Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Advertisements

Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Does anyone have concerns about the child’s functioning with regard to the outcome area? D OES THE CHILD EVER FUNCTION IN WAYS THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED.
Early On® Michigan Child Outcomes
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Lynne Kahn Christina Kasprzak Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes.
Orientation for New Staff Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center Early Childhood Outcomes Center September 2011.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
RtI in Early Childhood Lisa Kelly-Vance, UNO and Kristy Feden, Papillion- LaVista Schools.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
Session 1: So What’s This All About? Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Cycle II – Cohort 3 Web/Call Training – November 2009 Pat Cameron – Department of Early Education and Care and.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
1 Birth to 3 Child Outcomes Maryland’s Approach to Converting Assessment Data to OSEP Outcome Categories August 28, 2007 Deborah Metzger
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 The Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Session 4: The 7-Point Scale Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHILD OUTCOMES SUMMARY RATING PROCESS 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Entry Data Collection Using the COS Process Sarah Geldart – MA ESE
Embedding Child and Family Outcomes into Practice – Part 2 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Early Childhood Outcomes Center Webinar for the Massachusetts.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
1 Outcomes review and use of the 7-point scale. 2 Outcomes Jeopardy Jeopardy score sheet Jeopardy score sheet Pointing to the cabinet for cereal Reading.
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes Jim J. Lesko Director, Early Development and Learning Resources Delaware Department of.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Early Childhood Outcomes: Using Data for Program Improvement
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Understanding the Outcomes and the COSF: A Quick Review
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Child Outcome Summary Form
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010

What is the SPP? Accountability system focused on improving educational results/functional outcomes for students with disabilities Mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education and Improvement Act (IDEA) 2004 Based on monitoring priorities and indicators defined by the Federal Office of Special Education

Purpose of the SPP Provides a strategic plan to evaluate and improve state and local implementation of IDEA 2004 Informs OSEP of Michigan’s progress toward achieving results for students with disabilities

Implications of the SPP Changes to current state level student data collection and reporting systems Increased public scrutiny and accountability of the state and local levels regarding special education Further alignment within the special education Continuous Improvement Monitoring System and local district self- assessment processes conducted on a 3 year cycle

IDEA 2004 Parallels NCLB Drastically changing the way we collect and report data Requires SEA to report on the performance of every LEA in relation to SPP targets Preschool outcomes data is being collected to determine the efficacy of ECSE programs/services for determining future funding States are required to report preschool outcome data on all 3-5 year olds with an IEP, including children not served in program settings

LEA Roles and Responsibilities Generate the data Report the data Store the data – place a copy of the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) into CA-60

Outcome Areas to be Assessed Children compared to same-aged typically developing peers in their development of: Positive social-emotional skills Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy) Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

Child Outcome Information Positive Social-Emotional Skills (Including Social Relations) Examples: Relating with adult; Relating with other children; Following rules related to groups or interacting with others; Personal and Social Adjustment; and Contribution and Citizenship

Child Outcome Information Acquiring and Using Knowledge and Skills Examples: Thinking, reasoning, remembering, and problem solving; Understanding symbols; Understanding the physical and social worlds; and Pre-Academic and Functional Literacy; Communication

Child Outcome Information Taking Appropriate Action to Meet Needs Examples: Taking care of basic needs, showing hunger, dressing, feeding, toileting, etc.; Contributing to own health and safety, follows rules, assists with hand washing, avoids inedible objects; Getting from place to place, mobility; Using tools, forks, strings attached to objects; Physical Health; and Responsibility and Independence

Measurement of Outcomes 7-point scale Measure performance in each of the three outcome areas Decision Tree

Explanation of the 7-Point Scale 1 = Not Yet Child does not yet show functioning expected of a child his/her age in any situation. Child’s functioning might be described as that of a much younger child

3 Emerging Child does not yet show functioning expected of a child his/her age in any situation. Child demonstrates behavior and emerging skills upon which to build age-appropriate functioning. Functioning might be described as that of a younger child.

Explanation of the 7-Point Scale 5 = Somewhat Child shows functioning expected of a child his/her age some of the time an/or in some situations. Child’s behaviors and skills include a mix of age-appropriate and below age- appropriate functioning. Functioning might be described as that of a slightly younger child

Explanation of the 7-Point Scale 6 = Between Somewhat and Completely Child shows functioning expected of a child his/her age most of the time and/or in most situations. Child’s behaviors and skills are considered mostly appropriate for his/her age but there are some concerns about the child’s functioning in this outcome area

Explanation of the 7-Point Scale 7 = Completely Child consistently shows functioning expected of a child his/her age in all or nearly all situations. Child’s behaviors and skills are considered appropriate for his/her age. There are no concerns about this child’s functioning in this outcome area

What is Meant by a Variety of Situations ? Everyday Situations in the Child’s Life Home Classroom Playground Store Child care Etc.

What is the Definition of a Younger Child? Level 1 (Not Yet) - Much Younger Child = 24 month or greater delay Level 3 (Emerging) Younger Child = 18 – 23 month delay Level 5 (Somewhat) Slightly Younger Child = 9-17 month delay

OSEP Thoughts and Requirements Selected 3 developmental areas based on federal requirements and ECO center recommendations IEPs and IFSPs goals and objectives too narrow or some developmental areas absent and child must be compared to same-aged peers across domains States will determine the specific measurement tools to be used

Tool Selection Considerations Alignment to Early Learning Standards Sensitivity to cultural, racial, class, and gender differences Supports Curriculum Supports planning and interventions Valid and reliable Norm-referenced or criterion-referenced

Baseline Reporting Collect data on all students entering the program or services If you are a related service provider responsible for the implementation of the IEP use the Battelle Developmental Inventory-2 Screener If you are a classroom teacher use the Carolina Respond to level of progress child displays under each outcome area

Ongoing Data Collection Requirements Entry data to be collected for each child within 30 school days of the child’s beginning the program/services All 3 outcome areas must be assessed regardless of the disability of the child Use 7-point scale to compare child to same- aged peers Minimum of 2 data points are required (entry and exit) Generally gather data from ages 3-5 but could range 2 ½ - 6 years of age

Progress Data Reporting Exit data to be collected 30 school days before or after exiting the program Progress assessed only when a child receives 6 months of service or more (total service, does not have to be continuous) Early On considered different program so can’t count toward the 6 months Early On exit data can be used as preschool entry data (CA60 COSF)

What Constitutes “Exiting”? Child will exit into Kindergarten Child becomes ineligible for special education Child will have 6 th birthday

Contact Information Karen West Special Education Supervisor Ingham ISD 2630 W. Howell Road Mason, MI (517)