Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EARLY CHILDHOOD Early Childhood Whats new? All early childhood evaluations will be completed at the local school. This includes Child.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services What happens after Focused Monitoring? -
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
CONSOLIDATED PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I, PART C, MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM MEP STATE CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C Michigan Electronic Grants System (MEGS) Application for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Early On System Updates Winter 2011 Early On Training and Technical Assistance (EOT&TA)
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Produced by NICHCY, 2014 Procedures for the of the IFSP D evelopment R eview, E valuation & Module 5.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
Michigan State Plan for Early On ® February
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Aren’t they all the same? Differences Between Part B, Part C, and Michigan Mandatory Special Education (MMSE) Teri Johnson Assistant Director of Special.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
07/20/2007 State Performance Plan Indicators Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Vanessa Winborne Kelly Hurshe Colleen O’Connor EARLY ON ® UPDATES.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
CHILDREN OF PRISONERS PARTNERSHIP What is the Children of Prisoners (CP) Partnership? The CP Partnership is a funding project between PFI and selected.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) CEC Presentation March 2014 Grand Rapids, MI 1.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES
ARC Chairperson Training
Understanding the Section 504 Process
TEA Corrective Action Plan
ARC Chairperson Training
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
SPR&I Regional Training
U.S. Department of education Office of Special Education Programs
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007

Submission Information  Improvement plans for service areas that received Needs Assistance Determinations are due September 14,  Send plans to Mischele McManus, preferably electronically at  Plans will be reviewed and approved by Michigan Department of Education (MDE) Early On ® (EO) staff.  You will be notified of approval.

Purposes of Improvement Planning and Quarterly Reporting  To ensure systemic changes that will create significant improvements in child and family outcomes  Allow focus on the results of improvement activities planned to achieve systemic change  Achieve compliance with Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C regulations and the Michigan State Plan

Your Improvement Planning Team  Early On Coordinator and supervisor(s).  Local Interagency Coordinating Council (LICC) Members.  Other people with expertise and knowledge in the targeted areas.

The Improvement Plan  Must address each indicator highlighted in your determination letter.  Must result in “evidence of change.”

What is “evidence of change”? Record-level data that demonstrates that the area of identified need has been systemically addressed.

Example Indicator 1: Percentage of children who receive the Early Intervention Services on their Individual Family Service Plans (IFSPs) within 30 days of parent consent. Evidence of Change: Quarterly record review of newly enrolled children will demonstrate that more children with IFSPs receive their services within 30 days of parent consent; 65 percent by 12/01, 75 percent by 3/01, 85 percent by 6/01, and 95 percent by 9/01.

The Six Components of the Improvement Plan

1. ACTIVITIES  Must be as specific as possible.  Must be tied directly to analysis of existing data and knowledge of Part C and the local early intervention system.  Must be sequential and targeted.

Example 1. A meeting will be set up between EO and Intermediate School District (ISD) special education staff to review data and discuss timeliness of services. 2. Training on the new EO requirement for timely services within 30 days will be provided to all service providers. 3. New child files will be spot checked monthly for evidence of timely services.

2. TIMELINES  Include specific dates, whenever possible.  If developing or updating a document or form, include the date by which it will be completed.  If reviewing files, include the time frame in which the files will be reviewed.

3. BY WHOM?  Specifically identify the person(s) responsible for completing or supervising each activity.  Specifically identify the person(s). who will be conducting the training  Include each person’s title or role.

4. WHY THIS ACTIVITY?  Why is this activity most appropriate?  What is the relationship between the activity and the evidence of change? EXAMPLE: Because 70 percent of EO services are provided by Special Education, it is necessary for the EO and Special Education staffs to work closely together to increase the timeliness of services.

5. PRODUCTS  List training materials, new forms, new procedures.  List any documentation that shows timelines have been met. EXAMPLE: Training logs, copies of materials given to participants, and meeting minutes.

6. MONITORING & EVALUATION  How will you follow-up/assess the activity?  Describe how each activity will be monitored and maintained by the district to ensure that the expected changes take place.  Must be measurable.  Must be specific, including who will do it and when and how it will be done.

MONITORING & EVALUATION (cont.) EXAMPLE: The EO Coordinator will meet monthly with the Special Education Director to review the timeliness of services for newly enrolled children.

Overwhelmed?

Remember your resources:  Early On Training and Technical Assistance (EOTTA) training specialist  EO state staff  ISD monitor  Other EO coordinators  LICC members

Quarterly progress reporting  You will be assisted by your assigned technical assistance provider (EOTTA).  Reporting forms will be provided, along with finalized Improvement Planning forms by mid-August.  Be specific about how the plan has been implemented in the past three months.

Quarterly progress reporting (cont.)  Include data from file reviews of children newly enrolled in the past three months or available EETRK or other data.  Submission dates are: December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1.  Submit to Mischele McManus at

Celebrate Improvements!