. To determine communities at risk, each state should: – Include all lands and all ownerships – Use a collaborative process that is consistent with the complexity of land ownership patterns, resource management issues, and the number of interested stakeholders – Report the number of communities at risk on a gradient scale of low, moderate, and high”

# 2 - Prioritization “NASF strongly promotes Community Wildfire Protection Planning and encourages each state to prioritize community wildfire risk reduction projects based on nationally publicized risk-assessment methods and on community, state, or regional risk assessments. The intent of the risk assessment process is to compare relative risk to communities from wildfire within a state, not to compare wildfire risk to communities between or among states.” “Using available mitigation plans, CWPPs, or another similar analysis process, federal, state and local agencies and tribes will each annually examine the lands under its own ownership or jurisdiction and, with the involvement of all interested parties, identify high priority areas for conducting fuels reduction, ecosystem restoration, and other projects that have the potential to reduce the risk to a specific community or communities.”

Current Issues Related to Identifying, Mapping and Rating Communities at Risk text